HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/24/2026 - City Council - Agenda -Regular
City Council
Agenda
Monday, August 24, 2026, 6:30 PM
Work Session, 5:45 PM
Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia 24153
Regular Session, 6:30 PM, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia 24153
WORK SESSION
1. Call to Order
2. New Business
A. Discussion Items
Architectural Review Board Discussion
3. Adjournment
REGULAR SESSION
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Awards & Recognitions
A. Recognition of International Overdose Awareness Day
Presentation of a proclamation recognizing August 31, 2026, as International
Overdose Awareness Day.
4. Consent Agenda
A. Citizen Comments
Comments from the public, limited to five minutes, on matters not already having a
public hearing at the same meeting.
B. Minutes
Consider acceptance of the August 10, 2026, Work Session and Regular Meeting
Page 1 of 91
minutes.
C. Financial Reports
Consider acceptance of the Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the eleven
months ending May 31, 2026.
5. Old Business
A. Stormwater Utility
Consider an ordinance on second reading to amend, revise, reordain, and enact
Chapter 30, Environment, by adopting additional sections 30-189 through 30-199,
Article VI, Stormwater Utility Fee of the CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA.
(Approved on first reading at the August 10, 2026, meeting.)
B. Use Not Provided For Permit
The petition of The Preston Place Preservation Foundation Inc., property owner, for a
Use Not Provided for Permit for outdoor gatherings of less than 500 people on the
property located at 1936 West Main Street (Tax Map #138-2-7). (Advertised in the
July 23 and 30, 2026, issues of The Salem Times-Register.) The public hearing was
held at the August 10, 2026, Council meeting.
6. New Business
A. Abstract of Votes
Receive the Abstract of Votes cast at the Republican Primary for United States
Senate held on August 4, 2026.
7. Adjournment
Page 2 of 91
Item #: 3.A.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM,
VIRGINIA HELD AT CITY HALL
MEETING DATE: August 24, 2026
AGENDA ITEM: Recognition of International Overdose Awareness Day
Presentation of a proclamation recognizing August 31, 2026,
as International Overdose Awareness Day.
SUBMITTED BY: Renée Turk, Mayor
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke Valley Collective Response (RVCR), a program of the Roanoke Valley-
Alleghany Regional Commission (RVARC), has requested Salem City Council
recognize August 31, 2026, as International Overdose Awareness Day. The
observance remembers people lost to overdose, acknowledges people and families
affected by overdose, reduces stigma, and promotes education and life-saving
community action. The 2026 theme is "25 Years On. Still Needed." RVCR will host a
regional observance on Wednesday, August 26, 2026, at the Taubman Museum of
Art, Roanoke, Virginia.
FISCAL IMPACT:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends presenting the attached proclamation recognizing August 31, 2026,
as International Overdose Awareness Day.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. International Overdose Awareness 2026
Page 3 of 91
PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, The City of Salem recognizes the profound harm caused by fatal and nonfatal overdose and the grief, trauma, and lasting effects experienced by individuals, families, friends, first responders, service providers, and communities; and WHEREAS, International Overdose Awareness Day is observed worldwide on August 3 I to remember people lost to overdose, acknowledge people living with injury or grief, reduce stigma, and promote practical actions that prevent overdose and save lives; and WHEREAS, The Virginia Department of Health reported 1,548 drug overdose deaths among Virginia residents in 2024, and more than two-thirds involved fentanyl or other synthetic opioids. These losses demonstrate that overdose remains an urgent and preventable public health concern requiring continued community attention; and WHEREAS, the 2026 International Overdose Awareness Day theme, "25 Years On. Still Needed.", honors 25 years of remembrance and action while calling communities to continue education, compassionate engagement, timely access to care and support, naloxone awareness and training, treatment, recovery support, and coordinated response; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Valley Collective Response (RVCR), a program of the Roanoke ValleyAlleghany Regional Commission (RVARC) brings together partners across prevention, treatment, overdose reversal, recovery, public safety, health care, local government, and family support; and NOW, THEREFORE, I, Renee Ferris Turk, Mayor of the City of Salem, Commonwealth of Virginia, and on behalf of Salem City Council and all our citizens, do hereby recognize August 31, 2026, as ATTEST: INTERNATIONAL O\!£RDOS£ AWARENESS DAY in the City of Salem, Virginia, and I call this observance to the attention of all our citizens. Residents are encouraged to remember those lost, support people and families affected by overdose, learn to recognize and respond to overdose, reduce stigma, and strengthen pathways to prevention, treatment, recovery, and wellness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Salem to be affixed this the twenty-fourth day of August in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-six and of the Independence of the United States the two hundred and fiftieth. Mayor of the City of Salem, Virginia COUNCIL MEMBERS
John Saunders
H.Hunter Holliday
Randy Foley
Anne Marie Green
Renee Ferris TurkH.Robert LightClerk of CouncilCity of Salem, Virginia Page 4 of 91
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
Monday, August 10, 2026, at 6:30 PM
Work Session, 6:00 PM
Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem,
Virginia 24153
Regular Session, 6:30 PM, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia 24153
WORK SESSION
1.Call to Order
A work session of the Council of the City of Salem, Virginia, was held in the Council
Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, 114 N. Broad Street, Salem, Virginia, on
August 10, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., there being present the following members of said
Council to wit: Renée Ferris Turk, Mayor (participated remotely); Anne Marie Green,
Vice-Mayor; Council members; Byron Randolph Foley, H. Hunter Holliday, and John
Saunders (participated remotely); with Anne Marie Green, Vice-Mayor, presiding;
together with Chris Dorsey, City Manager; Rob Light, Assistant City Manager and
Clerk of Council; Rosie Jordan, Director of Finance; Will Simpson, Assistant Director
of Community Development/City Engineer; Carey Harveycutter, Director of Tourism;
Crystal Williams, Assistant to the City Manager; and Laura Lea Harris, Deputy Clerk
of Council; Also present was Katie Conner, Virginia Tourism Corporation; and the
following business was transacted;
Vice-Mayor Green reported that this date, place, and time had been set in order for
the Council to hold a work session; and
2.New Business
A.Discussion Items
Review of Salem Tourism Action Plan - Carey Harveycutter, Director of
Tourism/Katie Conner, Virginia Tourism Corporation
Cary Harveycutter, Director of Tourism, and Katie Conner of the Virginia Tourism
Corporation reviewed the Salem Tourism Action Plan. Ms. Conner provided an
overview of how and why the plan was developed, including the process used and its
Item #4.B
Date: 8/24/2026
Page 5 of 91
economic impact. She noted marketing, products, partnerships, and infrastructure as
the four strategic areas of focus. Also noted were immediate, short-term, and long-
term action items that are included in the plan. Ms. Conner shared how the success
of the plan will be measured.
Mr. Harveycutter noted City staff that were involved in the planning group.
Discussion was held. Councilman Foley asked if Council could be provided with
updated data once this information becomes available from the state. It was
confirmed that this information would be provided. A copy of the Tourism Action Plan
was provided for Council and staff in attendance.
3. Adjournment
There being no further business, Vice-Mayor Green adjourned the meeting at 6:22
p.m.
REGULAR SESSION
1. Call to Order
A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Salem, Virginia, was called to order at
6:30 p.m., there being present the following members to wit: Renée Ferris Turk,
Mayor (participated remotely); Anne Marie Green, Vice-Mayor; Council members:
Byron Randolph Foley, Hunter Holliday, and John Saunders (participated remotely);
with Anne Marie Green, Vice-Mayor, presiding together with Chris Dorsey, City
Manager; Rob Light, Assistant City Manager and Clerk of Council; Rosie Jordan,
Director of Finance; Will Simpson, Assistant Director of Community Development/City
Engineer; Mary Ellen Wines, Planning and Zoning Administrator; Mike Stevens,
Director of Communications; and Jim Guynn, City Attorney.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
Vice-Mayor Green noted that Councilman Saunders would be participating remotely
per Virginia Code section 2.2-3708.3(B)(1) in this evening's meeting for a temporary
medical condition and that no vote was required for his participation.
Vice-Mayor Green requested that Mr. Light read a request from Mayor Turk to
participate remotely in this meeting.
Mr. Light noted that Mayor Turk's remote participation was provided for under a
different code section and requires a vote by the other members of Council. He
noted that Mayor Turk asked him to read the following request on her behalf. “In
accordance with Section 2.2-3708.3 (B)(4) of the Code of the Commonwealth of
Virginia and the Remote Participation Policy of the City of Salem, I hereby request to
participate remotely due to a personal matter, specifically that I am out of town."
Randy Foley motioned to accept the remote participation of Mayor Turk. Hunter
Page 6 of 91
Holliday seconded the motion.
Ayes: John Saunders, Hunter Holliday, Randy Foley, Anne Marie Green
Nays: None
Abstaining: Renée Turk
Vice-Mayor Green thanked both Councilman Saunders and Mayor Turk for
participating remotely in the meeting this evening.
3. Awards & Recognitions
Vice-Mayor Green recognized Field Training Officer Randal McGee from the Salem
Police Department and asked the following new officers in attendance this evening to
come forward: Austin Eldridge, Troy Fryling, Taylan Herndon, and James
Nunley. Field Training Officer McGee noted that these officers had recently
graduated from the 87th Law Enforcement Academy with Cardinal Criminal Justice
Academy. He had the officers introduce themselves individually and share where
they were from and any prior experience that they h ad. Council congratulated the
officers and thanked them for their service. Vice-Mayor Green excused the officers to
return to work.
4. Consent Agenda
A. Citizen Comments
Comments from the public, limited to five minutes, on matters not already
having a public hearing at the same meeting.
No citizens were signed up to speak this evening.
B. Minutes
Consider acceptance of the July 27, 2026, Work Session and Regular
Meeting minutes.
The minutes were approved as written.
City Manager Dorsey provided an update on recent and upcoming activities and
events in the City of Salem.
Councilman Holliday noted the success of the recent Salem Distance Run.
C. Financial Reports
Consider acceptance of the Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the ten
months ending April 30, 2026.
The Financial Reports were received.
5. Old Business
There was no Old Business this evening.
Page 7 of 91
6. New Business
A. Stormwater Utility
Hold a public hearing and consider an ordinance on first reading to amend,
revise, reordain, and enact Chapter 30 Environment by adopting additional
sections 30-189 through 30-199, Article VI, Stormwater Utility Fee of the
CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA (Advertised in the July 23 and
30, 2026, issues of The Salem Times-Register).
Will Simpson, Assistant Director of Community Development/City Engineer,
presented an overview of a proposed stormwater utility fee to establish a dedicated
funding source for the City's stormwater program. He explained that Salem is subject
to a state-issued Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit, which
imposes increasingly stringent, largely unfunded requirements related to stormwater
management, erosion and sediment control, and total maximum daily loads (TMDLs),
including sediment reduction. The City is currently in compliance with its MS4 permit
but is operating near the limits of compliance. Mr. Simpson identified increased
development and impervious surface, more frequent and intense storms, and aging
stormwater infrastructure as factors contributing to the City's stormwater
management needs. The proposed fee would provide dedicated funding for
stormwater administration and regulatory compliance, maintenance of stormwater
facilities and drainage infrastructure, street sweeping, best management practices
(BMPs), stream and streambank restoration, sediment reduction, infrastructure
improvements, and capital projects. He noted that Virginia Code § 15.2-2114
authorizes localities subject to an MS4 permit to establish a dedicated stormwater
utility fee. Revenues collected through the fee would be restricted to stormwater -
related purposes.
Mr. Simpson reported that the City established a Stormwater Advisory Committee
consisting of citizens, businesses, industry representatives, churches, and
representatives of Roanoke College. The committee met over several months and
reviewed approaches used by other localities, including Roanoke City, Blacksburg,
Christiansburg, Lynchburg, and Staunton. Staff also conducted public outreach
through the City's website, social media, utility bill inserts, and two public meetings
held June 18 and June 24.
The proposed fee would be based on impervious surface area. For residential
properties, the City's average residential impervious area is approximately 3,500
square feet, which would constitute one Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU). The
proposed residential fee is $10 per month per ERU. Single-family homes,
condominiums, and townhomes would generally be charged $10 per month;
apartments, duplexes, triplexes, and similar multifamily properties would be charged
approximately $5 per month; and mobile homes wou ld be charged approximately $3
per month. Non-residential properties would be charged according to a tiered
schedule based on impervious area.
Page 8 of 91
Mr. Simpson explained that properties may qualify for credits for implementing
approved stormwater management measures. Depending on the measures
undertaken, credits could reduce a property's fee substantially, with qualifying
measures potentially providing credits of up to 90 percent. He noted that newer
development generally already incorporates measures that could qualify for credits,
while some older properties may need to make improvements to meet current
standards.
Mr. Simpson estimated potential annual revenue of approximately $2.8 million before
credits and approximately $2.4 million after anticipated credits. Expenditures would
include stormwater staff, equipment and vehicle maintenance, consultant services,
stormwater facility and drainage maintenance, street sweeping, stream and
streambank stabilization, sediment removal, and capital improvements to stormwater
infrastructure.
If approved, the fee would be included in the City's existing water and sewer utility
bills. Mr. Simpson anticipated approximately four months would be needed to
establish the billing system and verify parcel information before implementation. The
proposed implementation date is January 1, 2027. He stated that each parcel would
be reviewed to ensure proper billing and that an appeals process would be available
through the Director of Community Development for disputed charges. Nonpayment
penalties would be consistent with other utility charges.
Mr. Simpson also noted that residential and non-residential credit manuals were
being finalized and would be made available to the public. Additional public education
and outreach would continue, including assistance with the credit application process.
Mr. Simpson reviewed the steps completed to date, including research, advisory
committee meetings, public outreach, public input, modifications to the proposal, and
a July 27 City Council work session. The proposed stormwater ordinance is receiving
its first reading at this evening's meeting, with a second reading scheduled for August
24, 2026. Assuming approval, implementation of the stormwater utility fee would
begin January 1, 2027.
Councilman Foley asked Mr. Simpson to provide examples of residential credits.
Mr. Simpson responded that downspouts that go into a rain barrel, rain gardens, and
tree plantings were the three best examples.
Councilman Foley asked about options for driveways that could count as a credit
such as pavers.
Mr. Simpson discussed materials that could be used for driveways that would qualify
for a credit.
Vice-Mayor Green opened the public hearing.
Page 9 of 91
Joe Foley, 302 Academy Street, noted that he had attended one of the community
meetings for this item and commended City staff for their professionalism. He
expressed concern that the proposed residential stormwater utility fee would impose
the same $10 monthly charge on residential properties regardless of the amount of
impervious surface. He noted that a property with substantially more impervious area
would pay the same fee as a smaller residential property and expressed concern that
the flat fee could have a greater financial impact on smaller or lower-value
households. He acknowledged that tiering residential properties could increase
administrative costs and staffing needs but encouraged Council to consider t he
potential economic impact of the proposed structure. He otherwise commended the
work that had been done on the proposal and stated that the concern was offered for
Council’s consideration.
Stella Reinhard, 213 North Broad Street, asked whether a brick walkway that has
been in place for approximately 100 years would be considered a permeable surface
under the proposed stormwater utility fee. She also raised concerns about ongoing
erosion near the stream by City Hall and the potential for similar erosion to affect
residential properties and foundations. Ms. Reinhard acknowledged the need for
stormwater funding but encouraged Council to consider the broader impacts of
continued development and loss of green space, particularly in combination with
increased rainfall and aging infrastructure. She encouraged Council to consider the
relationship between stormwater management, continued development and the City's
comprehensive planning goals, and to ensure that efforts to increase development do
not undermine other community objectives.
Vice-Mayor Green closed the public hearing.
Mr. Simpson responded to citizen comments, explaining that erosion and exposed
outfalls are among the types of projects the City has identified through required MS4
outfall inspections and that addressing these issues could also contribute to sediment
reduction credits. He also explained that a flat residential fee was recommended over
a tiered structure after reviewing approaches used by other localities and consulting
with the Stormwater Advisory Committee. Mr. Simpson noted that both approaches
would generate similar revenue, but a tiered system would require significantly more
administrative work to continually update impervious-area calculations for individual
residential properties.
Hunter Holliday motioned to adopt ordinance on first reading to amend, revise,
reordain, and enact Chapter 30 Environment by adopting additional sections 30 -189
through 30-199, Article VI, Stormwater Utility Fee of the CODE OF THE CITY OF
SALEM, VIRGINIA. Randy Foley seconded the motion.
Ayes: John Saunders, Hunter Holliday, Randy Foley, Anne Marie Green, Renée Turk
Nays: None
Abstaining: None
Page 10 of 91
Vice-Mayor Green commended Mr. Simpson and City staff for their work on this item.
B. Special Exception Permit
Hold a public hearing and consider the request of Community Church Inc,
property owner, and Cornerstone Classical Academy, lessee, for the issuance
of a Special Exception Permit to allow for an Educational Facility,
Primary/Secondary, on the property located at 1923 East Main Street (Tax
Map #78-1-14). (Advertised in the July 23 and 30, 2026, issues of The Salem
Times-Register.) (Planning Commission recommended approval with
conditions.)
Vice-Mayor Green asked Ms. Wines for information on this request.
Mary Ellen Wines, Planning and Zoning Administrator, provided an overview of a
special exception permit application related to Community Church leasing a portion of
its East Main Street property to Cornerstone Classical Academy, a hybrid
homeschool program operating on the property approximately three days per week
for about 87–90 days per school year. She noted that Planning Commission
discussions focused on traffic circulation, student drop -off and pickup, parking, and
building and life-safety requirements. Two conditions were recommended:
submission of a minor site plan addressing traffic circulation and parking, and
termination of the special exception if the religious assembly use at the property
ceases.
Vice-Mayor Green opened the public hearing.
No one came forward to speak.
Vice-Mayor Green closed the public hearing.
Hunter Holliday motioned to approve the request of Community Church Inc, property
owner, and Cornerstone Classical Academy, lessee, for the issuance of a Special
Exception Permit to allow for an Educational Facility, Primary/Secondary, on the
property located at 1923 East Main Street (Tax Map #78-1-14) with the conditions
that:
1. A minor site plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development
within one month of approval to verify adequate on-site parking and ensure safe
traffic circulation throughout the property and surrounding area.
2. Approval for the operation of the primary and secondary educational facility shall
remain valid only while a religious assembly continues to operate on the property,
ensuring that the educational use does not become an independent principal use.
John Saunders seconded the motion.
Councilman Foley asked to clarify if Councilman Holliday was a member of the
church as a point of order.
Page 11 of 91
Councilman Holliday responded that he was a member of the church.
Councilman Foley asked the City Attorney if it was appropriate for Councilman
Holliday to vote on this item and noted that he just wanted to make sure that the item
was handled appropriately.
Mr. Guynn responded that given the fact that he was not the only member of the
church and that he did not draw any kind of salary or any remuneration that he did not
see that this would be a conflict of interest.
