The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About9/15/2021 - Planning Commission - Agenda -RegularPlanning Commission Meeting AGENDA Wednesday, September 15, 2021, 7:00 PM Work Session 6:30PM Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street Regular Session 7:00PM Council Chambers, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street WORK SESSION 1.Call to Order 2.New Business A.Discussion items from the September Meeting Discussion of items from the September 15, 2021, regular session agenda. 3.Adjournment REGULAR SESSION 1.Call to Order 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Consent Agenda A.Minutes Consider acceptance of the minutes from the August 11, 2021, work session and regular meeting. 4.New Business A.Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Hold public hearing to consider the request of Salem Building Supply, Inc., contract purchaser, and PHC of Virginia, Inc., property owner, for rezoning the property located at 405 Kimball Avenue (Tax Map # 235-1-2) from RMF Residential Multi-Family District with proffered condition to RMF Residential Multi-Family District without conditions. B.Use Not Provided For Permit Hold public hearing to consider the request of Salem Ministers Conference Community Food Pantry, contract purchaser, and Trustees God's Church of Deliverance and Power, property owner, for the issuance of a Use Not Provided For Permit to allow the relocation of the Salem Food 1 Pantry to the property located at 829 Indiana Street (Tax Map # 186-1-5). C.Simms Farm Section 1 Consider the request for approval of the amended subdivision plan filed by Simms Property, LLC., property owner/developer, for a 7.564 acre tract known as Simms Farm Section 1. 5.Adjournment City Council meeting, September 27, 2021, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street 2 Planning Commission Meeting MINUTES Wednesday, August 11, 2021, 7:00 PM Work Session, 6:00PM Council Chambers Conference Room Regular Session, 7:00PM Council Chambers WORK SESSION 1. Call to Order A work session of the Planning Commission of the City of Salem, Virginia, was held in Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, at 6:00 p.m., on August 11, 2021, there being present the members of said Commission, to wit: Vicki G. Daulton, Chair; Denise P. King, Vice Chair, Reid A. Garst II, N. Jackson Beamer, and Neil L. Conner; together with H. Robert Light, Assistant City Manager and Deputy Executive Secretary, ex officio member of said Commission; Charles E. Van Allman, Jr., Director of Community Development, Mary Ellen Wines, Zoning Administrator; Benjamin W. Tripp, City Planner; and Christopher Dadek on behalf of City Attorney Jim H. Guynn, Jr.; and the following business was transacted: Whereas Chair Daulton called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. and reported that this date, place, and time had been set in order for the Commission to hold a work session; and Whereas Mr. Tripp discussed the change in format of the agenda; and Whereas a discussion was held regarding moving item 4E to 4A; and Whereas Vice-Chair King stated that there was an error on page 2 of the minutes of the July 14, 2021, regular session. Susan Menee should be spelled Susan Mini; and Whereas Mr. Tripp acknowledge the presence of Mrs. Anne-Marie Green at the work session; and 2. New Business A. Discussion item from the September meeting Rezoning of 405 Kimball Avenue, Tax Map # 235-1-2 from RMF, Residential Multi-Family District with condition to RMF, Residential Multi-Family District without conditions. Whereas Mr. Tripp introduced an item scheduled for the September regular session meeting. 405 Kimball Avenue rezoning to remove the condition that the only use allowed is that of a human care facility. He explained that the contract purchasers would like to build townhomes; and 3 B. Discussion items from the August Meeting Discussion of items from the August 11, 2021, regular session agenda. Whereas Mr. Tripp introduced the Apperson Drive rezoning item explaining that neighbors from the City of Roanoke planned to appear at the meeting tonight to discuss traffic issues and truck access. Commissioner Conner asked if staff had a recommendation regarding this item. Mr. Tripp replied that staff would recommend approval. That Mr. Light and the Economic Development Office had been working with the contract purchasers for some time trying to find a suitable location for their expansion; and Whereas Mr. Tripp introduced the North Broad Street rezoning item explaining that the College wanted to rezone a portion of the property to allow for the construction of a residential single-family dwelling. He further explained that it is not known at this time if the College would build and use for faculty or sell the lot. Ms. Wines clarified that the buffer yard between the existing parking lot and the vacant lot would remain; and Whereas Mr. Tripp introduced the Village at North Mill Phase Four item explaining that the first plat with the red markings was the preliminary plat that staff comments on and returns to the engineers for correction and that the second plat with no markings is the final plat. He further explained that both the plat and the plan have been through staff review and have been approved; and Whereas Mr. Tripp introduced the Calhoun Townhomes item explaining that an update plat was sent notating that the adjacent alley was now shown as an eighteen-foot alley and not a public alley due to the indeterminate ownership of the alley. Ms. Wines explained that the facades facing Calhoun are actually the rear of the townhomes but will appear, from the street, as front facades. Chair Daulton inquired if there would be driveways onto Calhoun and Ms. Wines responded that there would be no individual driveways onto a right-of-way that there will be one access onto Calhoun and one on Chestnut: and Whereas Mr. Tripp introduced the 401 South Market Street item stating that this history of this property makes it a good candidate for the Historic Register and that it also is a good contender for the State and National Registers as well. Ms. Wines explained