Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11/25/2024 - Planning Commission - Agenda -Regular
Agenda Monday, November 25, 2024, 6:30 PM Regular Session, 6:30 PM, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 WORK SESSION WORK SESSION IS CANCELLED FOR NOVEMBER 25, 2024 REGULAR SESSION 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Bid Opening, Awards, Recognitions 4. Consent Agenda A. Citizen Comments Comments from the public, limited to five minutes, not already having a public hearing at the same meeting. B. Minutes Consider acceptance of the November 6, 2024, Special Meeting Closed Session minutes and the November 12, 2024, Work Session and Regular Meeting minutes. C. Financial Reports Consider acceptance of the Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the four months ending October 2024. 5. Old Business 6. New Business A. Council Salary Ordinance Hold a public hearing and consider the first reading of an ordinance increasing and establishing the annual salaries of the Mayor and Council effective July 1, 2027. (Advertised in the November 16 and 17, 2024, issues of the Roanoke Times.) Page 1 of 241 B. Amendment to the City Code - Chapter 106, Zoning Hold public hearing and consider ordinance on first reading amending Chapter 106, Zoning, Article IV Development Standards, section 106-406 miscellaneous provisions of the CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA pertaining to storage containers. (Advertised in the November 16 and 17, 2024, issues of the Roanoke Times.)(Planning Commission Public hearing was held September 11, 2024 and item was continued to the November 13, 2024, meeting. (Planning Commission recommended approval with a unanimous vote.) C. Amendment to City Code - Chapter 18 Consider adoption of ordinance on first reading amending Chapter 18, Buildings and Building Regulations, Article VII, Historic Structures be renamed and by adopting additional sections 18-701 through 18-805 of the Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, pertaining to the Maintenance of Structures, Spot Blight Abatement, and Vacant Building Registration. D. Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Consider ordinance on first reading regarding the request of Virginia Baptist Children's Home and Family Services d/b/a Hopetree Family Services (Salem CI) f/k/a The Virginia Baptist Childrens' Home f/k/a Baptist Orphanage of Virginia, property owner, for rezoning the properties located at 1000 block Red Lane and a portion of 860 Mount Vernon Lane (Tax Map #'s 41-1-1, 41-1-2, 41-1-3, 41-1-4, 41-1-5, 41-1-6, and a portion of 44-3-10) from RSF Residential Single Family District to PUD Planned Unit District with proffered conditions. (The Planning Commission and City Council held a joint public hearing during the Planning Commissions regular meeting on November 13, 2024 as advertised in the November 1 and 4, 2024, issues of The Roanoke Times. The Planning Commission recommended approval by a 4 to 1 vote). E. Special Exception Permit Consider for approval the request of Jason N. and Jennifer C. Fountain, property owners, for the issuance of a Special Exception Permit to allow an accessory apartment on the property located at 621 North Broad Street, (Tax Map # 70-2-1). (The Planning Commission and City Council held a joint public hearing during the Planning Commissions regular meeting on November 13, 2024 as advertised in the November 1 and 4, 2024, issues of The Roanoke Times. The Planning Commission recommended approval by a unanimous vote). F. 2025 Legislative Package Consider the adoption of Resolution 1489 adopting a Legislative Program for the 2025 session of the Virginia General Assembly and petitioning the General Assembly to favorably consider the issues and topics addressed herein. 7. Adjournment Page 2 of 241 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Wednesday, November 6, 2024 at 4:00 PM Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 1.Call to Order A special meeting of the Council of the City of Salem, Virginia, was called to order at 4:00 p.m., there being present the following members to wit: Renée Ferris Turk, Mayor; James W. Wallace, III, Vice-Mayor; Council members: Byron Randolph Foley, William D. Jones, and H. Hunter Holliday; with Renée Ferris Turk, Mayor, presiding; and the following business was transacted: Mayor Turk reported that this date, place, and time was set as a special meeting of City Council, in accordance with Section 4.6 (b) of The Charter of the City of Salem, Virginia, in order to interview the candidates for the two Salem School Board positions expiring December 31, 2024. 2.Closed Session A.Closed Session Hold a closed session in accordance with Section 2.2-3711 A (1) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, to discuss a personnel matter pertaining to School Board appointments, specifically for the purpose of interviewing the School Board candidates. James Wallace motioned to that in accordance with Section 2.2-3711 A(1) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, Council hereby convenes to closed session at 4:00 p.m. for the purpose of discussing a personnel matter pertaining to School Board appointments, specifically for the purpose of interviewing the School Board Candidates. Randy Foley seconded the motion. Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renee Turk Item #4B Date: 11-25-2024 Page 3 of 241 Nays: None Abstaining: None James Wallace motioned to reconvene at 5:00 p.m. in accordance with Section 2.2- 3712 D. of the Code of Virginia, 1950 as amended to date, Council certifies that in closed session only items lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act and only such items identified in the motion by which the closed session was convened were heard, discussed, or considered by the Council. Randy Foley seconded the motion. Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renee Turk 3. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 5:00 PM Page 4 of 241 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Tuesday, November 12, 2024 at 6:30 PM Work Session, 5:45 PM Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 Regular Session, 6:30 PM, City Hall, 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 WORK SESSION 1.Call to Order A work session of the Council of the City of Salem, Virginia, was held in the Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, 114 N. Broad Street, Salem, Virginia, on October 12, 2024, at 5:45 p.m., there being present the following members of said Council to wit: Renée Ferris Turk, Mayor; James W. Wallace, III, Vice-Mayor; Council members; Byron Randolph Foley, William D. Jones, and H. Hunter Holliday; with Renée Ferris Turk, Mayor, presiding; together with Chris Dorsey, City Manager; Rob Light, Assistant City Manager and Clerk of Council; Rosemarie B. Jordan, Director of Finance; A. K. Briele, Director of Electric Department; Kevin Divers, Electrical Engineer; Chuck Van Allman, Director of Community Development; Mary Ellen Wines, Planning and Zoning Administrator; Troy Loving, Building Official; Max Dillon, City Planner; Crystal Williams, Assistant to the City Manager; Laura Lea Harris, Deputy Clerk of Council; and A. J. Allen, with Davenport & Company, LLC; and the following business was transacted; Mayor Turk reported that this date, place, and time had been set in order for the Council to hold a work session; and 2.New Business A.Discussion Items 1) Update on borrowing results for Water/Sewer Department Projects - Page 5 of 241 Rosemarie Jordan, Director of Finance 2) Follow-up on Potential Code Changes - Mary Ellen Wines, Planning and Zoning Administrator A. J. Allen, Associate Vice President of Davenport & Company, LLC, presented the borrowing results for the Water/Sewer Department projects. A report of the process and results were shared with Council for their review. He shared the background on this borrowing and he and Ms. Jordan shared a summary of the process that was followed, leading to a recommendation that the City accept a 20-year bond with a 4.38% fixed interest rate through Webster Bank upon completion of the Request for Proposal (RFP) process. Vice Mayor Wallace noted that the City may want to consider loaning money internally through the Enterprise Fund in the future. Staff will go back and review the Reserves guidelines to ensure that nothing would preclude this and take this into consideration for future borrowings. Mary Ellen Wines, Planning and Zoning Administrator, shared an update with changes that have been made to the proposed Code Changes regarding Spot Blight Abatement, Exterior Maintenance, the Vacant Building Registry, and storage containers. Questions were asked and responded to. Discussion was held. 3.Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Turk adjourned the meeting at 6:30 p.m. REGULAR SESSION 1.Call to Order A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Salem, Virginia, was called to order at 6:30 p.m., there being present the following members to wit: Renée Ferris Turk, Mayor; James W. Wallace, III, Vice-Mayor; Councilmembers: Byron Randolph Foley, William D. Jones, and H. Hunter Holliday; with Renée Ferris Turk, Mayor, presiding together with Chris Dorsey, City Manager; Rob Light, Assistant City Manager and Clerk of Council; Rosemarie B. Jordan, Director of Finance; Chuck Van Allman, Director of Community Development; Mike Stevens, Director of Communications; and Jim Guynn, City Attorney. 