The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1/25/2016 - City Council - Agenda -RegularSalem City Council Work Session Agenda January 25, 2016 City Manager’s Conference Room City Hall 114 North Broad Street, Salem 6:30-7:30p.m. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Discussion Items a. Fine Arts Committee, Joe Palotas b. Baseball Stadium, Jay c. NovusAgenda update d. Other topics for discussion (Council) IV. Adjournment City Council Meeting Monday, January 25, 2016, 7:30 PM Council Chambers, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 1.Call to Order 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Bid Openings, Awards, Recognitions 4.Consent Agenda A.Minutes Consider acceptance of the minutes of the January 11, 2016, Salem City Council work session and regular meeting. B.Financial Report Consider acceptance of the Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for five months ending November 30, 2015. 5.Old Business A.Vacation of Alley Consider ordinance on second reading permanently vacating a certain unimproved 12' alley located off Pyrtle Drive, 150' south of the Kimball Avenue intersection. (Approved on first reading, January 11, 2016, meeting.) B.Zoning Ordinance Amendment Consider ordinance on second reading to enact and amend Chapter 106, Article II District Regulations, Sections 106-210.2(A)(5), 106-210.3(B)(1), 106-212.2 (B)(5), 106-212.3(B) (1), 106-218.2(B)(6), 106-218.3(C)(1), 106-218.3(C)(2), 106-220.2(B)(6), and 106- 220.3(C)(1), 106-220.3(C)(2), Article III Use and Design Standards, Sections 106-310.19, 106-312.3, Article IV Development Standards, Sections 106-404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Article VI Definitions and Use Types, Sections 106-602.9, and 106-602.11, pertaining to breweries and microbreweries, site development regulations, and definitions. (Approved on first reading, January 11, 2016, meeting.) C.Voting Precinct Consider ordinance on second reading amending Chapter 26, Article II, Section 26-38(b), of THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, regarding Precinct A or Conehurst precinct. (Approved on first reading, January 11, 2016, meeting.) 6.New Business A.Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Hold public hearing and consider ordinance on first reading the request of H2V properties LLC, property owner, for rezoning the property located at 201 West Main Street (Tax Map # 122-1-5) from RSF Residential Single Family District to DBD Downtown Business District. (Advertised in the January 7 & 14, 2016, issues of the Salem Times Register; recommend approval; see Page 1, Planning Commission minutes.) STAFF REPORT B.Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Hold public hearing and consider ordinance on first reading the request of PLM Ventures LLC, property owner, for rezoning the property located at 1037 East Riverside Drive (Tax Map # 248-4-2) from TBD Transitional Business District to HBD Highway Business District. (Advertised in the January 7 & 14, 2016, issues of the Salem Times Register; recommend approval; see Page 5, Planning Commission minutes.) STAFF REPORT C.Boards and Commissions Consider appointments to fill vacancies on various boards and commissions. D.Taxicabs Consider setting a public hearing in accordance with Section 98-94 of THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, for the issuance of Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity for the next twelve (12) months. (Suggest March 14, 2016) 7.Closed Session 8.Adjournment Wo rk Sessio n, Mo nday, January 25, 2016, 6:30p.m., City Manager’s Co nference Ro o m mM#.4Y) Schedule A City Of Salem, Virginia General Fund Statement Of Revenues And Expenditures For Five Months Ending November 30, 2015 Current Year Current Year o/o of prior year Budget Yearto Date Budget yearto Date Varianc€ DAIE ReYenues: Beginning Balance 7-1-15 General Property Taxes Other Local Taxes Permits And Licenses Fines And Forfeitures Revenue From Use Of Money And Property Charges For Services Payment ln Lieu Of Taxes from Electric Fund Payment ln Lieu Of Taxes from Water Fund Miscellaneous ReYenue Non-Categorical Aid Shared Expenses CategoricalAid Total Revenues Expenditures: General Government Judicial Administration Public Safety Public Works Health And Welfare Education Parks, Recreation And Cultural Community Development Non-Departmental Contingency Reserve For Fund Balance Replenishment Reserve For Capital Total Expenditurcs Revenues Over(Under) Expendiiures $ 3,158,701 33,226,300 20,560,s00 240,160 110,000 433,028 5,545,514 3,160,000 130,000 95,053 3.926,272 1,265,862 5,56't,399 77,412,7A9 6,402,255 2,057,337 16,230,167 15,3/.4,782 2,27 4,631 22,,119,957 4,709,721 1,222,323 6,08s,879 626.487 310,000 25,250 77,412,789 $- 12,253,916 4,990,688 130.933 35,385 230,589 2,444,907 1,580,000 60,934 72.83 492,292 388,506 't,473,783 24,1U,896 $-$ 12,152,658 4,565,454 187,948 42,990 311,221 2,191,564 1,580,000 40,865 62,008 483,800 403,918 ovo 24% 55% 32vo 530k 440/0 50% 47% 770/. 13o/o 310/o 27./. 101,258 425,234 (57,01s) (7,605) (80,632) 253,343 20,069 10,955 8,492 (1s,412) 31vo 1,343,440 130,34323,365,866 789,030 2,605,470 452,794 6,826,199 6,457,260 784.909 10,557.599 'l,867 ,571 655,533 2,206,045 2,593,174 777,326 7,O31,452 4,7 45,914 793,872 10,624,828 1,791,278 369,005 2.229,709 12,296 75,468 (20s,253) 1,711,346 (8,963) (67,229) 76,293 286,528 (23,664) 410/o 41./. 420k 42% 35% 48o/o 400/0 uo/o 366k o% 0% 00/o 32,813,379 _$__$p!!49l 30,956,s58 1,856,821 _$___9i99f92_ _$___099ZJ9tr Schedule B City of Salem Sales Tax Summary For FiscalYears 2014 -2OLG Apr May JuneFeb MarNov Dec Jan F\ 20L4 FY 2015 FY 2016 750,000.00 700,000.00 650,000.00 600,000.00 550,000.00 s00,000.00 450,000.00 400,000.00 350,000.00 300,000.00 250,000.00 200,000.00 150,000.00 100,000.00 50,000.00 Aug Sept Oct Schedule C City of Salem Meals Tax Summary For FiscalYears 2014 -zOtG 600,000.00 550,000.00 500,000.00 450,000.00 400,000.00 350,000.00 300,000.00 250,000.00 200,000.00 150,000.00 100,000.00 50,000.00 Dec Feb June tY 20L4 FY 2015 Fy 2076 t- July Au8 Sept Schedule D City of Salem Lodging Tax Summary For FiscalYears 2014 -2OtG JuneMayDec Jan Feb Mar FY 201s FY 2016 SeptJuly Aut 225,000.00 200,000.00 175,000.00 150,000.00 125,000.00 100,000.00 75,000.00 50,000.00 25,000.00 l1 t Currsnt Year Budgst $ 805,000 340.000 3,000,000 100.000 4,245,000 CurIentYear Year to Date $ 298,U7 139,377 '1,49'1,459 20.433 I ,950,1 16 %ol Budget 370/o 410/o 500/0 2oo/o 460/0 Prior Year Year to Date $ 301,209 138,835 1,306,27'l 33.325 1 ,779,640 SCHEDULE E Variance $ (2,362) 542 185,188 (12.892) 170,476 City Of Salem, Virginia Solid Waste Diaposal Statement Of Operations For Five lonths Ending November 30, 2015 Operaling Revenues: Revenues For Waste Disoosal: Toter Fees Container Fees Waste Collection & Disposal charges Recycling Proceeds Total Revenues For Waste Disposal Operating Expenditures: Refuse Collection: Salaries Fringe Benefits Contractual Services Printing and Binding Travel and Training Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Credits Materials and Supplies Capital Outlay Total Refuse Collection ContaineIs: Salaries Fringe Benefits Contractual Services Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Credits Materials And Supplies TotalContainers Transfer Station: Salaries Fringe Benefits Contractual Services Utilities Communications Travel and Traaning lvliscellaneous Waste Disposal lraterials and Supplies l\rachinery and Equipment Total Tranafer Station Total Operating Expendiiures Net Cost For Solid Waste Disposal 8,266 125,436)- (10,700) 48,662 1,572 36 (1 1,902) 93,439 1,327 16.500 114,035 642,590 305,622 199,225 1,500 625 (45,000) 56,204 258,403 120,149 81,585 252 1,212 (1 1,317) 6,600 4oo/a 39'/o 410/o 170/o 0% 42% 25% 120k 266,'113 118,204 81,632 939 (6,720) 45,943 (7,7',10) 1,945 (47) 252 ^-: (4,597) (39,343) 463,867 18,621 8,326 10,380 916 (593) 40% 410k 410/o 210/o 400/0 0% 516, 149 18,348 8,205 16,208 5'19 (551) (s2,282) 273 121 (5,828) 397 \42) s1,090 '176,976 69,223 94,701 12,U2 1,292 9,085 1,537,755 3,621 370k 490k 340/0 69% 370k uo 650k 200/0 46% 360/o 46% 440/o 1,808,295 2,367,268 70,019 6.983 00k 10.038 (3,055) 't,170,658 45,827 20,304 50,000 2,300 '16.500 16.500 100% 4,174,842 1 ,922,330 42,824 202,412 79,923 46,039 11,270 299 755 20,987 1,444,316 2,294 20.480 13 440 66% 95 13,345 138,911 364,263 203,496 136,800 35,000 1,000 2,000 45,560 3,360,173 '10,050 5,484,411 2.437,287 487 .171 587,628 (100,457) City of Salem, Virginia Debt Outstanding For Period Ending November 30, 2015 lssuances Principal Payments (400,000) @,itq) (89,425) (531,239) (700,000) (73,186) (477,250], (275,s75) (1 ,526,01 1) Schedule F Balance 't 1t30t2015 ztl,ozt 560,388 5,756,238 8,1 13,250 4,941,475 '19,642,378 --@@4W- Balance 7t1t2015 City Debt Outstanding 2003A Public lmprovement Bonds 2004 Refunding Bonds (of 1995 & 1996 PIB) 2006 Public lmprovement Bonds 20108 VMWACO Series G Build America Bonds 2010C VMWACO Series H Taxable Bonds 2010D VMWACO Bonds I Tax Exempt Bonds 2011 Union First Market Refunding Bonds 2013 Public lmprovement Bonds 2015 Key Bank Refunding Bonds Total City Debt Outstanding School Debt Outstanding 2003A Public lmprovement Bonds 2004 Refunding Bonds (of 1995 & 1996 PIB) 2010D VMWACO Bonds I Tax Exempt Bonds 2011 Union First Market Refunding Bonds 20124 Public lmprovement Bonds 2013 Public lmprovement Bonds Total School Debt Out8tanding Total Debt Outstanding 400,000 23,568 86,278 