HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/14/2018 - Planning Commission - Agenda -RegularPlanning Commission Meeting
AGENDA
Wednesday, November 14, 2018, 7:00 P M
Council Chambers, City Hall. 114 North Broad Street, Salem
1.C all to Order
2.C onsent Agenda
A.Consent Agenda
C onsider approval of the minutes from the October 10, 2018, work session and regular meeting.
3.New Business
A.Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
Hold public hearing to consider the request of Dynamic Medical, LLC, property owner, for
rezoning the property located at 1201 & 1203 Texas Street (Tax Map # 149-1-1.1) from RB
Residential Building with conditions to HBD Highway Business District without conditions.
B.Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
Hold public hearing to consider the request of 540 Properties, LLC, contract purchaser and
Mechanical Development Company, Inc., property owner, for rezoning the property located at 229
Apperson Drive (Tax Map # 234-3-1) from LM Light Manufacturing District to HBD Highway
Business District.
C .Subdivision
C onsider the request for preliminary approval of a proposed subdivision plat filed by T he Simms
Family Limited Partnership, property owner, to be located in the 200 blk. of Diamond Road (Tax
Map # 272-2-1).
4.Adjournment
Work Session, Wednesday, November 14, 2018, 6:00 p.m.,
Council Chambers Conference Room
UNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION October 10, 2018 A work session of the Planning Commission of the City of Salem, Virginia, was held in Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, at 6:30 p.m., on October 10, 2018, there being present all the members of said Commission, to wit: Vicki G. Daulton, Chair; Denise P. King, Vice Chair; Reid A. Garst II, N. Jackson Beamer, and Neil L. Conner; together with James E. Taliaferro, II (absent), Assistant City Manager and Executive Secretary, ex officio member of said Commission; Charles E. Van Allman, Jr., Director of Community Development; Mary Ellen Wines, Zoning Administrator; Benjamin W. Tripp, City Planner; and William C. Maxwell, Assistant City Attorney; and the following business was transacted: The Executive Secretary reported that this date, place, and time had been set in order for the Commission to hold a work session; and In re: Hold public hearing to consider the request of James H. Stewart and Kenton N. Bohn, lessees, and Mechanical Services & Installation LLC, property owner, for rezoning the property located at 748 W. Fourth Street (Tax Map # 142-3-1) from LM Light Manufacturing District to HBD Highway Business District WHEREAS, staff noted the following: the subject property consists of a single parcel of approximately 0.3 acres, located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Fourth Street and Spring Street, to the south of the intersection of Fourth and Main Street. The property is currently occupied by a single story office space on the 4th Street side and two connected storage/warehouse spaces, which front on Spring Street. This request is to rezone the property to allow it to be used as a retail store. The proposed business buys used items such as electronics and then resells them, often online. This will be their first location in Salem, in addition to locations in Roanoke City. The new business will have 2-3 employees, and the applicant has indicated they would like to improve the property by adding landscaping; and WHEREAS, staff and the Commission discussed the rezoning request; and WHEREAS, a full and lengthy discussion was held regarding the request of James H. Stewart and Kenton N. Bohn, lessees, and Mechanical Services & Installation LLC, property owner, for rezoning the property located at 748 W. Fourth Street (Tax Map # 142-3-1) from LM Light Manufacturing District to HBD Highway Business District.
2 THEREUPON, the Commission took no action at this work session. There being no further business to come before the Commission, the work session was adjourned at 6:55 p.m. _____________________________ Chair ________________________________ Executive Secretary
Planni ng Commi ssi on Meeti ng
M INUTES
Wednesday, October 10, 2018, 7:00 P M
Council Chambers, City Hall. 114 North Broad Street, Salem
1.C all to Order
A regular meeting of the Planning C ommission of the C ity of Salem, Virginia, was
called to order at 7:00 p.m., there being present the following members to wit: Vicki
G. Daulton, Chair; Denise P. King, Vice C hair; Reid A. Garst II, N. J ackson
Beamer, and Neil L. Conner; with Vicki G. Daulton, Chair, presiding; together with
J ames E. Taliaferro, Assistant C ity Manager and Executive Secretary; C harles E.
VanAllman, J r., Director of C ommunity Development Department; Benjamin W.
Tripp, C ity Planner; and William C. Maxwell, Assistant C ity Attorney.
2.C onsent Agenda
A.Minutes
Consider approval of minutes from the September 12, 2018, work session and
regular meeting.
Approved as presented
3.New Business
A.Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
Hold public hearing to consider the request of J ames H. Stewart and Kenton N.
Bohn, lessees, and Mechanical Services & Installation LLC, property owner, for
rezoning the property located at 748 W. Fourth Street (Tax Map #142-3-1) from LM
Light Manufacturing District to HBD Highway Business District.
T he Executive Secretary reported that notice of such hearing had been published in
the September 27, and October 4, 2018, issues of the Salem Times Register and
adjacent property owners were notified by letter mailed September 25, 2018.
