Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/11/2016 - City Council - Agenda -RegularSalem City Council Work Session Agenda January 11, 2016 City Manager’s Conference Room City Hall 114 North Broad Street, Salem 6:30-7:30p.m. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Discussion Items a. The Downtown Plan, Benjamin Tripp b. Economic Development Update, Melinda Payne c. Other topics for discussion (Council) IV. Adjournment City Council Meeting Monday, January 11, 2016, 7:30 PM Council Chambers, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 1.Call to Order 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Bid Openings, Awards, Recognitions 4.Consent Agenda A.Minutes Consider acceptance of the minutes of the December 14, 2015, Salem City Council meeting. 5.Old Business A.Vacation of Alley Receive report of viewers and consider ordinance on first reading permanently vacating a certain unimproved 12' alley located off Pyrtle Drive, 150' south of the Kimball Avenue intersection. (Viewers appointed at December 14, 2015, meeting.) 6.New Business A.Downtown Plan Hold public hearing and consider adoption of Resolution 1276 regarding the Downtown Plan and for amending "The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Salem" to reflect the addition of the Downtown Plan. (Recommended approval, see Page 1 of the Planning Commission minutes.) B.Zoning Ordinance Amendment Hold public hearing and consider ordinance on first reading to enact and amend Chapter 106, Article II District Regulations, Sections 106-210.2(A)(5), 106-210.3(B)(1), 106-212.2 (B)(5), 106-212.3(B)(1), 106-218.2(B)(6), 106-218.3(C)(1), 106-218.3(C)(2), 106-220.2(B) (6), and 106-220.3(C)(1), 106-220.3(C)(2), Article III Use and Design Standards, Sections 106-310.19, 106-312.3, Article IV Development Standards, Sections 106-404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Article VI Definitions and Use Types, Sections 106-602.9, and 106-602.11, pertaining to breweries and microbreweries, site development regulations, and definitions. (Advertised in the December 24, and 31, 2015, issues of the Salem Times Register. Recommended approval, see Page 6 of the Planning Commission minutes.) (STAFF REPORT) Continued on P age 2 C.Voting Precinct Hold public hearing and consider ordinance on first reading amending Chapter 26, Article II, Section 26-38(b), of THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, regarding Precinct A or Conehurst precinct. (Advertised in the December 28, 2015, and January 4, 2016, issues of The Roanoke Times.) D.Conv eyance of Property Hold public hearing to consider the conveyance of City of Salem real property designated as a 0.13405 acre tract located at 3733 Ellen Drive, Tax Map 055.10-03-47.00-0000, in the County of Roanoke. (Advertised in the January 4, 2016, issue of The Roanoke Times.) E.Mason Creek Greenway Consider awarding a contract for design of a portion of the Mason Creek Greenway. (Audit-Finance Committee) F.Berglund Ford Consider setting bond for erosion and sediment control measures and landscaping for the Berglund Ford Expansion project. (Audit-Finance Committee) 7.Closed Session 8.Adjournment Audi t Fi nance Commi ttee, Monday, January 11, 2016, 8:0 0a.m., Ci ty Manager’s Conference Roo m Work Sessi on, Monday, January 11, 2016 , 6:30p.m., Ci ty Manag er’s Conference Room ITEM: Vac ation of Alley SUBJECT: Rec eive rep ort of viewers and c o nsider o rdinanc e on first reading p ermanently vac ating a c ertain unimp ro ved 12' alley lo cated off Pyrtle Drive, 150' s outh of the Kimb all Avenue inters ec tion. (Viewers ap p o inted at Dec emb er 14, 2015, meeting.) ATTACHMENT S: Des crip tion Type Alley Vacation Cover Memo REVIEWER S: Dep artment Clerk of the Council t-.mM#_)-E_ DAIE AN ORDINANCE enacted pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2006 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, providing for vacating a portion of a street in the City of Salem, Virginia. WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Council of the City of Salem pursuant to the provisions ofthe aforesaid Section 15.2-2006, requesting that the following unimproved alley be permanently vacated and discontinued: a certain unimproved l2'alley, located off Pyrtle Drive, with the entrance located 150' south from the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Pyrtle Drive extending a total of480'; said application being filed by Steve Poffof lTth Century Builders, LLC, contractor on behalfofRonald Lee and Betty Clingenpeel, property owners; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 1277 adopted on the l4th day of December 2015, the Council ofthe City of Salem, Virginia, appointed viewers to report whether or not in their opinion any and ifany, what, inconvenience would result from permanently vacating the aforesaid alley as set forth in the application; and WHEREAS, the viewers reported in writing under date of January 5,2016, that, after having been duly swom they viewed the said street and are unanimously ofthe opinion that no inconvenience would result to anyone from permanently vacating and discontinuing a certain unimproved 12' alley,located off Pyrtle Drive, with the entrance located 150' south from the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Pyrtle Drive extending a total of480'; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code Section 15.2-2006, the applicants in this proceeding have caused a public notice to be published in the Salem Times Register, a newspaper published and having general circulation in the City of Salem, Virginia, such publication having been made twice, with a lease six days elapsing between the fist and second publication, to wit: on November 26, and December 3,2015, and such notice specified the time and place ofhearing, to wit: January 11,2016, at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City of Salem, at which persons affected may appear and present their views, all of which is shown by a Certificate of Publication executed by the Roanoke Times and filed with the papers in this proceeding; and WHEREAS, proper notice has been giving to the land proprietors along the street affected by the closing; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the evidence submitted, is of the opinion that vacating, discontinuing, and closing the aforesaid alley will not abridge or destroy any of the rights and privileges ofany person, and that no inconvenience would result to anyone therefrom, and it is further ofthe opinion that the request ofthe applicants should be granted; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COLINCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, a certain unimproved l2' alley, located off Pyrtle Drive, with the entrance located I 50' south from the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Pyrtle Drive extending a total of 480', be permanently vacated, discontinued, and closed as provided by Section 15.2-2006 of the Code of Virginia as amended to date, and in accordance with the law in such cases made and provided, title to said land is herby vested in the petitioner herein, who are the sole adjoining property owners, as provided by law. The alley hereby vacated shall become property of the petitioner. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA,that a certified copy of this ordinance be delivered by the City Clerk to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Salem, Virginia, for recordation therein, and to the City Engineer of the City of Salem, Virginia, and that the City Engineer of Salem, Virginia, make appropriate notation of the vacation herein approved, on the maps and other documents in his office. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be and the same are herby repealed. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its final passage. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: James L. Chisom - William D. Jones - Jane W. Johnson - John C. Givens - Byron Randolph Foley - Passed: Effective: s/ Mayor Attest: James E. Taliafeno, II Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia VIRGINIA: IN THE COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF SALEM IN RE: REPORT OF VIEWERS VACATING A CERTAIN UNIMPROVED 12, ALLEY, LOCATED OFF PYRTLE DRIVE, WITH THE ENTRANCE LOCATED 150' SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF KIMBALL AVENUE AND PYRTLE DRIVE EXTENDING A TOTAL OF 480,. The undersigned viewers, appointed by the Council for the City of Salem, by Resolution 1277 adopted the 14th day of December 2015, to view and ascertain and report in writing, pursuant to the provisions of $ 15.2-2006, of the Code of Virginia as amended, whether, in our opinion, any, and if any, what inconvenience would result from permanently vacating a certain unimproved 12' alley, located off Pyrtle Drive, with the entrance located 150' south from the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Pyrtle Drive extending a total of 480', in the City of Salem, Virginia, do respectfully report that, after having first been duly sworn, visited and viewed the said alley and are unanimously of the opinion that no inconvenience would result to anyone from discontinuing and vacating the said alley. GIVEN under our Subscribed and sworn to before me,tary lic in and for the City of Salem, State of Virsinia, this the an 2016. ary blic January My Commission Expires: September 30, 2OlB. VIRGINIA: IN THE COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF SALEM IN RE: AFFIDAVIT OF VIEWERS VACATING A CERTAIN UNIMPROVED 12' ALLEY, LOCATED OFF PYRTLE DRIVE, WITH THE ENTRANCE LOCATED 150' SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF KIMBALL AVENUE AND PYRTLE DRIVE EXTENDING A TOTAL OF 480'. The undersigned Howard C. Packett, William R. Shepherd, and Joseph E. Yates, Jr., being first duly sworn, depose and say that they will faithfully and impartially view a certain unimproved 12' alley, located off Pyrtle Drive, with the entrance located 150' south from the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Pyrtle Drive extending a total of 480', situate in the City of Salem, Virginia, which is sought to be permanently vacated and ascertain whether, in their opinion any, and if any, what inconvenience would result from permanently vacating, discontinuing and closing of same. GIVEN under our 2016. sworn to before me,a Notary and for the City of Virginia, this the 1Stl Jan No Subscribed and Salem, State of hands this the 5th day of January Publlz in My Commission Expires: September 30, 2018. 