Vice-Mayor Green asked to confirm that the City was working with the school and the
church on the life safety issues and that they would be taken care of.
Ms. Wines responded affirmatively and noted that they were required to fulfill these
regulations before they occupy the school.
Vice-Mayor Green called for a roll call vote.
Ayes: John Saunders, Hunter Holliday, Randy Foley, Anne Marie Green, Renée Turk
Nays: None
Abstaining: None
C. Special Exception Permit
Hold a public hearing and consider the request of Robertson Family
Revocable Trust, property owner, and Amer Alsayadi, lessee, for the issuance
of a Special Exception Permit to allow retail sales, smoke shop, on the
property located at 501 West 4th Street (Tax Map #143-3-14). (Advertised in
the July 23 and 30, 2026, issues of The Salem Times-Register.) (Planning
Commission recommended denial.)
Vice-Mayor Green asked Ms. Wines if there was any information that she would like
to share related to this request.
Ms. Wines explained that, following a 2024 Virginia General Assembly change,
localities were authorized to regulate smoke shops separately from general retail
uses. City Council chose to do so and has since required a Special Exception Permit
for smoke shops in the Highway Business District. She noted that the proposed
location met all regulations for required separation distances from schools and
daycare facilities. Staff also acknowledged Planning Commission concerns regarding
the number of existing smoke shops within the City and the suitability of the proposed
use at this location. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the request.
Vice-Mayor Green opened the public hearing.
No one came forward to speak.
Page 12 of 91
Vice-Mayor Green closed the public hearing.
Randy Foley motioned to deny the request for a Special Exception Permit for this
property as he believes this is not the highest and best use for this property. Hunter
Holliday seconded the motion.
Ayes: John Saunders, Hunter Holliday, Randy Foley, Anne Marie Green, Renée Turk
Nays: None
Abstaining: None
D. Special Exception Permit and Use Not Provided For Permit
Hold a public hearing at the request of The Preston Place Preservation
Foundation Inc., property owner, for a Special Exception Permit to allow an
assembly hall, nonresidential uses in an accessory structure, and
nonresidential uses out of doors; and a Use Not Provided for Permit for
outdoor gatherings of less than 500 people on the property located at 1936
West Main Street (Tax Map #138-2-7). (Advertised in the July 23 and 30,
2026, issues of The Salem Times-Register.)
Vice-Mayor Green noted that this item was divided into two separate parts, a special
exception permit and a use not provided for permit, and that each of these would be
voted on separately. She requested that Ms. Wines share information on these
items.
Ms. Wines explained that Preston Place is zoned Community Business District, which
was intended to provide a transitional district that allowed for small-scale mixed use
on the periphery of residential neighborhoods. Because the proposed use includes
nonresidential outdoor activities, accessory structures, an assembly hall, and outdoor
gatherings of fewer than 500 people, a Special Exception Permit is required. She
noted that the request was structured to address the various proposed uses together
rather than require the applicant to return for multiple approvals. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of the Special Exception Permits without
conditions and recommended conditions for the use not provided for in the ordinance,
including submission of an updated site plan, maintenance of the existing
brownstone, and traffic and parking plans for events exceeding the normal occupancy
load.
Councilman Foley asked if Commissioner Garst had also requested that a condition
limit occupancy to 200 persons.
Ms. Wines confirmed that this was correct.
Vice-Mayor Green asked to confirm if this was one of the recommended conditions.
Ms. Wines responded affirmatively and noted that there were four conditions
recommended.
Page 13 of 91
Vice-Mayor Green opened the public hearing and noted that one citizen, Mr. Breen,
signed up to speak. She requested that he come forward and state his name and
address for the record.
John Breen, 142 Bogey Lane, expressed strong support for the Preston Place
application, noting that the project is being undertaken by Salem residents organized
to preserve and enhance the property rather than by a commercial developer seeking
to increase profits. He stated that the project would enhance Salem's amenities,
benefit residents, and support goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan ,
and urged City officials to support the effort.
Dave Robbins, 620 High Street, President of the Preston Place Preservation
Foundation, shared an informative brochure and provided an update on the
Foundation's plans and parking needs. He emphasized that the Foundation's goals
are to preserve Salem's oldest house and the remaining green space in the area. He
stated parking is a major issue and that an updated parking plan provides for 14
additional spaces, which, combined with 17 existing spaces, would pro vide 31
spaces. The Foundation has received authorization for $50,000 from the EDA for the
parking improvements and is obtaining contractor bids. He also discussed efforts to
secure use of 36 additional paved parking spaces at a nearby commercial property
for approximately 12 special events per year. If secured, the additional parking would
bring the total available spaces to approximately 67, sufficient to accommodate nearly
200 people. He noted that other parking alternatives, including use of a church or
Walmart parking, would be more complicated or present safety concerns. Mr.
Robbins also raised concerns regarding traffic and congestion in the area, particularly
along the roadway near Mama Maria's and WaWa, upon its completion. He further
discussed potential future improvements to the property, including a period-
appropriate barn or an outdoor timber-roof structure for events. He stated that the
Department of Historic Resources was receptive to the concept of an outdoor
structure that could accommodate larger gatherings without requiring the additional
parking associated with a barn.
Vice-Mayor Green closed the public hearing and reiterated that this item would be
broken into two parts, with the first being consideration of the special exception
request to allow an assembly hall, nonresidential uses in an accessory structure, and
nonresidential uses out of doors for the Preston Place Foundation at Preston
Place. She also noted that the Planning Commission had recommended approval.
1) Special Exception Permit
Consider the request for a Special Exception Permit to allow an assembly
hall, nonresidential uses in an accessory structure, and nonresidential
uses out of doors. (Planning Commission recommended approval.)
Hunter Holliday motioned to approve the request for a Special Exception Permit to
allow an assembly hall, nonresidential uses in an accessory structure, and
Page 14 of 91
nonresidential uses out of doors. Randy Foley seconded the motion.
Mayor Turk expressed concern at the limitation of 200 and asked if Council could
consider capping the number at 350.
Councilman Foley clarified that the condition was for the Use Not Provided For permit
request and did not pertain to the Special Exception permit.
Vice-Mayor Green called for a roll call vote.
Ayes: John Saunders, Hunter Holliday, Randy Foley, Anne Marie Green, Renée Turk
Nays: None
Abstaining: None
2) Use Not Provided For Permit
Consider the request for a Use Not Provided for Permit for outdoor
gatherings of less than 500 people. (Planning Commission recommended
approval with conditions.)
Randy Foley motioned to approve the Use Not Provided For permit with the
conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Hunter Holliday seconded the
motion.
Councilman Foley noted that limiting the event capacity to 200 people could create
additional challenges for the applicant, as accommodating larger gatherings would
require additional space and parking.
Councilman Holliday stated that Council could come back and change that at a later
date once the parking had been accommodated to handle more peop le.
Mayor Turk expressed concern that limiting Preston Place events to 200 attendees
could restrict the property's ability to operate successfully, particularly for paid events,
and questioned the need to return to Council for a future capacity increase. She a lso
raised concerns about parking requirements that could result in additional paved,
impervious surfaces and increased stormwater runoff, and suggested that the City
review its ordinances regarding such requirements.
Vice-Mayor Green asked Ms. Wines or Mr. Robbins if there was a reason that the
specific number 200 was chosen by the Planning Commission for the recommended
condition, would there be a problem if this were increased to 350, and did Preston
Place want this number at 350.
Ms. Wines clarified that the 200-person capacity was an increase from the applicant's
original anticipated attendance. She stated that the overflow parking and traffic plan
condition would address larger events and that, provided the applicant can
accommodate the proposed number of attendees with adequate parking and traffic
measures for each larger event, staff would have no objection to increasing the
Page 15 of 91
occupancy limit.
Vice-Mayor Green asked to clarify that they could actually go up to 500 under the way
this was written as long as there was an appropriate traffic plan.
Ms. Wines responded affirmatively. She also noted that the 200 also included
employees and volunteers as well as ticket sales.
Councilman Holliday asked if there would be no requirement to revisit this according
to the way the permit request is now written.
Ms. Wines responded that it was true as long as Council did not include the condition
limiting occupancy to 200, Preston Place would not be required to come back to
Council in order to hold events up to 500 people. They would just need to supply the
parking and traffic plan.
Vice-Mayor Green asked to confirm that this particular issue would be resolved if the
motion were made to approve this permit without the condition relating to the
maximum of 200 people.
Ms. Wines confirmed that this was correct.
Vice-Mayor Green asked Mr. Robbins to come forward at his request.
Mr. Robbins noted that Preston Place did not request the number 200 but explained
that the 200-person capacity reflects the number currently believed to be
accommodated with available parking. He noted that additional parking could
potentially be provided on an adjoining grass lot without adding impervious surface,
subject to an agreement with the property owner and an exception allowing parking
on the grass. He stated that this could potentially increase the event capacity to
approximately 350 people and suggested addressing that option.
Vice-Mayor Green stated that what is being looked at this evening did not include any
parking on the grass; however, if Council removed the condition, Preston Place
Foundation would be able to hold a larger event, as long as an appropriate parking
plan was submitted and approved by staff.
There was discussion about the motion and the appropriate procedure.
Councilman Foley noted that he did not wish to amend his motion.
It was noted that the motion and second on the floor required a vote.
Mayor Turk requested to have the current motion reread.
Councilman Foley restated his original motion. "I move that we approve the Use Not
Page 16 of 91
Provided For permit with the four conditions that were approved by the Planning
Commission, one of which includes the limit to 200 attendees."
Vice-Mayor Green noted that this was the motion that was moved on, seconded, and
which Council needed to vote on.
Councilman Foley noted that he stood by his motion for approving the Use Not
Provided For permit which includes:
1. An updated site plan shall be submitted for review illustrating both the existing
parking configuration and the proposed parking lot expansion. Any future site
development shall require submission and approval of an amended site plan.
2. The existing brownstone parking surface shall be properly maintained through the
removal of grass, weeds, and other vegetation. Routine maintenance shall preserve
the approved brownstone surface, and standard gravel shall not be substituted.
3. Because the City's standard parking requirements do not apply to a Use Not
Provided For Permit, a parking overflow and traffic management plan, together with
any supporting documentation, including parking agreements or property owner
authorizations, shall be submitted to and approved by the City prior to the operation
of any special event.
4. Total occupancy on the property at any one time shall be limited to 200 persons,
including attendees, staff, vendors, volunteers, and participants.
Councilman Foley noted that this motion was seconded by Councilman Holliday
previously.
Vice-Mayor Green confirmed this and called for a roll call vote.
Ayes: John Saunders, Randy Foley
Nays: Hunter Holliday, Anne Marie Green, Renée Turk
Abstaining: None
Vice-Mayor Green stated that the motion failed and asked if there was a second
motion.
Hunter Holliday motioned to consider the request for the Use Not Provided For permit
for outdoor gatherings with the following conditions.
1. An updated site plan shall be submitted for review illustrating both the existing
parking configuration and the proposed parking lot expansion. Any future site
development shall require submission and approval of an amended site plan.
2. The existing brownstone parking surface shall be properly maintained through the
removal of grass, weeds, and other vegetation. Routine maintenance shall preserve
the approved brownstone surface, and standard gravel shall not be substituted.
3. Because the City's standard parking requirements do not apply to a Use Not
Provided For Permit, a parking overflow and traffic management plan, together with
Page 17 of 91
any supporting documentation, including parking agreements or property owner
authorizations, shall be submitted to and approved by the City prior to the operation
of any special event.
Renee Turk seconded the motion.
Mr. Dorsey asked to confirm that this would take the limit to 500 people.
Vice-Mayor Green confirmed that this was correct that the number would now have to
be 500 or under.
Ayes: John Saunders, Hunter Holliday, Anne Marie Green, Renée Turk
Nayes: Randy Foley (He noted that his vote was due only to the fourth condition.)
Abstaining: None
Vice-Mayor Green noted that this item had passed and asked to confirm that staff
understood the motion. This was confirmed.
E. Resolution Authorizing a Referendum
Consider adoption of Resolution 1535 authorizing a referendum on a not to
exceed one percent general retail sales and use tax used solely for capital
projects for new construction and major renovation of Salem City schools.
Mr. Dorsey explained that the General Assembly's biannual budget and appropriation
legislation enacted July 1 authorizes counties and cities to levy a general retail sales
and use tax of up to one percent, subject to voter approval by referendum. He noted
that the revenue could only be used for new school construction or major school
renovations and could not be used for existing debt or smaller capital projects. Mr.
Dorsey invited Dr. Curtis Hicks, Superintendent of Salem City Schools, to comment.
Dr. Hicks provided an overview of the City's school facilities, noting that major
renovations have been completed at G.W. Carver, Andrew Lewis, South Salem, and
Salem High School. He stated that East Salem and West Salem schools remain the
primary facilities in need of major renovations or potential additions. He explained that
the School Board currently has limited debt capacity until 2034 due to existing debt
obligations. Dr. Hicks noted that the schools are well maintained and that the City's
agreement allowing unused annual funds to be retained for capital improvements has
helped maintain the facilities. He added that future enrollment impacts from the Hope
Tree and Newman Drive projects could increase the need for additions at East Salem
and West Salem.
Councilman Holliday asked if Dr. Hicks could foresee possible future consideration of
closing one of the elementary schools or combining two schools.
Dr. Hicks responded that there would likely be limited community support for
consolidating the four schools. He noted that maintaining similarly sized schools
provides benefits in terms of student programs and staff availability and said the
Page 18 of 91
current structure is effective. He indicated that consolidation might only be considered
if a facility were determined to be unsafe or unable to be renovated to modern
standards.
Mr. Dorsey clarified that a referendum would authorize a sales and use tax of up to
one percent, rather than require the City to impose the full one percent. If approved
by voters, the City could establish a lower rate based on the School Board's long-
term capital improvement plan and the amount of funding needed for identified
projects.
Dr. Hicks noted that a facility study is scheduled for October, which would provide an
assessment of school facility needs and could be available following the referendum.
Councilman Foley asked if any projections had been made by staff of what this tax
could generate based on actual numbers this year or from last year.
Ms. Jordan estimated that, based on current information, a one-percent sales and
use tax could generate approximately $7 million, which could be used toward major
renovations, capital projects, or debt service associated with borrowing for
expansions.
Mr. Dorsey asked to confirm that this continues until 2046.
Ms. Jordan confirmed that this is a 20-year program which will sunset in 2046.
Councilman Foley asked whether there were any statutory limitations on
implementing the tax following voter approval, including whether implementation
could be delayed for up to five years.
Mr. Guynn responded that there was no limit in that regard. He noted that the
authorization of up to one percent would provide flexibility to impose a lower rate if
circumstances changed. Mr. Guynn shared that his concern was that, because the
authority was enacted as part of the biennial state budget, the City should hold the
referendum to preserve the option to implement the tax in the future. He also noted
that proceeds could be used for eligible school capital projects and could reduce the
need for future real estate tax increases to fund such projects, rather than necessarily
representing an additional tax burden.
Councilman Holliday expressed opposition to potentially increasing taxes at this time,
stating that the potential one-percent increase in the retail sales tax, along with
scheduled fees and other anticipated costs, would place an additional tax burden on
residents and businesses.
Vice-Mayor Green expressed concern that sales taxes are regressive, noting that
although the proposed tax would not apply to food and personal hygiene products, it
would apply to necessities such as clothing, tires, and cleaning supplies. The member
Page 19 of 91
also expressed concern that the General Assembly was shifting responsibility for
funding school construction to local governments and taxpayers.
Councilman Foley stated that the proposed referendum would simply give voters the
opportunity to decide whether to authorize an additional sales tax, rather than impose
a specific tax rate. He acknowledged that sales taxes can be regressive but noted
that sales tax revenue would also be generated from visitors and nonresidents
making purchases in the City, unlike real estate taxes. Councilman Foley expressed
support for allowing Salem voters to make the decision through a referendum. He
also noted that some of the issues under consideration may be difficult to clearly
communicate to voters, particularly given the various options and potential actions
involved.
Councilman Holliday expressed concern that voters may support a measure based
on its stated purpose, such as funding schools, without fully understanding its
potential financial impact on them. He stated that he did not support the measure at
this time.
Councilman Foley noted that there could be differing perspectives regarding future
property tax increases, citing the possibility that taxes could need to be raised by four
cents in three years to fund a new school.
Mayor Turk stated that the 1% limit would help prevent the tax from becoming overly
burdensome and expressed support for allowing citizens the opportunity to make the
final decision.
Councilman Saunders expressed opposition to the proposed sales tax increase,
citing concern that the General Assembly could potentially increase or modify the tax
in the future.
Councilman Holliday noted that, despite a two-cent reduction in the real estate tax
rate, increased property values resulted in higher tax bills for citizens. He opposed
raising taxes or placing the proposed increase on the ballot, expressing concern that
voters may not fully understand the financial impact. Councilman Holliday agreed with
Vice-Mayor Greene’s comment that the state may be shifting the tax burden to
localities and stated that the City should proceed accordingly.
Vice-Mayor Green noted that local government would likely be responsible for
providing citizens with factual, neutral information regarding a referendum, and
expressed concern about the staff time and effort required to ensure the information
is accurate and non-persuasive.
Mayor Turk emphasized that the City had reduced the real estate tax rate by 4%
despite increased property values and explained that, if voters approved a 1% sales
tax, the revenue could be dedicated to school renovations, additions, or rebuilding .
She stated that this would reduce the amount of City funds needed for schools and
Page 20 of 91
allow those funds to be redirected toward street repairs and other infrastructure
improvements.
Randy Foley motioned to approve Resolution 1535 authorizing a referendum on a not
to exceed one percent general retail sales and use tax used solely for capital projects
for new construction and major renovation of Salem City schools. Renée Turk
seconded the motion.
Ayes: Randy Foley, Renée Turk
Nays: John Saunders, Hunter Holliday, Anne Marie Green
Abstaining: None
Vice-Mayor Green noted that the resolution authorizing the referendum had failed.
F. Salem City School Board
Consider setting the date for a public hearing in accordance with Section 22.1 -
29.1 of the Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, regarding the consideration of
applicants for the School Board term expiring December 31, 2026, of Macel
Janoschka. (Suggest date of September 14, 2026).
Vice-Mayor Green requested that Mr. Light provide an explanation for this item.
Mr. Light stated that the Code of Virginia requires Council to hold a public hearing at
least seven days prior to naming a school board member. At that public hearing, the
name of anyone who might be named or appointed later must be read. The
individuals are not required to come forward and speak at the public hearing. Council
was requested, if amenable, to set the date of September 14, 2026, and to direct staff
to provide public notice and accept letters of interest and resumes from interested
applicants for naming at this public hearing.
Councilman Foley asked to clarify if a vote was required for this item.
Mr. Light noted that Council had voted on this in the past.