Staff noted the following regarding the rezoning request: the subject property
consists of a single parcel of approximately 0.3 acres, located on the southeast
corner of the intersection of Fourth Street and Spring Street, to the south of the
intersection of Fourth and Main Street. T he property is currently occupied by a
single story office space on the 4th Street side and two connected storage/warehouse
spaces which front on Spring Street. T his request is to rezone the property to allow
it to be used as a retail store. T he proposed business buys used items such as
ChairChairChair
electronics and then resells them, often online. T his will be their first location in
Salem, in addition to locations in Roanoke City. T he new business will have 2-3
employees, and the applicant has indicated they would like to improve the property
by adding landscaping.
C hair Daulton opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone to speak.
J ames Stewart, Lake Bluff, Illinois, lessee, appeared before the
C ommission explaining the rezoning request. He noted that he and his business
partner are interested in operating a retail business at this location, and after meeting
with Mr. Tripp and Mrs. Wines, they were informed that the property was not zoned
correctly for retail. So, they are requesting to rezone the property to HBD Highway
Business District.
C hair Daulton asked him what type of retail business would this be. Mr. Stewart
explained the business concept and noted it is basically a resale business that is
mostly done on the Internet. With this concept, people can bring their goods to trade
or sell.
C ommissioner Garst noted if he understood correctly, they have a retail location to
get people to bring their goods in and then they typically sell it online. He asked Mr.
Stewart is this was correct. Mr. Stewart noted that this is correct to a degree. T here
is a little bit of an overlap. In other words, they may have customers who come to
buy something, and they have something to trade in. T heir largest retail turnover is
in game systems so there are a lot of people bringing games to upgrade and get
different games. However, there is a large portion who come to just sell.
C ommissioner Conner noted if he heard him correctly this particular location will be
geared more towards online sales and try to drive the foot traffic to the store in
Roanoke. Mr. Stewart noted not to necessarily drive the foot traffic but any larger
items that is not conducive to selling online then they have an outlet to sell them.
Vice C hair King noted they have a letter from the property owner. She asked him if
he understood that the Commission is being asked to rezone the property and is not
a personal permit for the lessees. T his would change the zoning of the property no
matter who owns or leases the property. Mr. Stewart noted he understands this.
Further, they were given permission by the owner to file for the rezoning.
C hair Daulton noted that he mentioned they had changed the location in Roanoke to
a pawn shop. She asked if they have intentions for this location to be a pawn shop in
the future. Mr. Stewart noted that he did not think so because it is not large enough
from a storage perspective. Also, the security aspect would be greater if they went
to an advocated pawn shop in this area. At this point in time, it is certainly not on
their radar.
Vice C hair King asked him if most of the locations they have across the country
generally do not change to pawn shops. He noted that most of the stores they have
owned have been strictly retail stores. T he one in Roanoke is the only store they
have turned into a pawn shop, and it was primarily due to their customers asking
them to do this.
C hair Daulton asked him what was the advantage of having a location in Salem
when they already have a store in Roanoke. He mentioned that it is typically
demographics and a density of demographics. Further, they have a lot of customers
who drive from this area to the Williamson Road location. Also, he has seen how
Salem has progressed over the years he has been coming to this area, and it is
attractive from that perspective.
C ommissioner Beamer asked him if they would be open five or six days a week.
Mr. Stewart noted that it would be six days a week, and they would be closed on
Sundays. T hey are projecting they would be open from 10 am to 6 pm.
C ommissioner Garst asked Mr. Stewart is he could tell him the things that
differentiate a pawn shop from his retail model. Mr. Stewart noted collateralized
loans essentially. In other words, with a resale shop a customer sells them a watch
for $100, and then it is theirs to sell. With a pawn shop, a person gives them the
watch, and the owner has the right to come back and buy it back at $115 next month.
It stays in their possession until the person comes in to pay off the loan or pay the
principal and the interest.
C ommissioner Beamer asked if they have any other locations in Virginia besides the
one in Roanoke. Mr. Stewart noted the original owner of Cash C onverters had six or
seven stores in Virginia Beach and the Hampton Roads area, etc. He sold out to
Easy Pawn about four years ago, and they purchased the store in Roanoke from him
because Easy Pawn did not want this one as it was so far the other stores.
C ommissioner Garst asked staff if the HBD zoning would allow for a pawn store,
and Mr. Tripp noted that it would allow for this use. T here was further discussion
regarding pawn stores in general and the fact that there is one right down the street
from this location. Mr. Stewart noted at this point they are not interested in doing a
pawn store. If the business model changes, then they might look at this.
C hair Daulton asked if there is enough parking for the business, and Mr. Tripp
noted that staff had looked at parking, and there is sufficient parking. Mr. Stewart
noted he believes there are eight to ten parking spaces.
Vice C hair King asked if they would be using the entire building because she
noticed that it connects to the two big storage buildings. Mr. Stewart noted the
property owner has storage in the two buildings so at this point they will not be
using them.