2016. lt-ra aol o'-- D.(re 5\'; (\I i'@j 6d oPEi ra ltr''r* ,"8,ot: Ul: ?a a,8/-833 8,Es EPIer/ Decatur Circle I !t S ,**E s=A S ,/" +, "FS /,rq$ih- aoF9 K-"-rx t a F )qr ) F. N a F, )e F, 6.0 e.\s &o ", Ee@ q lrlzl lt, .€.t EE n,$_"" *\ frs *i^ *i- or 8ist .,, (oaao8{ t EI sEoFeoEioLrr,r n* *"\ 8er!'@ a "+\i - G' -r a?a.t (D\ l@l5c(D c .ULoE, g=,/ I $;d;'is-';"E"'T" "l *T.PS S:.'- -T1 arlrletic sorFqrSs cr- aIIS ru PyleflE 42tr/€ oish/ roentel.y e/FEe)/ .s7zee7) , (,'\9 ,V/s, gz,z.- &f ,r';'-;f /e,.o'74 z/. of ,U./5qr.'€,',</ft7614k 4//2,-2- 3a'n/.,8./. ii,t \ ,.j of \r Sth!"\r \Qr--tr i i $lu.tt 4D d\ ,r,f-g /o7 " t \ & \ i ,tottllt tt Dr \.rl!E_!r- !8 !r Lrmrrr u roir tt.B t rrt c r orrlrurerrc iirlt a-q! lcOlrlr \ k $ rot alll rlltrttt .\il&tvlttolt. 0l'/5 P?/yef€Ii ,+a. E. /5Pa.E 7'.--!4Jl 8rY 0{0 c. $tfis zora s t1?*1..4e ftnt to o- 5l-17-3r|80? /.ooN YEY FOR Q)^5..i, ili;ti.t{Q ,.a;,p r$ 30il,%o /a€URI AsZf 8. C//r{a.i/?i./ of zo/ / 8zoc.t6 s€t. / K//wBn//, ,"ceEt A8, 6 /ry. ?o /?.!p PnkTaf /z',"/1€/l{afi/ e/oga a./? ?aef dF Zof-, 8f Q 8/dec 54 51/1.V o6t/€ZoPrl46rUf Co,. tt4?p -sazd.W vlFolxll rv: T. P. PABKER & SOX ct{G$tctxs & SurvEYots, tTo. AALEI YIRG!iT^ tf.5 1ar,/ 8/ ocr 6 /-sftP),,8,?/ck art44 ;t, 5/2 ti rttttt "c^Le'.f=3ao^lE'.1t7,,1€ q fiaf- T X tt.l. i$[l N, cal.c. - iT?13 sLAI l'it lrlrArlfl;l !O IllfcrBlllI( Ilttcll ift EGBI t tltf.E arBoRS Et r LI6[aEo lErlonlrt.P)t272€ aztYa trocnesly dtsa si*eq) 4/gc 3, .so'tt - 8./. /of z - A.aeVaV- I 45.? /5'24A \uibo .3' ,d:i dprq'a. 'rirs.o'ro2!- tnt?,' I \ Ril r--T-I ll-r -r- - tlttl.EE. \ $ w _--- -- ___/4t.zora B.///ar1,6 ?€a,u/f Pldf P/ht/ af Zaf /, aocra, sEC /,' K/,VaOaZ 4@ E Q 5 R tc *uo eteTof Eual€)'t{qvc(ag No ?r2raFzor€ 8€.q, azaaa q ertz*, z.YezoPturtt(r a. iloP SURYEY FON&t{elo ./$€ @z d ca^teei/Eel S'Z€IJ' rt-tltl rv: T. P. PARKER & SOlt GXenECls r $rvEIOrs .uo.lllfl . tarttta P?otusea /-srrd*rcP I J Zdf //8l ocr c IDq6 *lr-I*!r.tr.Dltl r.l. - clLG. - nn E&o- *b.- .GILE: olrE: =it-a- l--ra.r -br- 7"( ' llst" In.-r-rr/2 Permit Fee BUILDING PERMIT /reot '' <-4 - B 14$SDate CITY OF SALEM APPUCANT TO COMPLETE NUMBEREO SPACES ONLY. PRINT OR TYPE Clas of work:DtrlEW DADDITION fIALTERATIOII BU I TDING PERMIT APPLICATION tr REPAIR DtrlOVE D REMOVE TAX MAP NO. 0escribework: OO NOT WRITE lN THIS SPACE Type of tleating Fuel: D cas E Oit O Elc"t'icity E Coat D Othar tSpecityl- 10 Valuation of work: $ SmgeBispod: E Publicorprivatoconrp.ny E lndhrtduat ($ptac tankl tihtsr &gply: D tndivHuat luuett, cisternl E PuUtt or Private company Air Conditioning: E vec E no Size of Eldg- ffotall Sq. Ft.APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE BY: OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: NOTICE SEPARATE PERMTTSAFE REOUIFED FOR ELECTBICAL, PLUMB. ING, HEATING. VENTILATING OR AIR CONOITIONING.txts penmir BEcoMEs NULL AND volD lF woRK oR con- STRUCTION AUTHORI ZED IS NOT COMMENCEO WITHI N 6 MONTHS, ON IT CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDEO OR ABANDONED Fon n pEBloD oF I YEAR AT ANY TIME AFTER woRK ls coM' MENCED, I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true ard correct All provisions of larps and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit dges no! presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisiom of any other state or tocal law regulati4g construction or the per- formance of construction. s*, lData) Ali blocks marked ReOuired must be initialed. H€ALTH OEPT. 3 CEHTIFIED PLATS TREASURERS OFFICE U'HEN PROPERLY VALIDATED {IN THIS SPACE' THIS IS YOUB PEBMIT Yello{-TEMP/Pink-ASSESSOR/Gold-APPLIGANT MISCELIINEOUS ACCOUNTS /T-zvIZ.-E-, !r59 C. t' To CITY Of SilEl, OrF;!GGOF GIIY TITAOTRafrrrlml PERIIT TO BUILD. N9 I 496 Bdl.l Cmtrrcbr On Ld-- llqrao t{o. ln Amrdrre ttUr Applbr[Pn No Er6nodc".nt tO )mO (-] i,r :B -q,JHmL-o)rl -rF r} fr1-r'-\ HS-.* IifrtF ;: rdiFr hfli \ =l: a?] r'\ -(rI ' (.15 *EL4t-T't r(n*l {l)+crJ- r-r f)C-r-F(;ti- ;fl d-:r -{Hr-- [-,1 tn (:: frt..., - c:.L- -1Cl 1F -ti 8i rFiS F$FeB gEsfr! t}r TULLY P. PARXER. P.E. & L.S. JOHN T. PAR(ER, P.E. & L.S. FRANK B- CALDWELL. III. P.E. {l L-S, T.P.PARKER&SON Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd. A I 6 AOULEVARO SALET,i. VIRGINIA 24t 53 /'7-712.- C_ TELEP}IONE 3A7-l t53 AREA C(,t)E 703 P.O. BOX 3S ,June 28, 1988 Ronald Lee cli.ngenpeel 5L2 Pyrtle Drive saIem, Virginia 24:l-5 3 Dear Sir: Enclosed you will f i.nd copies of the Building permit plot plau you requested be nade on L,ot L, Block 6. Section L, Kinball Acres and part of 1-2' a1ley noY, closed and part of Lots 8 and 9, Block 53, Salen Developtnent Corp. map. The loan survey you ordered has been sent to Mr. Ir. Richard Padgett, Atty. aslnstructed - I'Ie had a note to cal] you when your plot plan was conpletedbut were unable to reach you. If you have any questions, please caff. Thank you, Bookke eping AJS Enclosures HIS PLAT ISCLOSED /o7 " - 4Tpe1zeTs IS SUBJECT TO INFOR!,IATION WII ICH MAY BE 8Y A TITLE REPORT BY A LICENSED ATTORNEY.PYZf/€ zatt/€ ls, g2'2. - ;lf ,':-rr"fi./ so'4,/. B./. / raznar,e/y e€,ezy sR€€/) /t/./5 eg7'a.'k //4apzz uE2- f,1Lrnq> itYMorto c. wttrst*l c., cltt ta ,b, ,n;{r lua ./93, o 'ro ,4 ./. o oi \ \sh ,rro,Y{g \ I f \ ,0rt' \!'\ \ \\'\ t t\ frl\ \ ttt tt lrte, ,tortl'' ta Dl \.rttatt tra Ltittt o, rrr ro {rrrl t!@ toarrout It rEo. tat ,3tl ,t6c EIrrtrlr. tltt lattuttaltot trl^t3D C ttt t&oo a{llltlr, lt! tL ioa ra3t fttt?tDrt lcn tL rttlo ttatrtrola. \ $ s,.z 'ed*l r$l vl,\ll I olR /5?c.E o '-- S' /,'. zoTa gt///2tt/c PEE///r P/a/- P/.C/l/ .l ta.lr.lt.)m2 $ rl.rr.lruruo.\Qrr'31g) SUBVFY FORpo/1/,4/o /zl 8{7ry a.C0vAatr'e:e t of zor / 8/oc,<6., szc.4 ,<///?a/g/z 4zP€' n 8. 6.ry. "oeruo )oec7 oF /z',e/1!/ ilatr c/ossa .9Na ?,?Pf aF Zofs 8/g AzOeE 53 saz&vl zdt/€zoP/vltrNr co.. .v/?P z3,s- 2 -/5 S,q/€/Y/ VIRGINIA sv: T. P. PARKER & SON ENGINIERS & SURVEYORS , LTD. P€oPosso IS\, Itt \ t$N /-srd,el i 8,?/c,< zrlza \ r 5/2 ,r.s ' Ns'Zdf / 81 oc,< 6 SCALE: oATE I t"= 3O''F Z2 ne8e ^, rEM#\{il- oercl?:fr4? IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, December 14,2015: RESOLUTION 1277 A RESOLUTION providing for the appointment of not less than three nor more than five freeholders, any three of whom may act, as viewers in connection with the application of Ronald Lee & Betty Clingenpeel and 17th Century Builders, LLC to permanently vacate a certain unimproved 12' alley, located off Pyrtle Drive, with the entrance located 150' South from the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Pyrtle Drive extending a total of 480' per City of Salem GIS map at a bearing 5.74"-23'E to previously vacated point, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, thAt Howard Packett, Joseph E. Yates, Jr., and William R. Shepherd be and they hereby are appointed as viewers to view vacate a certain unimproved 12' alley, located off Pyrtle Drive, with the entrance located 150' South from the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Pyrtle Drive extending a total of 480' per City of Salem GIS map at a bearing S.l4-23'E to previously vacated point, as provided by Section 15.2-2006 of the Code of Virginia, as amended to date, and to report in writing, whether or not in their opinion any, and if any, what inconvenience would result from permanently vacating said alley. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: Lisa D. Garst - William D. Jones - Jane W. Johnson - John C. Givens - Byron Randolph Foley - ATTEST: James E. Taliaferro, II Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia q{3- g? t'(2' - sltvt- ($t NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: TAKE NOTICE the undersigned will apply to the Council of City of Salem at a public hearing on December 14, 2015, at 7:30 p.m-, or as s(xrn thereafter as may be heard, in the Council Chambers of the City of Salem, at 114 North Broad Stree! Salem, Virginia, based on an application to permanently \racate an unimproved alley more particularly described as follows: A certain unimproved 1? alley, located off Pyrtle Drive, with the entrance located 15(l| South from the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Pyrtle Drive extending a total of lt80' per Citt of Salem GtS map at a bearing 5.74223'Eto previouslyvacated point. All parties in interest and citizens may appear on the above date and be heard on the question. Ronald Lee & Betty Clingenpeel and 17s Century Builders, [I-C, Steve Poff- M l' ; EsqE" "'- CITY OF SALEM ENGINEERING OEPARTMENT 1 14 NORTH BROAD STREET P.O. BOX 669 SALEM, VIRGINIA 2,I,I 53.0E69 (540) 375-3032 N A MAPPING COMPUTED ON THE VIRGINIA STATE PLANE COOROINATE SYSTEM - SOUTH ZONE - ADJUSTED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF '9E3.TIC COORDINATE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY OF SALEM ENGINEERING OEPARTMENT. I inch = 100 feet 100 50 0 100 tap Features ,"..,' subdiYision Lin6 I Ta Parcal 235 z \ -' Tax Map Grid I l City ot Satem parcets Ay' cityasatmgdndary MAP NUMBER 235 ocToBER 2015 216 -{ta- ))'r Y.t ,/ I\\"_---- | '%\3,u@ Y,)/(. Ir"gO (o(o N " lD 5,i./lrrlorl/ s 1,i..i> i lz ,'z,i :!6. ,' @ oo oc o o 244 ITEM: Downto wn Plan SUBJECT: Hold p ublic