Randy Foley moved to set September 14, 2026, as the date for a public hearing to
consider candidates for the school board term expiring December 31, 2026. Hunter
Holliday seconded the motion.
Ayes: John Saunders, Hunter Holliday, Randy Foley, Anne Marie Green, Renée Turk
Nays: None
Abstaining: None
G. Appropriation of Funds
Page 21 of 91
Consider a request to amend the School Operating Fund budget as approved
by the School Board on July 14, 2026. Audit - Finance Committee
At their July 14, 2026, meeting, the School Board amended the Fiscal Year 2026 -
2027 School Operating Fund budget to increase revenues and expenditures by
$1,070,180 as outlined in the Council report included in the agenda. This amendment
was needed because the State did not approve their FY27 budget until June 29,
2026.
Randy Foley motioned approval of this School Board amendment to their Operating
Fund budget for Fiscal Year 2027. Hunter Holliday seconded the motion.
Ayes: John Saunders, Hunter Holliday, Randy Foley, Anne Marie Green, Renée Turk
Nays: None
Abstaining: None
H. Appropriation of Funds
Consider a request to transfer unallocated capital reserve for Fiscal Year 2027
Capital Improvement Plan projects. Audit - Finance Committee
The Fiscal Year 2027 budget was adopted on May 11, 2026, which included four
projects to be funded by capital reserves. Tonight’s action will authorize the City
Manager to transfer the funds for these approved Capital Improvement Plan items
into specific project accounts within the Capital Reserve Fund. The projects include:
• Storm Drain – Carey Avenue $850,000
• Storm Drain – Market Street and Clay Street $750,000
• Police Vehicle Replacement $523,249
• Front Load Dumpster Truck $452,000
Randy Foley motioned approval for the City Manager to transfer $2,575,249 from the
Capital Reserve account to the specific project accounts with an effective date of July
1, 2027, in conjunction with the Fiscal Year 2027 budget, as specified in the Council
Report included in the agenda. Hunter Holliday seconded the motion.
Councilman Foley asked to clarify a date and restated the motion.
Randy Foley motioned approval for the City Manager to transfer $2,575,249 from the
Capital Reserve account to the specific project accounts with an effective date of July
1, 2026, in conjunction with the Fiscal Year 2027 budget, as specified in the Council
Report included in the agenda. Hunter Holliday confirmed that he seconded the
motion.
Ayes: John Saunders, Hunter Holliday, Randy Foley, Anne Marie Green, Renée Turk
Page 22 of 91
Nays: None
Abstaining: None
7. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
Submitted by: Approved by:
H. Robert Light Renée Ferris Turk
Clerk of Council Mayor
Page 23 of 91
Schedule A
Current Year Current Year % of Prior Year
Budget Year to Date Budget Year to Date Variance
Revenues:
Beginning Balance 7-1-25 14,070,544$ -$ 0%-$ -$
General Property Taxes 55,392,153 49,473,027 89% 44,191,595 5,281,432
Other Local Taxes 29,773,315 26,478,510 89% 25,423,354 1,055,156
Permits and Licenses 368,940 445,815 121% 488,022 (42,207)
Fines and Forfeitures 120,000 93,934 78%94,046 (112)
Revenues from Use of Money and Property 6,397,291 5,836,452 91% 6,751,507 (915,055)
Charges for Services 3,973,647 3,427,003 86% 3,287,829 139,174
Payment in Lieu of Taxes from Electric Fund 3,160,000 2,896,667 92% 2,896,667 -
Payment in Lieu of Taxes from Water Fund 154,000 141,808 92% 137,810 3,998
Miscellaneous revenues 537,148 556,045 104% 455,485 100,560
Non-Categorical Aid 3,590,803 877,972 24% 869,733 8,238
Shared Expenses 2,005,871 1,582,888 79% 1,530,374 52,513
Categorical Aid 12,248,114 8,421,536 69% 8,646,524 (224,989)
Non-revenues Receipts 67,253 67,249 100% 104,260 (37,011)
Proceeds from Indebtedness 54,000 - 0%- -
Total Revenues 131,913,079 100,298,905 76% 94,877,207 5,421,698
Expenditures:
General Government 15,566,257 12,534,920 81% 10,744,484 1,790,436
Judicial Administration 3,526,623 2,965,939 84% 2,732,793 233,146
Public Safety 26,862,134 23,190,212 86% 21,747,005 1,443,208
Public Works 19,323,201 11,354,241 59% 11,111,125 243,116
Health and Welfare 9,850,176 6,544,321 66% 6,580,995 (36,673)
Education 26,948,396 26,948,396 100% 26,538,801 409,596
Parks, Recreation and Cultural 9,377,683 7,691,617 82% 7,897,032 (205,415)
Community Development 4,798,328 3,169,307 66% 3,321,277 (151,971)
Interest on long-term debt 524,815 - 0%- -
Transfers Out 13,773,311 12,933,028 94% 12,782,964 150,064
Contingency 1,362,155 1,362,155 100%- 1,362,155
Total Expenditures 131,913,079 108,694,137 82% 103,456,475 5,237,662
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures -$ (8,395,232)$ (8,579,268)$ 184,037$
City of Salem, Virginia
General Fund
Statement of Revenue and Expenditures
For Eleven Months Ending May 31, 2026
Page 24 of 91
Schedule B
-
50,000.00
100,000.00
150,000.00
200,000.00
250,000.00
300,000.00
350,000.00
400,000.00
450,000.00
500,000.00
550,000.00
600,000.00
650,000.00
700,000.00
750,000.00
800,000.00
850,000.00
900,000.00
950,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,050,000.00
1,100,000.00
1,150,000.00
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
City of Salem
Sales Tax Summary
For Fiscal Years 2023 - 2026
FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026
Page 25 of 91
Schedule C
50,000.00
100,000.00
150,000.00
200,000.00
250,000.00
300,000.00
350,000.00
400,000.00
450,000.00
500,000.00
550,000.00
600,000.00
650,000.00
700,000.00
750,000.00
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
City of Salem
Meals Tax Summary
For Fiscal Years 2023 - 2026
FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026
Page 26 of 91
Schedule D
-
25,000.00
50,000.00
75,000.00
100,000.00
125,000.00
150,000.00
175,000.00
200,000.00
225,000.00
250,000.00
275,000.00
300,000.00
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
City of Salem
Lodging Tax Summary
For Fiscal Years 2023 - 2026
FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026
Page 27 of 91
City of Salem, Virginia
Debt Outstanding
For Period Ending May 31, 2026
Schedule E
Balance Principal Balance
7/1/2025 Issuances Payments 5/31/2026
City Debt Outstanding
2013 Public Improvement Bonds 798,700$ -$ (89,425)$ 709,275$
2016B Public Improvement Bonds 150,694 - (150,694) -
2019 Public Improvement Bonds 3,850,000 - (222,000) 3,628,000
2020 Public Improvement Bonds 1,450,000 - (260,000) 1,190,000
2020 Public Improvement Refunding Bonds 3,797,874 - (636,809) 3,161,065
2021 Public Improvement Refunding Bonds 799,000 - (7,000) 792,000
2022B Public Improvement Bonds 13,323,000 - (611,000) 12,712,000
Total City Debt Outstanding 24,169,268 - (1,976,928) 22,192,340
School Debt Outstanding
2012A Public Improvement Bonds 3,818,000 - (477,250) 3,340,750
2013 Public Improvement Bonds 2,461,300 - (275,575) 2,185,725
2020 Public Improvement Bonds 22,340,000 - (1,105,000) 21,235,000
Total School Debt Outstanding 28,619,300 - (1,857,825) 26,761,475
Total Debt Outstanding 52,788,568$ -$ (3,834,753)$ 48,953,815$
Page 28 of 91
City of Salem, Virginia
Capital Projects Fund
Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Period Ending May 31, 2026
Schedule F
Project Total Available Year To
Budget To Date Encumbrances Project Balance Date
Fund Balance, July 1, 2025 11,843,156$
Revenues:
Federal Grants 21,254,536$ 6,062,050$ -$ 6,062,050$ 15,192,486$ (632,769)$
State Grants 17,134,985 8,847,703 - 8,847,703 8,287,282 1,764,154
Transfer From General Fund 16,058,504 16,058,502 - 16,058,502 2 1,403,700
Total Revenues 54,448,025 30,968,256 - 30,968,256 23,479,769 2,535,085
Expenditures:
Fire Station #2 Renovations & Storage Building 1,930,143 1,783,964 - 1,783,964 146,179 553,525
Fire Station #1 Renovations 654,000 8,826 - 8,826 645,174 -
Fire Station #3 Renovations 454,000 7,051 - 7,051 446,949 -
Fire Station Study 150,000 7,199 52,796 59,995 90,005 7,199
Old Animal Shelter Refurbishment 75,000 57,754 - 57,754 17,246 57,754
Colorado St Bridge Replacement 11,778,826 7,537,405 22,951 7,560,356 4,218,470 822,875
Apperson Drive Bridge Replacement 10,329,896 5,164,935 3,576,484 8,741,419 1,588,477 2,848,997
Valleydale Streetscape Improvements 1,500,000 651,242 - 651,242 848,758 98,332
Upland Drive Storm Drain and Curb & Gutter 250,000 - - - 250,000 -
4th Street/Union Street Storm Sewer Upgrades 650,000 30,470 17,140 47,610 602,390 30,470
Roanoke Boulevard Storm Drain Upgrades 100,000 - - - 100,000 -
Texas Street/Idaho Street Pond 100,000 - - - 100,000 -
Bainbridge Drive Storm Drain Expansion 225,000 - - - 225,000 -
Truck Storage Building 750,000 74,934 469,093 544,027 205,973 41,884
Pedestrian Crossings 469,464 34,273 26,528 60,801 408,663 34,273
Streambank Stabilization 241,200 - - - 241,200 -
Courthouse Foundation Repairs 25,000 3,183 - 3,183 21,817 3,183
Western Roanoke River Greenway 50,000 1,500 - 1,500 48,500 -
Elizabeth Campus Greenway 951,317 814,105 23,671 837,776 113,541 218,538
Moyer Sports Complex Renovation 229,344 219,520 - 219,520 9,824 62,454
Mason Creek Greenway Phase 3 3,119,430 440,977 68,617 509,594 2,609,836 63,904
Library Flooring Replacement 190,000 - - - 190,000 -
Library Co-working Space 155,000 - - - 155,000 -
Library Lawn Special Events Space 500,000 - - - 500,000 -
Library Renovation 250,000 - - - 250,000 -
Roanoke River Greenway - Apperson to Cook 2,121,155 - - - 2,121,155 -
Concourse Public Restrooms Renovation 175,000 35,672 71,052 106,724 68,276 35,672
Elizabeth Campus Greenway Phase 2 1,372,761 71,500 131,060 202,560 1,170,201 -
Downtown Impr - E Main St/Market St 5,440,677 4,440,487 34,667 4,475,154 965,523 3,883
Downtown Impr - E Main St/White Oak 2,311,825 90,246 5,250 95,496 2,216,329 2,285
Downtown Impr - College Ave 3,256,307 20,190 176,010 196,200 3,060,107 20,190
Downtown Impr - Boulevard 2,983,606 31,075 153,925 185,000 2,798,606 31,075
Page 29 of 91
City of Salem, Virginia
Capital Projects Fund
Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Period Ending May 31, 2026
Schedule F
Project Total Available Year To
Budget To Date Encumbrances Project Balance Date
Capital Projects Local Reserve 332,715 - - - 332,715 -
Excess Local Funding Reserve 1,326,359 - - - 1,326,359 -
Total Expenditures 54,448,025$ 21,526,508$ 4,829,244$ 26,355,752$ 28,092,273$ 4,936,493
Fund Balance, May 31, 2026 9,441,748$
Page 30 of 91
City of Salem, Virginia
Capital Reserve Fund
Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Period Ending May 31, 2026
Schedule G
Project Total Available Year To
Budget To Date Encumbrances Project Balance Date
Fund Balance, July 1, 2025 21,945,583$
Revenues:
Transfer From General Fund 29,009,284$ 29,009,284$ -$ 29,009,284$ -$ 6,816,568$
Total Revenues 29,009,284 29,009,284 - 29,009,284 - 6,816,568
Expenditures:
Capital Reserve 23,102,784 - - - 23,102,784 -
Fire Equipment 2,400,000 2,330,268 51,414 2,381,682 18,318 2,330,268
Police Vehicle Replacement 548,100 548,100 - 548,100 - 548,100
Salem Stadium Scoreboard Replacement 200,000 200,000 - 200,000 - 121,382
Spartan Field - New LED Lights 518,400 - 462,177 462,177 56,223 -
Salem Memorial Park Renovations 1,240,000 1,254,834 - 1,254,834 (14,834) 1,254,834
Salem Stadium LED Lighting 750,000 - 701,839 701,839 48,161 -
Civic Center Scoreboard Replacement 250,000 225,907 - 225,907 24,093 57,392
Total Expenditures 29,009,284$ 4,559,109$ 1,215,430$ 5,774,539$ 23,234,745$ 4,311,976
Fund Balance, May 31, 2026 24,450,175$
Page 31 of 91
Schedule H
Operating Revenues
Current Year
Budget
Current Year
Year to Date
% of
Budget
Prior Year
Year to Date Variance
Sale of Power 52,914,865$ 47,900,007$ 91% 48,074,809$ (174,802)$
Other Electric Revenue 640,905 627,691 98% 591,562 36,129
Gain on Sale of Assets - 224 0% - 224
Reserve for Encumbrances 1,159,131 - 0% - -
Appropriated from Net Position 200,000 - 0% - -
Total Operating Revenues 54,914,901 48,527,922 88% 48,666,371 (138,449)
.
Operating Expenses
Other Power Generation - Operation 100,000 56,503 57% 64,289 (7,786)
Other Power Generation - Maintenance 135,193 60,718 45% 61,350 (632)
Purchased Power 29,730,000 25,976,973 87% 25,724,095 252,878
Transmission - Operation 9,705,233 8,743,291 90% 8,569,182 174,109
Transmission - Maintenance 47,902 4,179 9% 7,654 (3,475)
Distribution - Operations 1,248,983 1,119,814 90% 1,021,309 98,505
Distribution - Maintenance 1,732,617 1,519,165 88% 1,497,669 21,496
Customer Service 739,842 632,763 86% 610,598 22,165
Administration & General - Operation 2,592,211 1,010,381 39% 829,765 180,616
Administration & General - Maintenance 256,694 236,705 92% 205,769 30,936
Depreciation - 1,602,940 0% 1,611,403 (8,463)
Capital 4,869,835 3,255,923 67% 2,974,693 281,230
Contingency 596,391 - 0% - -
Total Operating Expenses 51,754,901 44,219,355 85% 43,177,776 1,041,579
Income (loss) Before Transfers 3,160,000 4,308,567 5,488,595 (1,180,028)
Transfers (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) (3,160,000) (2,896,667) 92% (2,896,667) -
Income (loss)-$ 1,411,900$ 2,591,928$ (1,180,028)$
City of Salem, Virginia
Electric Fund
Statement of Operations
For Eleven Months Ending May 31, 2026
Page 32 of 91
Schedule I
Operating Revenues
Current Year
Budget
Current Year
Year to Date
% of
Budget
Prior Year
Year to Date Variance
Services 8,761,544$ 7,833,064$ 89% 7,608,801$ 224,263$
Other Revenue 533,970 996,944 187% 454,074 542,870
Water Federal Grants Revenue 12,000 16,204 0% 11,780 4,424
Interest Income - 37,094 0% - 37,094
Gain On Sale Of Assets - 2,385 0% 6,819 (4,434)
Reserve for Encumbrances 283,256 - 0% - -
Appropriated from Net Position 3,820,000 - 0% - -
Total Operating Revenues 13,410,770 8,885,691 66% 8,081,474 804,217
.
Operating Expenses
Salaries of Personnel 1,174,952 1,032,621 88% 952,755 79,866
Fringe Benefits 517,726 458,137 88% 423,793 34,344
Contractual Services 690,706 540,509 78% 535,470 5,039
Printing and Binding 2,500 680 27% 671 9
Advertising 1,000 175 17% - 175
Utilities 567,772 516,220 91% 495,229 20,991
Communications 5,900 3,193 54% 3,845 (652)
Insurance 36,500 24,868 68% 32,769 (7,901)
Travel and Training 9,800 8,929 91% 7,862 1,067
Miscellaneous 80,297 61,781 77% 72,435 (10,654)
Materials and Supplies 307,381 252,876 82% 214,537 38,339
Depreciation - 802,104 0% 798,247 3,857
Capital 341,795 203,394 60% 250,779 (47,385)
Interest Obligations - 103,283 0% 53,363 49,920
Bond Costs - - 0% - -
Contingency 186,576 - 0% - -
Total Production Expenses 3,922,905 4,008,769 102% 3,841,755 167,014
Salaries of Personnel 883,400 745,670 84% 764,101 (18,431)
Fringe Benefits 407,397 348,738 86% 348,358 380
Contractual Services 1,293,688 1,148,598 89% 980,443 168,155
Printing and Binding 500 75 15% 66 9
Advertising - 175 0% - 175
Communications 4,850 2,940 61% 4,181 (1,241)
Insurance 37,500 28,549 76% 36,204 (7,655)
Lease/Rent of Equipment 2,000 1,892 95% 1,377 515
Travel and Training 7,600 3,015 40% 4,034 (1,019)
Miscellaneous 34,597 33,723 97% 32,529 1,194
Miscellaneous Credits (290,000) (367,925) 127% (365,693) (2,232)
Materials and Supplies 260,528 210,556 81% 87,228 123,328
Depreciation - 277,993 0% 212,641 65,352
Capital 1,400,957 166,390 12% 1,808,720 (1,642,330)
Interest Obligations 1,742,848 132,523 8% 170,040 (37,517)
Bond Costs - - 0% 150 (150)
Total Distribution Expenses 5,785,865 2,732,912 47% 4,084,379 (1,351,467)
Income (loss) Before Transfers 3,702,000 2,144,010 155,340 1,988,670
Transfer to Water Capital Fund (3,548,000) - 0% (487,446) 487,446
Transfer (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) (154,000) (141,808) 92% (137,810) (3,998)
Income (loss)-$ 2,002,202$ (469,916)$ 2,472,118$ -
Production
Distribution
City of Salem, Virginia
Water Fund
Statement of Operations
For Eleven Months Ending May 31, 2026
Page 33 of 91
Schedule J
Operating Revenues
Current Year
Budget
Current Year
Year to Date
% of
Budget
Prior Year
Year to Date Variance
Services 7,706,888$ 6,918,245$ 90% 6,790,886$ 127,359$
Other Revenue 210,000 230,405 110% 192,519 37,886
Reserve for Encumbrances 135,685 - 0% - -
Total Operating Revenues 8,052,573 7,148,650 89% 6,983,405 165,245
.