Roger Martin, who owns the adjacent building at 736 West Fourth Street, appeared
before the C ommission. He noted that his concern is the parking for the proposed
building. He stated there are ten parking spaces, and he questions if this is sufficient
parking when they will have a couple of workers plus the people coming in to shop.
He has three renters in his building, and he is concerned that the overflow of traffic
will come over to his building. T here are times when his building uses every space
they have. He does not have a problem with the business. Chair Daulton asked staff
if Mr. Martin could put signs on his building that the parking is for his building. Mr.
Tripp noted that it is his property, and he could put signs up and also tow anyone
who may park there from the proposed business. Mr. Martin noted that he was
aware he could put up signs, but reality tells him there will be more people coming
than the parking they have. T here was further discussion regarding the parking for
the proposed building. Mr. Tripp noted that he and Mrs. Wines met with the
applicants, and they looked at the parking as part of the review. He further explained
the code requirements for the retail space, and they determined there was adequate
parking to meet the code.
Mr. Taliaferro noted that the request is to rezone the property from LM Light
Manufacturing District to HBD Highway Business District. During the plan review
process, there will be a zoning permit. At that point, C ommunity Development will
look at the use and the required number of parking spaces, and the applicant will
have to provide the number of spaces or they cannot get the permit to occupy the
building.
Mr. Stewart noted that their intention is to not have a retail floor. He stated will be
partitioning off part of the space and using about 1/3 of the space for the public. He
estimated it would be about 800 or 900 square feet. T he intention is not to attract
people to come and shop as much as people to come and sell their items. Most of
those transactions are completed in less than 10 minutes. He doubts they will have
the parking lot full with people wanting to sell things, and he would be grateful to
have that problem, but they certainly do not expect to have that amount of traffic. At
the current store in Roanoke, they do about 45 to 50 purchase transactions per day.
At this location, their goal for the first year is to average about 15 a day. Again, they
are not attracting retail customers. Further, they will only have two staff members
working. He understands Mr. Martin's concern and appreciates that it is a valid
concern.
C hair Daulton asked if there was anyone else to speak on this matter. T here was no
response, and the public hearing was closed.
T here was further discussion regarding the available parking, and it was noted there
should be some parking on Spring Street. Mr. VanAllman noted that they base
required parking on the use of the building and not the zoning.
J ackson Beamer motioned to recommend to the Council of the City of Salem that
the request of J ames H. Stewart and Kenton N. Bohn, lessees, and Mechanical
Services & Installation LLC , property owner, for rezoning the property located at
748 W. Fourth Street (Tax Map #142-3-1) from LM Light Manufacturing District to
HBD Highway Business District be approved. Reid Garst seconded the motion.
Ayes: Beamer, Conner, Daulton, Garst, King
4.Adjournment
T he meeting was adjourned at 7:27 p.m.
CITY OF SALEM ITEM 3A
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
Prepared by: Meeting Date:
City Administrative Staff November 14, 2018
Report prepared:
November 8, 2018
RE: Hold public hearing to consider the request of Dynamic Medical, LLC, property owner, for
rezoning the property located at 1201 & 1203 Texas Street (Tax Map # 149 -1-1.1) from RB
Residential Building with conditions to HBD Highway Business District without c onditions.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Zoning: RB Residential Business, with conditions
Future Land Use Plan Designation: Commercial
Existing Use: Single Family Residence
Proposed Use: Office/Laboratory, without conditions
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The subject property consists of a single parcel of 0.522 acres, located on the north side of Texas
Street, to the west of the intersection with Lynchburg Turnpike. The property contains two one-
story brick office buildings. On December 12, 1988, City Council approved to rezone the property
from Residential District R-1 to Residential-Business R-B with the following conditions:
(1) The project will be constructed in substantial conformance with the Conceptual Plan
by T. P. Parker & Son dated October 4, 1988
(2) Building "A" will be constructed within one year of the date of approval of the
rezoning. Building "B" will be constructed within four years of the date of approval
of the rezoning~ and
(3) Building "A" will be used for professional real estate appraisal services and related
activities. Building "B" will be used as rental space for professional offices, real
estate appraisal, and/or other similar occupations.
Currently Dynamic Medical, a general office, occupies 1201 Texas Street (Building B) and Chlo e
White Agency, Inc., an insurance office, occupies 1203 Texas Street (Building A).
Dynamic Medical is a medical office-consulting firm that pairs medical practices with laboratories.
The applicant proposes to expand their business and add the processing of samples on site to
alleviate the shipment to other laboratories.
This request is to rezone the property to allow it to be used as an office/laboratory. The applicant
has stated that no patients will be seen on site and less than six vehicles will be parked. Building
A will remain an insurance office at this time.
ISSUES:
None.