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Bid Opening, Awards, Recognitions There were none this evening. Page 6 of 241 4.Consent Agenda A.Citizen Comments Comments from the public, limited to five minutes, not already having a public hearing at the same meeting. Nancy Reynolds, 925 Saddle Drive, was the first citizen to address Council. She expressed concerns about unknown factors in relation to the potential HopeTree PUD. She expressed that she felt the timeline was too fast and requested more time for the Planning Commission and Council to study this application. Stella Reinhard, 213 N. Broad Street, expressed concerns about the process that was followed for the HopeTree application. She expressed concern that other locations were more appropriate for this project and that the proposal lacked definitive language. Ron Hunt, 922 Red Lane, was the last citizen to address Council. He expressed concerns about traffic with the potential HopeTree rezoning and asked that Council vote against this rezoning application. B.Minutes Consider acceptance of the October 24, 2024, Special Joint Work Session with the Salem City School Board and the October 28, 2024, Regular Meeting minutes. Vice Mayor Wallace requested to have the discussion about truancy from the Joint meeting with the School Board reflected in the minutes from the October 24, 2024, Special Joint Work Session with the Salem City School Board minutes. Mayor Turk asked to clarify if there was a record of this discussion. Mr. Light replied affirmatively that this discussion could be summarized in the minutes. The minutes were accepted with the changes stated. 5.Old Business 6.New Business A.Resolution for Energy Contracts Resolution 1486 authorizing the City Manager to finalize and execute EEI Master Service Agreements with multiple counterparties and a subsequent single Confirmation Agreement in forms acceptable to the City Attorney with the least-cost supplier for the purchase of a fixed load-shape energy product for the term of June 1, 2026, through December 31, 2028. Mayor Turk asked Mr. A. K. Briele, Director of the Electric Department, and Ms. Rosemarie Jordan, Director of Finance, to comment on this item. Page 7 of 241 Mr. Briele noted that the current contract with AEP was a 20-year contract signed in 2006, which will expire at the end of May 2026. The City is a member of the Blue Ridge Power Agency. They and its consultant, GDS Associates, Inc. issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) on behalf of the City to select the most advantageous electric power supply option. He shared that the recommendation was to do the fixed load shape because that was going to be the best option for the City. He added that during this process, they would negotiate Edison Electric Institute (EEI) agreements, which are standard in the utility industry, with five counterparties. The term would be for June 21, 2026, through December 2028. Ms. Jordan added that, after the negotiations, they found that these were the five vendors they felt were qualified to provide the power that the City needed. The standard process in the electric industry is such that the Edison Electric Institute Master Agreements are typically agreed to in form. The live pricing subsequently occurs, and then only one of them, an agreement with the lowest cost supplier, is executed through that counterparty agreement. Staff is not requesting to approve five purchases. They are requesting approval for the City Manager to approve these five, subject to that when the live pricing occurs, then the City Manager is also authorized to sign a contract with the least-cost vendor through that counterparty agreement. Mayor Turk added for the public's knowledge, that this is something that the Director of the Electric Department and the Finance Director have been working on for almost two years and that Council has been involved in these meetings to keep them informed as there will be a period of time when the City will no longer have a contract with AEP. Councilman Foley asked to clarify if the EEI agreement with one vendor will be applicable to all of the Blue Ridge Power participants. Mr. Briele shared that this was done as a group in an attempt to get better pricing but that this agreement would be specific to Salem. Vice-Mayor Wallace noted that this will be the single largest contract that Salem has ever signed and executed. Randy Foley motioned to adopt Resolution 1486 authorizing the City Manager to finalize and execute an EEI Master Service Agreement to obtain the best pricing possible to continue to deliver electricity to the Salem citizens. Mr. Light asked if Councilman Foley would be willing to amend his motion to add "to execute a single contract with the lowest cost supplier”. Randy Foley amended the motion to finalize and execute EEI Master Service Agreements with multiple counterparties and a subsequent single Confirmation Agreement in forms acceptable to the City Attorney with the least-cost supplier for the Page 8 of 241 purchase of a fixed load shape energy product for the term of June 1, 2026, through December 31, 2028. William Jones seconded the motion. Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renée Turk B.Resolution for Battery Storage Resolution 1487 authorizing the City Manager to execute a Battery Energy Storage Services (BESS) agreement and other associated documents between Delorean Power, LLC dba Lightshift Energy and the City of Salem, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Mayor Turk requested Mr. Briele and Ms. Jordan to provide information on this agenda item. Mr. Briele noted that as part of the City's discussion of power supply contract, costs have continued to increase. A number of transmission costs are being passed on to the City. Going onto the market, we will have some other cost exposures, one of which is capacity. In order to offset some of these, the City is looking at doing battery energy storage that would enable us to shave some of the peaks off during certain hours of the year that would affect us the most. He explained this concept. GDS Associates, Inc., the consultant, is looking at a contract with a life of 20 years. The payback is conservatively less than half of the 20-year period, and the City is optimistic this will help mitigate our cost exposure. The project will be located at the Electric Road Substation next to Fire Station 2. There will be an agreement for the storage, a lease or similar agreement, and an interconnection agreement. They are requesting approval for the City Manager to sign these documents. Ms. Jordan noted that there are potentially three agreements to sign as part of this deal subject to the City Attorney's review and approval that all of these are needed. There is an Electricity Interconnection Agreement, and Access Agreement, and potentially an anticipated Lease to define the area and terms for the battery storage placement for that 20-year term. Once the City Attorney has reviewed all of these, they are attempting to get this approval and get this moving so that the batteries can arrive in the United States prior to December 31, 2025. That is an important date for this. This product will be part of the fixed load shape. She stated that she agreed with Mr. Briele and she explained that a clause is included in the agreement that if they miss the peak, there is a penalty and the price comes down for the City of Salem. This provides a very strong incentive to hit the peak with their projections and save the City of Salem money during the term of the contract. Hunter Holliday motioned to adopt Resolution 1487 authorizing the City Manager to execute a Battery Energy Storage Services (BESS) agreement and other associated documents between Delorean Power, LLC dba Lightshift Energy and the City of Salem, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. William Jones seconded the motion. There was some discussion as to whether an amendment to the motion was required Page 9 of 241 to include verbiage in reference to whether an actual lease vs. other similar agreement would be necessary. Mr. Light noted that he did not see this as being necessary other than noting that as the City works through this process, as stipulated in the Council report, should a lease agreement be necessary, staff would need to come back to Council for a public hearing and a vote. The City Attorney, Jim Guynn, will determine the appropriate type of document. If a lease document is not required, and there is another document that defines the area and terms, this will not be necessary and would be covered in the authorization that is being requested this evening. Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renée Turk Nays: None Abstaining: None C.Resolution 1488- Performance Bonds Consider Resolution 1488 delegating the establishment of amounts and approval of performance bonds upon completion of the site or subdivision plan approval process to Community Development as an administrative function. Mayor Turk requested that Mr. Van Allman provide clarification on this item. Mr. Van Allman noted that essentially the Community Development Department is the recipient of site plans, which dictate how development in the City will proceed. The Community Development Department approves these site plans; however, they do not approve the actual amount for performance bonds. The performance bonds take into account anything that may be for the public or is a requirement of those site plans, whether that be landscaping, stormwater management, public roads, curves, storm drains, et cetera. When the Engineer does the site plan, he gives an estimate of the cost. The owner is requested to give the City a bond in that amount that allows the City use the bond to restore the site or complete the development if not done by the developer as specified in the site plan. He noted that it was straightforward to arrive at the amount, and once the City Engineer approves it, the performance bond is brought before Council for approval of the amount. He indicated that this slows the process, and that most localities, including Roanoke County and Roanoke City, administratively approve these performance bonds. They are bringing this to Council to request that administrative responsibility be granted to the Community Development Department for these performance bonds. Hunter Holliday motioned to adopt Resolution 1488 delegating the establishment of amounts and approval of performance bonds upon completion of the site or subdivision plan approval process to community development as an administrative function. William Jones seconded the motion. Councilman Foley reiterated that he had suggested that somehow this information be shared with the public. He felt it was important for the public to have an idea of the properties that were being developed and he would like for this information to be out Page 10 