Operating Expenses
Salaries of Personnel 1,027,292 740,126 72% 746,264 (6,138)
Fringe Benefits 480,351 340,587 71% 345,856 (5,269)
Contractual Services 3,564,455 2,449,534 69% 2,802,516 (352,982)
Printing and Binding 1,500 146 10% 133 13
Advertising 1,500 350 23% - 350
Utilities 5,472 4,758 87% 5,457 (699)
Communications 14,850 12,446 84% 13,490 (1,044)
Insurance 16,500 18,482 112% 15,807 2,675
Lease/Rent of Equipment 1,800 631 35% 1,377 (746)
Travel and Training 12,000 8,170 68% 6,866 1,304
Miscellaneous 44,516 40,724 91% 39,888 836
Miscellaneous Credits (270,000) (210,776) 78% (221,938) 11,162
Materials and Supplies 88,220 61,459 70% 64,229 (2,770)
Depreciation - 1,380,635 0% 1,319,833 60,802
Capital 194,827 107,252 55% 285,823 (178,571)
Interest Obligations 1,932,079 51,517 3% 62,489 (10,972)
Contingency 457,211 - 0% - -
Total Operating Expenses 7,572,573 5,006,040 66% 5,488,090 (482,050)
Income (loss) before Transfers 480,000 2,142,610 1,495,315 647,295
Transfer to Sewer Capital Fund (480,000) - 0% (2,274,710) 2,274,710
Income (loss)-$ 2,142,610$ (779,395)$ 2,922,005$
City of Salem, Virginia
Sewer Fund
Statement of Operations
For Eleven Months Ending May 31, 2026
Page 34 of 91
Schedule K
Operating Revenues
Current Year
Budget
Current Year
Year to Date
% of
Budget
Prior Year
Year to Date Variance
Shows/rentals 405,023$ 350,881$ 87% 354,262$ (3,381)$
Box office shows 1,887,681 3,708,639 196% 1,057,062 2,651,577
Merchandise and commissions 310,800 419,891 135% 342,105 77,786
Static advertising 60,000 68,300 114% 38,125 30,175
Miscellaneous income 20,000 21,291 106% 36,713 (15,422)
Interest Income 1,500 6,241 416% 2,111 4,130
Salem Fair 690,000 606,369 88% 664,618 (58,249)
Gain on Sale of Assets - 11,585 0% - 11,585
Reserve For Encumbrances 165,581 - 0% - -
Appropriated from Net Position 206,325 - 0% - -
Total Operating Revenues 3,746,910 5,193,197 139% 2,494,996 2,698,201
Operating Expenses
Salaries of personnel 1,472,247 1,391,147 94% 1,270,553 120,594
Fringe benefits 554,190 488,828 88% 453,340 35,488
Maintenance and contractual services 406,834 416,457 102% 212,231 204,226
Printing and binding 500 1,749 350% 304 1,445
Advertising 25,000 23,242 93% 31,402 (8,160)
Utilities 427,363 353,946 83% 353,314 632
Communications 11,400 10,122 89% 9,959 163
Insurance 32,000 37,436 117% 30,570 6,866
Leases and Rentals 3,200 8,926 279% 5,815 3,111
Travel and training 53,700 46,028 86% 17,258 28,770
Miscellaneous 108,260 104,965 97% 119,773 (14,808)
Show expense 1,800,000 4,372,397 243% 1,032,473 3,339,924
Fair expense 646,681 593,371 92% 561,003 32,368
Materials and supplies 50,000 48,696 97% 32,046 16,650
Capital 808,891 349,086 43% 313,475 35,611
Depreciation - 311,231 0% 287,481 23,750
Total Operating Expenses 6,400,266 8,557,627 134% 4,730,997 3,826,630
Income (loss) Before Transfers (2,653,356)(3,364,430) (2,236,001)(1,128,429)
Transfers 2,653,356 1,923,593 72% 1,803,674 119,919
Income (loss)-$ (1,440,837)$ (432,327)$ (1,008,510)$ 0.00
City of Salem, Virginia
Salem Civic Center
Statement of Operations
For Eleven Months Ending May 31, 2026
Page 35 of 91
Schedule L
Operating Revenues:
Current Year
Budget
Current Year
Year to Date % of Budget
Prior Year
Year to Date Variance
Catering 817,128$ 990,057$ 121% 619,928$ 370,129$
Concessions 177,500 264,305 149% 144,373 119,932
Moyer Concessions 100,000 153,475 153% 109,274 44,201
Salem High Concessions 14,000 19,242 137% 14,394 4,848
Reserve For Encumbrances 74,210 - 0% - -
Total Operating Revenues 1,182,838 1,427,079 121%887,969 539,110
Operating Expenses:
Salaries of personnel 354,775 294,495 83% 304,653 (10,158)
Fringe benefits 108,831 81,249 75% 89,398 (8,149)
Contractual services 33,465 29,331 88% 19,645 9,686
Printing and binding 300 - 0% 114 (114)
Advertising 2,000 515 26% - 515
Laundry and Cleaning 1,500 - 0% 48 (48)
Communications 200 154 77% 177 (23)
Insurance 2,000 1,408 70% 1,522 (114)
Miscellaneous 40,612 78,649 194% 25,799 52,850
Materials and supplies 247,500 311,256 126% 215,846 95,410
Capital 74,210 74,711 101% - 74,711
Depreciation - 3,271 0% 3,251 20
Contingency 36,261 - 0% - -
Total Catering Expenses 901,654 875,039 97% 660,453 214,586
Salaries of Personnel 65,183 68,555 105% 68,442 113
Fringe Benefits 13,001 14,528 112% 14,651 (123)
Contractual services 25,000 44,507 178% 16,526 27,981
Miscellaneous 150 17 11% (450) 467
Materials and Supplies 54,500 96,593 177% 46,395 50,198
Total Concessions Expenses 157,834 224,200 142% 145,564 78,636
Salaries of Personnel 37,740 39,772 105% 36,097 3,675
Fringe Benefits 11,713 8,538 73% 8,947 (409)
Contractual services 22,500 13,245 59% 16,789 (3,544)
Miscellaneous - (139) 0% (45) (94)
Materials and Supplies 33,000 53,596 162% 39,162 14,434
Total Moyer Expenses 104,953 115,012 110% 100,950 14,062
Salaries of Personnel 10,818 5,266 49% 7,421 (2,155)
Fringe Benefits 2,679 1,094 41% 1,372 (278)
Contractual 1,500 - 0% - -
Miscellaneous - (13) 0% 6 (19)
Materials and Supplies 3,400 4,484 132% 3,569 915
Total Salem High Expenses 18,397 10,831 59% 12,368 (1,537)
Income (loss) Before Transfers - 201,997 (31,366)233,363
Transfers - - 0% - -
Income (loss)-$ 201,997$ (31,366)$ 233,363$
Moyer Concessions
Salem High Concessions
City of Salem, Virginia
Salem Catering and Concessions
Statement of Operations
For Eleven Months Ending May 31, 2026
Catering
Concessions
Page 36 of 91
City of Salem, Virginia
Water and Sewer Capital Funds
Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Period Ending May 31, 2026
Schedule M
Project Total Available Year To
Budget To Date Encumbrances Project Balance Date
Water Capital Fund
Expenditures:
North Salem Water Improvements 7,650,000$ 58,139$ 2,751$ 60,890$ 7,589,110$ 42,093$
Well Construction 2,902,132 2,609,688 180,405 2,790,093 112,039 1,069,384
Franklin St Water Tank Replacement 605,236 605,236 - 605,236 - 25,659
Blackwood Tank Rehab and Replacement 820,000 5,750 - 5,750 814,250 5,750
Litchell/Wildwood Pump Station Replace 350,000 15,321 8,250 23,571 326,429 15,321
Waterline - Howard Dr and Jackson Dr 170,880 47,378 123,502 170,880 - 47,378
Waterline Design and Replacement 1,225,566 - - - 1,225,566 -
Contingency 50,000 - - - 50,000 -
Total Expenditures 13,773,814$ 3,341,512$ 314,908$ 3,656,420$ 10,117,394$ 1,205,585$
Sewer Capital Fund
Expenditures:
Roanoke River Upper Sewer Rehab 7,154,710$ -$ -$ -$ 7,154,710$ -$
Wiley Ct Sewer Improvements 375,000 - - - 375,000 -
Pomeroy Sewer System Upgrade 1,860,000 48,600 14,400 63,000 1,797,000 48,600
Mason Creek Interceptor Upgrade 740,000 424,243 286,300 710,543 29,457 397,471
Contingency 50,000 - - - 50,000 -
Total Expenditures 10,179,710$ 472,843$ 300,700$ 773,543$ 9,406,167$ 446,071$
Page 37 of 91
Schedule N
Budget
Current Year
Year to Date
Percent
to Date
Prior Year
Year to Date Variance
Beginning Net Position -$ 8,144,763$ 9,399,213$ (1,254,450)$
Revenue
Premiums Paid - City 6,153,355 5,889,852 96% 5,456,281 433,571
Premiums Paid - School 5,175,000 4,669,280 90% 4,623,762 45,518
Premiums Paid - Retirees 830,000 1,030,650 124% 827,721 202,929
Dental Premiums Paid 597,000 556,054 93% 551,228 4,826
Interest Earnings 470,000 312,176 66% 393,678 (81,502)
Miscellaneous 40,000 - 0% 64,865 (64,865)
Total Year to Date Revenues 13,265,355 12,458,012 94% 11,917,535 540,477
Expenses
Health Claims 12,025,936 12,039,564 100% 11,883,279 156,285
Dental Claims 597,000 527,823 88% 475,279 52,544
Employee Health Clinic 546,469 411,118 75% 397,894 13,224
Consulting Services 91,050 57,836 64% 67,108 (9,272)
Miscellaneous 4,900 4,764 97% 4,408 356
Total Year to Date Expenses 13,265,355 13,041,105 98% 12,827,968 213,137
Ending Net Position -$ 7,561,670$ 8,488,780$ (927,110)$
City of Salem, Virginia
Health Insurance Fund
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
For Eleven Months Ending May, 2026
Page 38 of 91
City of Salem, Virginia
Schedule of Deposits and Investments
For Period Ending May 31, 2026
Schedule O
Fair Value +FV + AI
Cash Value Net Change Accrued Accrued Income as a % of
5/31/2026 in Fair Value Income 5/31/2026 Portfolio
Demand & Time Deposits
Concentration Account 51,384,023$ -$ -$ 51,384,023$ 28.5%
Payroll Account 10,418 - - 10,418 0.0%
Revenue Recovery Account 249,920 - - 249,920 0.1%
Utility Billing Account 7,861 - - 7,861 0.0%
Box Office Account 2,938,730 - - 2,938,730 1.6%
Held as Fiscal Agent of:
Cardinal Academy 785,181 - - 785,181 0.4%
Court Community Corrections 1,337,972 - - 1,337,972 0.7%
Held on Behalf of:
Economic Development Authority 153,815 - - 153,815 0.1%
Total Demand & Time Deposits 56,867,920 - - 56,867,920 31.4%
Investments
Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP)117,409,408 - - 117,409,408 65.2%
VA State Non-Arbitrage Program (SNAP)275,406 - - 275,406 0.2%
Money Market Funds 3,067,038 - 8,864 3,075,902 1.7%
U.S. Government Agency Bonds 1,958,189 - 20,910 1,979,099 1.1%
Held on Behalf of:
Economic Development Authority LGIP 722,119 - - 722,119 0.4%
Total Investments 123,432,160 - 29,774 123,461,934 68.6%
Total Deposits and Investments 180,300,080$ -$ 29,774$ 180,329,854$ 100.0%
Page 39 of 91
Item #: 5.A.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM,
VIRGINIA HELD AT CITY HALL
MEETING DATE: August 24, 2026
AGENDA ITEM: Stormwater Utility
Consider an ordinance on second reading to amend, revise,
reordain, and enact Chapter 30, Environment, by adopting
additional sections 30-189 through 30-199, Article VI,
Stormwater Utility Fee of the CODE OF THE CITY OF
SALEM, VIRGINIA. (Approved on first reading at the August
10, 2026, meeting.)
SUBMITTED BY: Will Simpson, Assistant Director Community
Development/City Engineer
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The City of Salem is required to obtain and maintain a Municipal Separate Storm
Sewer System (MS4) permit. The MS4 permit is renewable every five (5) years.
Included in this permit are ever-increasing, unfunded mandates from the Department
of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The City’s MS4 permit is subject to multiple Total
Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements, the most stringent of which is sediment
allocations. The City is required to remove sediment loads from its creeks and streams
and is also responsible for stormwater management throughout all areas of the City.
These ever-increasing regulations from the State are not accompanied by funding,
and it is up to each individual locality subject to an MS4 permit to establish a funding
source for the administration of their programs. The establishment of a Stormwater
Utility Fee (SUF) is enabled by virtue of Virginia Code § 15.2-2114. Many of the MS4
localities in the State have already established a SUF.
The Community Development Department has been responsible for ensuring the City
remains in compliance with its MS4 permit. It has relied on general fund money and
the use of State Highway Maintenance funds (for eligible projects) to seek compliance.
However, each year, the mandates from DEQ become more and more stringent, and
there is not enough existing funding to keep up with these ever-moving standards.
The SUF would be a dedicated source of funding strictly for stormwater. Funds
brought in by this fee would go towards program administration, maintenance of
Page 40 of 91
existing stormwater facilities, and capital projects for stormwater. Administration duties
include, but are not limited to, compiling annual reports for DEQ, inspection of
hundreds of stormwater facilities and drainage outfalls, citizen response, and
construction inspection. Maintenance duties include, but are not limited to, repairs to
existing stormwater facilities, cleaning out storm drains and pipes, street sweeping,
and repairs to existing infrastructure. Capital projects would include, but are not limited
to, upgrades to existing storm drains, streambank stabilization, curb and gutter
installation, and river dredging.
On July 14, 2025, City Council adopted a resolution allowing for the establishment of a
Stormwater Advisory Committee. The purpose of this committee was to explore
different funding sources for stormwater. This committee was comprised of individuals
from all backgrounds within the community. Representatives from educational
institutions, industry, local retail, faith-based organizations, and residential were
involved. The committee met multiple times to discuss options, led by Wetland Studies
and Solutions (WSSI), the City’s environmental consultant. The committee evaluated
the City’s needs and requirements and then developed a plan to establish a funding
source to meet those needs. The committee and staff reached out to other localities in
the area that have already been through this process to discuss their programs and
the lessons they have learned.
The committee determined that a dedicated stormwater utility fee should be
established utilizing a flat fee for residential properties and a tiered system for
nonresidential properties. They were then tasked with deciding what the base rate for
an equivalent residential unit (ERU) would be. An ERU is the average size of
impervious area over all residential properties in the City. This data is collected
through the Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) by analyzing
aerial photography and establishing all impervious area on a parcel. The committee
took this information, along with information gathered from other localities, and
recommended a fee of ten dollars ($10) per ERU.
This fee is charged as a flat fee for residential units, broken down by the following
categories: $10 for single-family residential (including townhomes and condominiums),
$5 for multifamily (apartments, duplex, triplex, quadplex, and multifamily homes), and
$3 for mobile home units. Nonresidential properties (commercial, industrial, churches,
etc.) will be charged a tiered rate, which is shown in the ordinance. These rates are
based on the size of the impervious area that is present on each individual lot.
Once the recommendations from the committee were finalized, the City held two
public informational meetings at the Salem Civic Center on June 18, 2026, and June
24, 2026. These were advertised on social media as well as through a flyer insert in
the utility bills. These meetings were well attended and consisted of staff and WSSI
presenting the findings of the committee to the public and answering questions. Staff
presented an overview of the proposed program to City Council at a work session on
July 27, 2026.
Page 41 of 91
Per Virginia Code, if a stormwater fee is established, then the locality must offer a
crediting system. The crediting system is based on how much stormwater a site is
treating prior to discharging from the site. Credits can vary from 10% of the fee all the
way up 90%. There are many different items that can qualify for a credit. Such items
include trees, rain barrels, and rain gardens for residential properties and stormwater
ponds and quality control facilities for nonresidential. All of these methods will be
outlined in the Stormwater Utility Crediting Manual. There is a manual for residential
and nonresidential, as the criteria for credits are different between the two.
The effective date to begin collection will be January 1, 2027. Fees will be assessed
on the current utility bills and will be sent to the account holder for the utilities. If there
is a case where a renter does not have the utilities in their name, the stormwater fee
will be assessed to the property owner.
If Council chooses to approve the ordinance, there will be a re-evaluation of the
program every four years. This evaluation will analyze what the program costs are and
how much revenue is being generated by the fee. Staff will present a report to Council
after the evaluation is complete. If the needs are being met and the fee is deemed
adequate, then no action will be requested. However, if it is found that the needs of
the program are not being met, then the fee can be amended at that time by Council,
with the effective date being July 1 of the respective year. The first comprehensive
evaluation will occur during the early part of 2031.
City staff will continue assisting the public to address questions and publish
educational materials on the Community Development website and through social
media.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Establishment of the Stormwater Utility Fee would allow for a dedicated stream of
revenue that would be specific to stormwater administration and projects only.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council consider adoption of this ordinance on second reading,
amending Chapter 30 Environment to incorporate Article VI, Stormwater Utility Fee of
the City Code.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Stormwater Ordinance
2. Legal Ad 7.23
3. Legal Ad 7.30
Page 42 of 91
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND, REVISE, AND REORDAIN, AND ENACT, CHAPTER 30, ENVIRONMENT,
BY ADOPTING ADDITIONAL SECTIONS 30-189 THROUGH 30-199, ARTICLE VI, STORMWATER UTILITY
FEE OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, THAT SECTION 30-189
THROUGH 30-199, ARTICLE VI, STORMWATER UTILITY FEE, CHAPTER 30, ENVIRONMENT, OF THE
CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA BE ADOPTED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
Chapter 30
ENVIRONMENT
ARTICLE VI. STORMWATER UTILITY FEE
ARTICLE 6 – STORMWATER UTILITY FEE
Sec. 30-189. – Authority.
Pursuant to §15.2-2114 of the Code of Virginia, the City hereby establishes a Stormwater Enterprise Fund to enact a
system of utility fees to support a local stormwater management program consistent with the Virginia Erosion and
Stormwater Management Act (Virginia Code §16.1-44.15:24, et seq.) and all other state or federal regulations
governing stormwater management.
Sec. 30-190. – Findings and purpose.