AG - Agriculture District
BCD - Business Commerce District
CBD - Community Business District
CUD - College/University District
DBD - Downtown Business District
HBD - Highway Business District
HBD/HM - Highway Business/Heavy Manufacturing District
HBD/LM - Highway Business/Light Manufacturing District
HM - Heavy Manufacturing District
LM - Light Manufacturing District
LM/HM - Light Manufacturing/Heavy Manufacturing District
MHP - Manufactured Home Park District
PUD - Planned Unit District
RB - Residential Business District
RMF - Residential Multi-Family District
RMF/RB - Residential Multi-Family/Residential Business District
RSF - Residential Single Family District
RSF/HBD - Residential Single/Highway Business District
RSF/LM - Residential Single Family/Light Manufacturing
RSF/RB - Residential Single Family/Residential Business District
RSF/RMF - Residential Single Family/Residential Multi-Family District
RSF/TBD - Residential Single Family/Transitional Business District
TBD - Transitional Business District
EXISTING ZONING FUTURE LAND USE
Glenmore Drive
T e x a s S tr e e t
Lynchburg Turnpike
Sherwood Road
Corporate Boulevard
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Shoteka Hill (Private)
Ridgeland, PB 2, PGS 69, 85 (RC)
Salem Industrial Park, PB 4, PG 90 (RC)
Salem Industrial Park, PB 4, PG 90 (RC)
Bru g h R e s u b .,P B 8 ,P G 2 7
C ity of S ale m , P B 1 1, P G 6 5
C ity o f S ale m , P B 7, P G 6 4
City of Salem, PB 13, PGS 49-52
C ity of S ale m , P B 1 3, P G S 4 9-5 2
C ity o f S ale m , P B 1 4, P G S 5 1 ,5 2
Ci
ty
o
f
S
a
le
m,
P
B
1
4,
P
G
S
5
1
,5
2
C ity of S ale m , P B 1 4, P G S 8 1
6
7
8
9
A-2
A-1
5
2
1
3
A
B
B
11A
3B
3A 50
60
1
0
0
60
6
0
6
0
50
Taylor Lodge # 23
City of Salem
City of Salem
Stormwater Management Parcel
10
3
4
5
6
8
9
2
1
3
7
2
2.1
2.2
1.1
1
4
5
1
4.1
4
1.6
7
41.92
828.94
350.69
2 0 9 .4 6
205.06
108.00 117.75
225.75
310.00
295.00
1 2 3 .2
328.80
270.51
105.00
92.97175.73
181.70
204.10
90.00
90.00
42.23
64.91
135.08
200.70
203.80
3 1 .3 0
2
9
.
4
0
308.33
232.50
9 8 .1 1
143.96
22.43
47.57
5
8
.
9
3
43.0016.8 0
1 1 8 .7 5
28.70
56.43
80.00
133.50
1 0 1 .9 5
20.00
153.50
5 9 .8 1
102.63
1
1
7
.
1
7
7 1.1 4
1 2 7.6 4
1
5
3
.
3
7
1 4 5 .7 0
2
7
7
.
7
7
2
4
5
.
6
5
2 6 3.2 7
360.42
2 0 0.0 9
3 5 9.3 7
193.99
254.56
202.15
170.77
159.33
187.57
68.82
77.73
5
6
.
6
9
1
1
9
.
2
6
1
1
9
.
7
8
4
7
.
9
0
173.37
77.43
106.13
2 2 1 .1 2
1
8
5
.
4
9
29.88 3 0 3 .2 3
1
0
7
.6
8
63.53
269.55
16.81
27.34
792.00
806.00
1
2
11
2
1 0 0 8 (F o otb all S ta diu m )
1312
1 2 0 0
1145
1135
1129
1123
425
1221
1309
444
1203
1155
1226
1218
1209
1 2 0 3
1 2 0 1
1208
1130
1
0
1
1
0
4
112
113
1 1 8 1
107
6.056 Ac.
0.644 Ac.
3.41 Ac.
3.75 Ac.
7.21 Ac.
1.12 Ac.
0.318 Ac.
0.208 Ac.
0.364 Ac.
0.522 Ac.
0.854 Ac.
3.602 Ac.
1.590 Ac.
2.187 Ac.
1.813 Ac.
0 125 25062.5
Feet±1 inch = 125 feet NOVEMBER 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION
1201 & 1203 TEXAS STREET
CITY OF SALEM
Community Development DepartmentP.O. Box 869Salem, Virginia 24153-0869Phone: (540) 375-3032
Tax Parcel 149-1-1.1 Buildings Parcels City Limits
Commercial
Downtown
Economic Development Area
Industrial
Institutional
Mixed Use
Public Parks and Recreational
Residential
Transitional
Tax Parcel 149-1-1.1 Buildings Parcels City Limits
" " •
L
2.
3.
NOTES:
LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND
UTILITI!lS IS BASED ON ~IELD
SURVEYS, ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION
PLANS AND AVAILABLE RECORDS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY
LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIBS
PRIOR TO BEGINNING
CONS·ERUCTION.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT
WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE 100
YEAR c'LOOO BOUNDARY AS SHOWN
ON THE FEMA FLOOD BOUNDARY MAP
AND HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY
ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS.
THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO
INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE
DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT BY
A LICENSBD ATTORNEY.
PROPE.RTYOF
ROAl'-JOKE.. COLLE.GE.
TRUSTE.£5
TAX ~0 148 ·01 ·01
2.01-JE.D R • "2.
I /
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
BUlLOl!sJG,' E,"
PROFOSE.D
I· sr0RY OFFICE. BUILD\~
1,~00 ~Q..FT.
8 ~
,..,
i ....,,
PROPERTYOF
LEO VA.l--JCE. 8c. DOROT\--\Y 00~N
STE.\vART
,--""X 1--12. 14"1 • o I -0 I
"Z.01--.lE.D R-1
0.52..2. Ac..
~, 7~8 .~"2. ':::,IQ_. FT.
C\' 10' C\' ','
("NP.) /' ('NP.) ~
GRA"=>S.
1~~0
)
PA\IEO
-----PAR.Kit-JC.. -----
AREA
l·ST=-t CFFlC.E. l!,U\\..DIJ..X.
1,aoos.c:;i.FT.
4&'
0
r EXl~T. e:o<:,e:. Cir' PAVEMENT~--...... ~ \ ----
TEXAS
------
\
I \
STREET \\
---.
\\
' I ' \ \\
\
----
\
\
I
I
I
\
-----
\
I
\
\ ', ,,
\:,,
I ,,
'"
( ' ~
I
I
T"f PE.' e;
BUFFE.RYAR.D
SMAlL E.\li:..R<=-R'E..EJ..l
~E.E..c;. ("NR)
LN v(
(c' ~
VlClt---.lll"Y MAP
€ ~
"-
I ' It: . r---
PROP'E.R:lY 0~
ROBERT MlDRE.'w & BOYE.TTE PA I R\C.IA F.
BRUG~
,~ 1--J~ 14-C\-Ol·Oc...
-Z.01'1~O R-1
.SMALL
E.VER<!>~
SHRUE!6
(T"YP.)
10' ~· o'
I'! ~mr• •
-~ -~JI GRAPHIC
10' 20'
I
SCALE
J 1"= 10·
CONCEPTUAL PLAN
FOR
BILLIE A. GOLDING
SCALE: 1 "= 1 O'
SITUATE TEXAS STREET
SALEM, VIRGINIA DATE: OCT. 4, 1988
REVISIONS
t-:0-:-A=,T E::-,,--------------.---::B-:cY--1 DESIGNED BY D:W. B ·
----,>------,--------+----! DRAWN BY 0:W.B.
t---1-----------+--I CHECKED BY __ _
WO., 88•182.4-
t---t--------------t----l NB ____ _
t---il-----------+--1 TAX ; 14"1-0\ -01
'f. P. PARKER & SON
engineers & st1rveyors, ltd.
TELEPHONE (703) 387-1153
PO BOX 39, SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153
gL------,,---:-:----;--,-:----:---:--,-------------------------------------__:------------------------------------------------------------~----------------------------------------------~
=:!)• amerlcan blueprint of columbla
j
i
CITY OF SALEM ITEM 3B
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
Prepared by: Meeting Date:
City Administrative Staff November 14, 2018
Report prepared:
November 8, 2018
RE: Hold public hearing to consider the request of 540 Properties, LLC, contract purchaser and
Mechanical Development Company, Inc., property owner, for rezoning the property located at 229
Apperson Drive (Tax Map # 234-3-1) from LM Light Manufacturing District to HBD Highway
Business District.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Zoning: LM Light Manufacturing
Future Land Use Plan Designation: Inudstiral
Existing Use: Vacant
Proposed Use: Car Wash
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The subject property consists of a single parcel of approximately 0.5 acres, located near the
intersection of Apperson Drive and South Colorado Street. It is triangularly shaped, and bounded
by Apperson Drive on the southwest, by Riverland Drive to the no rth, and by Brook Avenue on
the east. The property is currently vacant.
This request is to rezone the property to allow it to be used for a car wash. The applicant has
proposed a single story, brick or block building for the site. There will be no direct access from
Apperson Drive, and access will be handled from Riverland Drive and will exit onto Brook Avenue
where it can circulate back to the light. A vacuum and parking area is proposed at the front of the
property.
ISSUES:
This property is partially located within the 100-year and 500-year floodplains.
PLANNERS • ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS
ROANOKE • RICHMOND • NEW RIVER VALLEY • STAUNTON • HARRISONBURG • LYNCHBURG
1208 Corporate Circle • Roanoke, Virginia 24018 • (540) 772-9580 • FAX (540) 772-8050
TWIN OAKS CAR WASH
229 Apperson Drive
Salem, VA 24153
Mr. Jay Taliaferro
Assistant City Manager
City of Salem
114 North Broad Street
Salem, VA 24153
RE: Rezoning Request Narrative for Parcel 234-3-1
Proposed Use: Car Wash
On behalf of 540 Properties, LLC (Current Contract Purchaser of the Subject Property), and
Mechanical Development Company, Inc. (Property Owner), we are requesting to rezone property
at 229 Apperson Drive (+/- 0.501 acres), further identified as City of Salem tax parcel 234-3-1.