of 241 for the public as this Council approval was often where this information was shared with the public. Mr. Van Allman noted that Community Development planned on being available to meet with the City Manager at any time that they would like to have a staff discussion on any site plan or any subdivision plan. Councilman Jones added that from the Audit-Finance Committee, the feeling was that this will be a better process. Councilman Foley noted that in all of the years, Council has not declined one of these requests for the recommended amount and this is more of an administrative function. Mr. Light noted that the intent, as noted in the Council Report, is to provide a monthly listing of all bonds approved in each monthly Department report to Council for informational purposes so that they would know the locations. Councilman Foley repeated that he would still like to see this published somehow for the public without divulging too much information. Mayor Turk asked if there was a way to put this information on the website. Mr. Van Allman indicated that this information could be released by Community Development based on when the developer gets a land disturbance permit sharing the location and whatever publicly available information is allowed. He indicated that they would like to continue the transparency and requested that Council give him a month or two to make this happen. Mr. Guynn stated that there would be nothing wrong with taking the list that Council receives and attaching them to the meeting minutes. Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renée Turk Nays: None Abstaining: None D.Public Improvement Bonds Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of general obligation public improvement bonds series 2024 in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $3,700,000. (As advertised in the October 24 and October 31, 2024 issues of the Salem Times Register.) Audit - Finance Committee Vice Mayor Wallace noted that this item is for the Water and Sewer Department to be able to do upgrades. Mayor Turk opened the public hearing. Page 11 of 241 No one came forward to speak. Mayor Turk closed the public hearing. James Wallace motioned to adopt the ordinance as presented authorizing the issuance of general obligation public improvement bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $3,700,000 for the purpose of acquiring, constructing and equipping capital improvements for the City’s water and wastewater system. Projects include new well infrastructure and the replacement of the Franklin Street water tank. William Jones seconded the motion. Councilman Foley noted for the benefit of the public that Council had just met with the City's Advisor from Davenport, discussing the process that was utilized to find the best rate from an institution and that is what Council is now acting on. Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renée Turk Nays: None Abstaining: None E.General Obligation Public Improvement Bonds Consider adoption of Resolution 1485 authorizing the issuance, sale and award of General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2024. Audit - Finance Committee Vice Mayor Wallace noted that this is a companion action required for the item Council just considered. James Wallace motioned to adopt Resolution 1485 authorizing the issuance, sale and award of its general obligation public improvement bonds, series 2024. William Jones seconded the motion. Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renée Turk Nays: None Abstaining: None F.Appropriation of Funds Consider request to amend the School Operating Fund, School Cafeteria Fund and School Grants Fund budgets as approved by the School Board on October 8, 2024. Audit - Finance Committee James Wallace motioned to approve the School Board’s appropriation changes of $2,299,994 to the School Operating Fund, $178,143 to School Cafeteria Fund and $333,512 to the School Grants Fund, as approved by the School Board at their October 8, 2024, meeting. This action results from the Schools receiving grants in addition to those originally budgeted. Randy Foley seconded the motion. Page 12 of 241 Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renée Turk Nays: None Abstaining: None G.Appropriation of Funds Consider request to amend the School Grants Fund, School Capital Projects Fund and School Reserve Fund budgets as approved by the School Board on October 24, 2024. Audit - Finance Committee James Wallace motioned to approve the School Board’s appropriation changes totaling $1,887,777 from the unallocated capital reserve funds. This consists of $108,760 to the School Grants Fund, $368,001 to the School Reserve Fund and $1,411,016 to the School Capital Projects Fund as approved by the School Board at their October 24, 2024, meeting. Additionally, approve the six-year CIP document submitted by the School Board. William Jones seconded the motion. Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renée Turk Nays: None Abstaining: None H.Appropriation of Funds Request to Appropriate Fund Balance for Software Purchase. Audit - Finance Committee Mr. Wallace noted that this item caused discussion among the Audit-Finance Committee. James Wallace motioned to appropriate $101,000 to the Designation of Beginning Fund Balance account and increase the budget by $101,000 in the Software account in the Commissioner of Revenue’s budget. The additional funding is needed because of a higher cost for tax billing and collection software to be used by the Commissioner of the Revenue and Treasurer since the original budget estimate was submitted. William Jones seconded the motion. Councilman Foley noted that he understood that this had changed some procedures internally going forward so that this did not happen again. Mr. Dorsey confirmed this statement. Vice Mayor Wallace noted that he and Mr. Jones felt there should be some accountability for this happenstance and that they would leave that to Mr. Dorsey to determine. Mayor Turk noted that he was implementing something. Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renée Turk Nays: None Page 13 of 241 Abstaining: None I.New Metal Building - 744 Electric Road Consider setting bond for erosion and sediment control and landscaping for New Metal Building - 744 Electric Road. Audit - Finance Committee Vice Mayor Wallace noted that this would be the last presentation by Council of a bond erosion motion. James Wallace motioned to bond erosion and sediment control and landscaping for a new metal building located at 744 Electric Road in the amount of $20,513.00 with a time frame for completion set at twelve (12) months. William Jones seconded the motion. Councilman Foley asked to clarify this location. Mr. Van Allman clarified that this is on Electric Road off of St. John Road. This is next to the Phoenix building and the old GE building. Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renée Turk Nays: None Abstaining: None J.School Board Appointment Consider the appointment of two School Board positions for three-year terms ending December 31, 2027. Hunter Holliday motioned to appoint the two new school board members, Chris King, to the board and Teresa Sizemore Hernandez, to the board on which she is currently serving. William Jones seconded the motion. Councilman Foley noted that a correction needed to be made to Ms. Sizemore's name as she is currently going by Ms. Teresa Sizemore. Randy Foley motioned to amend the original motion to correct Ms. Sizemore's name to Teresa Sizemore. William Jones seconded the motion. Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renée Turk Nays: None Abstaining: None K.Boards and Commissions Consider vacancies to various boards and commissions. Randy Foley motioned to appoint Wendel Ingram and Kathy Fitzgerald for Circuit Court reappointment for three-year terms ending November 30, 2027, to the Board of Equalization of Real Estate Assessments. Also, upon CPMT approval, appoint Casey Page 14 of 241 Mabery as an additional alternate for the private provider, Gift of Hope, to the Community Policy Management Team (CPMT). In addition, to reappoint Sean B. Kosmann and Joe Curran for four-year terms ending December 14, 2028, to the Economic Development Authority; and to reappoint Garry Lautenschlager for a two- year term ending November 23, 2026, to the Personnel Board. Hunter Holliday seconded the motion. Ayes: Hunter Holliday, William Jones, Randy Foley, James Wallace, Renée Turk Nays: None Abstaining: None 7.Adjournment Mayor Turk encouraged the citizens to support local businesses as we move into the holiday season. She also noted that the CIAA tournament will be played at the stadium this Saturday. She shared that they would be doing community service on Friday. The meeting was adjourned at 7:17 p.m. Page 15 of 241 Schedule A Current Year Current Year % of Prior Year Budget Year to Date Budget Year to Date Variance Revenue: Beginning Balance 7-1-24 6,757,755$ -$ 0%-$ -$ General Property Taxes 51,890,783 2,608,492 5%1,580,840 1,027,652 Other Local Taxes 29,110,800 4,969,257 17%4,798,228 171,029 Permits and Licenses 359,440 111,456 31%94,663 16,793 Fines and Forfeitures 128,500 30,715 24%30,604 111 Revenue from Use of Money and Property 6,342,391 2,553,601 40%2,589,527 (35,926) Charges for Services 3,728,697 1,096,594 29%1,080,711 15,883 Payment in Lieu of Taxes from Electric Fund 3,160,000 1,053,333 33%1,580,000 (526,667) Payment in Lieu of Taxes from Water Fund 147,696 51,465 35%49,980 1,485 Miscellaneous Revenue 358,500 155,397 43%112,539 42,857 Non-Categorical Aid 3,642,803 188,475 5%189,743 (1,268) Shared Expenses 1,933,459 449,071 23%391,580 57,491 Categorical Aid 10,800,992 2,656,307 25%1,935,601 720,706 Non-Revenue Receipts 36,209 36,208 100%23,821 12,387 Transfer From Other Funds - - 0%5,319,145 (5,319,145) Total Revenue 118,398,025 15,960,371 13%19,776,982 (3,816,612) Expenditures: General Government 14,482,727 3,582,179 25%3,653,680 (71,501) Judicial Administration 3,174,265 934,018 29%1,005,258 (71,240) Public Safety 25,455,478 8,346,120 33%7,811,230 534,890 Public Works 19,401,055 3,281,013 17%4,132,508 (851,495) Health and Welfare 7,137,055 1,750,091 25%1,322,259 