hearing and cons id er adoptio n of Res olution 1276 regarding the Downto wn P lan and fo r amending "The C o mp rehens ive Plan for the City o f S alem" to reflec t the ad d ition of the Do wntown Plan. (Recommended ap p ro val, see Page 1 of the Planning Commission minutes .) ATTACHMENT S: Des crip tion Type Downtown Plan Cover Memo PC Minutes Cover Memo REVIEWER S: Dep artment Clerk of the Council nEM#-!qfi- IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, January 11, 2016: RESOLUTION 1276 WHEREAS, the City of Salem is desirous of having the kind olvibrant and iconic downtown which our community deserves; and WHEREAS, Downtown Salem should be historic and respectful of the past, but also modem and relevant; it must be livelier with events and activities for all citizens, and a prime location for business; it will be lusher with greenery, and overhung with distinct, placemaking lighting; it must take its rightful place in the valley's consciousness; and WHEREAS, for the last year city staff and citizen stakeholders have worked towards that goal; and WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled meeting on the above date, there was presented The Downtown Plan to be added to the Comprehensive Plan ofthe City of Salem for approval, amendment and approval, or disapproval, as required by the provisions of Section 15.2-2226 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, notice has been given, in accordance with Section 15.2-2204 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, that a public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan would be held at the regularly scheduled meeting on the above date; and WHEREAS, the public hearing, as required, has been held; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 15.2-2230 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, City Council has reviewed the plan and recommends no further amendments at this time; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, that: (1) The Downtown Plan as presented is hereby approved.(2) The Comprehensive Plan is hereby reviewed, amended and updated. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: James L. Chisom - William D. Jones - Jane W. Johnson John C. Givens - Byron Randolph Foley ATTEST: James E. Taliafeno, II Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Council of the City of Salem, at its regular meeting on January 11,2076, at7:30 p.m., in Council Chambers of the City Hall, 114 N. Broad Street, in the City of Salem, Virginia, will hold a public hearing, pursuant to Sections 15.2-2204 and 15.2-2285 of the Code of Virgini4 as amended, to consider approval of the following request relative to the City of Salem ZoningOrdinance: l. Consider adopting Resolution #1276 regarding the Downtown Plan and for amending "The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Salem" to reflect the addition of the Downtown Plan. 2. Consider enacting and amending Chapter 106, Article II District Regulations, Sections 106-210_2(A)(5), 106-210.3(BX1), 106-212.2 (BXs), r06-2r2.3(BX1), 106-218.2(8)(6), 106-218.3(CXl), 106-218.3(C)(2), 106-220.2(BX6), and 106-220.3(C)(1), 106- 220.3(C)(2), Article III Use and Design Standards, Sections 106-310.19, 106-312.3, Article IV Development Standards, Sections 106-404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Article VI Definitions and Use Types, Sections 106-602.9, and 106-602.ll,pertaining to breweries and microbreweries, site development regulations, and definitions. Copies of the proposed plans, ordinances or amendments may be examined in the Office of the City Planner, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia. At said hearing, parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard relative to the said request. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA BY James E. Taliaferro, II Clerk of Council (PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE DECEMBER 24 AND 3t,20t5, ISSUES OF THE "SALEM TTMES-REGISTER" AND SEND STATEMENT TO:CLERK OF COUNCIL, PO BOX 869, SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153-0869.) ITEM #1 December 10, 2015 To: Planning Commission Members From: Melinda J. Payne, Director of Planning & Economic Development Date: December 10,2015 RE: Downtown Plan Resolution of Recommendation and amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Salem Attached is the final draft of The Downtown Plan and also a resolution of recommendation. With the adoption of the resolution, the Commission will be voting to amend "The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Salem" to reflect the addition of the Downtown Plan- Thanks. MEMORANDUM IN THE PLANNING coMMISSIoN oF THE cITy oF SALEM, VIRGINIA, December 16,2015: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Salem is desirous of having the kind of vibrant and iconic downtown which our community deserves; and WHEREAS, Downtown Salem should be historic and respectful of the past, but also modem and relevant; it must be livelier with events and activities for all citizens, and a prime location for business; it will be lusher with greenery, and overhung with distinct, placemaking lighting; it must take its rightful place in the valley's consciousness; and WHEREAS, for the last year city staff and citizen stakeholders have worked towards that goal; and WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled meeting on the above date, there was presented The Downtown Plan to be added to the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Salem for approval, amendment and approval, or disapproval, as required by the provisions of Section 15.2-2226 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, notice has been given, in accordance with Section 15.2-2204 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, that a public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan would be held at the regularly scheduled meeting on the above date; and WHEREAS, the public hearing, as required, has been held; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 15.2-2230 of the 1950 Code of Virgini4 as amended, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan and recommends no further amendments at this time; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, that: (l) The Downtown Plan as presented is hereby approved. (2) The Downtown Plan is here by recommended for approval to the Council ofthe City of Salem, Virginia, and The Comprehensive Plan is hereby reviewed, amended and updated. (3) A certified copy ofthis Resolution shall be presented to the Council ofthe City ofSalem, Virginia. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: Denise P. King - Samuel R. Carter III - Jimmy W. Robertson - Bruce N. Thomasson - Vicki G. Daulton - ATTEST: James E. Taliaferro, II Executive Secretary, Planning Commission City of Salem, Virginia UNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION December 16, 2015 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Salem, Virginia, was held in Council Chambers, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, at 7:00 p.m., on December 16, 2015, there being present all the members of said Commission, to wit: Vicki G. Daulton, Bruce N. Thomasson, Jimmy W. Robertson, Samuel R. Carter, III, and Denise P. King with Vicki G. Daulton, Chair, presiding; together with James E. Taliaferro, II, Assistant City Manager and Executive Secretary, ex officio member of said Commission; Melinda J. Payne, Director of Planning and Development; Charles E. Van Allman, Jr., City Engineer; Benjamin W. Tripp, Planner; Judy L. Hough, Planner; Mary Ellen Wines, Zoning Administrator; and William C. Maxwell, Assistant City Attorney; and the following business was transacted: The October 14, 2015, regular meeting minutes were approved as written. In re: Hold public hearing to consider adopting resolution of recommendation regarding the Downtown Plan and for amending “The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Salem” to reflect the addition of the Downtown Plan The Executive Secretary reported that this date and time had been set to hold a public hearing to consider adopting a resolution of recommendation regarding the Downtown Plan and for amending “The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Salem” to reflect the addition of the Downtown Plan; and WHEREAS, the Executive Secretary further reported that notice of such hearing had been published in the November 26, and December 3, 2015, issues of the Salem Times Register; and WHEREAS, staff noted the following: the final draft of The Downtown Plan had been submitted to the Planning Commission and also a resolution of recommendation; with the adoption of the resolution, the Commission will be voting to amend “The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Salem” to reflect the addition of the Downtown Plan; and WHEREAS, Ben Tripp, Planner, appeared before the Commission explaining the process for the Downtown Plan; he noted the document is a road map for the future of Downtown Salem; the process to create it began about a year ago, and from the beginning we set out to use a modern comprehensive approach to economic development, one that would be successful because of its collaboration, and decisive in its intent; last fall, Salem City Council appointed a 2 group of citizens, business owners to an Advisory Committee; using surveys and stakeholder meetings, staff undertook a community visioning process to determine what kind of do wntown residents wanted to have, and the response was overwhelming; he further noted he was sure none of the Commission would be surprised that Salem residents really care about their downtown; staff received 1,152 unique responses to one of the surveys, which was mailed to every single utility billing address in Salem; overall staff reviewed 3,400 individual comments about downtown, the most of any plan the city has ever done; staff sorted and cataloged these comments, and aggregated them into ten broad themes of consensus, which make up the body of the plan; each theme has goals and strategies about how to accomplish it; below is a list of the themes and a brief overview of a few of the strategies they contain: 1. Events – We must get more people downtown. We need more and different types of events than we have now. We also have to work with new partners, like the Salem Library, businesses, churches, and Roanoke College. 