The property is currently zoned Light Manufacturing (LM) and we are requesting a rezoning to
High Business District (HBD) to facilitate a car wash use on the currently vacant property.
The proposed development will consist of a one-story car wash building including two (2) fully
enclosed bays for vehicle washing. The two wash bays will be fully automatic equipment
“Touch-less” and/or “Soft Touch” systems. Other improvements to the property include vacuum
spaces for patrons utilizing the car wash. Access will be provided to the pay stations/wash bays
from Riverland Drive and a bypass lane will be provided. Vehicles will exit the property onto
Brook Avenue. A conceptual site plan has been included outlining the proposed improvements
for your reference. Please see Exhibit-A for additional details.
The proposed one-story building will be approximately +/- 2,000 s.f. and will be designed with
traditional building materials to compliment the surrounding commercial corridor. An example
of a similar building has been provided and included in the submittal package as Exhibit B.
The proposed use conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained within the City of
Salem Comprehensive Plan, which encourages the redevelopment of commercial areas with
special emphasis on certain corridors including Apperson Drive. The plan will allow for
appropriate commercial development that will not only provide real estate tax revenue, but will
also provide needed services to community residents and commuters.
PLANNERS • ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS
ROANOKE • RICHMOND • NEW RIVER VALLEY • STAUNTON • HARRISONBURG • LYNCHBURG
1208 Corporate Circle • Roanoke, Virginia 24018 • (540) 772-9580 • FAX (540) 772-8050
The current land use as identified on the Official Existing Generalized Land Use Map of the City
of Salem is commercial which is consistent and appropriate for a corner parcel bound on all three
sides by public right of way along the main corridor of Apperson Drive. The future land use as
shown on the Official Future Generalized Land Use Map of the City of Salem identifies this site
as Industrial. This designation was practical due to the adjacent land use by the selling party, but
more appropriate as a commercial use due to the frontage the site has on Apperson Drive and it’s
small parcel size. As the Mechanical Development Company is the selling party and they have
determined that their industrial use will not expand or utilize this parcel, it is appropriate to
remain as a commercial use.
The subject site presents many challenges for a variety of typical commercial uses, due to the
size of the parcel, unique shape, and with public right of way on all sides of the property. The
proposed car wash use presents a great opportunity for an active and positive use to serve the
surrounding community and traveling public along this commercial corridor. The proposed car
wash use provides a smaller building footprint and minimal parking demand which is
accommodated by the small parcel size of 0.501 acres.
Sincerely,
BALZER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Benjamin T. Crew, L.A.
Associate
A
P
P
E
R
S
O
N
D
R
I
V
E
RIVERLAND DRIVE
B
R
O
O
K
A
V
E
N
U
E
PROPOSED
CAR WASH
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
www.balzer.cc
RESIDENTIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
LAND USE PLANNING & ZONING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND SURVEYING
ARCHITECTURE
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
ENVIRONMENTAL & SOIL SCIENCE
WETLAND DELINEATIONS & STREAM EVALUATIONS
Roanoke
New River Valley
Richmond
Staunton
Harrisonburg
Balzer and Associates, Inc.
1208 Corporate Circle
Roanoke, VA 24018
540-772-9580
FAX 540-772-8050
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
TW
I
N
O
A
K
S
C
A
R
W
A
S
H
22
9
A
P
P
E
R
S
O
N
D
R
I
V
E
CO
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
CI
T
Y
O
F
S
A
L
E
M
,
V
I
R
G
I
N
I
A
EX-A
CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C1
C2
LENGTH
47.15'
253.15'
RADIUS
688.82'
676.25'
TANGENT
23.58'
128.07'
DELTA
3°55'18"
21°26'54"
CHORD DIRECTION
S 43°31'39" E
S 29°38'01" E
CHORD LENGTH
47.14'
251.67'
EXHIBIT B
ARCHITECTURAL EXHIBIT
B&A PROJECT#04180091.00
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
229 APPERSON DRIVE
CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA
TAX MAP #234-3-1
PROPERTY OF
MECHANICAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF APPERSON DRIVE AND THE SOUTHERLY
RIGHT OF WAY OF RIVERLAND DRIVE, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY
THENCE WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF RIVERLAND DRIVE N74°57’00”E 217.20’ TO A POINT
ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF BROOK AVENUE. THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF
WAY OF RIVERLAND DRIVE AND RUNNING WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF BROOK AVENUE
S15°03’00”W 203.52’ TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF APPERSON DRIVE. THENCE
LEAVING THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF BROOK AVENUE AND RUNNING WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT
OF WAY OF APPERSON DRIVE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES AND DISTANCES WITH A CURVE TO
THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 688.82’ HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N43°31’39”W A CHORD
LENGTH OF 47.14’ AN ARC DISTANCE OF 47.15’ TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE THENCE WITH
A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 676.25’ A CHORD BEARING OF N29°38’01”W A CHORD
LENGTH OF 251.67’ AN ARC DISTANCE OF 253.15’ TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING
0.586 ACRES SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA.
BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON PLAT BY PARKER DESIGN GROUP DATED MARCH 26, 2013
AND ENTITLED “TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR MECHANICAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.”