that there is a condition on the property that it would be used for only a masonic temple and that would have to be removed prior to the petitioners making any changes to the property; and 3. Adjournment Whereas Chair Daulton inquired if there were any other items for discussion and hearing none, adjourned the work session at 6:46 p.m. 4 REGULAR SESSION 1. Call to Order A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Salem, Virginia, was held after due and proper notice in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m., on August 11, 2021. Notice of such hearing was published in the July 19 and August 5, 2021, issues of the "Salem Times Register", a newspaper published and having general circulation in the City. All adjacent property owners were notified via the U. S. Postal Service. The Commission, constituting a legal quorum, presided together with Christopher Dadek on behalf of Jim H. Guynn, Jr., City Attorney; Assistant City Attorney; Rob Light, Assistant City Manager; Charles E. Van Allman, Jr., Director of Community Development; Benjamin W. Tripp, City Planner; and Mary Ellen Wines, Zoning Administrator; and the following business was transacted: Chair Daulton called the hearing to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Consent Agenda A. Minutes Consider acceptance of the minutes from the July 14, 2021, work session and regular meeting. Denise King motioned acceptance of minutes from the July 14, 2021, work session and regular meeting as amended. Neil Conner seconded the motion. Ayes: Beamer, Conner, Daulton, Garst, King 4. New Business Jackson Beamer motioned to move Item 4E to 4A. Reid Garst seconded the motion. Ayes: Beamer, Conner, Daulton, Garst, King A. Salem Historic Registry 5 Consider petition from JASS Properties, Inc., for inclusion in the Salem Historic Registry of the property located at 401 South market Street (Tax Map # 145-10-2). Staff noted the following: This building was originally erected in 1918 for Dr. William Rufus Brown, an important figure in Salem’s African American Water Street community, and the town’s only African American doctor at the time. Dr. Brown was also an active member of the John Wesley Methodist Church, the NAACP, YMCA, and the Salem/Roanoke County Civic League. He also helped to build Carver High School. The building later served as "Mae's Inn," a prominent restaurant in Salem's then segregated African American community owned by Ethel May Myers Whitfield. After the restaurant was sold in the late 1950s it became a Masonic lodge (Salem Lodge 120). On June 17, 2021, the Virginia Department of Historic Resources deemed this property to be eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places and the Virginia Landmarks Register. This property meets Criteria B and D for inclusion on the registry. Staff recommends approval. Shirley Everette, 1239 Wildwood Road, Salem, appeared before the Commission to speak on behalf of the request; she handed the Commission a presentation on the property. She stated that the history came to light with the support of Mike Pulice, Mike Stevens, Benjamin Tripp, Francine Ferguson, John Long, Benita VanCleave, clerk in the Real Estate Office, and the trustees of the Masonic Lodge. The building originally served as an apartment building for Dr. William Rufus Brown who died in 1964. Dr. Brown came to Salem after migrating from Trinidad in 1911 as a physician. Mrs. Everette stated that she and her twin sister lived in the building when they first came to Salem. She went on to discuss more history of the structure and shared photos with the Commission. Neil Conner motioned to approve petition from JASS Properties, Inc., for inclusion in the Salem historic Registry of the property located at 401 South Market Street (Tax Map #145-10-2). Denise King seconded the motion. Ayes: Beamer, Conner, Daulton, Garst, King B. Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Hold public hearing to consider the request of Layman Candy Company, Inc., contract purchasers, and Lewis-Gale Medical Center, LLC, property owner, for rezoning a portion of the property located at 2105 Apperson Drive (Tax Map # 281-1-2) from BCD Business Commerce District to LM Light Manufacturing District. Staff noted the following: 6 The subject property consists of a single parcel of approximately 9.4 acres, located along the north side of Apperson Drive, adjacent to the Eastern City Limits. It is occupied by a single large building that was part of the original shopping center, but which was most recently used as offices, a technical college, and as storage. This building is being subdivided off separately, so the request only applies to it. The owner of the property is requesting that the large building and its tract be rezoned to Light Manufacturing in order to allow the relocation and growth of their warehousing and distribution business. The applicant states that this new location will enable them to add product lines, increase sales significantly, and that they intend to add one hundred new employees in the next five years as they grow. Staff recommends approval. Ben Crew with Balzer and Associates, 1208 Corporate Circle, Roanoke, appeared before the Commission on behalf of Layman Candy Company. He noted that Glenn Bowe, Vice President of Layman Candy Company was also present. He stated that it is an exciting time for Layman Candy Company and the rezoning will allow them to relocate the business from West Main Street to this currently vacant and larger facility off of Apperson Drive. The relocation will also allow the company to work on the growth projection for the next five years, which are outlined in the narrative provided with the request. A discussion was held regarding tractor trailer/truck traffic to and from the site-- tractor trailers deliver goods, box trucks then distribute goods. Number varies, but possibly ten trucks a day typically more in the early morning. Glenn Bowe, Vice President of Layman Candy Company, 1630 West Main Street, Salem, appeared before the Commission to help explain truck traffic, egress, etc. with Ben Crew. A discussion was held regarding the travel path for the