2. Businesses – We have created a Façade Grant incentive program, and will take advantage of historic tax credits. We will work to limit the negative side effects of non-profits and government facilities on the critical mass of businesses necessary to have a successful downtown. We’ll have areas for outdoor dining that will be provided for restaurants. This will provide desired experiences for patrons and increases sales for business. We will take the information we learned from the surveys and make that available to businesses, so that entrepreneurship can fill the demand for the products people have told us they want. 3. History – Downtown is where Salem began. We will preserve the past and build its storied nature. We will make the streetscape look more historic by replacing the sidewalks with brick, by adding historic style streetlights and traffic signals, and reintroducing quirky little bits of character from downtowns past. We will encourage the use of historic tax credits, and amplify them through t he façade grant program. 4. Parking – How many parking spaces would you guess are in Downtown Salem? (WAIT) 2,019. And would you believe that parking is typically about 50% used? That doesn’t mean that there aren’t areas that are heavily used though. Wh at it means is there is an opportunity to use that extra capacity to make parking in downtown work smarter. We can increase the amount of parking and better manage it. We can have special parking for tourists, and improve the look of parking lots from th e street. 5. Character – We’ll create a “Salem” character. Look on the front of your copy of the plan. That’s it. You see bump outs in the sidewalk for outdoor dining, and areas of 3 congregation. You see a livable, pedestrian friendly downtown. Areas of downtown will be overhung by distinctive placemaking lighting, unlike anything else in our region, which will define the district, and create something special “under the lights”. 6. Downtown Living – Residential options are key to the success of any downtown, and ours is no exception. We have to have better quality units downtown and have better connections to the surrounding neighborhoods. We also have to make sure that the required services, such as municipal wifi, are in place downtown to cater to the needs of residents. 7. Appearance & Placemaking – Improve the turn movements at lights on Main Street. Improve property maintenance. Expand the footprint of downtown. Improve Boulevard between College and Market in order to make the area more attractive to business and a better entrance to downtown. 8. Landscaping – We will create a “landscaping” requirement for downtown, which will require plants on the sidewalk, flags, or other low-cost, colorful and character- producing elements. We will increase the tree canopy coverage and use trees to help create a sense of place, and a healthier environment. 9. Youth & College Students – We will work with Roanoke College, the Salem Public Library, and businesses to create more nightlife downtown. We will add family oriented events in Younger Park. We will create the kind of downtown that will appeal to the millennial generation. 10. Tourism – Last is tourism. Salem enjoys so many advantages in this area, from our beautiful natural scenery, to the Stagg Bowl. But we have to work to make these advantages benefit our downtown. We have to add signage to the interstate, hold “fan zones” downtown for sporting tournaments, and make sure our downtown fills a certain niche in the region. In conclusion, Downtown is the heart of Salem; it represents our identity, not just to our citizens, but also our identity in the region; by working together we can build on the idea of what Salem means; we can use downtown to propel our identity into the future; what we must do is commit ourselves to building the kind of downtown that our community, Salem, deserves; and he stated he would be happy to answer any questions the Commission might have; and WHEREAS, Vice Chair Thomasson noted he assumed the implementation phase is underway and will consistently improve the downtown area as we get grant money to do this; 4 Mr. Tripp noted that this is correct; he noted that there are a number of things which have already begun in the implementation phase and City Council has wisely set aside some money for high priority projects; but what he hopes will happen is that the idea of supporting downtown and focusing on downtown will become embedded in our community and in the way we operate; and WHEREAS, Chair Daulton asked if he could put a price tag on what the entire project would cost, what would he estimate; Mr. Tripp noted that he was not sure he could give her an estimate; he believes that there are probably between one and two million dollars of things outlined in the plan, and obviously this will be spread over a very long time frame; he noted the items in Phase 3 are probably beyond 10 years, and the things that are newer are much closer; he further noted that there is a whole host of items that could be done now with a zero cost; these items just involve a change in the way we do something; for instance, we have movies in the park at Longwood, and it is a great event; but what if this event was held in front of the library; it does not cost anything to do, but it changes the focus and it changes the kind of event; he believes there are other things we do as a community, like the new Salem ½ marathon coming up, which will help work with the Downtown Plan as well but they are not counted in the cost; in terms of the streetscape, which is probably the big ticket item and is not included in the figure he gave, he thinks we will need to do the engineering to determine the cost, but we have submitted for 1.5 million dollars in grants from VDOT and those gr ants have about a 20% local match; so the cost to the City will be 20% and the state will pay 80%; Chair Daulton asked if he is guessing the entire project should take 10 to 15 years from start to finish; he noted in terms of doing everything in the plan and checking off the items, it might not be quite that long but it will take time to see the changes that we want to see; he further noted that some of the items are very long term strategies like the parking garage; and WHEREAS, Commissioner King noted that she likes the idea of the drawing where we have set out sections that are to be done so that we are not running in different directions but focusing on an area; she referred to the change in the Olde Salem Christmas this year to the Library so it focused people to one area; she received several comments from people with small children who said it was walkable now that it had been moved; Mr. Tripp noted that this is a great example of the kind of thought change that can happen, and it did not cost anythin g to do it differently; he noted it was a great event with a fire pit in front of the library, shops were open, music, etc.; and WHEREAS, Vice Chair Thomasson noted that assuming Mr. Tripp is going to be the integral part of implementing the plan, and succession planning is very important for someone to pick up the baton after he is done; Mr. Tripp noted that he though t the Vice Chair was overstating his 5 involvement because there were a lot of people who worked on the plan; Vice Chair noted that this was correct – there had been a lot of people involved; Mr. Tripp noted that he wrote the plan, and he mentioned the steering committee and the advisory committee who had been involved; he noted that this has been a community process and was community driven; and WHEREAS, Melinda Payne noted that one of the advisory committee members was present and she invited him to share a brief perspective; and WHEREAS, Russ West, Downtown Plan Advisory Committee member, appeared before the Commission; he noted that he was very excited when the City reached out to him and asked him to be a part of the project; he further noted that he has done this a couple times in a land far, far away from Salem, and it is an exciting project; one thing he wanted to touch on is that we have all kinds of ideas here in the plan but it is fluid; we are going to move the plan around, there will be things added and things subtracted because there has to be – time, money, personnel, and engineering will all dictate a lot of what is going to happen here; but he wants to stress the fact that this is the downtown or the core of a 25,000 people community, and if we do not have a good, solid vibrant core, then we do not have the ability to go anywhere else within the community; he can guarantee with the success of this in 10 to 15 years that someone will be standing at this microphone and talking to 5 people sitting in the same chairs about the east end, West Main Street, Apperson Drive, or the district around the hospital; those other areas will want to know when it is their turn, and it will happen because the community will grow and thrive; he noted that this was the easy part putting the plan together, and come next year, that is when the hard work starts; and WHEREAS, Ms. Payne noted that she also wanted to thank Chair Daulton for serving as the liaison for the Planning Commission and for her support and the role that she played in it; she