AG - Agriculture District
BCD - Business Commerce District
CBD - Community Business District
CUD - College/University District
DBD - Downtown Business District
HBD - Highway Business District
HBD/HM - Highway Business/Heavy Manufacturing District
HBD/LM - Highway Business/Light Manufacturing District
HM - Heavy Manufacturing District
LM - Light Manufacturing District
LM/HM - Light Manufacturing/Heavy Manufacturing District
MHP - Manufactured Home Park District
PUD - Planned Unit District
RB - Residential Business District
RMF - Residential Multi-Family District
RMF/RB - Residential Multi-Family/Residential Business District
RSF - Residential Single Family District
RSF/HBD - Residential Single/Highway Business District
RSF/LM - Residential Single Family/Light Manufacturing
RSF/RB - Residential Single Family/Residential Business District
RSF/RMF - Residential Single Family/Residential Multi-Family District
RSF/TBD - Residential Single Family/Transitional Business District
TBD - Transitional Business District
EXISTING ZONING FUTURE LAND USE
West Riverside Drive
Front Avenue
King Street
South Colorado Street
Brook Avenue
Brook Avenue
R i v e r l a n d D r i v e
East Riverside Drive
B
r
o
o
k
A
v
e
n
u
e
A
pperson
Drive
BrookAvenueAccess
G ordon & M athe w s, P B 11, P G 31
Riverland Court, Sec. 4 PB2, PG 123 (RC)
E
ast, P
B 9, P
G 62
City of Salem, PB 9, PG 36
Riverland Court, Sec 1, PB 2, PG 123 (RC)
Riverland Court, Sec 1, PB 2, PG 123 (RC)
Riverland Court, Sec 4, PB 2, PG 123 (RC)
Riverland Court, Sec 2, PB 2, PG 123 (RC)
Ri ve r l a n d C o u r t , S e c 3 , P B 3 , P G 2 2 6 (RC )
S. D. C
o., S
ection 11, P
B 1, P
G 36 1/2 (R
C)
R i v e r l e e , P B 2 , P G 1 1 8 (R C )
Riverland Court, Sec 4, PB 2, PG 123 (RC)
R
i
v
e
r
l
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
,
S
e
c
3
,
P
B
2
,
P
G
1
2
3
(
R
C
)
Eldridge&JKL,PB11,PGS43,44
Bethel Baptist Church, PB 14, PG 50
B
ethel B
aptist C
hurch, P
B 14, P
G 50
123
11 12 13
24 23
25
DC EBA
F G
K
H
26
27
14 15 16 17 18 19
13 12 11 10 9 8 7
20A 21A 22 23
56 4
20
19
5
4
3 2
1
28
27
26
25
24
23
18 17
1615
14
13 12
18 17 16
15
14 13
12
11
10
9
8
6
5-A
5-B
7
6
5
4
3
2 1
1 2
4
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4 3 2 1
24
23
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
22
21
20
15
16
17A
18A
30
29
1
16A
14A
19A
28
3
3A
2A
1A
4
5
50
40
8 0
40
40
40
8 0
80
80
60
60
80
50
40
4 0
City of Salem
Bethel Baptist Church
Sec. 13
Vacated Kimball Avenue Ext.
DB 175, Pg. 299 09/05/91
City of Salem
Virginia Division of Forestry
Commonwealth of VA1
2
3
5
6
7 1.1
1
1
12
1
2
2
3 4
3
5
13141516
19
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
1.3
2.1
4
4
4
5
4.1
5
5
6
6
9
10
1
3
3
12
12.1
5.1
1.4
4
8
7
11
5
2
1
18 17
76
1
50.00
7
5.0
0
194.00
198.10
40.00
150.00
65.00
100.70
65.00
65.00
50.00
75.00
50.00
50.00
150.00
259.30
25.00
34.66 130.16113.00
130.00
130.00
130.00
68.00
50.00
75.00
75.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
130.00 181.50
163.50
72.00
91.50
130.00
50.00
80.00
136.40
150.00
80.00
93.29
150.00 80.00
75.00
150.00
80.00
8 0 .0 0 153.0 0
54.50
134.40
130.00
130.00
2 6.8 0
1
3
0
.
0
0
1
3
0
.
0
0
1
3
0
.
0
0
6 0 .0 0 6 0 .0 0
6 0 .0 0 6 0 .0 0
4 0 1 .4 0
7 5 .0 0 8 0 .0 0
6 5 .0 9 6 5 .6 6
157.92
137.80
129.83
1
2
6
.
2
4
1
2
4
.