The City Council finds that an adequate, sustainable source of revenue for stormwater management activities is
necessary to protect the general health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City. Further, Council finds that
property with higher amounts of impervious area contributes greater amounts of stormwater and pollutants to the
stormwater management system and waters of the Commonwealth and should carry a proportionate burden of the cost
of stormwater management. However, stormwater runoff is associated with all improved properties in the City,
whether residential or nonresidential, and the individual property impacts of runoff are correlated to the amount of
impervious surface on the property and land-disturbing activities on the property. The elements of stormwater
management infrastructure provide benefits and services to properties within the City through direct protection of
property, control of flooding and protection of the City's natural environment. Therefore, Council determines that it is
in the best interests of the public to establish a stormwater management utility and stormwater utility fees that allocate
program costs to all property owners or occupants based on impervious area.
Sec. 30-191. – Definitions.
The following words and terms used in this article shall have the following meanings:
Agricultural property means undeveloped property in the Agricultural Zoning District of the City of Salem used for
the tilling, planting or harvesting of agricultural, horticultural or forest crops or land used for raising livestock.
Common area means land in a development that is not owned by an individual owner of the development but dedicated
for shared use by all owners through a management organization, homeowners organization or cooperative board.
Developed property means real property that has been altered from its natural state by the addition of improvements
such as buildings, structures, and other impervious surfaces. For new construction, property shall be considered
developed pursuant to this section upon (a) issuance of a certificate of occupancy or (b) certification of the final
building permit inspection for those facilities not requiring a certificate of occupancy.
Page 43 of 91
Developed single-family residential property means a developed lot or parcel containing one (1) residence or dwelling
unit, and accessory uses related to but subordinate to the purpose of providing permanent dwelling facilities. Such
property may include, but is not limited to, houses, condominiums, and townhouses.
Developed multifamily residential property means developed property containing two (2) or more residences or
dwelling units, and accessory uses related to but subordinate to the purpose of providing permanent dwelling facilities.
Such property may include, but is not limited to, apartments, duplexes, triplexes, and multi-family homes.
Developed nonresidential property means developed property that does not serve a primary purpose of providing
permanent dwelling units. Such property shall include, but is not limited to, commercial properties, industrial
properties, parking lots, recreational and cultural facilities, hotels, offices and churches.
Equivalent residential unit or ERU: The equivalent impervious area of a typical single-family residential developed
property based on the statistical average horizontal impervious area of a single-family detached dwelling unit in the
City. An ERU equals 3,500 square feet of impervious surface area.
Impervious surface area means a surface that is compacted or covered with material that is highly resistant to
infiltration by water, including, but not limited to, most conventionally surfaced streets, roofs, decks, pools, sidewalks,
parking lots, gravel parking lots and roads, and other similar structures.
Mobile Home means any trailer, mobile home or any unit used for living and sleeping purposes, and which may be,
or is, intended for transport from one place to another, whether by motive power or otherwise.
Permanent reduction means the reduction of flow or pollutant load achieved by verifiable stormwater practices. The
practices available for use are limited to those contained in the Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook and
designed consistent with the standards and specifications contained therein.
Revenues means all rates, fees, assessments, rentals or other charges or other income received by the stormwater
management utility pursuant to this article in connection with the management and operation of the system, including
amounts received from the investment or deposit of monies in any fund or account and any amounts contributed by
the City, funds provided by developers or individual residents, and the proceeds from sale of general obligation bonds
for stormwater projects or stormwater revenue bonds.
Stormwater management system or system means the stormwater management infrastructure and equipment of the
City and all improvements thereto for stormwater control in the City. Infrastructure and equipment shall include
structural and natural stormwater control systems of all types, including, without limitation, stormwater management
facilities, roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels, or
storm drains.
Stormwater management utility or utility means the specialized municipal services that plan, construct, operate, and
maintain infrastructure to safely manage stormwater runoff, funded primarily through utility fees.
Stormwater utility fee means the monthly utility charge based upon the ERU rate applied and billed to property owners
or occupants of developed residential property, developed multifamily residential property, developed nonresidential
property and other property, all as more fully described in section 30-193.
Undeveloped property means any parcel which has not been altered from its natural state to disturb or alter the
topography or soils on the property in a manner which substantially reduces the rate of infiltration of stormwater into
the earth.
Sec. 30-192. – Establishment of stormwater management utility; stormwater
utility fee.
Page 44 of 91
existing utility account, the City will create the account in the name of the property owner to allow for billing
of the utility fee.
c. The ERU rate to be used for calculating the stormwater utility fee shall be ten dollars ($10.00) per month.
d. Except as otherwise provided in this article, the impervious area for a property shall be determined by the
City using aerial photography, as-built drawings, final approved site plans, field surveys or other appropriate
engineering and mapping analysis tools.
e. Notwithstanding subsection (b) above, and consistent with Virginia Code §15.2-2114, the stormwater utility
fee shall be waived in its entirety for the following:
1. A federal, state, or local government, or other public entity, that holds a permit to discharge
stormwater from a municipal separate storm sewer system; except that the waiver of charges shall
apply only to property covered by any such permit;
2. Public roads and street rights-of-way that are owned and maintained by state or local agencies
including property rights-of-way acquired through the acquisitions process; and
3. Cemeteries.
Sec. 30-193. – Stormwater utility fee calculation.
Adequate revenues shall be generated to provide for a balanced operating and capital improvement budget for
expansion and maintenance of the stormwater management system, as well as compliance with regulatory
requirements by setting sufficient levels of stormwater utility fees. These fees shall be billed to owners of all property
in the City subject to the stormwater utility fee; provided, however, where a tenant or occupant is the person to whom
water or sewer service, or both, are billed, the utility fees may be billed to such tenant or occupant (See Section 30-
197).
a. For purposes of determining the stormwater utility fee, all properties in the City are classified into one (1) of
the following classes:
1. Developed residential property;
2. Developed multifamily residential property;
3. Developed nonresidential property;
4. Undeveloped property; or
5. Agricultural property.
b. The monthly stormwater utility fee for developed single-family residential property shall equal the ERU rate.
c. The monthly stormwater utility fee for developed multifamily residential property shall be fifty percent (50%)
of the ERU rate per dwelling unit, billed to each property owner or occupant. For example, each half of a
duplex will be charged fifty percent of an ERU; or each apartment in an apartment complex will be charged
fifty percent of an ERU.
d. The monthly stormwater utility fee for a mobile home shall be thirty percent (30%) of the ERU rate per
dwelling unit, billed to each property owner or occupant.
e. The monthly stormwater utility fee for developed nonresidential property shall be based on the total
impervious surface area on the property as set forth in the tiered rate structure shown in subsection (i).
f. The stormwater utility fee for vacant developed property, both residential and nonresidential, shall be the
same as that for occupied property of the same class.
g. Undeveloped property shall be exempt from the stormwater utility fee; provided, however, that any
impervious areas on the property greater than three hundred-fifty (350) square feet shall be subject to the
monthly stormwater utility fee for developed nonresidential property, as set forth above in subsection (e).
h. Agricultural property shall be exempt from the stormwater utility fee; provided, however, that each developed
residential unit situated on a parcel devoted to agricultural use shall be charged a stormwater utility fee equal
to the ERU rate, and other impervious areas on the property greater than three hundred-fifty (350) square feet
shall be subject to the monthly stormwater utility fee for developed nonresidential property, as set forth above
in subsection (e).
Page 45 of 91
i. Tiered nonresidential rates:
Square
Monthly Stormwater Utility Fee
351 3,500 $5.00
3,501 7,000 $15.00
7,001 10,000 $24.29
10,001 20,000 $42.86
20,001 30,000 $71.43
30,001 40,000 $100.00
40,001 50,000 $128.57
50,001 60,000 $157.14
60,001 70,000 $185.72
70,001 80,000 $214.29
80,001 90,000 $242.86
90,001 100,000 $271.43
100,001 125,000 $321.43
125,001 150,000 $392.86
150,001 175,000 $464.29
Page 46 of 91
175,001 200,000 $535.72
200,001 250,000 $642.86
250,001 300,000 $785.72
300,001 350,000 $928.57
350,001 400,000 $1,071.43
400,001 450,000 $1,214.29
450,001 500,000 $1,357.14
500,001 600,000 $1,571.43
600,001 700,000 $1,857.14
700,001 800,000 $2,142.86
800,001 900,000 $2,428.57
900,001 1,000,000 $2,714.29
1,000,001 $2,857.15
Sec. 30-194. – Rate adjustment and periodic review.
The City shall conduct a comprehensive review of the Stormwater Management Utility Fee, and associated rate
structure every four (4) years. This comprehensive review shall evaluate the rational relationship between the fees
charged and the services provided, ensuring the program remains consistent with the Virginia Stormwater
Management Act.
Any necessary adjustment in fees as a result of any comprehensive review shall become effective on July 1 of said
year. The first comprehensive review shall be conducted in 2031 in preparation of the Fiscal Year 2032 budget.
Page 47 of 91
Sec. 30-195. – Stormwater utility fee credits and exemptions.
a. In accordance with Virginia Code § 15.2-2114(D), the Department of Community Development will
implement and maintain Salem Stormwater Utility Credit Manuals (Residential and Non-Residential). These
credits will provide partial waivers of stormwater utility fees for any persons who install, operate, and
maintain a stormwater management facility that achieves a permanent reduction in stormwater flow or
pollutant loadings. The amount of the waiver is based in part on the percentage reduction in stormwater flow
or pollutant loadings, or both, from pre-installation to post-installation of the facility, or for public or private
entities under Virginia Code § 15.2-2114(E) that implement or participate in strategies, techniques, or
programs that reduce stormwater flow or pollutant loadings or decrease the cost of maintaining or operating
the public stormwater management system, with written implementation policies developed by the
Department of Community Development, and kept on file with the Department. Nothing shall prevent the
modification of the system of credits, and such modifications may apply to holders of existing credits. Credits
shall not be issued retroactively. However, a one-time, six (6) month grace period will be granted for credit
applications received prior to July 1, 2027. Complete applications submitted between January 1, 2027 and
June 30, 2027 will receive retroactive credits as if the credit had been approved on January 1, 2027, and the
credit will be reflected on a future bill. Applications submitted on or after July 1, 2027, will be processed
prospectively with no retroactive credits allowed as described in subsection (b).
b. Except for new construction, complete applications for credits shall be made each year by February 1, with
the City providing a response within 45 days of receipt, and any approved credit taking effect on the following
July 1; applications for credits received after February 1 will be accepted but not reviewed until the following
year.
c. An application submitted without the necessary technical documentation (such as as-built drawings or signed
maintenance agreements) shall not be deemed to be a complete application until such deficiencies are
corrected.
a. The stormwater management enterprise fund is hereby established as a dedicated enterprise fund. The fund
shall consist of revenues generated by stormwater utility fees, as well as all other revenues as defined in
section 30-191.
b. The stormwater management enterprise fund shall be a dedicated revenue only used to pay for or recover
costs for the following:
1. The acquisition, as permitted by Virginia Code §15.2-1800, of real and personal property, and
interests therein, necessary to construct, operate, and maintain stormwater control facilities;
2. The cost of administration of the stormwater management program;
3. Planning, design, engineering, construction, and debt retirement for new facilities and enlargement
or improvement of existing facilities, whether publicly or privately owned, that serve to control
stormwater;
4. Operation and maintenance of facilities that serve to control stormwater;
5. Monitoring of stormwater control devices and ambient water quality; and
6. Other activities consistent with the state or federal regulations or permits governing stormwater
management, including, but not limited to, public education, watershed planning, inspection and
enforcement activities, and pollution prevention planning and implementation.
a. The stormwater utility fee is to be paid by the owner of each lot or parcel subject to the utility fees. However,
where a tenant or occupant is the person to whom water or sewer service, or both, are billed, the stormwater
utility fee may be charged to such tenant or occupant. In any case in which a tenant or occupant fails to pay
Page 48 of 91
the utility fee, the delinquent utility fee shall be collected from the owner of the property. All properties
subject to the utility fee shall be issued bills or statements for stormwater utility fees. As permitted by
Virginia Code § 15.2-2114(G), such bills or statements may be combined with sewer and water bills levied
pursuant to Chapter 90 of The Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, provided that all charges shall be
separately stated. The combined bill shall be issued for one (1) total amount. The Director of Finance is
hereby authorized and directed to create policies and procedures for the efficient billing and collection of
the combined bill, including a payment priority for allocation to the separate charges stated on the combined
bill. The bills or statements shall include a date by which payment shall be due. All bills for stormwater
utility fees prescribed by this article shall be due and payable by the due date stated on the bill and shall be
deemed delinquent if not paid in full within such time.
b. Delinquent stormwater utility fees shall be subject to a penalty thereon of five dollars ($5.00) for
residential accounts or five percent (5%) for nonresidential accounts.
c. A delinquent stormwater utility fee, along with penalty, may constitute a lien on the property, in accordance
with Virginia Code § 15.2-104 ranking on a parity with liens for unpaid taxes and may be collected in the
same manner as provided for the collection of unpaid taxes or otherwise permitted by law, in accordance
with Virginia Code § 15.2-2114 (G).
Sec. 30-198. – Petitions for adjustments.
a. Any property owner may request an adjustment of a stormwater utility bill by submitting a request in
writing to the Department of Community Development within sixty (60) days after the date the bill is
mailed or issued to the recipient of a stormwater utility bill. Grounds for adjustment of stormwater utility
fees are limited to the following:
1. An error was made regarding the square footage of the impervious area of the property;
2. The property is exempt under the provisions of section 30-192(e);
3. There is a mathematical error in calculating the stormwater utility fee; or
4. An approved credit was incorrectly applied.
b. The property owner or recipient of a stormwater utility bill shall complete a stormwater utility fee adjustment
application form available on the City’s website or supplied by the Department of Community Development.
c. If the application alleges an error in the amount of impervious area, a plan view of the property’s impervious
area will be provided by the City depicting all impervious areas within the property boundaries, including
buildings, patios, driveways, walkways, parking areas, compacted gravel areas, and any other separate
impervious structures identified in the City's impervious area database. This assessment will be the City's
initial response to the request for adjustment.
d. If the applicant is not satisfied with this initial response, the applicant may:
1. Request a meeting with the Director of Community Development; and/or
2. Submit an appeal with a revised plan signed and sealed by a professional engineer or professional
land surveyor licensed in the Commonwealth of Virginia attesting to the accuracy of the impervious
area measurements.
e. The requirement for a plan view of the property’s impervious area required in subsection (c) above may be
waived by the Director or their designee, if at the sole discretion of the Director or their designee the error is
obvious and is the result of a technical error or oversight by the City. In such case, the City shall be
responsible for recalculating the impervious area of the property.
f. The Director or their designee shall make a determination within forty-five (45) days of receipt of a complete
submittal for the request for adjustment. In the event that the Director or their designee finds that the appeal
is deficient or incomplete, the Director or their designee shall offer the owner sixty (60) days to supply the
missing information. The 45-day time for a decision will begin at such time as the requested information is
provided. If the information requested is not provided to the Director or their designee within sixty (60) days
of the original request, the petition will be deemed withdrawn.
Page 49 of 91
g. The Director’s decision on a stormwater utility fee adjustment petition is a final decision from which an
aggravated party may appeal to the Circuit Court for the City of Salem.
Sec. 30-199. – Severability.
The provisions of this article shall be deemed severable; and if any of the provisions hereof are adjusted to be invalid
or unenforceable, the remaining portions of this article shall remain in full force and effect and their validity
unimpaired.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its final passage.
Page 50 of 91
Page 51 of 91
WWW,ourvaney.org
t:1'1 TIJllts E 7 � ·llt<ttSTER . THURSDAY, JULY 30, 2026 • PAO
":'� 1:1■ Indoor/Outdoor Moving Sale Fumit\n,booka,Wllld6c::ol', ... ....._ Fridly•nd s.tU"d,y _,...., 118Cl')'9ltlt.ane Newport VA.
,j '.