further noted it was a lot of work and we are going to make it happen so she want ed to give accolades to everyone for the role they played in getting us to this point; and WHEREAS, Commission Member Robertson noted there were a lot of people who worked on the plan and it was a job well done; the thing that he really appreciates is that the plan covers how the work will be distributed for the future; Mr. Tripp noted that staff did not want to create a plan that would sit on the shelf; and WHEREAS, Barbara Bell of 352 North Broad Street appeared before the Commission; she noted that they have a neighborhood association, which is very active, and it is their hope to make North Broad Street a National Historic District; so she is here to let the Commission and 6 staff know she is interested in what is going on with the Downtown Plan, etc.; she is hoping once Mike Pulice with the Virginia Department of Historic Resources gets everything pulled together and they get all of their houses evaluated that it might be a good time for them to come before the City and get some financial help and approval for this designation; they believe that having a historic district adjacent to the downtown district might be a nice thing to consider; and she thanked the Planning Commission for their time; and WHEREAS, Commissioner King noted the area would be within walking distance of the downtown area so she thought it would be wonderful; and WHEREAS, no other person(s) appeared related to said request; and ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER KING, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ROBERTSON, AND DULY CARRIED, the request to consider adopting a Resolution of Recommendation regarding the Downtown Plan and for amending “The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Salem” to reflect the addition of the Downtown Plan be approved as presented – the roll call vote: all aye. ITEM: Zoning Ordinanc e Amendment SUBJECT: Hold p ublic hearing and cons id er ordinanc e o n firs t read ing to enact and amend Chap ter 106, Article II District Regulatio ns , S ectio ns 106-210.2(A)(5), 106-210.3(B)(1), 106-212.2 (B)(5), 106-212.3(B)(1), 106- 218.2(B)(6), 106-218.3(C)(1), 106-218.3(C)(2), 106-220.2(B)(6), and 106-220.3(C)(1), 106-220.3(C)(2), Article III Us e and Des ign Standards, Sections 106-310.19, 106-312.3, Artic le IV Develo p ment Stand ards , Sec tions 106-404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Artic le VI Definitio ns and Use Types , S ectio ns 106-602.9, and 106-602.11, pertaining to b reweries and micro b reweries, site develo p ment regulations , and d efinitio ns. (Ad vertis ed in the December 24, and 31, 2015, is s ues of the Salem Times Register. Rec o mmended ap p ro val, see P age 6 o f the Planning Commis s io n minutes.) (STAFF REPORT) Continued on P age 2 ATTACHMENT S: Des crip tion Type Zoning Changes Cover Memo PC Minutes Cover Memo REVIEWER S: Dep artment Clerk of the Council ITEM*-Gh- AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND, REVISE, AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 106, Article II District Regulations, Sections 106-210.2(AX5), 106-210.3(B)(l),106-212.2 (BX5), 106-212.3(BX1), 106- 218.2(BX6), 106-218.3(CX1), 106-218.3(CX2), 106-220.2(8)(6), and 106-220.3(CX1), 106- 220.3(C)(2), Article III Use and Design Standards, Sections 106-310.19, 106-312.3, Article IV Development Standards, Sections 106-404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Article VI Definitions and Use Types, Sections 106-602.9, and 106-602.11, pertaining to breweries and microbreweries, site development regulations, and definitions. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COLNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, thAt Sections 106-210.2(AXs), 106-210.3(BX1),106-212.2(BX5), 106-212.3(BX1), 106-218.2(BX6), 106-218.3(cXl), 106-218.3(cX2), 106-220.2(B)(6), and 106-220.3(CX1), 106-220.3(C)(2), Article II, Sections 106-310.19, 106-312.3, Article III, Sections 106-404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Article IV, Sections 106-602.9, and 106-602.11, Article VI, Chapter 106, of The Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, be amended, revised, and reordained to read as follows: CHAPTER 106 ARTICLE II DISTRICT REGULATIONS SECTION 106-210 DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT. Sec. 106-210.2. - Permitted uses.(A) The following uses are permitted by right in the DBD Downtown Business District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards 5. Commercial Use Types Antique Shops Automobile Paru/Supply, Retail Business or Trade School Business Support Services Commercial Indoor Entertainment Communicalion Services Consumer Repair Services Convenience Store Day Care Center * Funeral Services Homestay Inn * Hotel,Motel/Motor Lodge Microbrewerl'* Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restawant Retail Sales Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/C linic DA]E l- ll-1a:l(t', Sec. 106-210.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the DBD Downtown Business District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards.(B) Minimum and Maximum Setback Requiremenls. 1. PrincipalStructure: Front Yard: @.-Zero; Exception: Maximum of 20 feet if for outdoor patio-style dining. Front yard shall only be used for patio-styte outdoor dining. No front yard shall be used for any parking area or otherwise designed or devoted to any vehicle use. SECTION 106-212 TRANSITIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. Sec. 106-212.2. - Permitted uses. (B) The following uses are permitted by special exception in the TBD Transitional Business District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards 5. Commercial Use Types Assembly Hall Commercial Indoor Amusement Hospital Microbrewery* Sec. 106-212.3, - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the TBD Transitional Business District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards.(B) Minimum and Mmimum Selback Requirements. 1. PrincipalStructure: Front Yard: Ne+4inirsanm Zero; Exception: Maximum of 20 feet if for outdoor patio-style dining. Front yard shall only be used for patio-style dining. No front yard shall be used for any parking area or otherwise designed or devoted to any vehicle use. SECTION 106.218 LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICT. Sec. 106-218.2. - Permitted uses.(B) The following uses are permitted by special exception in the LM Light Manufacturing District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards. 6. Induslrial Use Types Asphalt Plant * Breweryt Industry Type II Landfi ll, Construction Debris Landfill, Rubble Landfill, Sanitary Meat Packing and Related Industries Railroad Facilities Resource Extraction Scrap and Salvage Services Sec. 106-218.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the LM Light Manufacturing District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards. (C) Maximum Height of Structures. 1. Principal Structures: z15 70 feet 2. Accessory Structures: 70 feet. SECTION 106-220 HEAVY MANUFACTURING DISTRICT. Sec. 106-220.2. - Permitted uses.(B) The following uses are permitted by special exception in the HM Heavy Manufacturing District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards. 6. Industrial Use Types Brewery* Industry Type III Landfi ll, Construction Debris Landfill, Rubble Landfill, Sanitary Resource Extraction Scrap and Salvage Services Sec. 106-220.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the HM Heavy Manufacturing District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards. (C) Mmimum Height of Structures. 1. Principal Structues:45 75 feet 2. AccessoryStructures: 75 feet ARTICLE III USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION 106-310 COMMERCIAL USES. Sec. 106-310.19. - Microbreweries.(A) General standards: 1. Such establishments shall include a tasting area, and may include restaurant, retail, and live entertainment uses. 2. First floor frontage shall have at least 500% transparency from the street, and shall be primarily occupied by non-industrial uses. Sec. 106-312.3. - Breweries. (A) General standards: 1. Such establishments may also include restaurants, tasting rooms, and retail related to the beverage being produced. ARTICLE IV DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION 106-404 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS. Sec. 106-404.17. - Minimum parking required.(E) Commerciql Use Types Microbrewery Schedule B (F) Industrial Use Types Brewery Schedule B ARTICLE VI DEFINITIONS AIYD USE TYPES SECTION 106-602 USE TYPES. Sec. 106-602.9. - Commercial use types. [The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:] Athletic Instruction Services. Establishments primarily engaged in providing indoor instruction and training in athletic sports that require high ceiling heights for the activity. Typical uses include gymnastics academies, baseball and softball training centers, tennis centers and golf centers. Microbrewery. An establishment engaged in the production ofbeer with a significant commercial component, such as a restaurant or retail store. Sec. 106-602.11. - Industrial use types. [The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:l Brewery. An establishment primarily engaged in the production of beer for distribution. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its final passage. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: James L. Chisom - William D. Jones - Jane W. Johnson - John C. Givens - Byron Randolph Foley - Passed: Effective: Mayor ATTEST: James E. Taliaferro, II Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia "\ CITY OF SALEM PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM #2 STAFF REPORT Prepared by: City Administrative Staff Meeting Date: December '16,2015 Report prepared: December 10, 2015 RE: Hold public hearing to consider enacting and amending Chapter 106, Article II District Regulations, Sections 106-210.2(AX5), 106-210.3(BX1), 106-212.2 (BX5), 106-212.3(BXl), 106- 218.2(BX6), 106-218.3(cX1), 106-218.3(cX2), 106-220.2(BX6), and 106-220.3(CXl), 106- 220.3(C)(2), Article III Use and Design Standards, Sections 106-310.19, 106-312.3, Article IV Development Standards, Sections 106-404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Article VI Definitions and Use Types, Sections 106-602.9, and 106-602.11, pertaining to breweries and microbreweries, site development regulations, and definitions. @: This request is to enact and amend Chapter 106, Article II District Regulations, Article III Use and Design Standards, Article IV Development Standards, and Article VI Definitions and Use Types pertaining to breweries and microbreweries, site development regulations, and definitions. BB9,SENIIANE: Sec. 106-210.2. - Permitted uses.(A) The following uses are permitted by right in the DBD Downtown Business District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards 5. Commercial Use Types Antique Shops Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail Business or Trade School Business Support Services Commercial Indoor Entertainment Communication Services Consumer Repair Services Convenience Store Day Care Center * Funeral Services Homestay Inn * Hotel/Motel/\,Iotor Lodge Microbrewery* Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant Retail Sales Page 2 Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic Sec. 106-210.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the DBD Downtown Business District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards.(B) Minimum and Moximum Setback Requirements. 1 . Principal Structure: Front Yard: @.-Zero; Exception: Maximum of 20 feet il for outdoor patio-style dining. Front yard shall only be used for patio-style outdoor dining. No front yard shall be used for any parking area or otherwise designed or devoted to any vehicle use. Sec. 106-212.2. - Permitted uses.(B) The following uses are permitted by special exception in the TBD Transitional Business District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards 5. Commercial Use Types Assembly Hall Commercial Indoor Amusement Hospital Microbrewery* Sec. 106-212.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the TBD Transitional Business District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards.(B) Minimum and Maximum Setback Requirements. l. Principal Structure: Front Yard: Ne-A4i+imum Zero; Exception: Maximum of 20 feet if for outdoor patio-style dining. Front yard shall only be used for patio-style dining. No front yard shall be used for any parking area or otherwise designed or devoted to any vehicle use. Sec. 106-218.2. - Permitted uses.(B) The following uses are permitted by special exception in the LM Light Manufacturing District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Desiga Standards. 6. Industrial Use Types Asphalt Plant * Brewery* Industry Type II Landfill, Construction Debris Landfill, Rubble Landfill, Sanitary Meat Packing and Related Industries Railroad Facilities Resource Extraction Scrap and Salvage Services Page 3 Sec. 106-218.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the LM Light Manufacturing District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards. (C) Maximum Height of Structures. l. Principal Structures: € 70 feet 2. Accessory Structures: 70 feet. The height efany aeeessery strueture shall net e'teeed the @ Sec. 106-220.2. - Permitted uses.(B) The following uses are permitted by special exception in the HM Heavy Manufacturing District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards. 6. Industrial Use Types Brewery* Industry Type III Landfi ll, Construction Debris Landfrll, Rubble Landfrll, Sanitary Resource Extraction Scrap and Salvage Services Sec. 106-220.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the HM Heavy Manufacturing District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards. (C) Mmimum Height of Structures. 1. Principal Structures: 4575 feet 2. Accessory Structures: @75feet Sec. 106-310. t 9. - Microbreweries.(A) General standards: 1. Such establishments shall include a tasting area, and may include restaurant, retail, and live entertainmenl uses. 2. First floor fronlage shall have at least 500% transparency from the street, and shall be primarily occupied by non-industrial uses. Sec. 106-312.3. - Breweries. (A) General standards: l. Such establishments may also include restaurants, tasting rooms, and retail related to the beverage being produced. Sec. 106-404.17. - Minimum parking required. (E) Commercial Use Types Microbrewery Schedule B(F) Industrial Use Types Brewery Schedule B t Page 4 Sec. 106-602.9. - Commercial use types. [The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:] Athletic Instruction Services. Establishments primarily engaged in providing indoor instruction and training in athletic sports that require high ceiling heights for the activity. Typical uses include gymnastics academies, baseball and softball training centers, tennis centers and golfcenters. Microbrewery. An establishment engaged in the production olbeer with a significant commercial component. Sec. 106-602.11. - Industrial use types. [The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:] Brewery. An establishment primarily engaged in the production of beer for distribution. In re: Hold public hearing to consider enacting and amending Chapter 106, Article II District Regulations, Sections 106-210.2(A)(5), 106-210.3(B)(1), 106-212.2 (B)(5), 106-212.3(B)(1), 106-218.2(B)(6), 106-218.3(C)(1), 106-218.3(C)(2), 106- 220.2(B)(6), and 106-220.3(C)(1), 106-220.3(C)(2), Article III Use and Design Standards, Sections 106-310.19, 106-312.3, Article IV Development Standards, Sections 106-404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Article VI Definitions and Use Types, Sections 106-602.9, and 106-602.11, pertaining to breweries and microbreweries, site development regulations, and definitions The Executive Secretary reported that this date and time had been set to ho ld a public hearing to consider enacting and amending Chapter 106, Article II District Regulations, Sections 106-210.2(A)(5), 106-210.3(B)(1), 106-212.2 (B)(5), 106-212.3(B)(1), 106-218.2(B)(6), 106- 218.3(C)(1), 106-218.3(C)(2), 106-220.2(B)(6), and 106-220.3(C)(1), 106-220.3(C)(2), Article III Use and Design Standards, Sections 106-310.19, 106-312.3, Article IV Development Standards, Sections 106-404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Article VI Definitions and Use Types, Sections 106- 602.9, and 106-602.11, pertaining to breweries and microbreweries, site development regulations, and definitions; and WHEREAS, the Executive Secretary further reported that notice of such hearing had been published in the November 26, and December 3, 2015, issues of the Salem Times Register; and WHEREAS, staff noted the following: this request is to enact and amend Chapter 106, Article II District Regulations, Sections 106-210.2(A)(5), 106-210.3(B)(1), 106-212.2 (B)(5), 106- 212.3(B)(1), 106-218.2(B)(6), 106-218.3(C)(1), 106-218.3(C)(2), 106-220.2(B)(6), and 106- 220.3(C)(1), 106-220.3(C)(2), Article III Use and Design Standards, Sections 106-310.19, 106- 312.3, Article IV Development Standards, Sections 106-404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Article VI Definitions and Use Types, Sections 106-602.9, and 106-602.11, pertaining to breweries and microbreweries, site development regulations, and definitions; and WHEREAS, Mary Ellen Wines, Zoning Administrator, appeared before the Commission explaining the proposed zoning ordinance amendments; staff over the past few years gathered several housekeeping changes that needed to be made and before the Commission tonight are part of the changes; she noted that included in the changes are the addition of a couple of definitions and uses, one of those is the microbrewery to be added to the Downtown Business District and the Transitional Business District; with the popularity of breweries now, staff believes it is very appropriate to include this use in these districts before we have someone show interest in these areas; also from a couple of years ago when Parkway Brewery located in the City, we did not have a use in the ordinance for brewery so this has been added to the industrial districts permitted uses as well, and a definition for breweries has been ad ded to the definitions; in 2 addition, a definition has been added for athletic instruction services which was inadvertently left out of the approval process a few years ago; further, there are some changes related to maximum height of structures and front setback which staff feels is more appropriate than the existing regulations; and WHEREAS, no other person(s) were present related to said request; ON MOTION MADE BY VICE CHAIR THOMASSON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CARTER, AND DULY CARRIED, the Planning Commission of the City of Salem doth recommend to the Council of the City of Salem that Chapter 106, Article II District Regulations, Sections 106- 210.2(A)(5), 106-210.3(B)(1), 106-212.2 (B)(5), 106-212.3(B)(1), 106-218.2(B)(6), 106-218.3(C)(1), 106-218.3(C)(2), 106-220.2(B)(6), and 106-220.3(C)(1), 106-220.3(C)(2), Article III Use and Design Standards, Sections 106-310.19, 106-312.3, Article IV Development Standards, Sections 106- 404.17(E) and 106-404.17(F), Article VI Definitions and Use Types, Sections 106-602.9, and 106- 602.11, pertaining to breweries and microbreweries, site development regulations, and definitions be amended as follows: ARTICLE II DISTRICT REGULATIONS SECTION 106-210. DBD – Downtown Business District Sec. 106-210.2. - Permitted uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right in the DBD Downtown Business District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringen t standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards 5. Commercial Use Types Antique Shops Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail Business or Trade School Business Support Services Commercial Indoor Entertainment Communication Services Consumer Repair Services Convenience Store Day Care Center * Funeral Services Homestay Inn * Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge Microbrewery* 3 Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant Retail Sales Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic Sec. 106-210.