8
3
331.45
2 3 2 .2 8
128.74
100.00
200.25
76.5448.31
162.09
75.00
50.00
170.00170.00170.00170.00
50.00 50.00 75.00
51.90 103.80
75.00
50.00 62.50
46.94
75.00
62.50
103.80
51.90
128.26
170.00
170.00
170.00
170.00
156.08
170.00
50.00 50.00
75.00
75.00 50.00 100.00
100.00
113.34
56.66
170.00
116.80
169.24 99.68
253.70 353.38
81.00
55.26
170.00
174.46
6
5
.3
0
1 2 4 .9 1
1 5 2 .5 5
1 3 2 .0 9
45.00
192.95
237.94
28.83
1
0
0
.
0
0
5
0
.
0
0
6
0
.
0
0
2
0
194.50
217.50
2 4 3 .9 0
157.70
52.19
20
47.48
140.89
20.04
169.24
55.00
55.00
75.00
169.24
85.00
169.24
100.0085.00
75.00
300.00
75.00
75.00
169.24
169.24
75.00
120.00
65.19
113.00
159.00
130.00
44.00
150.00
132.50
181.50
454.74
284.00
279.00 325.00
130.00
130.00
130.00
130.00
130.00
50.00
75.00
25.00
5
0.0
0
75.0
0
50.00
35.53
124.93
169.17
5
0.00
50.00
143.40
2
2
9
.
6
0
158.69
360.41
95.20
60.00172.71
34.10
20.04
247.38
52.55
133.62
176.51
2
2
1
6
6 4
3
2
1
5
5
1415
1409
1403
1628
1626
1622
1616
305
303
1
6
2
7
1600
1406
1
4
1
6
210
324-326
322
300 306 310
316
31 7 32 1 32 7 32 9 33 1303
33 2
309
1501-1505-1507-1509
4
11
111
109
102 1516
1511
1 1 6124
6
1601
2
104
106
113
1
6
1
7
1
6
2
1
1
6
1
1
334
328
101
10
3
107
108
1608
1610
1
1515
31 5
22
2
0
0 - 2
0
6 - 2
1
0 - 2
1
2
1600 A - B
229
4.73 Ac.(c)
1.09 Ac.
5.161 Ac.
0.149 Ac.
0.075 Ac.
0.261 Ac.
1.152 Ac.
0.149 Ac.
0.149 Ac.
0.988 Ac.
0.389 Ac.
0.880 Ac.
0 125 25062.5
Feet±1 inch = 125 feet NOVEMBER 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION
229 APPERSON DRIVE
CITY OF SALEM
Community Development DepartmentP.O. Box 869Salem, Virginia 24153-0869Phone: (540) 375-3032
Tax Parcel 234-3-1 Buildings Parcels City Limits
Commercial
Downtown
Economic Development Area
Industrial
Institutional
Mixed Use
Public Parks and Recreational
Residential
Transitional
Tax Parcel 234-3-1 Buildings Parcels City Limits
CITY OF SALEM ITEM 3C
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
Prepared by: Meeting Date:
City Administrative Staff November 14, 2018
Report prepared:
November 8, 2018
RE: Consider the request for preliminary approval of a proposed subdivision plat filed by The
Simms Family Limited Partnership, property owner, of the property located at 211 Diamond Road
(Tax Map # 272-2-1).
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Zoning: AG Agricultural
Future Land Use Plan Designation: Residential
Existing Use: Agriculture
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The subject property consists of a single parcel of approximately 62.4 acres, one of the largest
parcels of land within the city boundaries. It is bounded on the west side by Franklin Street, on
the South by Upland Dri ve, on the east by Diamond Road, and on the North by a private section
of Homeplace Drive. The property is currently occupied by “The Simms Farm”, a long -time
established agricultural use. Elevation varies from a high point of approximately 1,230 feet on the
hilltop flats, to a low point of 1,072 on Franklin Street. The flatter portions of the property have
been cleared over the years, but there are still large wooded areas, particularly on t he western
side and in the ravines, and large mature trees exist throughout. It can best be described as
rolling farmland, and is occupied by a house, several stables, and various associated outbuildings
and facilities related to its use as a horse farm. It is currently zoned agricultural.
This request is to subdivide the property into four lots, of various sizes between approximately
10.5 acres, and 30 acres, as shown on the attached plat. These lots would have frontages on the
following public streets: Franklin Street, Upland Drive, Diamond Road, and Homeplace Drive.
Under the City of Salem Subdivision ordinance, the subdivision of five lots or less is possible
administratively. However, the ultimate authority for subdivision rests with the Planning
Commission. Given the size and nature of this property, and the potential for significant future
development and the associated demands on infrastructure and transportation, staff has referred
the subdivision to Planning Commission under the authority provided in Section 78 -403 of the
Subdivision Ordinance.
The applicant has not stated any intended use for the property a t this time, only that they intend
to market the various parcels for sale. Any future proposed development, other than agricultural
uses, would require the property to be rezoned through a public process.