2,700,000 50,000 3,198,379 3,330,576 '1,692,950 1,932,097 13,4'13,848 700,000 271 ,027 560,388 5,829,424 8,590,500 5,217,050 21,168,389 ze,ioa 86,278 2,700,000 50,000 3,198,379 3,288,762 1,603,525 1 ,932,097 12,882,609 --44@N- City of Salem, Virginia Capital Projects Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenditures For Period Ending November 30, 2015 Poed Total Available year ToBudqet To Date Encumbrances Proiect Balance Date 80,330 1s,1275,406 1- 252,60077,062 174.44117,868 1 1,892 2,379 1- 400,972 Schedule G 162,428 (70e) Fund Balance, July 1, 2015 Revenues: ERP-Transfer From cF ERP-Transfer From EF ERP-Transfer From Schools ERP-2013 Bonds Cama System-Transfer From GF GTG-2013 Bonds Sharepoint-20'13 Bonds Document [i]gmt Solution-2o1 3 Bonds Biqcle & Ped Safety Impr Prog-Federal Bic-ycle & Ped Safety lmpr Prog-Slate Greenway Phase 2B-Enhancement Greenway Phase 28-2013 Bonds lnterest Greenway Phase 2B-Xfer cF Greenway Phase 4-RSTP Greenway Phase 4-Enhancement Greenway Phase 4-2013 Bonds Greenway Phase 4-Xfer GF Greenway Phase s-RSTP Greenway Phase 5-Enhancement Greenway Phase 5-2013 Bonds Greenway Phase s-Xfer GF Greenway Donations Mason Creek Greenway Phase 2-Federal Mason Creek Greenway Phase 2-Local TotalRevenues Exoenditures: ERP - New World ERP . PCI Cama System GTG Sharepoint Document Mgmt Solution Bicycle & Pedestrian Safety lmpr Prog Rke River Greenway Phase 28 Rke River Greenway Phase 4-Apperson Rke River Greenway Phase s-Eddy Greenway Donations Mason Creek Greenway Phase 2 Field Turf Replacement Salem Stadium Total Expendltures Fund Balance, November 30, 2015 223,879 302,400 .t50,000 123,800 115,000 38,045 12,500 13,000 299,789 33,3'10 450,903 1,109 4,246 800,000 80,330 15,127 5,407 262,600 25'1,503 17,869 1,892 2,340 400,972 108,994 3,715,055 500,079 300,000 1'15,000 38,045 12,500 't3,000 333,099 456,258 900,864 533,864 2,340 509,966 1,277,948 470,949 266,893 82,334 75.215 26,775 100,862 96,902 251,294 1,371,224 1,277,94a 490,949 278,033 '102,334 75.2'15 125,800 224,652 124,420 2,437,107 223,879 302,400 150,000 123,800 115,000 38,045 12,500 13,000 65,875 7,319 20,658 't,'162 4.246 80.330 15,127 5,406 77,062 17,868 1,892 2,379 223,879 302,400 150,000 123,800 115,000 38,045 12,s00 13,000 65,875 7,319 20,658 1,162 4,246 233,914 25,991 430,245 (53) 800.000 (762) 20,000 11,140 20,000 99,025 123,790 27,918 9,130 21,967 12,666 38,045 12,500 13,000 257,8A4 330,458 676,212 409,044 2,380 509,966 251 ,294 (251,294\ 1,600 '.010 80 3 715,055 301,873 '1,673,097 2,041,958 Schedule H City of Salem, Virginia Electric Fund Statement of Operations For Five Months Ending November 30, 2015 Operating Revenues Sale of Power Other Electric Revenue Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenses Total Operating Expenses lncome (loss) Before Transfers Transfers lncome (loss) Current Year Budget $ 39,725,000 895,284 40,620,284 37,460,284 3,160,000 (3,160,000) Cunent Year Year to Date $ 16,474,201 't't0,751 16,584,952 17,',t67 '15,417 9,324,295 '1,558,813 ,t3,415 364,874 458,952 205,664 471 ,705 17,66'l 1,113,288 Prior Year Year to Date $ 16,701,438 84,851 ll-qlqg?lq 43,O23 6,923 10,370,526 1,492,272 1,214 330,309 390,169 156,322 2,108,752 43.269 849,963 Other Power Generation - Operation 135,000 Other Power Generation - Maintenance 55,688 Purchased Power 24,950,641 Transmission - Operation 3,510,500 Transmission - lvlainlenance 24,000 Distribution - Operations 875,907 Distribution - Maintenance 1,0U,246 Customer Service 494,323 Administration & General - Operation 2,535,512 Administration & General - Maintenance 149.500Capital 3,175,389Contingency 519,578 o/o ol Budget 4',to/o ,t2% 41% Variance $ (227 ,237) 25,900 (201,337\ (25,856) 8,4 (1,046,23',1\ 66,54't '12,202 34,565 68,782 49,342 (1,637,O47) (25,608) 263,325 ,130k 28vo 37% 44Yo 56% 42o/o 44% 42% 19% 12% 35% 0!o 36% 50o/o _q______________ _$___111!199_ 15,792,743 (2,231 ,492\ 993,546 2,030,154 (1,580,000) _$____9s3,546 _$___1!!J_!1_ 13,561,252 3,023,700 (1,580,000) City of Salem, Virginia Water Fund Statement of Operations For Five Months Ending November 30, 2015 Current Year Budget $ 6,606,000 399,125 7,005,125 o/o of Budget 42Vo 32o/o 410k Schedule I Variance $ 88,732 29,418 1 '1 8,1 50 Current Year Year to Date $ 2,744,0't2 128,4',t8 2,872,430 309,409 161 ,863 241,629 899 JOZ '153,541 5,124 7,1 56 2,808 34,228 37 ,552 20,155 Prior Year Year to Date $ 2,655,280 99,000 ._arr _ 296,344 162,008 203,292 151 ,551 4,588 6,510 391 30,663 35,253 21,224 Operating Revenues Services Other Revenue Total Operating Revenues Opsrating Expenses Production Salaries of Personnel Fringe Benefits Contractual Services Printing and Binding Advertising Utilities Communications lnsurance Travel and Training Miscellaneous Materials and Supplies Capital Contingency Total Production Expenses Distibution Salaries of Personnel Fringe Benefits Contractual Services Communications lnsurance Lease/Rent of Equipment Travel and Training Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Credits l\ilaterials and Supplies Capital lnterest Obligations Total Distribution Expenses lncome (loss) Before Transfens Transfers lncome (loss) 695,998 455,964 63'r ,969 8,200 500 367,000 5,000 15,100 8,000 42,423 163,500 373,064 532,256 3,298,974 521,398 275,496 743,260 4,550 10,000 2,000 3,600 10,488 (312,000) 277 ,293 240,000 1 ,800,066 3,576,15l 130,000 (130,000) i- 974,725 218,637 93,849 208,085 147_ 1 ,354 3,579 (104,190) 57 ,77 5 29,307 3,1',tz 51 1,654 '1,386,050 (60,935) _q__.1.',!?!J6 44o/o 35% 38% 11o/o 720k 42Yo 1020/0 470k 35o/o 81o/o 23o/o 50/o 0o/o 30o/o 42o/o 34o/o 28o/o 3o/o 0o/o 0o/o 380k 34Yo 330h 21o/o 12o/o 0o/o '140h 9',t1,824 232,519 101 ,835 286,163 704- 1,343 2,372 (110,287) 98,830 43,429 4,149 66'l,056 'l ,'181 ,400 62p02 (13,882) (7,986) (78,078) (557) 11 ,t ,207 6,097 (41,056) (14,',t22) (1 ,037) ('t49,402\ 204,650 13,065 (145) 38,337 899 362 1,990 536 646 2,4',17 3,566 2,299 (1,069) 470k (40,865) (20,070) $ 1,140.535 $ 184.s81 City of Salem, Virginia Sewer Fund Statement of Operations For Five Months Ending November 30, 2015 Current Year Budget $ 7,061,000 793,0',t7 7,854,017 Current Year Year to Date $ 2,899,064 48,894 2,947 ,957 o/o of Budget 410/o 38% Prior Year Year to Date $ 2,950,831 31 , l55 2,981,987 Schedule J Variance $ (51,768) 17,739 (34,029) Operating Revenues Services Other Revenue Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenses Salaries of Personnel Fringe Beneflts Contractual Services Advertising Utilities Communications lnsurance Lease/Rent of Equipment Travel and Training lvliscellaneous Miscellaneous Credits Materials and Supplies Capital lnterest Obligations Contingency Total Operating Expenses lncome (loss) 493,216 343,',t45 3,374,086 3,000 4,000 9,050 19,000 3,000 6,600 27 ,045 (325,000) 78,000 1,525,272 't,780,o71 513,532 7,854,017 $- 175,302 90,879 1,307,'t56 249 881 't47 5,066 759 14,934 (123,680) 34,087 173,658 57,641 1 ,737 ,078 _$__!10,qzg_ 360/o 260h 39o/o 80h 2o/o 27% 0% ,120h 550k 380h 440h 't10/o 3o/o 0o/o 22o/o 148,308 79,142 '1 ,070,106 876 704 4,124 844 4,706 (99,019) 11,226 47,888 30,037 26,993 1',t ,737 237 ,050 249 (557) 942 (85) 10,228 (24,662) 22,861 125,770 27 ,604 't ,298,942 438,1 36 _$_-1.q9!p1! _$324_qq Schedule K City of Salem, Virginia Salem Civic Center Statement of Operations For Five Months Ending November 30, 2015 Operating Revenues Shows/rentals Box office shows Catering and concessions Merchandise and commissions Static advertising Miscellaneous income NCAA events Salem Fair Blue Ridge Music Festival Reserve for encumbrances Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenses Salaries of personnel Fringe benefits Maintenance and contractual services Printing and binding Advertising Utilities Communicalions lnsurance Traveland training Miscellaneous Show expense NCM expense Blue Ridge Music Festival Materials and supplies Capital Reduction Total Operating Expenses lncome (loss) Befo.€ Transfers Transfers lncome (loss) Current Year Current YearBudget Year to Date $ 385,000 1,060,000 156,000 1 19,000 62,500 20,'r00 307,000 142.500 10,000 $ 191,722 563,750 56,516 67,393 33,743 1,296 20,124 152,271 2,250 o/o ol Budqet 5Oo/o sSvo 36Vo 57o/o 54o/o 6% 7% 107o/o 23vo o% 48Vo 49yo 380k 33% 17% 41% 440/o 44% ovo 71% 370h 5',lo/o 7o/o ook 270/o Oo/o 0% Prior Year Year to Date $ 't42,214 259,613 53,930 70,923 54,892 12,974 49,033 168,351 133,150 Variance $ 49,507 304,'136 2,586 (3,530) (21,149) (11,677) (28,90e) (16,080) (130,900) 2,262,100 957,639 421,636 164,680 3,500 51 ,000 252,285 24,OOO 20,000 15,500 56,114 1,060,000 307,000 52,416 1,089,065 47'1,338 158,974 54,',t0'l 608 20,979 1 10,336 10,545 11,01'l 20,935 538,918 22,599 14,157 - 945,080 459,215 155,753 77,877 945 40,447 112,282 9,703 1'l,916 16,291 74,493 26,449 19,162 19,870 ,143,984 12,123 3,222 (23,776) (338) (19,668) (1,946) 842 (905) 4,845 4U,425 (3,850) (19,162) (5,7't4l 3,385,770 (.t,123,670\ 1,123,670 1,434,502 420/o (us,437\ 561,835 $ $ 216,398 't,024,603 409,899 (79,523) (265,914) 561,835 $ 482,312 $ (265,914) City of Salem, Virginia Salem Catering and Concessions Statement of Operations For Five Months Ending November 30, 2015 Current Year Budget $ 651,082 143,500 47,000 16,000 857,582 '191,950 107,495 12,500 1,000 13,000 850 :^-225 135,583 153,973 Current Year Year lo Date o/o ol Budget 44% 24% 69% 380/0 42yo 59o/o 28% 39% o% 42Vo 35% 0% 0o/o 4',tvo 56vo ovo OVo 480/0 34Vo 35vo 21vo 22lo 27% 640/o 54Vo 42Vo 73% 5'lvo 60Yo 65% 54yo 00h 480k Prior Year Year to Date Schedule L 