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the DBD Downtown Business District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards. (B) Minimum and Maximum Setback Requirements. 1. Principal Structure: Front Yard: No Minimum; Maximum of 20 feet. Zero; Exception: Maximum of 20 feet if for outdoor patio-style dining. Front yard shall only be used for patio- style outdoor dining. No front yard shall be used for any parking area or otherwise designed or devoted to any vehicle use. SECTION 106-212. TBD – Transitional Business District Sec. 106-212.2. - Permitted uses. (B) The following uses are permitted by special exception in the TBD Transitional Business District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards 5. Commercial Use Types Assembly Hall Commercial Indoor Amusement Hospital Microbrewery* Sec. 106-212.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the TBD Transitional Business District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards. (B) Minimum and Maximum Setback Requirements. 1. Principal Structure: Front Yard: No Minimum Zero; Exception: Maximum of 20 feet if for outdoor patio-style dining. Front yard shall only be used for patio-style dining. No front yard shall be used for any parking area or otherwise designed or devoted to any vehicle use. 4 SECTION 106-218. LM – Light Manufacturing District Sec. 106-218.2. - Permitted uses. (B) The following uses are permitted by special exception in the LM Light Manufacturing District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards. 6. Industrial Use Types Asphalt Plant * Brewery* Industry Type II Landfill, Construction Debris Landfill, Rubble Landfill, Sanitary Meat Packing and Related Industries Railroad Facilities Resource Extraction Scrap and Salvage Services Sec. 106-218.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the LM Light Manufacturing District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards. (C) Maximum Height of Structures. 1. Principal Structures: 45 70 feet 2. Accessory Structures: 70 feet. The height of any accessory structure shall not exceed the height of the principal structure on the lot. SECTION 106-220. HM – Heavy Manufacturing District Sec. 106-220.2. - Permitted uses. (B) The following uses are permitted by special exception in the HM Heavy Manufacturing District, subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this chapter. An asterisk (*) indicates that the use is subject to additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in Article III, Use and Design Standards. 6. Industrial Use Types Brewery* Industry Type III Landfill, Construction Debris Landfill, Rubble 5 Landfill, Sanitary Resource Extraction Scrap and Salvage Services Sec. 106-220.3. - Site development regulations. The following are general development standards for the HM Heavy Manufacturing District. For additional, modified or more stringent standards see Article III, Use and Design Standards. (C) Maximum Height of Structures. 1. Principal Structures: 45 75 feet 2. Accessory Structures: The height of any accessory structure shall not exceed the height of the principal structure on the lot. 75 feet ARTICLE III USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION 106-310. Commercial uses. Sec. 106-310.19. - Microbreweries. (A) General standards: 1. Such establishments shall include a tasting area, and may include restaurant, retail, and live entertainment uses. 2. First floor frontage shall have at least 50% transparency from the street, and shall be primarily occupied by non-industrial uses. SECTION 106-312. Industrial uses. Sec. 106-312.3. - Breweries. (A) General standards: 1. Such establishments may also include restaurants, tasting rooms, and retail related to the beverage being produced. ARTICLE IV DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION 106-404. Off-street parking requirements. Sec. 106-404.17. - Minimum parking required. 6 (E) Commercial Use Types Microbrewery Schedule B (F) Industrial Use Types Brewery Schedule B ARTICLE VI DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES SECTION 106-602. Use types. Sec. 106-602.9. - Commercial use types. [The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:] Athletic Instruction Services. Establishments primarily engaged in providing indoor instruction and training in athletic sports that require high ceiling heights for the activity. Typical uses include gymnastics academies, baseball and softball training centers, tennis centers and golf centers. Microbrewery. An establishment engaged in the production of beer with a significant commercial component. Sec. 106-602.11. - Industrial use types. [The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:] Brewery. An establishment primarily engaged in the production of beer for distribution. -- the roll call vote: all aye. There being no further business to come before the Commission, the same on motion adjourned at 7:27 p.m. Executive Secretary Chair ITEM: Voting Precinc t SUBJECT: Hold p ublic hearing and cons id er ordinanc e o n firs t read ing amend ing Chap ter 26, Artic le II, S ectio n 26- 38(b ), o f THE C ODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, regard ing Prec inc t A o r Co nehurst p recinct. (Advertis ed in the December 28, 2015, and January 4, 2016, issues o f T h e Roa n oke Times.) ATTACHMENT S: Des crip tion Type Precinct Change Cover Memo REVIEWER S: Dep artment Clerk of the Council ITEM #- DATE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND, REVISE, AND REORDAIN SECTION 26-38 (b), ARTICLE II, CHAPTER 26, OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, PERTAINING TO PRECINCT A OR CONEHURST PRECINCT. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, thAt Section 26-38 (b), Article II, Chapter 26, of The Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, be amended, revised, and reordained to read as follows: CHAPTER 26 ELECTIONS ARTICLE II. PRECINCTS; VOTING PLACES. Section 26-38. Precinct A or Conehurst Precinct. (b) Voting place. The voting place in Precinct A or Conehurst Precinct shall be and thesameisherebyestablished,aslongasitisavailable,at@ een$rSalem Civic Center, 1001 Roanoke Boulevard. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its final passage. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: James L. Chisom - William D. Jones - Jane W. Johnson - John C. Givens - Byron Randolph Foley - Passed: Effective: lsl Mayor ATTEST: James E. Taliaferro, II Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia SALE Office of the City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING A public hearing will be held before Salem City Council, in Council Chambers, Salem City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia, on January lL, 2016, at 7:30 p.m. to consider the following amendment to The Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, pertaining to a change in voting places: Section 26-38 (b) to change the voting place of Precinct A or Conehurst Precinct from Lakeside Baptist Worship Center, 447 Dalewood Avenue to the Salem Civic Center, 1001 Roanoke Boulevard; and Maps and other documents pertaining to these changes may be viewed in the City Manager's Office, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia. Interested parties may appear at the public hearing and be heard by City Council. CITY OF SALEM James E. Taliaferro, II Clerk of Salem City Council TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE DECEMBER ISSUES OF THE ROANOKE TIMES AND CITY OF SALEM, P. O. BOX 869, SALEM, VA 24153-0869. 28, 2075 AND JANUARY SEND BILL TO: CLERK 4,2016, OF COUNCIL, Mary Ellen H Wines Flom: Sent: lo: Subject: Please see following Sharon E Pratt Tuesday, December 01, 2015 2:17 PM Mary Ellen H Wines FW: Build Usage-Lakeside Baptist Church From: Brenda Frankie Imailto:brenda@lbcva.com] S€nt: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 9:59 AM To: Sharon E Pratt <spratt@salemva.gov> Sublect: Build Usage-Lakeside Baptist Church Lakeside Baptist Church 447 Dalewood Avenue Salem, VA 24153 December 1, 2015 Dear Ms. Pratt, This letter is in regards to the future use of our church facilities. As infringements have increased on Christians, Christian organizations and even churches, our board of trustees feel at this time we must only allow church members who align themselves with our constitution including our doctrinal statement to use our facilities. We are disappointed that the current climate in the United States has turned against those who would choose to follow the Bible and long-standing Christian beliefs. We feel that it is necessary to protect our facilities, our members and our pastors. We are saddened that we must take this course of action, but feel we have no other choice. Hopefully the sentiment against Bible-believing Christians will change, but our legal counsel has steered us in this direction for now. Sincerely trying to please God and serve people, A"t 1l^"*- Senior Pastor This e-mail message is for the sole use ofthe intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged and/o. confdential