trucks--the standard is for all truck traffic to use the signalized intersection, which is a controlled access point. Trucks will then go to the back of the building to the loading docks where the majority of the trucks will be located to do unloading and reloading. It was noted that employees will park in the front of the building; there are two main shifts of employees--7 a.m. to 4 p.m. is the main shift and a shift that comes in at 6 a.m. and works until finished. Initially there will be less than 50 employees working at one time. It was also noted that the way the property is being subdivided there will be a property owners' association and it will have cross access easements to ensure that the main parcel and all out parcels are covered from an access and maintenance standpoint. The Director of Community Development noted that there are more conflict points on West Main Street where you can have traffic problems in addition to overflow traffic from Interstate 81 compared to Apperson Drive where it is a clear intersection with less conflict points. Bill Turner, 1302 Belle Aire Lane, Roanoke, VA, appeared before the Commission and stated that his property is in the City of Roanoke, but if overlooks the property. He 7 stated that he has lived here for almost three years and the main shopping center has been vacant, but Lewis Gale Hospital has been a very good neighbor. He reviewed the history of the businesses that he remembers being in the property over the years. He stated that the notice that was sent out stated that the address of the property is 2105 Apperson Drive and he drove down the property and could not find that address on the main shopping center building. He stated that 2105 Apperson Drive is located on what he considers a "strip mall" perpendicular to Wendy's, which is not large enough to house a candy store much less a distribution center. He spoke with the Zoning Administrator regarding the address issue, and the truck traffic to the property. He stated that he is concerned about the truck traffic coming to and from the property. He further stated that he received a call from Sergeant Beard with the Salem Police Department regarding the truck traffic to and from the property. The concerns he addressed with Sergeant Beard were regarding trucks entering the property by the former Sakura Restaurant, site distance, truck traffic blocking the entrance to Wendy's, truck traffic going in front of the Small Steps Day Care Center, etc. He stated that there is another entrance, but it is privately owned. Chair Daulton asked that Mr. Crew and Mr. Bowe address Mr. Turner's concerns. A discussion was held regarding the address issue of the notice. It was noted that the description of the property to be rezoned is noted by the meets and bounds of what is being rezoned. It was further noted that the address listed is the "master" number of the tax parcel. Jeff Cheater, 1305 Belle Aire Lane, Roanoke, appeared before the Commission. He stated that he looked the property up and there are four buildings on the property with the same parcel number. He questioned what building on the property is being rezoned. The Zoning Administrator stated that the building in the back, which is the one requesting the rezoning, will be subdivided into its own tax parcel at a later date. Mr. Cheater stated that he feels that the truck traffic should have been addressed in the initial presentation. Chair Daulton stated that is why the Commission asked specific questions regarding the truck traffic. Chair Daulton again asked Mr. Crew and Mr. Bowe to address the traffic concerns. Mr. Crew stated that Lewis-Gale is the seller and does not have any concerns with there being a conflict of users; therefore, he does not see there is a concern. It was noted that Lewis-Gale is also a landlord to other businesses located on the parcel. He stated that the majority of the truck traffic should be dissipated by 8 a.m. and there will not be a multitude of tractor trailers coming to and from the property, it will be approximately ten in-bound tractor trailers a day; one out-bound tractor trailer a day going to North Carolina, and ten plus or minus box trucks per day for "regional" delivery. He further stated that he feels that the businesses will be able to work together. The Virginia Varsity Storage access is private and is not connected to the development. He noted that 8 it is a standard operational procedure by Layman Candy Company that truck traffic is to use a signalized intersection to access the property. A discussion was held regarding tractor trailer and truck traffic loading, unloading and turning radius in the back of the building, and the number of vehicles coming and going from the property. The location of truck traffic near the daycare center--it was noted that there is a designated turn-in area for the daycare; therefore, the truck traffic will not be near the children. It was further noted that the actual route the truck traffic will take on the property has yet to be determined. No other person(s) appeared related to the request. Jackson Beamer motioned to approve request of Layman Candy Company, Inc., contract purchasers, and Lewis-Gale Medical Center, LLC, property owner, for rezoning a portion of the property located at 2105 Apperson Drive (Tax Map #281-1-20) from BCD Business Commerce District to LM Light Manufacturing District. Neil Conner seconded the motion. Ayes: Beamer, Conner, Daulton, Garst, King C. Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Hold public hearing to consider the request of Roanoke College Trustees, property owner, for rezoning a portion of the property located at 232 North Broad Street (Tax Map # 87-7-7), from CUD College and University District to RSF Residential Single-Family District. Staff noted the following: The subject property consists of a single parcel of approximately one acre located along the east side of North Broad Street, across the street from Shipman Alley. The use of the property divides roughly in half: it is occupied by a parking facility, accessed from Red Lane, on the eastern half, but is vacant on the half fronting on Broad Street. The applicant is proposing to subdivide off about one-third of the property along North Broad Street and is requesting that this portion be rezoned to Residential Single Family in order to allow the construction of a new single-family residence. Staff recommends approval. Ben Crew, Balzer and Associates,1208 Corporate Circle, Roanoke, VA 24018, appeared before the Commission on behalf of Roanoke College. He noted that David Moen, Vice President of Business Affairs at Roanoke College, was also present. He stated that Roanoke College feels this property is "surplus" and would like to have the property rezoned as it is the best use for the parcel. He noted that Roanoke College does not have immediate plans to sell the property, but it may come on the market in the future. It was noted that the residents who inquired about the rezoning were in favor of the rezoning once they found out it was for residential single family. 9 No other person(s) appeared related to the request. Denise King motioned to approve the request of Roanoke College Trustees, property owner, for rezoning a portion of the property located at 232 North Broad Street (Tax Map #87-7-7) from CUD College and University District to RSF Residential Single- Family District. Neil Conner seconded the motion. Ayes: Beamer, Conner, Daulton, Garst, King D. The Village at North Mill Phase Four Consider the request for preliminary and final approval of proposed subdivision plan and plat filed by RFC2017 Land, LLC, property owner/developer, for a 7.767-acre tract known as The Village at North Mill Phase Four. Staff noted the following: This plat would create seven new lots in phase 4 of the Village at North Mill. These lots are an extension of Woodside Drive, with a remnant lot to be included in a future phase. This plat meets the City of Salem Subdivision Ordinance, and the Subdivision Plan has been approved by staff. Staff recommends approval. Reid Garst motioned to approve the request for preliminary and final approval of proposed subdivision plan and plat filed by RFC2017 Land, LLC, property owner/developer, for a 7.767-acre trace known as The Village at North Mill Phase Four. Denise King seconded the motion. Ayes: Beamer, Conner, Daulton, Garst, King E. Calhoun Townhomes Consider the request for preliminary and final approval of proposed subdivision plan and plat filed by Virginia Valley Properties, LLC, property owner/developer, for a 0.72-acre tract known as the Calhoun Townhomes. Staff noted the following: This plat would create seven (7) new lots (6 townhomes, 1 common area lot) for the Calhoun Townhomes. Parking will be at the rear of the townhomes to include garages. The stormwater management area will be located within the common area lot. This plat meets the City of Salem Subdivision Ordinance, and the Subdivision Plan has been approved by staff. Staff recommends approval. The City Planner noted that the alley behind the property has changed from a designation of an 18-foot public alley on the preliminary plat to 18-foot alley on the final plat. 10 Neil Conner motioned to approve the request for preliminary and final approval of proposed subdivision plan and plat filed by Virginia Valley Properties, LLC, property owner/developer, for a 0.72-acre tract known as the Calhoun Townhomes. Jackson Beamer seconded the motion. Ayes: Beamer, Conner, Daulton, Garst, King 5. Adjournment On motion by Jackson Beamer seconded by Neil Conner and duly carried, Chair Daulton adjourned at 8:21 p.m. Ayes: Beamer, Conner, Daulton, Garst, King City Council meeting, August 23, 2021, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street 11 Item # 4A Date: 9-15-2021 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA held in Council Chambers of City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, VA 24153 AGENDA ITEM: Use Not Provided For Consider the request of Salem Building Supply, Inc., contract purchaser, and PHC of Virginia, Inc., property owner, for rezoning the property located at 405 Kimball Avenue (Tax Map # 235-1-2) from RMF Residential Multi-Family District with proffered condition to RMF Residential Multi-Family District without conditions. SUBMITTED BY: Mary Ellen Wines, CZA CFM Zoning Administrator SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Zoning: RMF Residential Multi-Family District Land Use Plan Designation: Residential Existing Use: Vacant land (formerly Mt. Regis) Proposed Use: Townhomes The subject property consists of a .82-acre parcel located northeast of the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Pyrtle Drive. The parcel is vacant as the former Mt. Regis Center facility was demolished in 2018 after a fire in 2016 caused major damage to the structure. This request is to remove the condition placed on the rezoning of 1988. The property was rezoned from R-2 to R-4 with the proffered condition that the only R-4 use would be a human care facility (Mt. Regis Center). Salem Building Supply, Inc. intends to develop the site into seven (7) townhomes. The proposed use of townhomes is a by-right use in the residential multi-family district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request to remove the condition. 12 13 14 August 2, 2021 Mr. Jay Taliaferro City Manager - City of Salem 21 South Bruffey Street Salem, VA 24153 RE: 405 Kimball Avenue – Salem, VA 24153 Balzer and Associates, Inc. Job # 04210054.00 Rezoning Request Dear Mr. Taliaferro, PHC of Virginia, Inc. (Property Owner) and Salem Building Supply, Inc. (Contract Purchaser) are providing official application, supporting documents, and associated fees required to request a removal of an existing proffered condition on tax parcel 235-1-2. The zoning designation will remain the same as Residential Multi-Family District (RMF). The removal of the existing proffered condition will allow the site to be developed as townhomes under the current zoning district. Project Narrative & Existing Conditions: The existing parcel is currently vacant and has been since the Mount Regis facility was destroyed by fire in 2016. The Mount Regis facility use of “Human Care Facility” is the only allowable use per the