8,334 492 311 (80) (221) 2S (75) (5,200) 18,777 Operating Revenues: Catering Concessions Moyer Concessions Salem High Concessions Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenses: Cateino Salaries of personnel Fringe benefits Contractual services Printing and binding Laundry and Cleaning Communications lnsurance Travel and training Miscellaneous Materials and supplies Capital Reduction Total Catering Expenses Concessions Salaries of Personnel Fringe Benefits Miscellaneous Materials and Supplies Total Concessions Expenses Mover Concessions Salaries of Personnel Fringe Benefits Contractual services Miscellaneous l\4aterials and Supplies Total Moyer Expenses Salem Hiah Concessions Salaries of Personnel Fringe Benerits l\4iscellaneous Materials and Supplies Total Salem Hlgh Expenses lncome (loss) $ 288,648 34,369 32,231 6,155 361,403 113,748 30,515 4,852 5,472 296 55,46; 86,550 $ 270,235 15,433 22,330 Variance $ 18,413 18,936 9,90'l6,544 (390) 314,542 46,86'l '105,413 30,023 4,540 80 5,693 267 75 60,669 67,773 6'16,576 55,639 16,787 51,350 35,500 '159,276 28,972 8,902 2,500 6,750 14,500 61 ,624 12,714 4,242 300 2,850 20,106 296,901 18,713 5,809 't1,o27 7,737 43,286 18,527 4,818 1,O42 4,933 7,430 36,749 8,261 2,300 1,382 1 1 ,943 $ (27 .475\ 274,534 8,994 2,746 5,344 4,215 21 ,299 22,860 6,891 't,042 3,421 7,265 41,478 4,361 1,235 26 't,877 22,367 9,719 3,063 5,683 3,522 21,987 (4,333) (2,073) 1,5'.t2 ,t64 (4,729\ 3,900 1,065 (26) (495) 4,44459% 7.499 $ (30,268) $ 2.792 Schedule l\il City of Salem, Virginia Health lnsurance Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenses For Five Months Ending November 30,2015 Budget Current Year Percent Year to Date to Date Prior Year Year to Date Variance Beginning Fund Balance Revenue Premiums Paid - City Premiums Paid - School Premiums Paid - Retirees lnterest Earnings Miscellaneous Total Year to Date Revenues Expenses Claims Employee Health Clinic Consulting Services Miscellaneous Total Year to Date Expenses Ending Fund Balance 6,0'15,780 5,284,000 715,000 5,500 't2,020,280 1'1,496,406 407,274 59,300 57,300 12,020,280 $ $ 724,35',1 2,260,795 1 ,E37 ,622 360,411 3,164 4,462,032 3,800,894 't99,728 .10,596 3,404 4.O14,622 _$__ 1;1?1,?61 4,540,600 4,502,658 189,744 I 0,4.16 2,395 4,70s,213 $ 994,771 (78,568) (70't,764) 9,984 '180 I ,009 (690,s91) _$___12!:999_ 38Vo 3svo 50o/o 58vo 0!o $ 1,159,384 2,335,68E 1,861,663 340,231 3,018 $ (435,033) (74,893) (24,041) 20,180 146 40 370k 330/0 49o/o lEo/o 6Vo 33o/o rEM#5-- DATE 1 I') I' AN ORDINANCE enacted pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2006 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, providing for vacating a portion of a street in the City of Salem, Virginia. WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Council of the City of Salem pursuant to the provisions ofthe aforesaid Section 15.2-2006, requesting that the following unimproved alley be permanently vacated and discontinued: a certain unimproved 12' alley, located off Pyrtle Drive, with the entrance located 150' south from the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Pyrtle Drive extending a total of480'; said application being filed on behalf of Ronald Lee and Betty Clingenpeel, property owners; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 1277 adopted on the 14o day of December 2015, the Council of the City of Salem, Virginia, appointed viewers to report whether or not in their opinion any and ifany, what, inconvenience would result from permanently vacating the aforesaid alley as set forth in the application; and WHEREAS, the viewers reported in writing under date of January 5,2016, that, after having been duly swom they viewed the said street and are unanimously of the opinion that no inconvenience would result to anyone from permanently vacating and discontinuing a certain unimproved 12' alley,located off Pyrtle Drive, with the entrance located 150' south from the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Pyrtle Drive extending a total of480'; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code Section 15.2-2006, the applicants in this proceeding have caused a public notice to be published in the Salem Times Register, a newspaper published and having general circulation in the City of Salem, Virginia, such publication having been made twice, with a lease six days elapsing between the fist and second publication, to wit: on November 26, and December 3,2015, and such notice specified the time and place ofhearing, to wit: January 11,2016, at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City of Salem, at which persons affected may appear and present their views, all of which is shown by a Certificate of Publication executed by the Roanoke Times and filed with the papers in this proceeding; and WHEREAS, proper notice has been giving to the land proprietors along the street affected by the closing; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the evidence submitted, is of the opinion that vacating, discontinuing, and closing the aforesaid alley will not abridge or destroy any ofthe rights and privileges ofany person, and that no inconvenience would result to anyone therefrom, and it is further ofthe opinion that the request ofthe applicants should be granted; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COTINCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, a certain unimproved 12' alley,located off Pyrtle Drive, with the entrance located 150 feet south fiom the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Pyrtle Drive extending a total of480 feet, be permanently vacated, discontinued, and closed as provided by Section 15.2- 2006 ofthe Code of Virginia as amended to date; and in accordance with the law in such cases made and provided, title to said vacated alley shall vest in each adjacent property owner to the centerline of the vacated alley; such vacation however, shall be subject to an easement retained by the City for public utilities. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED BY THE COL]NCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, that a certified copy of this ordinance be delivered by the City Clerk to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Salem, Virginia, for recordation therein, and to the City Engineer of the City of Salem, Virginia, and that the City Engineer of Salem, Virginia, make appropriate notation ofthe vacation herein approved, on the maps and other documents in his office. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions ofthis ordinance be and the same are herby repealed. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its final passage. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: James L. Chisom - William D. Jones - Jane W. Johnson - John C. Civens - Byron Randolph Foley - Passed: Effective: t. / Mayor Attest: James E. Taliaferro, II Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia rEM# 56 oml'7.c; lU, AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND, REVISE, AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 106, Article II District Regulations, Sections 106-210.2(A)(5), 106-210.3(BX1),106-212.2 (BX5), 106-212.3(BX1), 106- 218.2(BX6), 106-218.3(CX1), 106-218.3(CX2), 106-220.2(B)(6), and 106-220.3(CX1), 106- 220.3(C)(2), Article III Use and Design Standards, Sections 106-310.19, 106-312.3, Article IV Development Standards, Sections 106-404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Article VI Definitions and Use Types, Sections 106-602.9, and 106-602.11, pertaining to breweries and microbreweries, site development regulations, and definitions. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COLINCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, that Sections 106-210.2(AX5), 106-210.3(B)(1),106-212.2 (B)(s), 106-212.3(BX1), 106-218.2(BX6), 106-218.3(cXl), 106-218.3(CX2), t06-220.2(B)(6), and 106-220.3(cXl), 106-220.3(C)(2), Article II, Sections 106-310.19, 106-312.3, Article III, Sections 106-404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Article IV, Sections 106-602.9, and 106-602.11, Article VI, Chapter 106, of The Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, be amended, revised, and reordained to read as follows: CHAPTER 106 ARTICLE II DISTRICT REGULATIONS SECTION 106-210 DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT. Sec. 106-210.2. - Permitted uses.(A) The following uses are permitted by right in the DBD Downtown Business District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards 5. Commercial Use Types Antique Shops Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail Business or Trade School Business Support Services Commercial Indoor Entertai nment Communication Services Consumer Repair Services Convenience Store Day Care Center * Funeral Services Homestay Inn * Hotel,Motel,Motor Lodge Microbrewery+ Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant Retail Sales Studio. Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic Sec. 106-210.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the DBD Downtown Business District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards.(B) Minimum and Maximum Setback Requirements. l. PrincipalStructure: Front Yard: W.-Zero; Exception: Maximum of 20 feet if for outdoor patio-style dining. Front yard shall only be used for patio-style outdoor dining. No front yard shall be used for any parking area or otherwise designed or devoted to any vehicle use. SECTION 106-212 TRANSITIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. Sec. 106-212.2. - Permitted uses.