informalion. lf you are not the intended recipient, please conlact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies ofthe original message. ITEM: Conveyanc e o f P ro p erty SUBJECT: Hold p ublic hearing to cons id er the conveyanc e o f C ity of Salem real property des ignated as a 0.13405 acre trac t lo cated at 3733 Ellen Drive, Tax Map 055.10-03-47.00-0000, in the County o f Ro anoke. (Advertised in the January 4, 2016, is s ue o f The R oanoke Times.) ATTACHMENT S: Des crip tion Type 3733 Ellen Drive Cover Memo REVIEWER S: Dep artment Clerk of the Council mM# (T)- ssr.t'll')-LG ProFrty Locrtion: 3733 ELLEN DR Prrr.l ID: 055.1G03-47.00-0000 Mrgka.rLlDtarict: CATAWBA Ac.outrt: 19298 C.rd I of I Own.r N.nc rrd M.iling Addrt$l SALEM CITY OF xxxxxrco0ooooo(xxxxxxxxxx)o(xxxxxx)o(x )o(xxxrcooooogxxxxxxxxrcoG xx 99999 Currcnt Propcrty Asscssmctrt 2015 Toltl Buildirg Vrtu.: 0 Totrl Lrnd V.luc: I l70O Tottl Vrluc: 11700 NsrrrtiYc DBcription This property cootahs I Lot of lard with a(n) N/A style building, Built about N/A, having primary N/A secondary N/A exterior and N/A roof cover, N/A be&oom(s), N/A tull bah(s), N/A halfbath(s). Jurildicaiol!: L.grl Dcs.ription: D.cdcd Acr.rgc: Estim.a.d Acrt.gc: Vrcrt!t Land: I Lot 0.13405212 AC YES Propcrty Chmctcristics COUNTY WELL LT I BLK 2 ANDREW LEwlS PLACE Nclghbortood: H006/ANDREWLEWISPLACE Ccnrur Blotlc 5l1610303m3019 Lr[d Utc ProgrrE: NO S.le Drte Sala Prica Lcsal Rafaranca Salcs Informrtion Most Rcccot Srlcs S.lc! IX3criotiotr 1/1/'t900 '111/1900 P80000300036 DB00 10630727 PLAT NEEDS REVIEW 't2t3t2015 --m Propcrty Locrtion: 3733 ELLEN DR Percel II): 055.10-03-47.00-0000 MegisterirlDistrict: CATAWBA Account: 19298 Card I of I SPlit: NO Zonine Code County-Rl Action No: Date: Ordinance: Name: Zoning Informetion Zonine Desciotion County-R I /Low Densitv Residential 12t3t2015 Propertylocation: 3733 ELLEN DR Perccl ID: 055.10-03-47.00-0000 MegistcrirlDistrict: CATAWBA Account: 19298 Crrd I of I Tax Map 12t312015 .F'; ',r lt!*'.. r9 *9i Jtsi Saa tao zz i Er 3 :i ! zalq cg ! Ee ! iE3:iI !. : ota a( zl:;t; iir;r 92r 3ii *' a ora,Er .I il. rl3 sl9 il; ils el 3lNl.-lGI.=l tl 't,.1-' i:. a,, i. .i,. _ ,. gg t..4. J.-,} :*1 t," tt '-, r!:!i ;;ilE ob{t:r: a -(:rlir?i tt0uhzoo f,-oi:ii:ipriiE: iiEi!i r!;itgCqq;68;;zf$ilr:;It !,'gn: (- D.tF=6rzYot sEiils:3'98,"o!.3dltii:iYF ( 2< < i i' iiiilWffil'ii |!i$ jlil*ilr{ i 111 $ lirll Lii;sil: s ' 'l flililli i 4 i4 I t d .d a i or 4 6 -,Y!.g€ ill lt It*"ao1t, nlra q rra'lr3- ?r\tll9 u, I)zu,t>l< Fc U -*ogc c: ul *.zi'gi F, ii o 7 FIC0,lrl..cO9Atgai-i 3o I "qi ugi( 0.i7 I ti, n F i o 6 9l,u it5rO ruc l-sif,: ou 6_ t,i i.r Q1 * It I o I, I ;*r***!, ': I' -z r:9., i!:'5I8 s:ill:tl; E;l'=$EgFl ieii tiE5 "5?o lg;'9!6du-l;r I .'i;iW:*l #ffi, ,l Pc aaa .cg Zog ,ta -.oC ,cz ae c o'oe a at r;ii': J,JZ , l tn t:sz <zilOlso5c;ao{iF::-cI ds i*a;9^ ;sEzltt0< zca <,- E5 <B< :rEirii!:a:i -'au.,UF e.I IcaOqa =0EE2r:ioo o IE l.. < ! --^.::-{ aAl pc aoo o'Qs ,', :,,,-,,I.itrii' i ):.:,fI'. J.r'E+ ' 1i-"1,",, *1i , );. .,,; I t",-.;i ,.,;-: l:. lrl , ,: l'' Til l, CJ., t i .'.)"u { gi ,'o-'ld '-J !:i: 1t' UJi,".,f;4t; i ,,, =tEAEi2i'i^a?El:i',,e3,I!3 i,* =El u5:"i- I E,:,^. i: I *Q',: .t l' ..( ." lE! ' .' !',. Z a ., ',, j,"*,.3,,1 io ' 1. 1' ., { ..i'.' rloldlto' l"* i'' aij ltt a qrLa aataa. l^- J/6-,Eoorl0sl ?MTn llIS BD oerlc rnd .otrr.d lnto Ghtt Ae lfaey oe t{erch. 1977, by 8nd b.tr.Ga B. ELTDOD OlEf. eal IIAIGIIET D' dlBf,' bta rlfe. lnd BATIICE N. CIII|DEB. rldoy. Ptrtl" of th' ftatc prrt. .nd the Ctff Otr 8AI8ll, VIAGIIIIA. P'rty of th' t'Gord P'aC' lfrttrlSSErE: Ttrt, tluERBAS, by dcrd d.G.d Octob'a t. 1959, rnd recorded Octobsr 8, 19t9 la D..d BooL 627, pagc 549 ' trferlocc befuUi to the recordr of !h. Clsrk'. Offtco of Ch' ClrGulC Couat foa thc Cou[G, of no.ook , Vtstttrt'. Chrpea-Rlco, Iac ' dtd convey Irt l. Bloct 2, rccordlng Go th' t{'D of Andrrr L'vl' Pl'c€' dated uay 28, 1948, end rccordrd la thr lfomreld rrcordr ' to Rob€rt 8lt ood onan rnd Jobn l{ttcln Crondor, t/A " ' P'rca'ttblP kno5r a. Andr6, l.erl. lr.lsr tlolt , thr mld oi,.tr 'nd Crotd'r havlng, on Octobor 1, 19t9, mt.rad lBGo ' D'rCn'arhlp for tbr purpoae of opcrttlng m exfutlng r.taa r at- locrtrd ta tlrr lubdtvlaton lmour a3 Andrd Larla PLc'. 6itu'C' la nocoL' Countyt.nd. UHEnBAB, EhG .rld Or.n atd Crord'r dld coatlnu' tb' oporrtloo of aeld r.!.a .t GGo' lrP.odlng th: tA fsa tl'Dt @ tlDB, untll ttr dreth of Joba ltrrtln Grordrr, t'hlch t't'!t['f'd lald p.rtn.r.htP 3 rnd. $y.BnfAs, th. .rld Crondrr, by vtll d'c'd ADltl 28' 1948 and probrt.d Novrrbrr 10. 19rr, .nd Go ba lond rprad otr Page 396 of lltll Eoob f,o. 4 of ttrr rocordr o! tlre Cbrkrr Offlcr of th. clrcutt Cosst of th. Clt, o! 8e1o, Vlrtlnlr, dld drvtr rnd beguotb r11 of htr ProP.agt, t.rl .od Perlotrl. !o hlr rtfr' lcagrldc l{errbr1l Grord.r' .Ppolarlnt tc tft. th.crrtdl of il' aatalat &d' I I i i illa J.nr a ltG. roo(100J roE128 rtf,EEBAg. drc Patll'cr o! Glr' !tra't P'rt hreG nor egpced Go r.1l .!d cotrt rt to tlr. Glt, of 8alco. vta8lntr, ell of thc holdhgr, both l..t rnil Prrroael, fororrly br1or81i8 tq' th' tfor'- nro.d ptltncrshtp of Grco ald Crovdcr. n6r, 'rriEnEtrcRB, ln conrlderltton of th' tuu of sct'EtTl rf,ofrsArD DoIII$l (i?O.O0O.OO). P.ytbl' ar folloru: i10'000'00 crlh to B. Blt ooat Orca rad 910.000.00 G!!h to B'rt"tc' l{' Crordcrr ' the rec.tDc of rrtrtch ,.. hGr€b, lcknontrdgrd; rnd tout (6) notce of cveo dtt6 h.!6tlth, rlth 61 inter"t th'tGm ' aro of rald notcrforglo.0oo.o0,teuthsduconcycarf,rode!c.oocpeyeblr to th. teld Orea end onc payablc Go th' tlld Crorrdcr 'nd thc r.ollnin8 tto not.. ln the !t! of $15.000'00 rach ' fallltg duc aro(2)yrarcfrood.t..nd9t,.blc.onetoth...ldoU.n.ndth. odrca to ttr. rrl'd crot,d.8, rrtro. rl.ttr Gmarel t,.rrlnty .nd EoSulh Cov.n8nt. of tlcl., do har.by conv'y utrto th' Clty of 3'16t' vlrglnla th. rfor.d..crlbGd Lot tlo' 1, BIoGL 2' lccordlng to th' ltip o! Andr.s LGrlt PLc., e plrt o! rhlch rubdtvtrlon it rGcord'd ,.n PllG Book 3. P.8. !5, o! tlrc rccordr of tht cl'!tc't olllcr o! the ClrculE Coutg o! Boaook' Councr. Vlr8lnlr' lo8ethe tth r11 eh.lr tl8htt, tttla .nd ln!rt"!' ln rnd to th' Andr.t' Llttt' tlatct lloakt, ,.oclu.iv.. bu! not ll'ilc'd to' !11 r't'r o'lnt ' ltma. oatcra. vllvat ' hyda'ntt. coEr'ccton' t t'wlcct' Plp"' oalnc, vollr, r.11 houta!, Pt[Pt, 'tG" rlto rtv end ett oro- uots and rtShtr of ray, drotlrcr acquirrd b' ! vrlttm llttaro"rC o! by PtetcrlPttoE. tll11[883 the follorlag t18n'6rr" and rcrlr thlt th' E*, of liarch' 1977. (SEAL) (SEAL) ). 'i eattlce -2- M--cewt It. I I Ii it. I t I I I I I i I I i I ! I I I 3.a. Jrrt a atJrrc arltn]'artL!, a^Llr. Ya. STATE Otr YINGITIA CIff OF SALB{, c9-rlc: tte foregolag lnettucnc r't soort1063 ncE729 rcknorlcdgcd bcforc uc tilr lrlba"y of Harch, L977, by B' BLImOD OllBll end uARGAngl B' OrEn, hla vtfe. ily colreton crPlrcr 6s' STATB OT WNCINIA CITI Of SAIEU, to-ulE: Ttrc foregotng lnrtnunc ra'rcknowlrdged bcforc nr thlr PE dey of llarch, Lg77, by BBAIRICE t'l' CRrmDBn' rldor' Hy cmlrrloa orPlr., ,4tfu"t zllefu fur{'M SteU Td t- ln ttr' Clalr'r Ofrlcaff dr. Clrcdt oourt io? lh. Oounry ot Rolaokt Vr. thlt cahrv Td s-- 4 6v d lhat- lg7/ lttt lnrlrumcnl war Dletcntcd. rndlhb lnrlrumcnl wor gretcntcd, rnd dmittcd to rccord ll rmr^&npo..d by prl. 58.+a tlC 58.54.1 &* -3- Fr Fo 120 a zD I SALE Office of the City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Council of the City of Salem, at its regular meeting on January 11 , 2016, at 7:30 p.m., in Council Chambers of the City Hall, ll4 North Broad Street, in the City of Salem, Virginia, will hold a public hearing to consider the sale of a )3405212 acre tract located at 3733 Ellen Drive, Tax Map 05 5. I 0-03-47 .00-0000, in the County of Roanoke. Questions concerning the proposed sale may be addressed to the Office of the City Manager, City Hall, ll4 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia, at 375- 3016. At said hearing, parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard relative to the said request. TFIE COLNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA Jarr*t E,Tal;alynw, ll James E. Taliaferro, II Clerk of Salem City Council PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE January 4,2016, ISSUE OF "THE ROANOKE TIMES'' AND SEND STATEMENT TO: CLERK OF COUNCIL CITY OF SALEM P. O. BOX 869 SALEM, YA24l53-0869. ITEM: Mas o n Creek Greenway SUBJECT: Cons id er awarding a c o ntract for d es ign of a p o rtion of the Mason Creek Greenway. (Aud it-F inance Committee) ATTACHMENT S: Des crip tion Type Mason Creek Cover Memo REVIEWER S: Dep artment Clerk of the Council ITEM #- Onn l-ll-)r'itr' The City has $344,000 in funding remaining from the Mason Creek (GE) Greenway and other funds for the design and possibly some preliminary work on the stretch of greenway between East Main Street and the southem end of the Hanging Rock Trail. (Please see aftached drawing). The estimated cost to design and buiH the 0.45 mile trail is $900,000. We have a proposed mntracl with Anderson and Associates to design the trail segment lor $122,54Q. We would like to bring this item to City Council at the January 11, 2016. Also, we are actively seeking funding to fully fund this project. lf you have any questions, please let me know. Memo To: From: CG: Date: Re: City Council Jay Taliafeno Kevin Boggess December 14, 2015 Mason Creek Greenway Gityr of Salem i I ITEM: Berglund Ford SUBJECT: Cons id er setting bond for ero s io n and s ed iment c ontrol meas ures and lands c aping fo r the Berglund Ford Exp ansion pro jec t. (Audit-Financ e Co mmittee) REVIEWER S: Dep artment City Attorney ITEM: fo o tno te SUBJECT: Audit Finance Committee, Monday, January 11, 2016, 8:00a.m., City Manager’s Conference Room Work Session, Monday, January 11, 2016, 6:30p.m., City Manager’s Conference Room REVIEWER S: Dep artment City Attorney