427,832 Education 26,538,801 9,880,323 37%10,244,691 (364,368) Parks, Recreation and Cultural 10,127,934 2,983,711 29%2,463,486 520,225 Community Development 4,393,989 1,587,890 36%1,254,930 332,960 Transfers Out 6,641,356 975,522 15%9,714,518 (8,738,996) Contingency 1,045,365 - 0%- - Total Expenditures 118,398,025 33,320,867 28%41,602,560 (8,281,693) Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures -$ (17,360,496)$ (21,825,578)$ 4,465,081$ City of Salem, Virginia General Fund Statement of Revenue and Expenditures For Four Months Ending October 31, 2024 Page 16 of 241 Schedule B - 50,000.00 100,000.00 150,000.00 200,000.00 250,000.00 300,000.00 350,000.00 400,000.00 450,000.00 500,000.00 550,000.00 600,000.00 650,000.00 700,000.00 750,000.00 800,000.00 850,000.00 900,000.00 950,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,050,000.00 July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June City of Salem Sales Tax Summary For Fiscal Years 2022 -2025 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 Page 17 of 241 Schedule C 50,000.00 100,000.00 150,000.00 200,000.00 250,000.00 300,000.00 350,000.00 400,000.00 450,000.00 500,000.00 550,000.00 600,000.00 650,000.00 700,000.00 750,000.00 July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June City of Salem Meals Tax Summary For Fiscal Years 2022 -2025 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Page 18 of 241 Schedule D - 25,000.00 50,000.00 75,000.00 100,000.00 125,000.00 150,000.00 175,000.00 200,000.00 225,000.00 250,000.00 275,000.00 300,000.00 July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June City of Salem Lodging Tax Summary For Fiscal Years 2022 -2025 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Page 19 of 241 City of Salem, Virginia Special Revenue Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenditures For Period Ending October 31, 2024 Schedule E Project Total Available Year To Budget To Date Encumbrances Project Balance Date Fund Balance, July 1, 2024 -$ Revenues: ARPA - Election Grant 14,075$ 14,075$ -$ 14,075$ -$ 14,075$ Total Revenues 14,075 14,075 - 14,075 - 14,075 Expenditures: Election Grant 14,075 14,075 - 14,075 - 14,075 Total Expenditures 14,075$ 14,075$ -$ 14,075$ -$ 14,075 Fund Balance, October 31, 2024 -$ Page 20 of 241 City of Salem, Virginia Debt Outstanding For Period Ending October 31, 2024 Schedule F Balance Principal Balance 7/1/2024 Issuances Payments 10/31/2024 City Debt Outstanding 2013 Public Improvement Bonds 888,125$ -$ (89,425)$ 798,700$ 2016B Public Improvement Bonds 297,713 - - 297,713 2019 Public Improvement Bonds 4,065,000 - - 4,065,000 2020 Public Improvement Bonds 1,700,000 - - 1,700,000 2020 Public Improvement Refunding Bonds 4,405,060 - - 4,405,060 2021 Public Improvement Refunding Bonds 805,000 - - 805,000 2022B Public Improvement Bonds 13,916,000 - - 13,916,000 Total City Debt Outstanding 26,076,898 - (89,425) 25,987,473 School Debt Outstanding 2012A Public Improvement Bonds 4,295,250 - (477,250) 3,818,000 2013 Public Improvement Bonds 2,736,875 - (275,575) 2,461,300 2020 Public Improvement Bonds 23,395,000 - - 23,395,000 Total School Debt Outstanding 30,427,125 - (752,825) 29,674,300 Total Debt Outstanding 56,504,023$ -$ (842,250)$ 55,661,773$ Page 21 of 241 City of Salem, Virginia Capital Projects Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenditures For Period Ending October 31, 2024 Schedule G Project Total Available Year To Budget To Date Encumbrances Project Balance Date Fund Balance, July 1, 2024 13,489,570$ Revenues: Federal Grants 12,922,021$ 2,774,932$ -$ 2,774,932$ 10,147,089$ 404,163$ State Grants 17,015,640 4,340,354 - 4,340,354 12,675,286 102,291 Proceeds From Debt Issuance 15,015,146 15,015,145 - 15,015,145 1 - Interest Income 663,818 663,817 - 663,817 1 - Transfer From General Fund 25,801,022 25,574,795 - 25,574,795 226,227 66,175 Total Revenues 71,417,647 48,369,044 - 48,369,044 23,048,603 572,629 Expenditures: Next Generation 911 378,493 187,161 30,609 217,770 160,723 - Fire Station #2 Renovations 432,000 121,953 - 121,953 310,047 16,430 Fire Station #2 Storage Building 515,000 - - - 515,000 - Fire Station #1 Renovations 654,000 8,826 11,534 20,360 633,640 1,045 Fire Station #3 Renovations 454,000 7,051 4,844 11,895 442,105 - Colorado St Bridge Replacement 11,778,826 4,872,580 1,781,190 6,653,770 5,125,056 1,014,374 Apperson Drive Bridge Replacement 9,784,451 1,032,156 449,781 1,481,937 8,302,514 8,347 Jury Room Expansion 900,000 277,505 531,459 808,964 91,036 36,210 Apperson Drive Bridge Repairs #1800 682,432 326,719 353,013 679,732 2,700 244,347 Valleydale Streetscape Improvements 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 - Upland Drive Storm Drain and Curb & Gutter 125,000 - - - 125,000 - Western Roanoke River Greenway 50,000 1,500 - 1,500 48,500 - Elizabeth Campus Greenway 2,252,578 203,540 4,245 207,785 2,044,793 6,200 Moyer Sports Complex Renovation 27,903,295 26,868,786 229,365 27,098,151 805,144 (22,727) Mason Creek Greenway Phase 3 2,610,681 318,437 167,735 486,172 2,124,509 76,102 Library Flooring Replacement 190,000 - - - 