(B) The following uses are permitted by special exception in the TBD Transitional Business District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards 5. Commercial Use Types Assembly Hall Commercial Indoor Amusement Hospital Microbrewery* Sec. 106-212.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the TBD Transitional Business District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards.(B) Minimum and Maximum Setback Requirements. L Principal Structure: Front Yard: ]'le+{inimum Zero; Exception: Maximum of 20 feet if lor outdoor patio-style dining. Front yard shall only be used for patio-style dining. No front yard shall be used for any parking area or otherwise designed or devoted to any vehicle use. SECTION 106.218 LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICT. Sec. 106-218.2. - Permitted uses.(B) The following uses are permitted by special exception in the LM Light Manufacturing District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards.6. Industrial Use Types Asphalt Plant + Brewery* Industry Type II Landfill, Construction Debris Landfill, Rubble Landfill, Sanitary Meat Packing and Related Industries Railroad Facilities Resource Extraction Scrap and Salvage Services Sec. 106-218.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the LM Light Manufacturing District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards.(C) Maximum Height of Structures. l. Principal Structures: 45 70 feet 2. Accessory Structures: 70 feet. SECTION 106-220 HEAVY MANUFACTURING DISTRICT. Sec. 106-220.2. - Permitted uses. (B) The following uses are permitted by special exception in the HM Heavy Manufacturing District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards. 6. Industrial Use Types Brewery* Industry Type III Landfi ll, Construction Debris Landfill, Rubble Landfill, Sanitary Resource Extraction Scrap and Salvage Services Sec. 106-220.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the HM Heavy Manufacturing District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards. (C) Maximum Height of Structures. 1. Principal Structures: 45 7 5 feet 2. AccessoryStructures: 75 feet ARTICLE III USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION 106-310 COMMERCIAL USES. Sec. 106-310.19. - Microbreweries.(A) General standards: 1. Such establishments shall include a tasting area, and may include restaurant, retail, and live entertainrnent uses. 2. First floor frontage shall have at least 50yo transparency from the street, and shall be primarily occupied by non-industrial uses. Sec. 106-312.3. - Breweries. (A) General standards: l. Such establishments may also include restaurants, tasting rooms, and retail related to the beverage being produced. ARTICLE IV DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION 106-404 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS. Sec. 106-404.17. - Minimum parking required. (E) Commercial Use Types Microbrewery(F) Industrial Use Types Brewery Schedule B Schedule B ARTICLE VI DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES SECTION IO6-602 USE TYPES. Sec. 106-602.9. - Commercial use types. [The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:] Athletic Instruction Services. Establishments primarily engaged in providing indoor instruction and training in athletic sports that require high ceiling heights for the activity. Typical uses include gymnastics academies, baseball and softball training centers, tennis centers and golf centers. Microbrewery. An establishment engaged in the production ofbeer with a significant commercial component, such as a restaurant or retail store. Sec. 106-602.11. - Industrial use types. [The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:] Brewery. An establishment primarily engaged in the production of beer for distribution. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions ofthis ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its final passage. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: James L. Chisom - William D. Jones - Jane W. Johnson - John C. Givens - Byron Randolph Foley - Passed: Effective: Mayor ATTEST: James E. Taliafeno, II Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia ITEM #- DATE r . ., AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND, REVISE, AND REORDAIN SECTION 26-38 (b), ARTICLE II, CHAPTER 26, OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, PERTAINING TO PRECINCT A OR CONEHURST PRECINCT. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COLINCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGNIA, thAt Section 26-38 (b), Article II, Chapter 26, of The Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, be amended, revised, and reordained to read as follows: CHAPTER 26 ELECTIONS ARTICLE II. PRECINCTS; VOTING PLACES. Section 26-38. Precinct A or Conehurst Precinct. (b) Voting place. The voting place in Precinct A or Conehurst Precinct shall be and thesameisherebyestablished,aslongasitisavailable,at@ €ente+Salem Civic Center, 1001 Roanoke Boulevard. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its final passage. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: James L. Chisom - William D. Jones - Jane W. Johnson - John C. Givens - Byron Randolph Foley - Passed: Effective: /ol Mayor ATTEST: James E. Taliaferro, II Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia ITEM#-LJ,- AN oRDINANCE To AMEND sECTroN 106-110, ARTTcLE I, cHAprER 106, oF THE coorbE'Hni I I IL CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, RELATING TO ZONING AND DIVIDING THE CITY INTO BUILDING DISTRICTS AND ESTABLISHING DISTRICT BOUNDARY LINES ON THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, that Section 106-110, Article I, Chapter 106 ofThe Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, relating to building district boundary lines be amended in the following particular and no other, viz: That the following described property in the City of Salem, of H2V Properties LLC, property owner, being the property located at 201 West Main Street (Tax Map Number 122-1-5), be and the same is hereby changed from RSF Residential Single Family District to DBD Downtown Business District: BEGINNING at a point marking the northwest comer of the intersection of Lewis Avenue and Main Street in the Town of Salem and designated as Point "A" on a Map made by Raymond E. Roberston, State Certified Land Surveyor, a copy of which is recorded in Deed Book 710, page 304, Clerk's Office, Circuit Court, County of Roanoke, Virginia; thence leaving said point of BEGINNING and with the West line of Lewis Avenue North 1l deg. 55' West, 92.84 feet to a point designated as "B" on said map and marked by an iron pin; thence leaving the West side of Lewis Avenue and with the new division line through the property now or formerly of Wiley, South 78 deg. 00' West, 142.64 feel to a point in the center of Dry Branch designated as "C" on said plat; thence with the center of Dry Branch South 16 deg.24' East,92.17 feet to a point where the center of Dry Branch intersects with the No(h line of Main Street; thence with the North line of Main Street North 78 deg.24' East, 135.46 feet to the place of BEGINNING All ordinances or parts ofordinances in conflict with the provisions ofthis ordinance be and the salne are hereby repealed. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its final passage. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: James L. Chisom - William D. Jones - Jane W. Johnson - John C. Givens - Byron Randolph Foley - Passed: Effective: ls/ Mayor ATTEST: James E. Taliaferro, II Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia UNAPPROVED MINUTES PTANNING COMMISSION january 13, 2016 A regular meeting ofthe Planning Commission ofthe City ofSalem, Vir8inia, was held in Council Chambers, City Hall, 114 Nonh Broad Street, at 7:00 p.m., onjanuary 13, 2016, there being present all the members of said Commission, to wit: Vicki G. Oaulton, gruce N. Thomasson, limmy W. Robertson, Samuel R. Caner, lll, and Denise P. King with Vicki G. Daulton, Chair, presiding; together with lames E. Taliaferro, ll, Assistant City Manager and Executive Secretary, ex officio member ofsaid Commission; William L. Simpson, Jr., Assistant City Engineer; Eenjamin W. Tripp, Planner; Judy L. Hough, Planner; Mary Ellen Wines, Zoning Administrator; and William C. Maxwell, Assistant City Attorney; and the following business was transacted: The December 16, 2015, work session and regular meeting minutes were approved as written. ln re: owner. for rezoninl the orooertv located at 201 West Main Street (Tax Mao fl122-1-51 from RSF Residential Sinsle Familv Distrid to DBD Downtown Business District The Executive Secretary reported that this date and time had been set to hold a public hearing to consider the request of H2V Propenies LLC, property owner, for rezoning the properties located at 201 West Main Street (Tax Map #122-1-5) from RSF Residential Single Family District to DBD Downtown Business District; and WH€REAS, the Executive Secretaryfurther reported that notice of such hearing had been published in the December 31, 2015, and January 7,2016, issues ofthe 5g!C!!_I!!g!