Fincastle United Methodist Church Is seeking a part, time Adult Choir Director toJo-,oorWOfl;hlpte.-n, INdourldiJtchoit --•ndJoyfuly,ond lmprowandencouregethe rnwlcalwpeblhofour m1.111clen1.Re.por.ibiltiet ll'lduoetelecthgmuaicfor ""'"'°"·-""-� chdr,.,._,.., --June� con!uott,glhochoirond 00rgreg1tionforSU"1day momlf'Gll'ldapedal Mrvloes,planni'lgtnd coordn1lf'G._.l mU1le forarnmertervlces,md .. �-000tdlnabr/edvl10rlor
hff:jquar'9flln 81�.VA.�-..,. puretytetaoomrnutt,,;MfH PQlltion•EEm.,rwide en�'Mtw'tUS Potllionr9q1M'N�ID20� dom 31nl'ltreveVyr OfferedS.•ry· S1&4.500i\'TJobcMill Ev.kJtteMsyeCtm performenct.�tanclng lhecontrb.Jton1of,....,I 1uHylllffl1,pt'OYktr,g feed>acklOd__.atopn-.nt l!Mfflt,dtftta proclld�ufremtnts, 1upporthlegrablofnew •nd•xilbr\1161-d!Mng 101'tMreonto validel aod t•t benchu, amongotlerdufel. To •PPY.arn1lrewma10 co-.C-■ wltt,a\.l>jectRE�
Process Engine er sought by Virginia Transformer Corp. (VTCR) (Roanoke, VA) todevek>p1ndh'lprove manufactur'ngprocenet, pert,rmproce11anal'flls andercilneelir'QchaoG•, and tl4)por1i>Oll�and dOaJmenta�n Appt-,Lean Manufacturklg, She Sigma, androotcai.aeanat-,lis. Email resumes to· Kyle_vo11t@vatransfom1er
.Jrn:1 •• �
theSactetafYofHUO "6 N�6l��:ING �ai.'s.coo;. I -r:°::._o:��� ��=:�«sVtla ���:°�� pLJSL-b'fg� ���;J.� ����::��� =�.,!i c..,.1yam,11Cou'1. ,Iii'•-.... a,,� 111Ro, Clwtttion..... °""""-
1,n=�i::s,. ���::-1 --�l�'Nr,o,:,. Co,npNhe,.HeP\-, �n��"'s':� rs:da� COMMUNICATIONFRDMO C�atitlregular OC#lg TownHlll'#rilbeopenand Novembef15,2007, ADEBTCOUECTOR� �oflAUgusl lO, Copi..dtht 1vliltblt10receive�blic dnlgnnd11P1-,No.S-ANYINFORMA��uSED 20�,•t�J:��� Pllns,Of'dlnenoe.� oommtnlllnptlM>f\ltU. 83269,,copyofvihlehlt ����pOSE, 1�titD.1UNorth ===-� ��:Stt!:�� ��::-�• TERMS Of SALE tt,e ,oad Streat, In �� Of Community� Iha Town'I Zonlrg Map, County, Virglri1. 11 ��o�:.lll �����;:1�� ��StrMlt. f;::�!��:rnay �=��:"ber
���.!;�a'ci:..,, ""'!,.bl��ntol o ��-· �� �=!nC:.�1:': BEINGtheuma propertf
ABC NOTICE
hevt -.... .._ M1nSttMt,CM1tl1nlbu,g, corweyadlD7Hilt,lnc,t he,ra ':1...��� ��4:!'!r:::;I _ r::�:r;�c� l'lq!Jesq,, 500 p.m Mondtyttvwgh 1ndlk\d1M Craed,dlttd Friday Contactlhe November 17,2006,lnd ING Plamng Departrr.nt. 11 recorded In lhe aforeslid OF THE (540) la:2-6128, ext 1902 Clerk's Ofloe n lnstn.m.-il LEM, VIRGINIA, or by emlll at Number 06013235 ev pl1nn"QGchntti-,lburgor
t�s!,_� !::.=�w ��;�;!i�,:\,.. 11.\bi LPEuGe�7cN���c:i�ci �1:J.:::P�=� -• OF THE TOWN OF eonvnonwe•lh ol Vl,gln•. NOTICE IS CHRISTIANSBURG and being"''"" partkuiarty HEREBY GIVEN, By PLANNING ••-• 1011"'" the Board of COMMISSION PARCEL 1t. Tax Map �� ���=� :�g ,tradng as ----NOTICE OF Supervisors of the �:��n�:S!!,"'w�rg Number 059-A A 109 200The Glet>eBLV0, County of hoktaPublicHeari-.gon BEGINN1NGatapoh .. on Oalevile.Bo1etourtCounty, pUSLIC HEARING Montgomery, Mond ay.August17,2026, mark.adby amom.ment
relladrr-...lk.algro� Outtllcatior.. •Experienc:edl>Ctl,g churchchoh •Fonnaleib::atlonand ba<:kgl'Ol#'ldlnmuslcor musleedUC8tion. •Abiltytocollaborats'Mtl, teach,andr'laplrevollnteer �=-•lnanaffim,il'G IIM1:A VA 24083. Virginia at 7:00 PM In the Councll found, being the polrt of that the Board of Chambersoflhe 1ntersec:�ofRoute754 Theat:ioveestablish ment ls applyin glo theVIRG1NIA ALCO HOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) AUTHORllY for a Retail Re slaurantor Cater�Privlege/ClaulftcatiOn Change-Restaurant,Wine, Beer Mixed Beverages, Con�med On and Off Premises l icense toseUor manufacb.Jl'ealcoholc beverages
Notie8is herebyglven toa1 lntarestedperso�thatthe co uncl oflheC,Yof saiem.atlts regular ,neetinoon Monday,AugUII 10,202 e,at 6.30 p.m_,i'l councilChambers,Cit'f Hall, 114, N Broad Street, ln theCit)lof Salem, Virginla,willholdapubGc hearing,pursuant to sections 15.2-2204 and 152.22BSofthe Codeof Virginla,as ame�,to ec,nsklerthefollOWWlQ requests relative to the CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM , VIRGINIA:
Supervilorshe11tby Chr\stllnlburgTcwnHllt, and U .S ROl.rte11&-460 • •c:haoJJes a publichearing 100E Mal'IStseet. (RoanokaRoad):the nceN onAogust10,2028,tt7:15 Chriltianlburg,Vlrgi'lia 29deg.58'21.E.174.&4 p.m oras100nthereafter ll 24073,pu11t.11ntl0Sectlons feet(shownas175 .00reet. Compensation: •Cholr0irector$11,000-$13,000 Pleasereplyto offic:e@ftncastiellllc.org or cal(540)473-3001
SALE BY PUBLIC AUCTION TO SATISFY MECHANIC'S LIEN PROPERTY TO BE SOLD IN C/0 Fincastle United EXCEL Methodist Church P�e';�����,1�� Is seeking a part• thatporsuantto Vl,ufnia time Plano and/or Cod• §<43-34, Excel
Acawn��ta:!5�00r ;J�F£��1�!;: I :r�t��u':nhelp l ead of the Botetourt Coonty ' meanilgfu1 spirit fJled ����,��:�: 205
ELLEN O'ARDENNE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NOTE Objectionslolhe .111uanoeof thisllcense mustbesubmittedtoABC nolater than 30daysfrom thepublistvng date oflhe firstOftwoiequlred
JL. 1,eon,lder the request of eommunityCh urch lnc, propertYowner and • •1
theMontgomeryCol.rlty 152-2204and152-2285of lnDeedBook.1037,page Govemment Certer, 2nd the Code of Virgina, 11 8591 to a pol'lt mark.eel by Fk>or Board Room, 755 amended The PJrpose of an Iron pi'-. set; thence s. 58 Ro1nok.eSt reet, thepubllcheari�ISIO deg 41'04•E 13647feet Chriltiansburg, Vu-gl'lia, t> receive �blic comments to a point mar1<ed by an iron hear cm.en comments on concerning· pin set, thence S 28 d eg. ��=�ha�:�;:� A. Code M\encinert ��t6�:m!:·:;!:i'! ;., Administration, of the Code request by Town of set; thence N. 58 deg 59' ofthe Courtyof ;�,:�sburg,Appticant.to so·;:ed5�00f�tto.a �t �:=����� g��:::t:�;��• ���;!�I;: !,�s• Return Chcdt Fee, lo Permitted usee Data mamod b't W1 ;mn pl\ 16t lndudeelectronlcpayment cente1tarecunen'dy \henceN 59deg lS'oo· oftaxesoranyo1har1an al\crHedb'trightinthe We&OOteettoap01rt due, which is au.blequen\tt Gener1ol Industrial l\-'2) ma�od '71 an '111>1\� set.. �ytu:e��i;an";t'�1 ·• ! �°t��'?.9 <.·inu �e.:����� , :i�tp,���1:��= �:;�2��:· on ! : =r=�.:�k,g • �&:��i=-�:rj =:.:!.��: ii::=.<,__..,_·e:=:.�,ogllti,lod. ,· www.abc.vlrganl:1.gov or
,. Comersto=_!� �;,,.�= ��Permit toalow fotWtEdueational Facff�. Primary/SecOndary,onthe propertylocated,t1923
deposttoryi'lll\�Uon.or. i ,Hl eonditional u&e·perr'nltlo,.,J1u 0 433acre1asshown on
,:;:,.:::O,,:t�:q l���f2�Yffl'ffl !',�./!1'•ff-/undtrl'llltedlol'l•lhe l Oiltrfct. l mprovementSurveyfor 8®o52.J200. rnlltofan eledl'OOlc TownHallwflbeopenand PP Raj,lnc ",dated
J :�r::��•�tMnents ��:;:�Loaderis ln goodwork.ilgorder �•�':iiiiif'--"'1 Mil■ East Main Street (TaxMapt78-1-14) :::r:n:;:��:the ::::�,:=:s: t;r;:,���J�::r'ared
nonexf11enceof1ny tlmaoflhls P ublicHeariig BalzerandAssoclates,lnc .. accOl.l'ltmltchirglhe Acoipyoftheapplcation, and recorded as l nstrume�f Qualifications· •Proficlency'Mth plano ancUororgan •Ablitytosight-read mLISic •AblitytoYIQr1<. •eolaboratlvel'f'Mthciergy, ehoir,andolher muslcia� •Strongsensaofm1.1Sica11ty and,ensitivitytoY10rship flow Compensation, •PianlstSS,000-$7,000 •Organist$12,000 · $16,000 Pleasereplyto office@fincastk9Lmc.org or cal (540)473-3001
BUSINESS STRATEGIST TorcRobotics, lnc.&eeks Busi'lessStrateglstbased outofUS.headQuarters ln Blacksburg, VA. Hov.ever, purely telecaTln"MJtilgiWfH position -EE may reside
anyvdlere'Mthil U.S, Positlonreql.Jresupk>25o/o
dom.&infltraveVyr Offerec:ISalary· $113,797,'yr.Jobm.Jties: Supportdes}gn, develoi:men� construction, testirgoperatlons. andeventual commerdallzation ofthe AutoncmoLSTruckti.Jbs andthelr natv,or1<.;and leaddeslgn,dave1opment, and Implementation of
Cll118 teimi'lals desgjned toenablaandoptinizethe ose ofl0ft'1sel.drivi'lg trucks.Toapply,amel res1.1Mto eareers@torc.8'wlth IU�ect REOl810.
STAFF SOFlWARE ENGINEER Torc Roboticl,W'lc.seeks StaflSoftwaraEnglnaer based out of U.S. headq\.at'11111n Blac:ksbu-g,VA.t--lo'MWr, purelyte\eCOmn'M.ltr"lgM'FH polltlon -EEmayreslde an)"l'tlerawitlW'IU.S. Podlon reqllres L4I i:l 20%
dom.&infltraveVyr . Offered Salary: •'$207,870tyr .Jobm.Jtles: execuetullaottware develoi:mentlfe<yde activities ull� modem
C++; an.Yz.e a� mprove currantege>-m0ti0n eatimatlonandlocallzation algori!'llre:definaaottv.erareqL.irements.deslgn 1oftwara1rchitectUl8,and d9Yet:,prot:iustverilcation,t11�,smongo!her dutias. Toappty,amal .....,,.,. careers@lOfC.alwlO'l 111�ectREClll8C8.
SENIOR SYSTEMS ENGINEER Tore Roboticl,".seek' Senio<5Yt""''eni;neer t,o,edot.tof U.S.
l naccordance'MthVirginl& Code §43-34, Exoel Equ.,m8nt,UC,ls
advertlsingtha ,
aforementioned public auctionilthisnawspaperof genaral drculation ln BotetourtCot11ty,Vlrgi'lla. LikeWise.nodceOfthe aforemantionedaalahas been prov idedtolhe presentOYA'ler oftheloader by certified or registered malatlaast len(10)d ays priortothesaleand notioe haabaenprOYidedtoany ,ec:uredpartywhohasfied aftnanci'lgatatemenl egainstlheLoader, TERMS' Cash-Bkldar'a deposit of one-hundred (100o/o)r:lthe1alespricest thetimeofsala For lnfoimationRegarding theSale,ContactWoods Rogersvandeve n1erBlack, PLC.105.JaffersonSL s ui1e1800,Roanoke,VA 24011.(540)983-7560. ForlnformationRegardl� theloeder,Contact Dustin Cole.Vic:e-prasldent.Exc:el Equ�men\ U.C. (540)$0-6747. The Loadeda cunenUyloca1edat1020 Leetighway,Roanoka,VA ii;.;:;.;; Commissioner's Sale PursuanttothaSngla FamilyMo"'age ForeclosureActof1994,12 U.S.C. Chaplef 38A and the 5ecretary'1Foreck>sura eonwnissk>nar de19'\ation,
Order of Publication Corrvnonwealth of\lirginia VA Code§§1-211.1;801· 316,,317,20-104
2 Considerth eraqlll!IStof RobertsonFamU,,, Revocab1aTrust,ptoperty owner and Amer AJaaYadi,
Case No 28-1292 VIRGIN IA: IN THE COURT FOR THE COUtlTY OF ROANOKE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGI NIA, Complainant, v,. PURCELL BARRm, et el. Respordents. TO: THE RESPONDENTS: Theobjectdttilsuit lslo enforoe thalenfortaxes assessedbythe Countyof Roanoke,\!1rgi'liaaga inst certaln realproperty deslgnall!d 11TaxMap ParoelNo,026.19-01-27.00-0000.AAaffidavit havingbeenmadesnd filad lh at dligencahasbeen usedwithouteffectto sscertain thelocationof Cl ydeB.Banettand that there areormaybepeisons 'Mth an inm reati'llhe subjectproperfy,including helrs,dev isees,and ,ucceuorsi'ltitleof Clyde B .Barrettandthatthere are or maybepersons wlthan interet1 iltheaubjecl property,ildudlrGhelrs,
devisees,and suc.cessorsln titleof ClydeB,Barrett,who maybedeceased,'Hhose namesand ad d res.ses are unknO'Ml,W:ishereby ORDERED that each of the partiasappearonorbefore theAogust12,2026,and do wtialeverilneoeuaryto p�omct their1�:�•ts n said
It ii further ORDERED, purRJantofVa.Code Ann.§8.01-321, lhallhis OrderofPub1lcatlonb& publlahadonoeaweekfor
�=1'�:8pti���=:�
allow a retalaa1et,smoke shop on th e property locatedal 501West4th Slteet(TaxMapt143-3-14). 3,Conslder th a reqoest of Toe Preston Place, Preservation Foundation tnc,propertyowner,fora Special Ex oeptionPennit to
anowanassemblyhall, nonresidential uses In an accessorystructure,and nonresldential uae1outof door1,and a Uaa�ol Provlded forPeimit for ouldoor ga ther ingsd lessthan SOOpeopleontha propertylocated at1936W estMa1n Street (TaxMapt138·2•7).
Cop,..ollhepn,pc:eed plans,on:linanoesor ameodments msybe exami"ledinthaOfficeof community Development, 21SouthBruffeyStreet, s aiem,Virg inll. Ataaid hearing,partiesil lnterestand citlzensshall haveanopportunitytobe heardrelati'latotha saiclrequests. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY oFSALEM, VIRGINIA BY: H Robertllght ciert<:ofCouncil
four (4}1ucc:e1111/eMek1ln
Notice Is hereby given to all Interested persons that the City of Salem Planning commission. atittragularlT'IM!i'lgon AUglAt12,2026,at8:30 thelli!mn.linn,a newspaperofgt,naral cktulationintheCot11tyd Roanoka,andthatacopy bepostad1tthefron t door of the Cou!'muse In Colrlty of Roanoke, Virgilla. Enteredths7"dayol July2026.
�;-:;��-�-sueet.lnlheC'YofSalem, V11Vlnla,.,UholdP"bllc .. ,-.""""'"tto Secti00515.2-2204 ■nd 15 2.22eso111>oCodeof
accoll'ltlnformation thaTown'sZoningM&p, Number 2012006665 Said provldedbythat&Xpayer, Zoni'lgOrdiianco,and propertyfurther&hO'M'IMd provided that the taxpayer Future Land Use Map may described on Plat of Survey hat not tflndered ,riy other be viewed In the Planning prepared by Andttrson & electronic payment order Department Office, 100 E Assooates, Inc , dated thatwas nohonored durif'G Mai'lStseet. January 14, 1986,and the 12 months precadl� Christiansburg, VA 2 40 73, recorded ii lh� �m·s the ,erder of 1ha payment d uring normal office hours Offloe of the Cuwt Court of ��;r:�::�01::: �:!�\�;�:�0��: ��"!:":��572, otherfee orpenwty ContactthePlanrif'G Page679 provided bylaw. Oepartnent.at(S40)382-Aeopyofthafu11extof tha 6128,Exl 1902 ort1)1email Ordinanoeison filai'llhe at Office of the County plannlng@chnstiansbur�.or Ad ministr1torandls g,withanyqueslions or 1f 1vtl\ablaforpublic yourequi11treasonable Inspection or copyng. accommodations BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Ang�aM ,HI
County.tdrrinl1tr1tor
BEING the same property conveyeclun'D71ills,lnc, aVirgm,a co,poration,by Deed from PP. Raj, Inc., datec1Aogust7,2012,and record ed11theaforesad Clerk'sOffic:eas lnstn.rnent Number12006665
LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING OF THE TOWN OF CHRISTIANSBURG TOWN COUNCIL The Town of Christiansburg Town Counc:I wll hold a PublcHear ingonTuetday, August 11, 2026, It 700 PMl\theCouncl
Chambersoflhe Christiansburg Town Hal� 100E.Maii5treet.
Chr istlantburg,Vlrgiiia 24073.ThepurpoMofthe publlc hearinglsto receive publiccorrments concemi,g:
NOTICE OF TRUSTEES' SALE OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTY 7120RoanokeRoad, Shawsvlle, Virgirua (aJklaShawneeM1n1Mart) 9311 Roanoke Road, Eltiston,'v'rginia (afK/aBliston FoodMart) Pursuant tothe termsr:la ()eedofTrust(the·0eec1of Trust·)datedaso!July22. 2016, recordedi'llhe Clerk'sOfficeoftheCircu1t Court of Montgomery County, Virginia(lhe -Clerk'tOfficeiH lnstlU'YlenlNlfflber 160005662,and an AppointmentofSubllrtlJte TrusteedatedNOY«nber 19,2018,<e<O«ledlnlhe Clerk'IOffioe•lnstrunent No.20180()6463,the
::%:ri�!:'rtt)�� beoffered fora aleatpublic aoc:tiononAugust 14,2026, atnoon,atthaShawnee MinlM•rt. 712�Roanok e RGad, Shawtv1la, VA 24162 Shawnee Mi'll Mwt-7120 Roanoke Road,Sha'NS'11le, VA 24162:
Terms Adeposrtnthe formofcash orcerllfted funds1nlheamot11toften peroent(10%)oflha succ:esshibldwillbe requiredatthetrnflofsa1a. Clo11ngwithln thlrt,(30) days of sale Tima isofthe essence.ThePropertyis be ngsold•AS\S"wtthOut represenlation orwarranty ofanysortor nature concemngits cond1bon. Obtart1ngpossess1onoflhe Propertyshalnotbel\e responsbiityof theTruslee or thehokterof tha no te secured by th e Deed of Trust,but shall bealtha 1olacost,risk,andexpense of 1 hesucc:esshibldder Th e sucoessful bldder sh al payloraUrecordng charges,examinabonof 1111a,serdemen1fees,andal costsof conveyanci'lg. whlChshallbebySpecial WarrantyDeed The Trustee.sreseivethe rightto rejectanybid(s),withdraw thePropertylromlhesale atanytrnebeforethe 1erm1natonoflhe b1dd11g, keepthebidd11gopen for anylength oftima,postpone the sale.review the qual1ficat10nsolanbldders, and amend and/or supplemen t thetenns of salebyveltla1and wntten announcemen!Spnorto and/ord umglhesale For more11form ationviS1t UnkouaAuct10n Groupat www llnkousauct10n com
a COMM ISSIONER'S SALE of360MaplaRidge lane, Fincas"8,VA24090(Short Legal OeSCl1)ti>n: TAX 10 27569)'MUoccura!pubic ,uctionoutsldelhemllin entrancei:lthebuidlngof !he Circuit Court of Botek>urtColl"ltyC11a.it Court,VA1ocatedlt1W Mail Street. FincasHa. VA 24090onALlgust21,2026a1 1·00PM,p..1rsuanttoa
defaultofanotesecured byadeedoftrust axea.ited by Cel'/ W. Obe,.haln and P1triciaY.O>en1hli'l recoroed4124/2012,il theCiJnlltCooOlo< Botek>urt Coooty CIIWI eoun,VA.ilotrunent Numt,or12 0001707,and th9,'sllOl'lffl9fllinfr./OfOf
Hon. Olar1es N. Dorsey, Judge =·r�=� fc,Jla<(ll9 ... --. to lhe cQDE OF THE CITY OF SALfM, VIRGINIA:
A.ConditionalUaePerml raquestbyJeffreyT ard JnleM .Zoelnar, Applcants,andRayD, Craget1Tru1t.el0Mna C. Rogers,Trustea,Property Owner ,i:l8'1owaPISlned Houll�Otrtek>pment cor-.iltingof oneTwoFamilyDNellilg lnthe Genaial Bulineu (8-3) zonl�<istrlc:tonproperty locatedal185NewSNW,ldeoohd•T• Partel526-((A))•238: (Pa rcel1D004144),ard contiltingof 1pproxi'n11ely of 0A6Sacn,o.The pn,pe,1y lsdeais,\aledH Bu1i'less/Commercialon tha Futl.lre LandU.eMap of the 20130lriltiarabur; Com preher-.;.,ePlan.