current proffered condition. Salem Building Supply, Inc. intends to develop the site into seven (7) townhomes with associated improvements. This use is complementary to the existing mix of single family residential, two- family dwellings, and multi-family development in the area. These residential townhomes will compliment the surrounding area while providing additional opportunities for housing within the City of Salem. See attached civil exhibit plan – “Zoning Exhibit – Exhibit A” dated 8/3/2021 for the proposed townhouse buildable area. Exhibit B and B1 have been provided offering an example of the townhouse elevations from Kimball Avenue. The existing parcel is approximately 0.82 acres and is bounded by the public rights- of-way of Kimball Avenue to the South, RSF zoned property to the west, north, and east. The parcel generally drains from south to north. Buffers A twenty five (25’) buffer consisting of evergreen trees will provided between the existing adjacent RSF parcels and the existing RMF zoning (subject parcel). Comprehensive Development Plan & Summary: This project is in conformance with many of the Goals and Objectives defined in the City of Salem’s Comprehensive Plan. This project is sensitive to the existing surrounding properties by utilizing a vacant property for an appropriate use to match surrounding land uses. This project provides an excellent opportunity to the City of Salem to gain additional residential property in a location of high demand. Sincerely, Benjamin T. Crew Associate 15 N/F PHC OF VIRGINIA INC TAX#: 235-1-2 LOT SIZE: 0.82 AC. ZONING: RMF N/F CITY OF SALEM TAX#: 216-4-1 LOT SIZE: 21.09 AC. ZONING: RSF N/F PINELLO LYNDA W TAX#: 235-1-1 LOT SIZE: 0.204 AC. ZONING: RSF PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT ±7 UNITS 25' B U F F E R 25 ' B U F F E R PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond Shenandoah Valley New River Valley / Lynchburg PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 1 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 1 0 0 5 4 . 0 0 K I M B A L L A V E N U E T O W N H O M E S \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 1 0 0 5 4 R e z o n i n g B a s e _ N o U n i t s . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 3 / 2 0 2 1 9 : 0 9 : 5 8 A M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 SMD BTC BTC 8/3/2021 1" = 20' KI M B A L L A V E N U E T O W N H O M E S ZO N I N G E X H I B I T 40 5 K I M B A L L A V E N U E CI T Y O F S A L E M EX-A 04210054.00 PRE L I M I N A R Y 16 17 18 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: KIMBALL AVENUE TOWNHOUSE TAX MAP NUMBER 235-1-2 BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF KIMBALL AVENUE; THENCE N 15°37'00" E A DISTANCE OF 165.00' TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF AN UNIMPROVED STREET; THENCE S 57°44'05" E A DISTANCE OF 247.30' TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT WITH AN ARC LENGTH OF 127.77', WITH A RADIUS OF 101.02', WITH A CHORD BEARING OF S 21°30'00" E, WITH A CHORD LENGTH OF 119.42' TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF KIMBALL AVENUE; THENCE N 74°11'00" W A DISTANCE OF 309.00' TO A POINT WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA OF 35,809 SQUARE FEET, 0.822 ACRE 19 ~N ORDIN~NCE TO ~MENO SECTION 32-9, ~RTICLE II, CH~PTER 32, OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF S~LEM, VIRGINIA, RELATING TO ZONING AND DIVIDING THE CITY INTO BUILDING DISTRICTS ~ND ESTABLISHING DISTRICT BOUNDARY LINES ON THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAT..JEM, VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, Mount Regis Center, Limited Partnership, owner, has heretofore petitioned to have property located at 405 Kimball ~venue rezoned from Residential District R-2 to Residential District R-4; and WHEREAS, in said petition, Mount Regis Center, Limited Partnership, owner, did voluntarily proffer a written condition in addition to the regulations provided for in Residential District R-4 into which this property is requested to be rezoned; and WHEREAS, Council has reviewed the proposed condition and is of the opinion that the requested rezoning without the proposed condition would not be in the best interests of the City and that the condition proffered will more closely comply with the intent of the Land Use Plan heretofore adopted; and WHEREAS, Council has adopted the provisions of Chapter 320 of the 1978 ~cts of the General Assembly of Virginia, Sections 15.1-491.1 through 15.1-491.6, relating to conditional zoning; and WH8RE~S, the Planning Canmission at its regular meeting held on May 11, 1988, did recommend to Council after holding a 9ub1ic hearing that such rezoning be done with the condition as proffered; NOW, THEREFORE, BE I'r ORDAINED BY THE COUNCl L OF THE C ['rY OF S~LEM, VIRGINI~, that Section 32-9, ~rtic1e II, Chapter 32 of The Code of the City of Salem, be amended, revised, and reordained to read as follows and the map referred to shall be changed in this respect and no other: Section 1. That the following described property, presently zoned Residential District R-2 in the City of Salem, be and the same is hereby changed from Residential District R-2 to Residential District R-4 and the map referred to shall be changed in this respect and no other. However, in addition to the regulations for such zoning district as contained in Chapter 32 of The Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, there is hereby incorporated the condition set forth in Section 2 of this ordinance to the same extent and purpose as though such condition were herein fully set out at length: BEGINNING at a point at the southeast corner of T..Jot 6, Block 42, Salem Development Company, Plat Book. 1, page 36-1/2; said point being on the northerly side of the right of way of Kimball Avenue (80 foot wide right of way); thence with the northerly side of Kimball ~venue S. 74° II' E. 309.00 feet to a point; thence leaving the right of way of Kimball ~venue and with the southerly side of an unnamed street (30 feet right) with a curved line to the left having a chord bearing and distance of N. 21° 30' W. 119.42 20 feet, an arc distance of 128.31 feet to a point; thence N. 58° 49' W. 320.46 feet to a point at the northeast corner of Lot 6, Block 42, Salem Development Company; thence with the easterly line of said lot S. ISo 49' w. 160.00 feet to the point and place of BBGINNING. Section 2. ~he following condition voluntarily proffered shall apply in addition to the regulations contained in Chapter 32 of The Code of the City of Salem: 1. The only R-4, Residential District, use which will be made of the property will be as a human care facility. ~ll ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed. ~his ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its final passage. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: Passed: June 13, 1988 Effective: June 23, 1988 /s/ James E. Taliaferro Mayor ~fitj~ Fares t G. Jones 7 Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia Howard C. Packett -~ye ~lexander M. Brown -Aye Carl E. Tarpley, Jr. -Aye W. Mac Green -Aye James E. Taliaferro -Aye 21 AG - Agriculture District BCD - Business Commerce District CBD - Community Business District CUD - College/University District DBD - Downtown Business District HBD - Highway Business District HBD/HM - Highway Business/Heavy Manufacturing District HBD/LM - Highway Business/Light Manufacturing District HM - Heavy Manufacturing District LM - Light Manufacturing District LM/HM - Light Manufacturing/Heavy Manufacturing District MHP - Manufactured Home Park District PUD - Planned Unit District RB - Residential Business District RMF - Residential Multi-Family District RMF/RB - Residential Multi-Family/Residential Business District RSF - Residential Single Family District RSF/HBD - Residential Single/Highway Business District RSF/LM - Residential Single Family/Light Manufacturing RSF/RB - Residential Single Family/Residential Business District RSF/RMF - Residential Single Family/Residential Multi-Family District RSF/TBD - Residential Single Family/Transitional Business District TBD - Transitional Business District EXISTING ZONING FUTURE LAND USE D e c a t u r C i r c l e Kimball Av e n u e Palmer Ave n u e Mount R e g i s D r i v e E a s t , P B 9 , P G 9 0 Goodman, P B 1 2 , P G 1 1 Fortune Pro p e r t i e s , L L C , P B 9 , P G 4 7 Fortune Pro p e r t i e s , L L C , P B 9 , P G 4 7 Brown R e s u b . , P B 8 , P G 2 2 Gi l l s P l a t , P B 6 , P G 2 1 Kimball Acr e s , S e c . 1 , P B 6 , P G 2 9 ( R C ) Clin g e n p e e l , P B 1 4 , P G 5 9 Clin g e n p e e l a n d R a g a n , P B 1 4 , P G 8 0 Clingenpeel a n d R a g a n , P B 1 4 , P G 8 0 18 17 16 6 5 4 3 2 1 3 10 4 9 9 8 8 7654 3 2 1 12 10 11 10-A 5-A 4 3 1 23 4 56 78 12 1314 1514A 1234 14 13 12 11 1010-A 13A 5 8 7 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 11 10 9 1A1A1 80 80 60 80 60 50 50 12 ' A l l e y Blk. 26 City of Salem Vacated 1 2 ' a l l e y D.B. 523, P g . 3 7 0 10-11-54 Blk. "6" Minera l S t r e e t v a c a t e d DB 238 , P g 2 1 9 P B 6 , P g . 2 1 (THIS BLK. U N O P E N E D ) Salem Fig S t r e e t V a c a t e d 1 1 / 0 7 / 0 2 Py r t l e D r . v a c a t e d 2 / 1 9 / 0 4 ofCity PROSPECT PARK Vacated Al l e y R e s . N o . 1 2 7 7 2 / 4 / 1 6 1 5.1 12 6 7 8 9 2 4 5 1 15 1 2 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 11 1112 13 14 15 10 11 1 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.12.10 2.9 5 1.1 1.2 1.1 1 3 4 1.2 2 3 47 . 1 2 30.37 47.12 34 . 6 9 80 . 0 0 40 . 0 0 50 . 0 0 60 . 0 0 96 . 5 0 53 . 5 0 50 . 0 0 25 . 0 0 80 . 0 0 50 . 0 0 60 . 0 0 50 . 0 0 25 . 0 0 130.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 70.00 60.00 70.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 105.85 210.6680.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 50.00 35.64 50.00 50.00 15 0 . 0 0 15 0 . 0 0 15 0 . 0 0 80.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 125.00 15 6 . 0 0 20 1 . 6 7 183 . 3 3 95 . 0 0 15 0 . 0 0 30. 0 0 30. 0 0 53.2 6 53.2 6 53.2 6 50.99 309.00 371. 8 0165 . 0 0 50.00 30.0012 6 75 . 0 0 15 0 . 0 0 125.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 60 . 0 0 15 6 . 0 0 15 6 . 0 0 79.62 1 1 3.10 50.0 0 53.4 0 103. 4 0 167.10 5 0 . 0 0 4 9 . 0 4 50.00 50.00 80.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 30.00 35.64120.00 50.00 150.54 6.0 0 248.62 1 0 1 . 4 0 66.79 1 0 3 . 5 6 62.50 62.50 57. 17 14 0 . 0 0 15 6 . 0 0 15 6 . 0 0 15 6 . 0 0 15 6 . 0 0 15 6 . 0 0 15 6 . 0 0 15 6 . 0 0 15 0 . 0 0 15 0 . 0 0 15 0 . 0 0 15 6 . 0 0 192.21 73.8 9 85.27 1 1 8 . 4 8 70 . 0 0 82 . 6 1 13 6 . 9 2 70.11 12 3 . 9 8 11 1 . 0 3 80.90 71.19 58.18 107 . 3 0 71.18 84.19 38 . 5 2 80. 3 7 92. 9 6 92. 9 6 114.40 84.57 75 . 3 0 111 . 0 4 69.30 5 27 . 0 0 70 . 0 0 110 . 0 0 70.00 90.0070.10 88.97 12 0 . 0 0 15 0 . 0 0 100.00 150.00 76 . 0 0 70 . 0 0 150.00 70 . 0 0 18 4 . 5 2 130.00 130.00 130.00 130.00 130.00 130.00 62 . 5 0 62 . 5 0 100.00 130.00 130.00 50 . 0 0 25 . 0 0 75 . 0 0 47 . 8 0 183.59 10 5 . 0 0 10 5 . 0 0 130.00 30.00 83.75 15 . 0 0 5 65 5 4 2 1 3 515 511 429 427 425 508 500 500 501 413 409 40 1 51 6 524 51 2 405 2222 2216 2212 238 234 505 31 1 30 6 30 2 31 6 30 7 30 5 31 4 31 2 31 3 430 424 420 418 416 414 404 400 314 310 306 302 2223 228 30 8 30 4 0.239 Ac. 21.09 Ac. 0.452 Ac. 0.179 Ac. 0.370 Ac. 0 100 20050 Feet±1 inch = 100 feet SEPTEMBER 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM 4A405 KIMBALL AVE. CITY OF SALEM Community Development DepartmentP.O. Box 869Salem, Virginia 24153-0869Phone: (540) 375-3032 Tax Parcel 235-1-2 Buildings Parcels City Limits Commercial Downtown Economic Development Area Industrial Institutional Mixed Use Public Parks and Recreational Residential Transitional Tax Parcel 235-1-2 Buildings Parcels City Limits 22 23 24 25 26 Item # 4B Date: 9-15-2021 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA held in Council Chambers of City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, VA 24153 AGENDA ITEM: Use Not Provided For Consider the request of the Salem Ministers Conference Community Food Pantry, contract purchaser, and Trustees God's Church of Deliverance and Power, property owner, for the issuance of a Use Not Provided For Permit to allow the relocation of the Salem Food Pantry to the property