-EgEi:!C! and WHEREAS, staff noted the following: the subject property consists of one parcel located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Lewis Avenue and West Main Street; the total acreage is approximately.3 acres, and the property is occupied by a one-story vacant office building; the applicant states that he and his panner would like to turn the building into a co- working office space, similar to a co-lab; this concept involves a shared ofrice environment that is used by independent individuals, often with their own business; the us€rs benefit from proximity to other creative individuals and their ideas and hopefully this results in synergy that fosters entrepreneurship; the Zoning Administrator has determined that this activity is consistent with the "Office" use type, which is a by-right use in DBO; the Future Land Use Map desiSnates 2 this propertys future use as "Downtown"; and a portion ofthis property lies within the Floodway boundary; and WHEREAT Justin vanBlaricom, property owner, appeared before the Commission explaining the rezoning request; he presented the Commission with a handout for his presentation ofthe property and also ofthe second item on the agenda; he stated the building shown on the handout is clearly not a single family ,esidential building; which is the current zoning; the building was buih and used as office space as long as he can remember; he recently purchased the building and found out that zoning was single family and was grandfathered for business use; he feels the DBD Downtown Business Distrid zoning is a more fitting description, and it is the future land use designation forthis area; further, it is the last building in downtown Salem;the proposed use is to make it much likethe Grandin Co-Lab, a co-working space; he noted that he was born in Salem, grew up in Roanoke and went to Roanoke College; he believes that a lot of young people from the area who go to Roanoke College move away for a couple of years, much like he did; he was gone for 10 or 11 years and just recently moved back to Roanoke; he thinks that there is a good opportunity to keep some ofthe Roanoke College students in town, if they can have a place to operate a business while they are in college; he also thinks the facility will work well for people who work out of their homes that do not have office space; his wife worked from home foryears and with three children around, it is a little tough to get work done; these type of co-working environments allow people to have office space and a mailing address without the expense of having to rent a huge space; he further discussed the handout showing the exterior and interior concepts; they are working with the Building Official to make sure they meet the criteria with regards to renovating; part ofthe building is in the floodway so there are restrictions as far as how much can be done to renovate it; they are working to make sure that they stay within the 5096 of the assessed value of the building; and he further discussed the renovations and repairs to the buildin8; another reason for the rezoning is that the.e is not a lot of parking on the property; the parking is in the back, and there are eight or nine spaces maybe; in this type of establishment as opposed to normal office space the majority of the people are using public transportation, bikes, and walking from the neighborhood in order to operate their business; further, they are not allthere during normal business hours rather at different times of the day; so, the parking should not be an issue with a lot of people from Roanoke College, etc., who will come by bike or walk; he has spoken to Roanoke College and they have their center for entrepreneurship coming up; one ofthe restridions at Roanoke College is that students cannot operate a business on campus; he expeds that this would also apply at most public and private universities; so the students will learn and have their programs, etc. at that facility, but they will not be able to operate their businesses so they will send them to this facility and hopefully some 3 ofthem will stay in town after school and Srow the business to where they need to move it other properties in salem; and WHEREAS, Vice ChairThomasson noted what he likes aboutthis isthat it keepstheyoung people here and hopefully they will cultivate a business that is successful and keeps them in the valley; Mr. vanBlaricom noted he absolutely agreed with him; and WHEREAS, Commissioner KinB asked if the front entrance would be in the current location, and Mr. vanBlaricom noted that it would be at the same location; he further elaborated the entrances to the building; and wHEREAS, Chair Daulton noted as opposed to a seasoned business owner that needs to have space is he hoping to attrad more young people just starting a business; Mr. vanBlaricom noted he is hoping to have a good mix of both; he has talked with lim Flowers of VT Knowledgeworks, a business incubator in the Virginia Tech Corporate Research Center, about having some programs for entrepreneurs to start up their business; he has also talked to Ariel Lev at the Grandin Co-Lab, and a lot of their business comes from people who were already operating a business but were working from their home; so he wants to have a place where they can also inco.porate the younger people because a lot of what these co-working spaces drive is working together; this way the older established business owners can kind ofmentorthe younger ones; this is the concept of how the facility will work; he believes that it will work well in Salem as Salem is a very loyal place; he believes if the community can get behind it, then it will be a good way to keep some ofthe youth and entrepreneurs in town; and WHEREAS, Vice Chair Thomasson noted with the synergy between creative people and legal people, we never know what can happen; and WHEREAS, Chair Daulton asked how many people is he hoping to have at the facility - what would be the capacity; Mr. vanBlaricom noted that there are three different classes; there will be 5 or 6 private offices depending on what they do with one of those spaces; most of the revenue from an establishment like this comes from desk rentals so they will have a room with this type of setup; it will max out with probably 10 to 12 desk rentals; the third class will be memberships; he believes that it will be hard to get 30 memberships; he further discussed the setup ofthe facility, special events, and the number of people he mi8ht expect to be in the facility at one time; and 4 WHEREAS, Commissioner King noted that parking was a concern for her even though there is parking on Lewis Avenue; she stated that while she was there at the property she pulled around to the back ofthe building; she is concerned about the ai. conditioning units fo. the Glen Mary Apartments which are located adiacent to the parking for the building; she noted that it would be very easy to hit the units while trying to back up in the parking lot; Mr. vanBlaricom noted that he think that a large part of the parkinS area should be handicapped parking as it would not be fair for them to have to park on the street; he thinks the spaces will be limited; he further noted that the apartments are forsale or being sold so he willwork with the new owners to make sure their property is protected as well; and WHEREAS, Commissioner Robertson asked if there would be scheduling of time for the various parts of the building; Mr. vanBlaricom noted that this would only be done for the conference rooms; he noted with the memberships in this type of facility, there is no long term contracts; they will only have memberships up to the amount of desks they have in the facility; and then there will be a standard memberships which will be for the room that is like a lounge- type business environment; he noted that room is where a lot ofthe work gets done in this type offacility; further, there rarely are that many people who would be there at the same time; he cannot imagine having more than 30 people in the building at one time; Commissioner Robertson asked if a person rents a desk, then that is literally their desk until they decide to give it up, is that correct, and Mr. vanBlaricom noted this was correct; WHEREAS, Commissioner Robertson asked if the area is locked, and M.. vanBlaricom noted that the area is not locked but the desks do have locks; Mr. vanBlaricom further discussed security for the facility, etc.; and WHEREAS, Chair Daulton asked if they would be installing telephones on the desks, and Mr. vanBlaricom noted that they are working on the phone systems; the private offices will have phone systems, but a lot ofthe young entrepreneurs have Skype and things such as this where they use a headset attached to their computers so there is not a real need for the infrastructure ofphone systems; Vice ChairThomasson noted they also have cell phones which havetaken over the land lines; Mr. vanBlaricom noted that they will have access to printing etc. on site; further, they will have coffee the.e as well, but the goal is not to compete with any local businesses in this reSards; and WHEREAS, Chair Daulton noted it appears there are several areas with printers or copy machines set up, and Mr. vanBlaricom noted that this was correcu he wants it to be a modern 5 business environment, and he funher discussed the printihS, etc., and noted they are still working out the details; and WHEREAS, Commissioner King noted that it is a neat idea, and it has worked really well in other cities; and WHEREAS, no other person(s) appeared related to said request; and ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER KING, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR THOMASSON, AND