All thatcertain lotot parcel oflandsituatalntheCount,J ofMoriQomery, eorrwnonweallh ofVirginia. andbeingmoreparticularty dM,cri)edastollcwrtl.
pARCEL 1 Tax Map Noa OB3-G13 13,�514A. 083-C2517
The Substitute Truslec may be ablelorespon d to inqu1riesconcemmgthe sale lalkbrlhi&: Nrtt H. Geddes, E.tql.ira VSBl38650 OPN Law 3140 ChaR1rralOrive, Suite:200-C Roarw:,kaV124018 Ph:(540)725-8181 FX:540)m-0126 Emait aQ"900@gpnlawcmJ CnunslforfnmobiNnt
1c;onside<lhe'"'luestol TenypropertleeofVAlnc., ��� excepionl'effllklO"°""■ ...-,IY��lho �s•eet.(TaxMap t 191.:i-1; 2.ConPW�
B. Conditional Use Penni request by s ...... 1 Bish op, P r operty�rard Appkan\toalow rasldentialutei'lO'le Ge .... 1ill1i.-(B.J) zonirt1d1trictonproperty locatedat.-SSStuartStreat NE,ldentifiedasTaParcel 527�(3))-SOAond 527�(3))-49B: (Paroe! ID0017SGand 001755), and ccnsbtirG d
BEINGalofLcts13, 14A. ind17aslhoWnonaplat oflUfVO'fentiled,"l'lat St,oww,gBo\11da,ySuNey oflot13andlot17, aourmaryUneVacationon Lot14,Lot15,ondld16, and Vacation of Dmlage
N Red Broughton, Substitute Trustee SandsMdersonPC P O Box2009 Ch nshansburg.Virginia 24068-2009 540-260-9011 540-260--0022(facsimile) rbr oughton@sandsanderso
I
Page 52 of 91
Item #: 5.B.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM,
VIRGINIA HELD AT CITY HALL
MEETING DATE: August 24, 2026
AGENDA ITEM: Use Not Provided For Permit
The petition of The Preston Place Preservation Foundation Inc.,
property owner, for a Use Not Provided for Permit for outdoor
gatherings of less than 500 people on the property located at 1936
West Main Street (Tax Map #138-2-7). (Advertised in the July 23 and
30, 2026, issues of The Salem Times-Register.) The public hearing
was held at the August 10, 2026, Council meeting.
SUBMITTED BY: Mary Ellen Wines, Planning & Zoning Administrator, Maxwell
Dillon, Planner
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At City Council's August 10, 2026 meeting, a public hearing was held on the request of The
Preston Place Preservation Foundation, Inc. for a Special Exception Permit to allow an assembly
hall, nonresidential uses in an accessory structure, and nonresidential uses out of doors; and a
Use Not Provided For Permit for outdoor gatherings of less than 500 people on the property
located at 1936 West Main Street.
The Special Exception Permit was motioned for approval and affirmed upon Council vote. The Use
Not Provided for Permit motion was to consider the item vs. a motion to approve or deny. The
following conditions were also included in the motion:
1. An updated site plan shall be submitted for review illustrating both the existing parking
configuration and the proposed parking lot expansion. Any future site development shall
require submission and approval of an amended site plan.
2. The existing brownstone parking surface shall be properly maintained through the removal
of grass, weeds, and other vegetation. Routine maintenance shall preserve the approved
brownstone surface, and standard gravel shall not be substituted.
3. Because the City's standard parking requirements do not apply to a Use Not Provided For
Permit, a parking overflow and traffic management plan, together with any supporting
documentation, including parking agreements or property owner authorizations, shall be
submitted to and approved by the City prior to the operation of any special event.
Note that the consideration motion did not include a condition recommended by the Planning
Commission that total occupancy on the property at any one time shall be limited to 200 persons,
including attendees, staff, vendors, volunteers, and participants. The draft August 10, 2026,
Council meeting minutes included in the agenda packet reflect the discussion by Council related to
Page 53 of 91
removal of this condition.
Having considered the item on August 10th, staff requests Council action to approve (with such
conditions as Council deems appropriate) or deny the request.
Zoning: CBD Community Business District
Land Use Plan Designation: Commercial
Existing Use: Vacant
Proposed Use: Mixed-Use
The subject property (1936 West Main Street) consists of a 9.398-acre tract of land which currently
sits within the CBD Community Business District zoning designation. The Preston Place
Preservation Foundation Inc, now the owner and operator of the property, seeks to incorporate a
variety of different uses on the property over time – museum exhibits for rotating displays, a City
information center, an assembly hall, and outdoor gatherings. Additionally, a live-in caretaker will
oversee and manage the property. As is the case with any zoning district, the CBD Community
Business District allows a number of uses by-right and others by Special Exception Permit. Council
approved this Special Exception Permit at their August 10, 2026 meeting.
Additionally, because the zoning ordinance only provides for outdoor assemblies of 500 or more
people, a Use Not Provided For permit to allow outdoor gatherings of less than 500 people is
required.
While a definitive plan for the exact combination of uses for the parcel and sequence of
development is not yet crystallized, the ultimate goal for this project is to attract visitors and
residents alike to the property for both regular activities (e.g. rotating museum exhibits) and special
events (i.e. weddings, music events, fundraisers, etc.). As a result, access to the property, along
with parking for guests, is of paramount consideration. A 2017 site plan indicates that there are 19
existing parking spaces (including a handicap space), though a recent site inspection indicates that
a few of those spaces have since been dedicated for a fire lane. In 2019, a site plan to construct
14 additional spaces on the eastern portion of the property was approved, though that plan will
have to move back through the review process since its mandated 5-year approval period has
expired. If re-approved in its current form, the property would contain approximately 30 total off-
street parking spaces which is enough to accommodate guests for standard operations, though
insufficient to park guests for a special event (e.g. a wedding with a significant number of guests).
Because of this constraint, the applicant should demonstrate a detailed plan for accommodating
scenarios comprising a large guest attendance.
The site will be subject to site plan requirements to ensure that relevant construction standards
(including, but not limited to paving, landscaping, and stormwater management - if applicable) are
satisfied prior to development of any kind.
FISCAL IMPACT:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Having considered the item on August 10th, staff requests Council action to approve (with such
conditions as Council deems appropriate) or deny the request.
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 54 of 91
1. 1936 West Main Street SEP & Use Not Provided For application
2. Email description of potential activities
3. Currently Approved Site Plan
4. Proposed Site Plan - Parking Lot Expansion
5. Affidavit
6. 1936 West Main Street neighbor notification map
7. July 15 2026 PC minutes
8. Council meeting owner notification letter1936 W Main St Special Exception Permit
Page 55 of 91
Application Data for Application Number: Z26-30094
Application Type Zoning
Application Sub-Type Special Exception
Applicant Preston Place
Location 1936 W MAIN ST SALEM VA 24153
Applicant Address P. O. Box 235 Property Owner THE PRESTON PLACE
PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC
Salem,VA,24153 Owner Address 212 N BROAD ST
Tax Parcel 138-2-7 SALEM, VA,24153
Section Question Answer
Details and
Scope of Work
Please provide a detailed description of the work
associated with this application.
We are requesting a Special Exception Permit for
Outdoor Gatherings (public and private) such as
weddings, fundraisers, music festivals, croquet
tournaments, graduation parties, educational
workshops, garden tours & lawn events,
auctions/market vendors, volunteer appreciation
cookout, information center, food trucks. In
addition, a Special Exception Permit for Mixed Use
Structure for a live-in occupancy in 1 bedroom on
2nd floor for on-site security.
Existing
Structure Info
Year Built
Property Description Vacant W/Outbuildings
Number of Stories
Number of Rooms
Number of Bedrooms
Number of Bathrooms
Type of Roof
Type of Exterior
Type of Basement
Finished Square footage of Primary Building 0.00
Parcel
Information
Lot Size Acres 9.40
Lot Size SQFT 409377.00
Zoning Classification CBD
Legal Description TR 3A 9.331 AC SALEM HISTORICAL SOCIETY
PID 1817
Special
Exception
Details
Please advise Current Zoning type CBD - Community Business District
Please advise current use vacant
Please advise future use Outdoor events, info center, live-in
Application Information
Page 56 of 91
Special
Exception
Details
Please advise designation from the future land
use map
Commercial
Is the building or parcel in a district currently
designated as historic
Yes
If yes, describe the proposed measures for
meeting the standards of the Department of
Historic Resources
We are in constant contact with DHR in meeting the
standards for historic resources for the building and
grounds.
This Special Exception/Use Not Provided For is
being requested in order to?
To operate a non-profit for the various uses
described above and residence for caretaker to live-
in year round.
Describe in detail how you plan to develop the
property for the proposed use and any
associated uses
In keeping with historic requirements, yards,
buildings, and entire property will be maintained to
required standards. Additional parking is planned
and already approved. Outdoor uses would include
rental equipment such as tents, chairs and tables.
Additional landscaping. Fencing along perimeter of
property may be installed to prevent trespass and
debris from neighboring businesses and Main Street.
Describe why the proposed use or exception is
desirable and appropriate for the area
Preservation of the oldest home in Salem has shown
support from local citizens for many years. The
addition of usable greenspace and gardens for
private and public events will supplement the
offerings of Salem and enhance West Main Street
and provide environmental stewardship for the
future.
What measures will be taken to assure that the
proposed use or exception will not have a
negative impact on the surrounding vicinity?
Currently surrounded by a commercial district, no
negative impact can be foreseen to affect the area.
In contrast, Preston Place outdoor events will
promote the patronizing of local gas stations,
restaurants and retail stores with the attendance that
is drawn to public and private gatherings. This
venue will create a positive impact to the area and
community in demonstrating our commitment to the
preservation of history, bringing tourism and
revenue.
Is the subject property located within the
Floodplain District?
Yes
If yes, describe the proposed measures for
meeting the standards of the Floodplain
Ordinance
Any future development will meet the requirements
of the Floodplain Ordinance.
Have you provided a conceptual plan of the
proposed development, including general lot
configurations and road locations?
No
Are the proposed lot sizes compatible with
existing parcel sizes in the area?
N/A
Page 57 of 91
From:Maxwell S Dillon
To:Mary Ellen H Wines
Subject:FW: [Ext.] Re: Preston Place Special Exception Permit
Date:Friday, May 29, 2026 10:40:30 AM
Attachments:image001.png
FYI.
Max Dillon, CZA
Planner II
21 South Bruffey Street
Salem, VA 24153
From: Preston Place <prestonplace1821@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2026 8:24 AM
To: Maxwell S Dillon <msdillon@salemva.gov>
Subject: [Ext.] Re: Preston Place Special Exception Permit
CAUTION: This message has originated from an external source. Please use proper judgment and
caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to this email.
Max,
The $500 fee was paid in full today.
To answer your question for additional information, we plan:
Weddings 8 per year
Music venues 6 per year
Antiques, art, pottery & craft shows 3 per year
Croquet/frisbee golf tournaments 2 per year
Flea Mkt - Fund raisers 2 per year
Educational workshops 4 per year (garden, birding, environmental, history,
nature etc)
Maximum attendance is 125 people per event with current parking requirements.
If you need additional information, please let us know,
Karita Knisely
Page 58 of 91
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 1:31 PM Maxwell S Dillon <msdillon@salemva.gov> wrote:
Good morning,
We have received the Preston Place Special Exception Permit application, and I
believe the $500 application fee should be available to be paid in the Cityworks portal.
The information provided on the application is very helpful. At your convenience,
please provide a description of the intended frequency and maximum capacity of
outdoor events planned. We may need some additional information throughout the
process, but that will help us move forward.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Best,
Max Dillon, CZA
Planner II
21 South Bruffey Street
Salem, VA 24153
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you
are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Page 59 of 91
www.balzer.cc
Roanoke
New River Valley
Richmond
Staunton
Harrisonburg
Balzer and Associates, Inc.
1208 Corporate Circle
Roanoke, VA 24018
540-772-9580
FAX 540-772-8050
VICINITY MAP SITE INFORMATION:
SHEET INDEX
1936 WEST MAIN STREET
PRESTON PLACE
LEGEND
ABBREVIATIONS
GENERAL NOTES
ENGINEERS NOTES:
Page 60 of 91
www.balzer.cc
Roanoke
New River Valley
Richmond
Staunton
Harrisonburg
Balzer and Associates, Inc.
1208 Corporate Circle
Roanoke, VA 24018
540-772-9580
FAX 540-772-8050
Page 61 of 91
www.balzer.cc
Roanoke
New River Valley
Richmond
Staunton
Harrisonburg
Balzer and Associates, Inc.
1208 Corporate Circle
Roanoke, VA 24018
540-772-9580
FAX 540-772-8050
LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE:
HANDICAP SIGN DETAIL
Page 62 of 91
www.balzer.cc
Roanoke
New River Valley
Richmond
Staunton
Harrisonburg
Balzer and Associates, Inc.
1208 Corporate Circle
Roanoke, VA 24018
540-772-9580
FAX 540-772-8050
11,7610.27TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = _____________AC.=____________SQ. FT.
GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL LEGEND:
GRAVEL AND WIRE MESH DROP IP
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TEMPORARY GRAVELCE
SF CONSTRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE
INLET SEDIMENT FILTER
PAVEMENT STRIPING DETAIL
Page 63 of 91
www.balzer.cc
Roanoke
New River Valley
Richmond
Staunton
Harrisonburg
Balzer and Associates, Inc.
1208 Corporate Circle
Roanoke, VA 24018
540-772-9580
FAX 540-772-8050
FERTILIZER SPECIFICATIONS AND
RATES FOR MANAGEMENT
PERMANENT SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONSPS TEMPORARY SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONSTS
Page 64 of 91
SHEET INDEX
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
PRESTON PLACE
PARKING EXPANSION
CITY OF SALEM
1936 WEST MAIN STREET
LEGEND
ABBREVIATIONS
C1 COVER
C2 EXISTING CONDITIONS & LAYOUT PLAN
C3 GRADING, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
C4 NOTES & DETAILS
C5 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS
1208 Corporate Circle
Roanoke, VA 24018
540.772.9580
PROJECT NO
REVISIONS
SCALE
DATE
CHECKED BY
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
www.balzer.cc
Roanoke / Richmond
New River Valley / Staunton
Harrisonburg / Lynchburg
P L A N N E R S / A R C H I T E C T S
E N G I N E E R S / S U R V E Y O R S
6/5/2019
CLL
BTC
BTC
4/30/2019
AS SHOWN
PR
E
S
T
O
N
P
L
A
C
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
E
X
P
A
N
S
I
O
N
CO
V
E
R
19
3
6
W
E
S
T
M
A
I
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
CI
T
Y
O
F
S
A
L
E
M
,
R
O
A
N
O
K
E
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
I
R
G
I
N
I
A
C1
04190026.00
6/5/2019
VICINITY MAP
SITE INFORMATION:
GENERAL NOTES
ENGINEERS NOTES:
Page 65 of 91
WEST MAIN STREET - 80' R/W
VA
N
9
3 2
1208 Corporate Circle
Roanoke, VA 24018
540.772.9580
PROJECT NO
REVISIONS
SCALE
DATE
CHECKED BY
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
www.balzer.cc
Roanoke / Richmond
New River Valley / Staunton
Harrisonburg / Lynchburg
P L A N N E R S / A R C H I T E C T S
E N G I N E E R S / S U R V E Y O R S
6/5/2019
CLL
BTC
BTC
4/30/2019
1" = 20'
PR
E
S
T
O
N
P
L
A
C
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
E
X
P
A
N
S
I
O
N
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S
&
L
A
Y
O
U
T
P
L
A
N
19
3
6
W
E
S
T
M
A
I
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
CI
T
Y
O
F
S
A
L
E
M
,
R
O
A
N
O
K
E
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
I
R
G
I
N
I
A
C2
04190026.00
6/5/2019
LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE:
ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION ACCESS DRIVE SECTION
GRAVEL PARKING
LAYOUT PLAN NOTES:
CROWN OF ROOT BALL SHALL BEAR SAME RELATION (OR
TOPSOIL MIX OR CLEAN SUBSOIL
NON-BIODEGRADABLE WRAP IS USED. REMOVE TOTALLY.
FOLD DOWN OR CUT AND REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP IF
CREATE SOIL SAUCER WITH TOPSOIL 6" MIN.
MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWOOD
PREVIOUS GRADE. PLACE ON SUBGRADE PEDESTAL.
SLIGHTLY ABOVE) TO FININSHED GRADE AS IT BORE TO
12"
MIN.
PREPARED SUBSOIL
PEDESTAL
BACKFILL
WOODEN SUBSTITUTE. ANCHOR FIRMLY.
PREVAILING WIND. T-RAIL IRON STAKE OR ACCEPTABLE
LOCATE ANCHOR STAKE 18" AWAY FROM TRUNK ON SIDE OF
RUBBER HOSE AROUND TREE AT
WIRE
EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL
NO SCALE
2.5 X BALL DIA. MIN.
RUBBER HOSE AT BARK
GUY WIRES (3). WHITE FLAG ON EACH TO INCREASE VISIBILITY.
TURNBUCKLE (3). GALVANIZED OR DIP-PAINTED
SET TREE AT ORIGINAL GRADE
MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWOOD
SOIL SAUCER: USE PREPARED SOIL 6" MIN.
WOOD DEADMEN (3)
ROPES AT TOP OF BALL SHALL BE CUT. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP.
NON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE TOTALLY REMOVED
PREPARED SUBSOIL TO FORM PEDESTAL TO PREVENT SETTLING
DEC. TREE PLANTING DETAIL
NO SCALE
Page 66 of 91
WEST MAIN STREET - 80' R/W
1208 Corporate Circle
Roanoke, VA 24018
540.772.9580
PROJECT NO
REVISIONS
SCALE
DATE
CHECKED BY
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
www.balzer.cc
Roanoke / Richmond
New River Valley / Staunton
Harrisonburg / Lynchburg
P L A N N E R S / A R C H I T E C T S
E N G I N E E R S / S U R V E Y O R S
6/5/2019
CLL
BTC
BTC
4/30/2019
1" = 20'
PR
E
S
T
O
N
P
L
A
C
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
E
X
P
A
N
S
I
O
N
GR
A
D
I
N
G
,
E
R
O
S
I
O
N
&
S
E
D
I
M
E
N
T
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
P
L
A
N
19
3
6
W
E
S
T
M
A
I
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
CI
T
Y
O
F
S
A
L
E
M
,
R
O
A
N
O
K
E
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
I
R
G
I
N
I
A
C3
04190026.00
6/5/2019
9,5850.22TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = _____________AC.=____________SQ. FT.
GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL LEGEND:
GRAVEL AND WIRE MESH DROP IP
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TEMPORARY GRAVELCESFCONSTRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE
INLET SEDIMENT FILTER
Page 67 of 91
1208 Corporate Circle
Roanoke, VA 24018
540.772.9580
PROJECT NO
REVISIONS
SCALE
DATE
CHECKED BY
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
www.balzer.cc
Roanoke / Richmond
New River Valley / Staunton
Harrisonburg / Lynchburg
P L A N N E R S / A R C H I T E C T S
E N G I N E E R S / S U R V E Y O R S
6/5/2019
CLL
BTC
BTC
4/30/2019
AS SHOWN
PR
E
S
T
O
N
P
L
A
C
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
E
X
P
A
N
S
I
O
N
NO
T
E
S
&
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
19
3
6
W
E
S
T
M
A
I
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
CI
T
Y
O
F
S
A
L
E
M
,
R
O
A
N
O
K
E
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
I
R
G
I
N
I
A
C4
04190026.00
6/5/2019
Page 68 of 91
1208 Corporate Circle
Roanoke, VA 24018
540.772.9580
PROJECT NO
REVISIONS
SCALE
DATE
CHECKED BY
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
www.balzer.cc
Roanoke / Richmond
New River Valley / Staunton
Harrisonburg / Lynchburg
P L A N N E R S / A R C H I T E C T S
E N G I N E E R S / S U R V E Y O R S
6/5/2019
CLL
BTC
BTC
4/30/2019
AS SHOWN
PR
E
S
T
O
N
P
L
A
C
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
E
X
P
A
N
S
I
O
N
ER
O
S
I
O
N
&
S
E
D
I
M
E
N
T
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
N
O
T
E
S
&
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
19
3
6
W
E
S
T
M
A
I
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
CI
T
Y
O
F
S
A
L
E
M
,
R
O
A
N
O
K
E
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
I
R
G
I
N
I
A
C5
04190026.00
6/5/2019
FERTILIZER SPECIFICATIONS AND
RATES FOR MANAGEMENT
PERMANENT SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONSPS TEMPORARY SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONSTS
Page 69 of 91
Page 70 of 91
Page 71 of 91
Page 72 of 91
1
1. Call to Order
2. New Business
th Street -SEP – Retail Sales, smoke shop
Page 73 of 91
2
1. 432 Chestnut Street -SEP – Two family dwelling
3. Adjournment
Chair King adjourned at 6:25 p.m.
REGULAR SESSION
1. Call to Order
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Salem, Virginia, was
held in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, at 6:30 p.m., on
Wednesday, July 15, 2026, there being present the following members of said
Commission, to wit: Denise P. King, Reid Garst, Jackson Beamer, Mark Henrickson, and
Nathan Routt, constituting a legal quorum, with Chair King, presiding; together with Chris
Dorsey, City Manager and Executive Secretary, ex officio member of said Commission,
William L. Simpson Jr., Assistant Director of Community Development; Mary Ellen Wines,
Planning and Zoning Administrator; Maxwell S. Dillon, Planner; and Jim Guynn, City
Attorney, and the following business was transacted:
Chair King called the July meeting of the City of Salem Planning Commission to
order at 6:30 p.m. reporting that this date, place, and time had been set in order for the
Commission to hold a public meeting.
A. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Consent Agenda
A. Minutes
Consider acceptance of the minutes of May 13, 2026, work session and regular
meeting.
Chair King asked the Commission if anyone had any questions, additions, or
comments. Hearing none, the minutes were accepted.
3. Reports
A. Site Plan and Subdivision Plat Approvals
Mr. Dillon presented the Site Plan and Subdivision Plat Report, noting that no
Page 74 of 91
3
Planning Commission meeting was held in June; therefore, the report encompassed
activity for both May and June. He reported that no site plans were approved in May.
One site plan was approved in June for the property located at 23 Dixie Drive, where
the owners are completing building renovations and associated site improvements. He
further reported that two subdivision plats were approved in May, one located on South
Colorado Street and one at the corner of West 4th Street and Elm Street. No subdivision
requests were approved in June.
4. Public Hearing Item
Page 75 of 91
4
previous school year and had worked with both Salem City Schools Transportation and
the Salem Police Department to improve traffic flow. She stated that dismissal times
were adjusted to avoid conflicts with school bus routes, and staggered dismissal
procedures were implemented. Students are dismissed in two groups, with the first
dismissal occurring between 2:15 p.m. and 2:25 p.m., allowing Salem City School buses
to pass through the area between approximately 2:30 p.m. and 2:35 p.m. A second
dismissal begins at 2:45 p.m., with all students typically picked up by 2:55 p.m. She
stated these adjustments had significantly improved traffic circulation.
Page 76 of 91
5
Chair King confirmed that the revised traffic management procedures had been
implemented before the end of the previous school year and appeared to be effective.
Ms. Case agreed and added that American National University had permitted
parents to queue on its property rather than along the roadway. Parents were also
instructed not to arrive before designated drop-off times.
Chair King requested that Mr. Dalton return to the podium. She asked whether
there was a difference between a certificate of occupancy for a church and one for an
educational facility, whether City staff had discussed those requirements with the
applicant, and whether the church understood that additional building improvements
could be required before occupancy.
Mr. Dalton stated that the church had retained an architectural engineer to
evaluate the building and identify improvements necessary to comply with applicable
City codes. He stated that the church intended to obtain the appropriate certificate of
occupancy required for the proposed use.
Chair King stated that the Commission wanted to ensure applicants understood
that additional requirements could apply before concluding the public hearing.
Mr. Dalton acknowledged that the church understood those requirements and
was actively working with City staff to address them. He noted that the necessary
improvements would likely not be completed before the beginning of the school year
but appreciated staff's willingness to work cooperatively throughout the process.
Ms. Wines stated that, based upon discussions with the Building Official and the
Fire Chief, several building deficiencies had been identified. While staff would work with
the applicant regarding the timely submission and review of plans, life-safety
requirements could not be waived. She emphasized that all life-safety issues must be
corrected before the building could be occupied for the proposed educational use.
Chair King asked whether any comments or concerns had been received from
neighboring property owners.
Ms. Wines stated that no correspondence had been received from neighboring
property owners. She noted that the Fire Chief had submitted a memorandum outlining
life-safety concerns and requested that it be entered into the official record.
Mr. Beamer asked when the academy would begin and end its school year.
Ms. Case stated that classes would begin on September 9 and conclude on May
14.
Chair King opened the public hearing at 6:42 p.m.
Chair King asked if anyone wished to speak regarding the request and hearing
Page 77 of 91
6
none, she closed the public hearing at 6:42 p.m.
Page 78 of 91
7
that the proposed business would generate additional tax revenue, improve utilization of
the property, and attract customers to neighboring businesses. Mr. Alsayadi then
deferred to his manager to provide additional details regarding the request.
Page 79 of 91
8
would operate in a manner that was respectful of the surrounding residential
community.
Page 80 of 91
9
Mr. Henrickson Aye
Mr. Beamer Aye
Mr. Garst Aye
Chair King Aye
Chair King stated that the Planning Commission serves as an advisory and
recommending body to City Council. She noted that the Commission had unanimously
recommended denial of the Special Exception Permit and that the request would be
forwarded to City Council for final consideration. She further advised the applicant that
notification would be provided regarding the date and time of the City Council public
hearing.
C. Hold a public hearing and consider the request of Preston Place Preservation
Foundation Inc., property owner, for a Special Exception Permit to allow an
assembly hall and nonresidential uses in an accessory structure, nonresidential
uses out of doors and a Use Not Provided For Permit for outdoor gatherings
of fewer than 500 people on the property located at 1936 West Main Street
(Tax Map # 138-2-7).
Chair King asked if there was a representative present to speak on behalf of the
applicant.
Dave Robbins, 620 High Street, President of the Preston Place Preservation
Foundation, Inc., introduced the request. He stated that the Foundation was seeking
approval of a Special Exception Permit and a Use Not Provided For Permit to allow
outdoor events on the property adjacent to Preston Place and to permit assembly and
other nonresidential activities within a proposed accessory structure.
Mr. Robbins referenced materials distributed to the Commission, which included
the Foundation's Articles of Incorporation, Board of Trustees, and conceptual
illustrations of a Brown Swiss step-back barn. He explained that the proposed barn
design represents a traditional German-Swiss step-back barn commonly found in
Virginia's Shenandoah Valley and is recognized by the Virginia Department of Historic
Resources as an architecturally appropriate historic building type.
Chair King asked whether the Virginia Department of Historic Resources had
approved construction of the proposed barn at this location.
Mr. Robbins responded that no approval had been granted at this time. He
explained that the Foundation's objective is to create revenue-generating opportunities
through activities such as weddings, croquet tournaments, antique automobile shows, art
events, and similar community functions. He stated that adequate parking remains the
Foundation's greatest challenge.
Page 81 of 91
10
Mr. Robbins noted that the Salem Economic Development Authority had awarded
the Foundation $50,000 toward construction of an expanded parking lot and that
revised parking plans would provide approximately 14 additional parking spaces. He
emphasized the Foundation's desire to preserve one of Salem's oldest historic properties
while maintaining the remaining green space along West Main Street. He stated that
preserving the landscape is important because additional paving would negatively affect
both the property's historic character and existing stormwater conditions.
Mr. Robbins further explained that occupancy within the historic house is limited
by the Fire Marshal to approximately 68 occupants at one time. With the existing
parking and the proposed parking expansion, the Foundation estimates that
approximately 96 attendees could be accommodated before off-site parking would
become necessary. Larger events would require agreements with nearby businesses for
overflow parking or the future acquisition of adjacent property.
Mr. Robbins stated that the Foundation was established after the Salem Museum
declined to operate the property. The Foundation's mission is to preserve both the
historic Brown House and its surrounding green space while ensuring continued public
access. He noted that Preston Place is protected by a preservation easement held by the
Virginia Department of Historic Resources, making it the only property within the City
subject to such restrictions. As a result, no alterations to the property may occur without
Department approval.
Mr. Robbins explained that discussions with representatives of the Department of
Historic Resources confirmed that a historically appropriate barn could be considered on
the property, provided it accurately reflects the architectural period. However, no
approval has been granted regarding the proposed location of the structure.
Mr. Henrickson asked whether the proposed barn would have to be a relocated
historic structure or whether it could be newly constructed to replicate a historic barn.
Mr. Robbins stated that either option would be acceptable, provided the final
structure accurately reflected the historic period. He explained that preliminary concepts
had been prepared with architect Sheldon Henderson. Due to the property's floodplain
location, the building would likely be elevated above grade and designed as a three-story
structure. The first level would accommodate weddings, civic meetings, and similar
events, with accessibility provided by ramps and an elevator. Large barn doors would
allow the facility to function as both an indoor and outdoor event venue depending upon
the season.
Mr. Robbins stated that the upper floors could accommodate museum exhibits,
meeting rooms, or potentially a Veterans Memorial Museum. He estimated that
construction of such a facility would cost approximately $1.7 million and noted that any
future expansion would require additional parking improvements.
Mr. Garst asked about the Foundation's anticipated annual operating costs.
Page 82 of 91
11
Mr. Robbins stated that the Foundation's first-year operating budget is
approximately $70,000. He explained that significant capital improvements have already
been completed, including a new roof, HVAC system, and other building improvements.
While annual maintenance costs remain uncertain because of the age of the structure,
he estimated future maintenance expenses at approximately $20,000 per year.
Mr. Garst asked whether the Foundation's business model depended upon the
property generating sufficient revenue to support its ongoing preservation.
Mr. Robbins confirmed that it did, explaining that occupancy limitations within the
historic house significantly restrict revenue opportunities and make outdoor events
essential to the Foundation's long-term financial sustainability.
Mr. Garst observed that the Foundation has limited financial resources.
Mr. Robbins agreed, stating that expanded event opportunities are necessary to
generate revenue for continued preservation of the property.
Chair King commented that the proposed event venue appeared to function
primarily as a fundraising mechanism supporting preservation of the historic property.
Mr. Robbins agreed and stated that a future event barn could also provide space
for a Veterans Memorial Museum, creating an additional attraction for visitors traveling
through Salem.
Chair King asked approximately how many people the proposed barn could
accommodate.
Mr. Robbins stated that a structure comparable to the barn at Smithfield
Plantation accommodates approximately 120 people. The Foundation's conceptual
design would likely be somewhat larger and could potentially accommodate
approximately 200 attendees, although the upper floors would contain museum exhibits
and therefore provide less usable assembly space.
Chair King asked whether the facility would also be suitable for reunions,
anniversary celebrations, and similar social gatherings and whether kitchen facilities
would be provided.
Mr. Robbins stated that the building would include restrooms, accessibility
features, elevators, and climate control but that kitchen facilities had not been planned.
Catering services would instead be provided by outside vendors. He emphasized that the
Foundation's objective is to provide a community gathering place while preserving one
of Salem's most significant historic resources.
Chair King asked about the existing tree line shown on the concept plan.
Page 83 of 91
12
Mr. Robbins explained that the trees currently exist on the property and include a
registered Osage orange tree recognized as the third-largest specimen in Virginia. He
stated that the Foundation is working with regional garden clubs to raise funds for
preservation of the tree and to restore the historic landscaping using plant materials
appropriate to the property's period of significance.
Mr. Garst commended the Foundation for its preservation efforts. He noted that,
while preserving Preston Place is an admirable goal, the Planning Commission must also
evaluate the property's long-term viability and consider the limitations imposed by the
historic preservation easement. He observed that relying exclusively upon the property
itself to generate sufficient revenue for long-term preservation could present financial
challenges.
Mr. Routt again asked about the Foundation's annual operating budget.
Mr. Robbins stated that the current operating budget is approximately $70,000.
He reviewed several recent improvements, including installation of a new garage roof,
appliances, fire protection systems, security improvements, and a Knox Box for
emergency responders. He also announced that Preston Place would hold a soft opening
for invited donors and supporters on August 14, featuring one of Southwest Virginia's
finest collections of Revolutionary War documents and artifacts. He explained that
attendance at the opening would be staggered because of occupancy limitations.
Mr. Robbins added that Preston Place will also function as an informational
resource for visitors to Salem by providing brochures and, eventually, digital resources
highlighting local attractions, restaurants, sporting events, and community activities. He
further described the Foundation's plans to develop educational programming centered
on Dr. Esther Brown and the history of the property.
Chair King asked if there were any additional comments or questions from the
Commission.
Mr. Henrickson asked whether the requested Use Not Provided For Permit could
be modified to limit the maximum attendance, noting that the application referenced
gatherings of fewer than 500 people.
Ms. Wines stated that the occupancy limit could be modified as a condition of
approval. She explained that the application referenced fewer than 500 people because
the City's Zoning Ordinance specifically identifies assemblies exceeding 500 occupants
as a separate use category.
Mr. Routt asked what attendance level would be appropriate based upon the
parking available on the property.
Mr. Robbins stated that the Foundation anticipates hosting primarily boutique
weddings and similar events with attendance generally ranging from 75 to 100 people.
Page 84 of 91
13
He noted that designated rooms within the historic house would be available for bridal
parties and other event preparations.
Page 85 of 91
14
would instead remain at her current residence. She encouraged the Commission to view
Preston Place as a historic property in the early stages of restoration, noting that the
Preston Place Preservation Foundation had owned the property for only a few months
but had already accomplished a significant amount of preservation work.
Page 86 of 91
15
Chair King then requested a motion regarding the Use Not Provided For Permit.
2. Mr. Garst made a motion to recommend approval of the Use Not Provided For
Permit, subject to the following conditions:
a. An updated site plan shall be submitted for review illustrating both the
existing parking configuration and the proposed parking lot expansion.
Any future site development shall require submission and approval of
an amended site plan.
b. The existing brownstone parking surface shall be properly maintained
through the removal of grass, weeds, and other vegetation. Routine
maintenance shall preserve the approved brownstone surface, and
standard gravel shall not be substituted.
c. Because the City's standard parking requirements do not apply to a Use
Not Provided For Permit, a parking overflow and traffic management
plan, together with any supporting documentation, including parking
agreements or property owner authorizations, shall be submitted to and
approved by the City prior to the operation of any special event.
d. Total occupancy on the property at any one time shall be limited to 200
persons, including attendees, staff, vendors, volunteers, and
participants.
Mr. Routt seconded the motion.
Roll Call
Mr. Routt Aye
Mr. Henrickson Aye
Mr. Beamer Aye
Mr. Garst Aye
Chair King Aye
Chair King stated that the Planning Commission serves as an advisory and
recommending body to City Council. She noted that both requests had been
unanimously recommended for approval, subject to the stated conditions, and would be
forwarded to City Council for final consideration. She further advised the applicant that
notification would be provided regarding the date and time of the City Council public
hearing.
5. A. Consider resolution to adopt a remote participation policy for commissioner
participation in Planning Commission meetings for fiscal year 2026-2027.
Chair King asked for a motion.
Mr. Henrickson made a motion for approval.
Mr. Jackson 2nd the motion.
Page 87 of 91
16
Page 88 of 91
July 17, 2026
The Preston Place Preservation Foundation, Inc.
P. O. Box 235
Salem, VA 24153
RE: Petition For Special Exception Permit and Use Not Provided For Permit
1936 W. Main Street
Salem VA 24153
Tax Map # 138-2-7
To Whom It May Concern:
You and/or your agent shall appear before City Council on Monday, August
10, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, First Floor, Salem City Hall,
114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia for consideration of your Special
Exception and Use Not Provided For requests for the above-referenced property.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our office at
(540) 375-3016.
Sincerely,
H. Robert Light
Assistant City Manager/Clerk of Council
Page 89 of 91
Item #: 6.A.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM,
VIRGINIA HELD AT CITY HALL
MEETING DATE: August 24, 2026
AGENDA ITEM: Abstract of Votes
Receive the Abstract of Votes cast at the Republican
Primary for United States Senate held on August 4, 2026.
SUBMITTED BY: Benjamin Leeson, Director of Elections and General
Registrar
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Per the Code of Virginia, a certified copy of the Abstract of Votes from each election
must be received and formally recorded.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council receive the Abstract of Votes for the Republican Primary
for United States Senate held on August 4, 2026.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Abstract of Votes August 2026 Republican Primary
Page 90 of 91
Page 91 of 91