HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/13/2010 - Planning Commission - Minutes - RegularAPPROVED MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
January 13, 2010
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Salem, Virginia, was held in
Council Chambers, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, at 7:00 p.m., on January 13, 2010, there
being present the following members of said Commission, to wit: Gardner W. Smith, Jimmy W.
Robertson, Vicki G. Daulton, and Bruce N. Thomasson (Terrance D. Murphy – absent); with
Gardner W. Smith, Chairman, presiding; together with Melinda J. Payne, Director of Planning
and Development; Charles B. Aldridge, Sr., Acting Building Official and Zoning Administrator;
Charles VanAllman, City Engineer; Benjamin W. Tripp, Planner; Judy L. Hough, Planner; Krystal
M. Coleman, Deputy Clerk of Council; and William C. Maxwell, Assistant City Attorney; and the
following business was transacted:
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSION MEMBER ROBERTSON, AND DULY CARRIED, due to
the absence of the Executive Secretary and Assistant Executive Secretary, Kyrstal M. Coleman,
is hereby appointed Executive Secretary Pro Tem for this meeting of the City of Salem Planning
Commission – the roll call vote: all present – aye.
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSION MEMBER DAULTON, AND DULY CARRIED, the
minutes of the regular meeting and work session held on December 16, 2009, were approved
as written – the roll call vote: all present – aye.
In re: Request of D & D Property Management, property owner, for the issuance
of a Special Exception Permit to allow a two-family dwelling on the property
located at 702 Front Avenue (Tax Map #201-10-2)
The Executive Secretary Pro Tem reported that this date and time had been set to hold a
public hearing to consider the request of D & D Property Management, property owner, for the
issuance of a Special Exception Permit to allow a two-family dwelling on the property located at
702 Front Avenue (Tax Map # 201-10-2); and
2
WHEREAS, the Executive Secretary Pro Tem further reported that notice of such
hearing had been published in the December 30, 2009, and January 6, 2010, issues of The
Roanoke Times, and adjoining property owners were notified by letter mailed December 29,
2009; and
WHEREAS, staff noted the following: the subject property consists of one parcel, at the
northwest corner of the intersection of Front and Eddy Avenues, near the Dilly-Dally
convenience store; the property is approximately 130 feet by 57 feet and is occupied by an
approximately 1,300 square-foot, one-story single-family residence; at the rear of the property
is a small outbuilding that was formerly used as a barber shop; this request is for a Special
Exception Permit to allow a two-family residence; the applicants state that they will build an
attached two-story addition to the existing one-story structure and demolish the former barber
shop to add a parking area adjacent to the alley at the rear of the property; this property lies
entirely within the 100-year flood zone; the existing barber shop extends approximately four
feet into the Eddy Avenue right of way; off-street parking must be provided for a two-family
dwelling; two spaces are required for each dwelling unit, and all off-street parking areas are to
be constructed of a hard surface consisting of bituminous concrete or concrete; and if the
Special Exception Permit is approved, the applicants will be required to record a combination
plat before a building permit can be issued; and
WHEREAS, David Gordon of 114 Bowman Avenue, property owner, appeared before the
Commission in support of said request; he noted he owns approximately 10 other properties on
this street; and he stated he would like to add another unit onto the existing single-family
dwelling on this property; and
WHEREAS, Commission Member Thomasson asked if he had spoken to any of his
neighbors regarding the request; Mr. Gordon noted that he had talked to the neighbors; he
noted that the old barbershop building is encroaching on Eddy Avenue and the alley, and he
intends to demolish this building; further, he will have plenty of off-street parking; the property
has been completely cleaned up, and the existing structure has been painted, etc.; and he
stated that the neighbors are in favor of his request; and
3
WHEREAS, Commission Member Daulton asked if the addition would have to be
built up on the property since it is located in a flood zone; Mr. Gordon stated that the structure
would have to be built one foot above the current elevation according to the City Code; and
WHEREAS, Chairman Smith asked if the entrance to the new dwelling would be on Eddy
Avenue, and Mr. Gordon noted that the entrance would be on Eddy; and
WHEREAS, Commission Member Robertson asked if he owned other properties in this
area, and Mr. Gordon stated that he owned about 10 other properties on Front Street; and
WHEREAS, Commission Member Thomasson asked if staff had any issues with the
request, and Chuck Aldridge noted that the new unit would have to be attached to the existing
unit, and a firewall would be required between the two units; Mr. Aldridge further noted that
separate sewer, water, and electric services will be required for the new addition; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Gordon stated that he is a Class A contractor; further, he added he does
not build houses to sell them, this is really like a hobby for him; and
WHEREAS, Chairman Smith asked Mr. Gordon if he does the work himself, and Mr.
Gordon noted that he does the work; and
WHEREAS, Commission Member Daulton noted that the existing dwelling is
approximately 1,300 square feet; she asked Mr. Gordon the size of the proposed dwelling, and
Mr. Gordon stated that the proposed addition would be 38 X 24 feet; and
WHEREAS, no other person(s) appeared related to said request;
4
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSION MEMBER THOMASSON, AND DULY CARRIED, the
Planning Commission of the City of Salem doth recommend to the Council of the City of Salem
that the request of D & D Property Management, property owner, for the issuance of a Special
Exception Permit to allow a two-family dwelling on the property located at 702 Front Avenue
(Tax Map # 201-10-2) be approved – the roll call vote: all present - aye.
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the same on motion
adjourned at 7:11 p.m.