DULY CARRIED, the Planning Commission of the City of Salem doth recommend to the Councilofthe City ofSalem that the request of H2V Properties, LLC, property owner, for rezoning the property located at 201 West Main Street (Tax Map #122-1-5) from RSF Residential Single Family District to DBD Downtown Business Distrid be approved -the roll callvote: all aye. ln re: Hold oublic hearinr to consider the reouest of PLM Ventures LLC. DroDertv owner, for rezoninq the orooertv locatd at 1037 East Rlverside Drive fiax Mao f24&+2) from TBD Transitional Business Distrid to HBD Hirhwav Business Distrid The Executive Secretary reported that this date and time had been set to hold a public hearing to consider the request of PLM Ventures LLC, property owner, for rezoning the property located at 1037 East Riverside Drive (Tax Map *248-4-2)from TBD Transitional Business District to HBD Highway Business District; and WHEREAS, the Executive Secretary further reported that notice of such hearing had been published in the December 31, 2015, and January 7, 2016, issues of the 5a!C[I!l!e!8ggi!!gI; and WHEREAS, staff noted the following: the subject property consists of a sinSle parcel located at the intersection of East Riverside Drive and Apperson Drive; the property is adjacent to the Roanoke River Greenway and is currently vacant; across Riverside Drive is Aqua Pros, a pools, hot tubs and hearth business, and across Apperson Drive is a vacant restaurant; this request is to rezone the .575 acre parcel from TBD Transitional Business Distrid to HBD HiShway Business District; the new property owner would like to use the propertY to increase usaSe ofthe greenway in Salem; he is proposingto make the building into a food truck dining room for patrons to eat as well as adding outdoor dining space; the facility also would be rented for paint nights/birthday parties/exercise classes on the greenway; under the current zoning desiSnation, CITY OF SALEM ITEM #1 PLANNING COMTTIISSION STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Meeting Date: CityAdministrative Stafi January 13,2016 Report prepared: January 8, 2016 RE: Hold public hearing to consider the request of H2V Properties LLC, property owner, for rezoning the properties located at 201 West Main Street (Tax Map # 122-1-5) from RSF Residential Single Family District to DBD Downtown Business District. S[,ecxaWIESIlE: Zoning: RSF Residential Single Family Diskict Land Use Plan Designation: Downtown Proposed Zoning: DBD Downtown Business District Existing Use: Vacant office space Proposed Use: Co-working office space BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The subjec{ property consists of one parcel located at northwest comer of the intersec{ion of Lewis Avenue and West Main Straet. The total acreage is approximately .3 acres, and the property is occupied by a one- story vacant office building. The applicant states that he and his parlner would like to tum the building into a Co-Working Office Space, similar to a Co-Lab. This concept involves a shared office environment that is used by independent individuals, often with their own business. The users benefit from proximity to other creative individuals and their ideas and hopefully this resuhs in synergy that fosters entrepreneurship. The Zoning Administrator has determined that this activity is consistent with the "ffice' use type, which is a by-right use in DBD. The Future Land Use Map designates this property's future use as "Downtown". !wEs,: A portion of this property lies within the Floodway boundary. &IEE!!AII}E,: 'l) Recommend approval of the rezoning request to Cig Council as submitted. 2) Recommend approval of the rezoning request with conditions not yet received. 3) Recommend denial of the request. LAND USE PLAN .j'\-., -b 20frLleItr-*- --.---I@"-'*BE-.---I-'*-* EXISTII{G ZONING IAF FEATURCS Fr r al-i.lt t. c-go.L3 f corxecl^L I oorrrrromt I Ecoxoaarc ocv€LoP{er.T aRC^ ! rousrntt E r,rsrmtrpnet $ norrsc ! errte rears arD REcRE Tor-- REstoEl.rla! I rRlxsirrroaaa! rry I..'b€_ rI ".58-n..'''-"-".''' MAP FEATURES I---- PETTTTON FOR ZONTNG AMENDMENT (REZONING) City of Salem Deprtment of Planning and Development Melinda J. Payne, oirector Email: moayne@salemva.oov Judy HoiJgh, Planner Email: ihouoh@salemvs.oov Teleptnne: 540-375-3N7 Ben Tripp, Plannsr Email: btripo@salemva.oov Legal 0wne(s) olpropedy requ€sted to be rezoned: D)tl..r"-r^,1. ,.- t t / 2. Location of Property: Address: ,l L i iol \r',/v\-:^ S+ SuMivision: Official Tax Map Number: 3. Characteristics of Prope(y: \LZ-I -\ Saze (Acreage):Ai i\1 Deed Restnctions: Prcsent Use: [,/{ it e .1 4,Zoning Classification: Pcsent Zoning:(5r Proposed Zoning:6r) Land Use DBignation: 5. Reason(s)for Rezoning Request (lncluding proposed use).ui-,a [a*) -.1. rs zci.tl' D'(i) 6. Agent(s) or representative(s) of prop( \.r..+,'"^ v., -r \' (Specify interest) t , t L(Dt,a.1 Telephone Number: 7. Affidavit: A, The undErstgned person certlfies hat this petitioo and he foregoing answers, statements, and other information herewith submitted are in dl respects true and conecl to the best of theh knowledge and belief, Also, fire petitroner understands lhai a'Nolice of zoning Requesr sign will be psted on the proporly by he city. Signed:Dare: vlta f'> lnter$t in Propertyr Mailing Address Telephone Number: Mailing AddGss: . 7-q. I December 23,201S Planning Commission 114 N. Broad St salem, VA 24153 RE: rezonin8 of 201-207 West Main St. PlanninB Commission, I am writing to request that you take into consideration the rezoning of the property located at 201-207 W. Main St. (tax map id s 122-1-5). The property is currently zoned as RSF with a special exception for office use. Wewould like to chante the zonint to Downtown Business District, Thefutureland use for that property is set as DBD toin6 forward and it has been used as an office since it was built 40+ years ago. We would llke to turn the building lnto a co-working space/business lab in downtown Salem. The improvement would include updating the fagade, raising the floor above the flood plaln, and full renovation of the interior, There is not a significant amount of parking at this building and DBD would allow for use as office space toint forward and match the needs of the Co-working space, where a malorlty of occupants of co-workint spaces nationally commute by walkint or bicycle. The Co-working space would be focused on keeping young p€ople in the community and providing a place where entrepreneurs can operate their business in Salem. Justin vanBlaricom It2V ProDerties LLC Thank you for your consideration,a Legend ^i Tax Number lO A. Mdross b Oistanco - Tax Parcels Road C€nterline l+ RailroadE I City Limits AFFADAVIT OF iIAILING PURSUANT TO SI5.2.2204 CODE OF VIRGINIA PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 13,2016 ITEM # { This is to certiff that I mailed letters in reference to the rezoning request of H2V, Properties, LLC, property owner, for rezoning the property located at 201 West Main Street (Tax Map #1221-5) from RSF Residential Single Family to HBD Highway Business District to the following property owners and adjacent property owneni on January 7,2016, in the 2:00 p.m. mail: ELDERDERM LLC RITE INVESTORS.VA2IRITE ADM INC. W TEMPLETON NORRIS JR Zt6 &ZtgW MAIN ST TRUSTEE REVoCABLE DECLAMTION oFTRUST SALEM, vA241s3 lt:_fli,li1]TAcY INc sroRE ffittrXrJiNNoRRIslRrRUsrEE ONE CVS DRIVE SALEM, VA 24153 wooNsocKET, RI02895 WTINVESTMENTSII1. 42s5 KrNGS COURT;; cHU RUSSELL DAVrD WT TNVESTMENTS LLC RoANoKE, vAz4ot; 3il#,\fl;l$ i3t^t-t"ir:t iorxtlr'* TRUSTEES FIRST UNITED HOBACKANDREW F METHODIST CHURCH 232 LEWIS AVE I25W MAIN ST SALEM, VA24L53 SALEM, VA24L53-0887 LOYD MARVIN L IR & LOYD SSM PROPERTIES LLC KRISTEN C 3724LARE DRSWPOBOX2848 ROANOKE,VA?4oIB SALEM, VA241S3 Signed Date City of Salem Commonwealth of Virginia The foregoing instmment was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,2O_, by Notary Public My commission expires: Renovations to 20I-207 \M. Main St. Salem, Va .24153 H2V Properties LLC +to-o(J CoU l-o a-l-oPx LIJ Po-o(J CoU l-oa-l-oPC - lnterior Concept cont. ITEM#-UD- AN .RDINANCE To AMEND 'ECTI.N r06-110, ARTT.LE r, cHAprER r06, oF THE coDE UF*IIEI-l'j I k CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, RELATING TO ZONING AND DIVIDING THE CITY INTO BUILDING DISTRICTS AND ESTABLISHING DISTRICT BOUNDARY LINES ON THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COLTNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, that Section 106-110, Article I, Chapter 106 of The Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, relating to building district boundary lines be amended in the following particular and no other, viz: That the following described property in the City of Salem, of PLM Ventures LLC, property owner, being the property located at 1037 East Riverside Drive (Tax Map Number 248-4-2), be and the same is hereby changed from TBD Transitional Business District to HBD Highway Business District: BEGINNING at an iron pin on the easterly side of Riverside Drive at its intersection with the northerly side of Apperson Dr.; thence with the easterly side of Riverside Drive, N. 1 deg. 54' W. 67.53 ft. to a point marked by an iron pin and N. 7 deg. 14' W. 107.56 ft. to a point marked by an iron pin; thence with the property now or formerly owned by Virginia Fitzgerald, S. 87 deg. 53' E. 136.00 Ft. to a point marked by an iron pin; thence S. 36 deg.47' E. 70.00 ft. to a point in the Roanoke River; thence down the river S. 6 deg. 10' W. 147.59 ft. to a point on the northerly side of Apperson Drive; thence with Apperson Dr., N. 77 deg.03' W. 150.00 ft. to the place of BEGINNING and containing 0.675 acre as shown on plat of T.P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveryors, LTD. Dated March26, 1985. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its final passage. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: James L. Chisom - William D. Jones - Jane W. Johnson - John C. Givens - Byron Randolph Foley - Passed: Effective: lsl Mayor ATTEST: James E. Taliaferro, II Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia 5 business environment, and he further discussed working out the details; and WHEREAS, Commissioner KinS noted that it other cities; and the printing, etc., and noted they are still is a neat idea, and it has worked really well in WHEREAS, no other person(s) appeared related to said requesu and ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER KING, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR THOMASSON, AND DUtY CARRIED, the PlanninS Commission of the City of Salem doth recommend to the Councilofthe City of salem that the request of H2V Properties, LLC, property owner, for rezoning the property located at 201 West Main Street (Tax Map #122-1-5) from RSF Residential Single Family District to DBD Downtown Business District be approved -the rollcall vote: all aye. ln re: owner. for rezonine the properw located at 1037 East Riverside Drive ffax Map f248{-2) from TBD Transitional Business District to HBD Hiqhwav Business District The Executive Secretary reported that this date and time had been set to hold a public hearing to considerthe request of PLM Ventures LLC, property owner, for rezoning the property located at 1037 East Riverside Drive (Tax Map #248-4-2) from TBD Transitional Business District to HBD HiShway Business District; and WHEREAS, the Executive Secretary further reported that notice of such hearing had been published in the December 31, 2015, and January 7, 2015, issues of the Salem Times Resister; and WHEREAS, staff noted the following: the subject property consists of a sinSle parcel located at the intersection of East Riverside Drive and Apperson Drive; the property is adjacent to the Roanoke River Greenway and is currently vacant; across Riverside Drive is Aqua Pros, a pools, hot tubs and hearth business, and across Apperson Drive is a vacant restaurant; this request is to rezone the .675 acre parcel from TBD Transitional Business District to HBD Highway Business District; the new property owner would like to use the property to increase usage ofthe greenwayin Salem; he is proposingto makethe building into a food truck dining room forpatrons to eat as well as adding outdoor dining space; the facility also would be rented for paint nights/birthday parties/exercise classes on the greenway; under the current zoning designation, 6 ass€mbly halls are pe.mitted with the approval of a Special Exception Permit; in the HBD zoni.g, assembly halls are permitted by right so the property owner would like to rezone the property; and WHEREAS, Justin vanBlaricom, property owner, appeared before the Commission explaining the rezoning request; he noted that the property is located at the corner of East Riverside Drive and Apperson, and there is a metalshed which was used fora fruit stand for years and next door was an insurance office; he stated it was his daughte/s idea to purchase the property so they bought it and have tried to come up with a reason to have it because it needed a lot ofwork; the floors and walls were all rotten from flooding in the past; they have removed the walls and floors and put on a new roof; he wo*ed with Todd Sutphin, Building Official, again on what they could do to fix it up because the property is in the floodway also; so the idea they came up with forthe propenywasthat hisfamily wanted a place in Salem wheretheycould hang out; the greenway is a great public investment, and he read a study that was done a couple years ago which noted the greenway in Roanoke City had 120,000 users in that year and the greenway in Salem near Moyer Park had 77,000 users, he believes; this is pretty impressive consideringthat the greenway in Roanoke City goes by Rivers Edge and all those front facing properties; the greenway in Salem does not have a lot of those front facing properties, and this is one ofthe two or three propenies remaining which have not been knocked down; so he wanted to save the building first ofall so that it would not be torn down; obviously, it is not a charitable thinS so they have talked about trying to make money with the property by having a food truck dining room; this idea came when he was eating at a food truck down in Roanoke City near the hospital; he could not hear the communication with the person he trying to order from because of the generators running; and then when he went to eat his food in the parking lot he was sweating and miserable; there are a lot of food trucks in the area now, and a lot ofthem park in Salem to get their food prepped, etc.; so he thought it would be great use for the food trucks to come to the property and they would be able to plug in and not have the loud generators running; with the property being right on the greenway, people could go for a walk on the greenway on their lunch break, and then have a climate controlled place to eat their food; in the winter, the trucks do not do a lot of business because of the weather, but if there is a place where people can go that is heated, it would make it more convenient; further, there are no parking requirements for patrons of the food trucks, and the health inspedors inspest the food trucks so this is a way to have a different restaurant every day ofthe week in one place; then the people who come tothe food trucks can go for a walk and use the greenway; they also have expanded this into wanting to have a place they could rent out for birthday parties, exercise classes, yoga classes, etc., and it makes a lot of sense where it is located; it will be concrete floor inside the buildin8, so if does flood, itjust be a matter of sweeping it out; further, there will be a patio area outside with steps 1 down to the greenway; he noted that the Commission has the copies of the renderings of this building which he passed out earlier; with regards to the metal building, he has a tenant who would like to open up a produce stand there; so, people would be able to come, eat at the food truck, gettheir organic fruits and vegetables and then everyone is happy; and WHEREAS, Commissioner King asked where he planned to put the parkinS; Mr. vanBlaricom noted from his understanding that he would need nine spaces due to the fact that a lot of people would be parkinS in other areas for the greenway and walkingto this location; he noted that he can get nine spaces in the existing Sravel parking located on the p.operty but he cannot add more gravel; but a lot ofthe traffic will be coming from the Sreenway so it is not like he will need parking like a restaurant would need; and WHEREAS, Chair Daulton asked if there is a reason why he cannot add more gravel, and Mary Ellen Wines noted that any new parking hasto be paved; Mr. vanBlaricom noted the.e are also other regulations with regards to the floodway, i.e. FEMA rules, etc.; the easier decision was to see how manyspacesthey could get in the existingarea; hewantsto have enough parking and does not want to overwhelm it with cars so that people cannot see what is going on; he believes that most of the traffic will come from the greenway; hopefully it will be a destination that people will park in some ofthe public spacesthat are already there, as well as the park riSht up the street, and then walk to his property; and WHEREAS, Commissioner King noted it looked like there was only one bathroom in the drawing; she asked ifthere was only goingto be one restroom; Mr. vanBlaricom noted that there would only be the one; he further noted that he has already had the building plans approved by the Building Official; because the building is only assessed at $28,000, he has half ofthis amount that he can spend on improvements and adding another bathroom is an improvement and not a repair; to add another bathroom would take a substantial portion ofthe overall budget he has to put into 8e$ing the building open; and WHEREAS, Chair Daulton asked if he was thinking different food trucks every day, and Mr. vanBlaricom noted that this corred; he further noted it would be like a different restaurant every day; Chair Daulton asked if it would be only one truck per day, and Mr, vanBlaricom noted that initially it would probably one per day unless there is a reciprocal agreement between the food trucks; because he does not want people to compete against each other for the customers; he noted ifthere is an agreement, then there is possibly room for two trucks; and I WHEREAT Commissioner Robertson noted the moneythat he has spent so far, butwhere will the income come from; will there be a rental fee for each vending truck that comes to the property; Mr. vanBlaricom noted it is a learning process for him; he would like to do a percentage of sales so it incentivizes vendors to come and try it out, but food trucks are a cash business so he would have to be fairlytrusting, and this trust is built overtime and not given ove.night; so, it will probably start as a flat fee per a four hour block, a lunch