located at 829 Indiana Street (Tax Map # 186-1-5). SUBMITTED BY: Mary Ellen Wines, CZA CFM Zoning Administrator SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Zoning: RSF Residential Single-Family District Land Use Plan Designation: Residential Existing Use: Vacant (formerly religious assembly) Proposed Use: Salem Food Pantry The subject property consists of a .43-acre parcel located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Indiana Street and 7th Street. The parcel is occupied by a single-story brick and sided structure. Much of the lot is paved for parking. This request is for a Use Not Provided For Permit to allow the relocation of the Salem Food Pantry. The Pantry provides food and financial assistance to people in need. The Pantry has been located at City owned property 915 Union Street where a Use Not Provided For Permit was approved by City Council in 2019. The Pantry is purchasing the Indiana Street property to allow for a permanent home. The closest bus stop is at Arch Street and the Boulevard which provides patrons utilizing Valley Metro a short three block walk. 27 28 29 30 31 32 Item # 4C Date: 9-15-2021 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA held in Council Chambers of City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, VA 24153 AGENDA ITEM: Use Not Provided For Consider the request for approval of the amended subdivision plan filed by Simms Property, LLC., property owner/developer, for a 7.564 acre tract known as Simms Farm Section 1. SUBMITTED BY: Mary Ellen Wines, CZA CFM Zoning Administrator SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 1 plans were modified to move the stormwater pond into an area where it can better collect and detain the runoff from the development. There were no changes to the layout, utilities or plat. The only changes were to the stormwater pond. Calculations were re-submitted and reviewed by staff and were found to be adequate. The Council approved bond has not changed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff notes that this plan amendment meets the requirements and recommends approval. 33 5 2 1 3 4 6 8 7 9 35 34 38 3941 57 40 43 42 61 59 58 60 65 68 66 62 63 67 73 71 69 70 76 72 7975 74 80 77 64 83 85 81 82 84 86 88 87 91 89 94 95 96 97 93 100 90 92 99 101 103 104 106 78 98 105 10 11121314151617 1819 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3233 130131 119 36 37 107 102 108 109 110 111 112 113 116 117 118 120 121 122 123 124 125 126127129132133134 136 137 138 4445 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 115 139 128 135 114 PHASE 1 OPEN SPACE 1.24 AC. PHASE 1 OPEN SPACE 0.49 AC. PHASE 2 OPEN SPACE 1.02 AC. PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley / Staunton Harrisonburg / Lynchburg PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 0 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 S I M M S F A R M S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 C i v i l B a s e 2 0 2 1 - 8 - 6 R e v i s e d S W M . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 7 : 4 9 P M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 KAM CPB BTC 12/14/2020 1"=100' SI M M S F A R M S E C T I O N 1 OV E R A L L P R O P E R T Y M A P UP L A N D D R I V E CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A C2 04200056.00 3/31/2021 5/3/2021 8/23/2021 34 PROPOSED ROAD C P R O P O S E D R O A D A PROPOSED RO A D D LOT 115 LOT 116 LOT 117 LOT 118 LOT 119 LOT 120 LOT 121 LOT 122 LOT 123 LOT 124 LOT 125 LOT 127LOT 128LOT 129LOT 130LOT 131LOT 132LOT 133 LOT 135 LOT 126 LOT 6 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 7 LOT 113 LOT 112 LOT 111 LOT 110 LOT 136 LOT 134 LOT 102 LOT 11LOT 12 LOT 114 PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley / Staunton Harrisonburg / Lynchburg PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 0 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 S I M M S F A R M S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 C i v i l B a s e 2 0 2 1 - 8 - 6 R e v i s e d S W M . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 8 : 0 4 P M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 KAM CPB BTC 12/14/2020 1" = 30' SI M M S F A R M S E C T I O N 1 LA Y O U T & U T I L I T Y P L A N UP L A N D D R I V E CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A C3.1 04200056.00 3/31/2021 5/3/2021 8/23/2021 35 LOT 119 LOT 120 LOT 121 LOT 122 LOT 123 LOT 124 LOT 125 LOT 127LOT 128LOT 129LOT 130 LOT 126 LOT 136 LOT 137 LOT 138 LOT 139 PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley / Staunton Harrisonburg / Lynchburg PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 0 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 S I M M S F A R M S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 C i v i l B a s e 2 0 2 1 - 8 - 6 R e v i s e d S W M . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 5 7 : 1 4 P M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 KAM CPB BTC 12/14/2020 1" = 30' SI M M S F A R M S E C T I O N 1 LA Y O U T & U T I L I T Y P L A N UP L A N D D R I V E CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A C3.2 04200056.00 3/31/2021 5/3/2021 8/23/2021 36 PROPOSED ROAD C P R O P O S E D R O A D A PROPOSED RO A D D LOT 115 LOT 116 LOT 117 LOT 118 LOT 119 LOT 120 LOT 121 LOT 122 LOT 123 LOT 124 LOT 125 LOT 127LOT 128LOT 129LOT 130LOT 131LOT 132LOT 133 LOT 135 LOT 126 LOT 6 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 7 LOT 113 LOT 112 LOT 111 LOT 110 LOT 136 LOT 134 LOT 101 LOT 102 LOT 11LOT 12 LOT 114 PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley / Staunton Harrisonburg / Lynchburg PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 0 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 S I M M S F A R M S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 C i v i l B a s e 2 0 2 1 - 8 - 6 R e v i s e d S W M . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 5 5 : 4 6 P M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 KAM CPB BTC 12/14/2020 1" = 30' SI M M S F A R M S E C T I O N 1 GR A D I N G P L A N UP L A N D D R I V E CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A C4.1 04200056.00 3/31/2021 5/3/2021 8/23/2021 DITCH A DETAIL N.T.S. 2YR VELOCITY = 2.97 fps 10YR DEPTH = 0.76' EC-3, TYPE A LINING DITCH B DETAIL N.T.S. 2YR VELOCITY = 4.89 fps 10YR DEPTH = 0.88' EC-3, TYPE A LINING 37 LOT 119 LOT 120 LOT 121 LOT 122 LOT 123 LOT 124 LOT 125 LOT 127LOT 128LOT 129LOT 130 LOT 126 LOT 136 LOT 137 LOT 138 LOT 139 PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley / Staunton Harrisonburg / Lynchburg PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 0 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 S I M M S F A R M S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 C i v i l B a s e 2 0 2 1 - 8 - 6 R e v i s e d S W M . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 5 6 : 1 2 P M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 KAM CPB BTC 12/14/2020 1" = 30' SI M M S F A R M S E C T I O N 1 GR A D I N G P L A N UP L A N D D R I V E CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A C4.2 04200056.00 3/31/2021 5/3/2021 8/23/2021 38 PROPOSED ROAD C P R O P O S E D R O A D A PROPOSED RO A D D LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE +/- 8.7 AC PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley / Staunton Harrisonburg / Lynchburg PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 0 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 S I M M S F A R M S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 C i v i l B a s e 2 0 2 1 - 8 - 6 R e v i s e d S W M . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 9 : 1 7 P M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 KAM CPB BTC 12/14/2020 1" = 30' SI M M S F A R M S E C T I O N 1 E. S . C . P L A N UP L A N D D R I V E CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A C5.1 04200056.00 3/31/2021 5/3/2021 8/23/2021 39 PROPOSED ROAD C LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE +/- 8.7 AC PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley / Staunton Harrisonburg / Lynchburg PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 0 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 S I M M S F A R M S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 C i v i l B a s e 2 0 2 1 - 8 - 6 R e v i s e d S W M . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 9 : 3 8 P M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 KAM CPB BTC 12/14/2020 1" = 30' SI M M S F A R M S E C T I O N 1 E. S . C . P L A N UP L A N D D R I V E CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A C5.2 04200056.00 3/31/2021 5/3/2021 8/23/2021 40 PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley / Staunton Harrisonburg / Lynchburg PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 0 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 S I M M S F A R M S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 C i v i l B a s e 2 0 2 1 - 8 - 6 R e v i s e d S W M . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 9 : 4 6 P M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 KAM CPB BTC 12/14/2020 N/A SI M M S F A R M S E C T I O N 1 E. S . C . N O T E S UP L A N D D R CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A C5.3 04200056.00 3/31/2021 5/3/2021 8/23/2021 CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT DETAIL NTS 41 PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley / Staunton Harrisonburg / Lynchburg PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 0 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 S I M M S F A R M S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 C i v i l B a s e 2 0 2 1 - 8 - 6 R e v i s e d S W M . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 9 : 5 6 P M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 KAM CPB BTC 12/14/2020 N/A SI M M S F A R M S E C T I O N 1 E. S . C . D E T A I L S UP L A N D D R CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A C5.4 04200056.00 3/31/2021 5/3/2021 8/23/2021 FERTILIZER SPECIFICATIONS AND RATES FOR MANAGEMENT PERMANENT SEEDING SPECIFICATIONSPS TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONSTS FOR INSTALLATION OF TREATMENT - 2 SOIL STABILIZATION MATTING STAKES, STAPLES, & PINS TYPICAL TREATMENT - 1 (SOIL STABILIZATION BLANKET) INSTALLATION CRITERIA BLANKET MATTINGB/M CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCETEMPORARY GRAVELCE SF CONSTRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE SPECIFIC APPLICATION GRAVEL CURB INLET SEDIMENT FILTERIP TEMPORARY DIVERSION DIKE DD OUTLET PROTECTIONOP SEDIMENT TRAP #1 DETAIL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP #1 SPECIFICATIONSST SEDIMENT TRAP #2 DETAIL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP #2 SPECIFICATIONSST 42 PROPOSED SANITARY E-EX PROFILE PROPOSED STORM 1-5 PROFILE1 2 3 4 5 6 9 7 8 10 11 12 13 PROPOSED STORM 6-10 PROFILE PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley / Staunton Harrisonburg / Lynchburg PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 0 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 S I M M S F A R M S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 C i v i l B a s e 2 0 2 1 - 8 - 6 R e v i s e d S W M . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 5 0 : 3 0 P M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 KAM CPB BTC 12/14/2020 AS SHOWN SI M M S F A R M S E C T I O N 1 UT I L I T Y P R O F I L E S UP L A N D D R CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A C6.2 04200056.00 3/31/2021 5/3/2021 8/23/2021 43 PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley / Staunton Harrisonburg / Lynchburg PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 0 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 S I M M S F A R M S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 0 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 C i v i l B a s e 2 0 2 1 - 8 - 6 R e v i s e d S W M . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 5 0 : 4 1 P M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 KAM CPB BTC 12/14/2020 N/A SI M M S F A R M S E C T I O N 1 DE T A I L S UP L A N D D R CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A C8.1 04200056.00 3/31/2021 5/3/2021 8/23/2021 S.W.M. POND #1 DETAIL 44