block or a dinner block, and then it will transition to a percentage of sales once the trust is built up; he will also have income from the produce stand, vending and the facility rental; and WHEREAS, Commissioner Robertson not€d that he admires his opportunist vision, which is very impressive; he assumes the next thing if the trucks do well that he might be in that business, also; Mr. vanBlaricom laughed and noted that he does not have a desire to run a food truck; and WHEREAS, no other person(s) appeared related to said request; and ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSTONER ROBERTSON, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR THOMASSON, AND DULY CARRIED, the planning Commission of the City of Salem doth recommend to the Council ofthe City of Salem that the request of pLM Ventures LLg property owner, for rezoning the property located at 1037 East Riverside Drive (Tax Map d248-4-2) from TBD Transitional Business District to HBD Highway Business District be approved - the roll call vote: allaye. There being no further business to come before the Commission, the same on motion adjourned at 7:27 p.m. Executive Secretary Chair CITY OF SALEM ITEM #2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Meeting Date: City Administrative Staff January 13, 2016 Report prepared: January 7 ,2016 RE: Hold public hearing to consider the request of PLM Ventures LLC, property owner, for rezoning the property located at 1037 East Riverside Drive (Tax Map # 248-4-2) from TBD Transitional Business Diskict to HBD Highway Business District. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Zoning: TBD Transitional Business District Land Use Plan Designation: Commercial Proposed Zoning: HBD Highway Business Distric't Existing Use: Vacant insurance offic€ and fruit stand Proposed Use: Assembly hall BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The subject property consist of a single parcel located at the intersection of East Riverside Drive and Apperson Drive. The property is adjacent to the Roanoke River Greenway and is currently vacant. Across Riverside Drive is Aqua Pros, a pools, hot tubs and hearth business, and across Apperson Drive is a vacant restaurant. This request is to rezone the.675 acre parcel from TBD Transitional Business District to HBD Highway Business District. The new property owner would use the property to increase usage of the greenway in Salem. He is proposing to make the building into a food truck dining room for patrons to eat as well as adding outdoor dining space. The facility also would be rented for paint nights/birthday parties/exercise classes on the greenway. Under the cunent zoning designation, assembly halls are permitted with the approval of a Special Exception Permit. ln the HBD zoning, assembly halls are permitted by right so the property owner would like to rezone the property. ISSUES: None ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the rezoning request to City Council as submitted. 2) Recommend approval of the rezoning request with conditions not yet received. 3) Recommend denial of the request. EXISTING ZONING MAP FEATURES Zo,lhew|a-** I6h-b 9tfl - -.-..I-----* da ...,..-,h&I*-,..-.*I-*--- ijjSd " $ 6k ImEo-'"--r-"- &-u-d*-d...-€I-.-"* f4:r. ! .|'E,.^.ftf+.4.*,-.4d w['*: @.-.d.d ID".fr.l.B. IAP FEATURCS Fafirc lrttd Uta C-eELE I coraencn I oownrorvr.t I ecoxol.rc DCVELoPUEi{? ^RGA! rousrn:rt E $6rrrt roN^L El rr:(eo.rrsE ! errettc necxs aiao RErcflEAttoN I REsroE.{rur- I rrersrrolet I--*- LAND USE PLAI{ PETTTTON FOR ZONTNG AiTENDMENT (REZONING) City oJ Salom Departmefi of Pbnning and Development Malinda J. Payn€, Oirector Email: @eIEt@99!9!O!849y Judy Hough, PlannBr Email: i!9!gtE!e!qleE!gg9y Telephone: 54G375-3007 Ben Tripp, Plannsr Emailr btrioo@salemva oov 1. Legal Owne(s) of popery requested to be razoned: ?LtV\ e,1,.1 v,2.., LIC 2. Location of ProoertY:'*iJl,ji,, SuOCiri.o- Offcial Tax Map Number:Zi6- q -L 3. Characleristics of Property: Sizelncreagel 0, b15 Deed R6tnclions: Present Use: {'u 1:l^. L 4. Zoning Classification: Present Zoning: Propos€d Zoningl Land Use Deslgnatlon: ./r'r \) tr zr r--rona Mailing AddBss: 'l t 1 Tglsphone Numbar 5rC jrY -' rq2". a 7. Affdavit: A. The undelsigned porson cerlifies hat this petitixl and hE br€going an6r€rs, stabm€nts, and othor information here*iti submitl€d are in all respcds true and conect to the bc6t of heir knowledge ad belief, Also,.he potitionel undeBbnds U6\a'Mtioeot Zoning Roquesf sign will be posted on the pfoperty by he City, ' Dare: tz f .r f ,; Lt 5. Reason(s)fu Reaning Request (lrEMkE proposed use):an ),lr- L i.*+ '..-l L' t^.',i,+- 1, rr.r., (.- ol ,t*o^J r,.+,,.J^ Tehphone Number: lqo - 7l q - tS Z \ Signed: lnter$t in Msiling December 23,2015 PlanninB Commission 114 N. Broad St Salem, VA 24153 RE: czoning of 1037 E. Riverside Dr. Planning Commission, I am writing to request that you take into consideration the rezoning of the property located .t 1037 E. Riverside Dr. Salem VA 24153. (tax map 248-4-2) The property is currently zoned TBD and was formerly used as an insurance office and frult stand. The floor was completely rotted out due to floodint and has been removed along with most interior walls. I propose that the zoning be chanted to HBD so that we can use the property to lncrease usage of the creenway ln Salem. I plan on maklng the building into a food truck dininB room so that people can access the greenway on their lunch breaks and food trucks nould have a climate controlled room for patrons to eat as well as outdoor dining space without the need to run noisy generators. I vvould also like to rent out the facility for paint nights/birthday parties/exercise class€s on the Sreenway. lnorderto be able to rent out the facility lwould need a zoning chante to HBD. ThaTokfdp for rrcur consideration, l{ittln vanBlarlcom ,,'/nru ventures t-tc. / 1l0l 1 ,0 1 q U-r>= &ot r B\v6P-9\Dg ^oiio $ i,q ,i; 0 lr 'l)r,qi L(lt2-l.j l[;[ le;r zoAal-d? "flf4.a .5 I Z ',tt 0 T 5E-T - * 3.4.<- ROANO}<E Rtvee_. '\. [',a I o'- 'v!. '\- o.675 AC. ,44 , gq , - +,'r'r 6Btt't^, ;,L.. ,a {/6r-r " b-r'r(h ?oer'ar SURVEY FORPEARL SHEPPABo 5 Hr: .r-r, xr e. O. 6-15 A. c R.E_ --rRAc-f +,a!-Ei.< !r T. P. PARXER & SOitlNGrNtatS a sUavlrol3 .uoallat VltOtitA x! 1_r'q ..,,. t'':y- ,,..-. -.-E ,1. ,..s,1t.')/: - pp-N€-'$ '-€f t f,Ea . - - - ---',: - -E.:--. -*__:-_.-. . AFFADAVIT OF IIAILING PURSUANT TO 515,2.2204 CODE OF VTRGINIA PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 13, 20{6 ITEM # 2 This is to certiff that I mailed letters in reference to the rezoning request of PLM Ventures LLC, property owner, for rezoning the property located at 1037 E. Riverside Drive (fax Map * 248-4- 2) from TBD Transitional Business District to HBD Highway Business District to the following property owners and adiacent property owners on January 7, 2016, in the 2:00 p.m. mail: DAVIS ROBERTW & DAVIS MARY G DUNKER KENNETH D & DUNKER SNARE FAMILY 1971 JOHNSON SCHOOL RD MARY B PROPERTIES LLC THAXTON, VA24174 5327 SUNDANCE RD '1525 ELECTRIC RD SALEM, VA 24153 SALEM. V424153 NEW LEAF INVESTMENT INC FAME, THOMAS M & FAME, LEAH M MITCHEM ROBERT 1601 ELECTRIC RD 221 HOMEPLACE DR KENNETH SALEM, VA 24153 SALEM, VA 24153 1OO8 APPERSON DR SALEM, VA 24153 WENG HWEI FENG TINA &WENG HWEI SHIN DANIEL 14,16 COLORADO ST SALEM, VA 24153 Signed Date City of Salem Commonwealth of Virginia The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this - day of -,ZO-by Notary Public My commission expires: pIl 1 Lt 6 o' ^ ItrF Itl'tI [Dr !r Il8:. ro 0d! r1l fiffrar0rE urDt]|tll lDrE i.ra U LaL fi tE tBar!{ rr.' l/lrtllri lE^E D I Eal-D lro r5-lll lrr" 01 , ,t, -o o l, I I tclraax! E(EIat .l,rt lE F_S(rICH tr CSEEhWAY E^SEI/EXT IO E€ A@UIR€D BY OTY OF SALEM FROT ROONEY M. SUIIH LOCAIE.D IN oTY f sluy{iclxa Aden Associatcs FltN NO. 80,a130.04 Ee \ \ ral h @raa! ra{aFl ll la. rG aJ, Jr at ,4. ultlL7it3rrt9t+j ,tpptRSOr, 6a e I I Jt \ t"c l/; F rl I t, to.h.Y !. s.iiltl. o.a. tdr. pc, cs+ru 24t-(4F2 Renovations to 1-037 E. Riverside Dr. Salem, Va .24L53 PLM Ventures LLC . t, o,f 'l J;r- Apperson ,, t Front Exterior l-o t-l-o {-,x IJ.J -Y(J ((, m {Jo-o(J Co(J l-o a.-!-oPC !nterior concept cont. 1t1912016 Salern. VA Cod€ of Ordinances Sec.98-94. - Council's annual hearing. The council shall conduct a hearing each year between January 1 and March 31 for the purpose of determining the number of taxicabs for which certificates shall be issued during the next year and for the purpose of determining to which persons such certificates shall be issued, after a consideration of the factors prescribed in section 98-87. No certificate shall be renewable as a matter of right, but the council shall decide in the exercise of its sound discretion and after consideration ofthe factors prescribed in section 98-87 to which persons such certificates shall be issued for the next certificate year. Such hearing shall be public, after notice thereof has been given by mail to all holders of certificates and applicants for certificates, at the address shown on such certificates and applications and after notice thereof by publication at least once and not less than ten days prior to the hearing in some newspaper published or having a general circulation in the city. Any such hearing may be continued from time to time without fu rther notice. (Code 1969, 5 28-37) https:/,,,/ww.municode.cornilibrarylvdsaleo/cod€s/code_of_ordinances?nodeld=PTlICO_CH98VEHI_ARTIITA_DIV2CEPUCONE S9&94COANHE 111 ITEM #_,___ DATE i- i') tU'