190,000 - Library Co-working Space 155,000 - - - 155,000 - Civic Center East/West Fields Restroom 261,070 253,694 - 253,694 7,376 253,694 Longwood Park Restroom Replacement #2 170,000 142,839 - 142,839 27,161 142,782 Kiwanis Park Wall Pads 110,000 - 93,448 93,448 16,552 - Library Lawn Special Events Space 500,000 - - - 500,000 - Flood Mitigation-CFPF 78,962 75,013 3,949 78,962 - - Downtown Impr - E Main St/Market St 5,440,677 2,471,808 1,752,764 4,224,572 1,216,105 1,126,251 Downtown Impr - E Main St/White Oak 2,311,825 40,332 25,175 65,507 2,246,318 - Capital Projects Local Reserve 397,629 - - - 397,629 - Downtown Improvements Reserve 140,350 - - - 140,350 - Excess Local Funding Reserve 1,641,378 - - - 1,641,378 - Total Expenditures 71,417,647$ 37,209,900$ 5,439,111$ 42,649,011$ 28,768,636$ 2,903,055 Fund Balance, October 31, 2024 11,159,144$ Page 22 of 241 City of Salem, Virginia Capital Reserve Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenditures For Period Ending October 31, 2024 Schedule H Project Total Available Year To Budget To Date Encumbrances Project Balance Date Fund Balance, July 1, 2024 17,026,870$ Revenues: Transfer From General Fund 17,026,870$ 17,026,870$ -$ 17,026,870$ -$ -$ Total Revenues 17,026,870 17,026,870 - 17,026,870 - - Expenditures: Capital Reserve 13,107,803 - - - 13,107,803 - Fire Ladder Truck 2,400,000 - - - 2,400,000 - Body Cameras and In-Car Camera Replacement 654,067 - 654,004 654,004 63 - Front Load Dumpster Truck 415,000 408,857 - 408,857 6,143 408,857 Salem Stadium Scoreboard Replacement 200,000 - - - 200,000 - Civic Center Scoreboard Replacement 250,000 - 176,735 176,735 73,265 - Total Expenditures 17,026,870$ 408,857$ 830,739$ 1,239,596$ 15,787,274$ 408,857 Fund Balance, October 31, 2024 16,618,013$ Page 23 of 241 Schedule I Operating Revenues Current Year Budget Current Year Year to Date % of Budget Prior Year Year to Date Variance Sale of Power 50,066,620$ 19,074,749$ 38%15,038,527$ 4,036,222$ Other Electric Revenue 648,370 125,709 19%130,037 (4,328) Reserve for Encumbrances 1,817,312 - 0%- - Appropriated from Net Position 250,000 - 0%- - Total Operating Revenues 52,782,302 19,200,458 36%15,168,564 4,031,894 . Operating Expenses Other Power Generation - Operation 125,000 25,790 21%24,024 1,766 Other Power Generation - Maintenance 103,715 55,010 53%38,896 16,114 Purchased Power 26,815,000 10,211,102 38%9,408,198 802,904 Transmission - Operation 10,054,500 3,185,460 32%3,416,335 (230,875) Transmission - Maintenance 46,750 5,847 13%1,090 4,757 Distribution - Operations 1,194,500 393,415 33%371,251 22,164 Distribution - Maintenance 1,609,161 519,531 32%496,186 23,345 Customer Service 686,849 239,928 35%219,987 19,941 Administration & General - Operation 2,814,721 99,100 4%313,146 (214,046) Administration & General - Maintenance 242,000 108,931 45%114,965 (6,034) Depreciation - 585,757 0%527,885 57,872 Capital 5,484,755 334,005 6%16,588 317,417 Contingency 445,351 - 0%- - Total Operating Expenses 49,622,302 15,763,876 32%14,948,551 815,325 Income (loss) Before Transfers 3,160,000 3,436,582 220,013 3,216,569 Transfers (Payment in Lieu of Taxes)(3,160,000) (1,053,333) 33%(1,580,000) 526,667 Income (loss)-$ 2,383,249$ (1,359,987)$ 3,743,236$ Income (loss)-$ 4,766,498$ (2,719,974)$ 7,486,472$ City of Salem, Virginia Electric Fund Statement of Operations For Four Months Ending October 31, 2024 Page 24 of 241 Schedule J Operating Revenues Current Year Budget Current Year Year to Date % of Budget Prior Year Year to Date Variance Services 7,967,406$ 2,903,349$ 36%2,526,189$ 377,160$ Other Revenue 530,996 149,187 28%140,635 8,552 Water Federal Grants Revenue - 11,780 0%- 11,780 Reserve for Encumbrances 5,636,889 - 0%- - Total Operating Revenues 14,135,291 3,064,316 22%2,666,824 397,492 . Operating Expenses Salaries of Personnel 1,136,388 324,562 29%310,520 14,042 Fringe Benefits 479,930 147,481 31%142,918 4,563 Contractual Services 729,307 199,600 27%181,477 18,123 Printing and Binding 2,500 66 3%24 42 Advertising 1,000 - 0%- - Utilities 422,200 177,676 42%131,697 45,979 Communications 5,900 1,596 27%1,313 283 Insurance 36,000 1,786 5%1,786 - Travel and Training 9,800 1,674 17%1,216 458 Miscellaneous 66,793 51,313 77%38,950 12,363 Materials and Supplies 331,688 104,509 32%110,292 (5,783) Depreciation - 289,161 0%284,473 4,688 Capital 3,242,861 69,245 2%(19,710) 88,955 Contingency 265,581 - 0%- - Total Production Expenses 6,729,948 1,368,669 20%1,184,956 183,713 Salaries of Personnel 774,961 263,358 34%186,549 76,809 Fringe Benefits 368,938 125,682 34%86,922 38,760 Contractual Services 837,061 357,020 43%254,755 102,265 Printing and Binding 500 66 13%136 (70) Communications 4,850 2,136 44%1,189 947 Insurance 36,000 - 0%- - Lease/Rent of Equipment 2,000 375 19%375 - Travel and Training 7,600 832 11%793 39 Miscellaneous 33,193 11,591 35%10,114 1,477 Miscellaneous Credits (290,000) (139,247) 48%(101,632) (37,615) Materials and Supplies 166,075 31,038 19%55,323 (24,285) Depreciation - 77,095 0%56,178 20,917 Capital 3,441,949 937,619 27%46,365 891,254 Interest Obligations 1,874,520 62,223 3%81,220 (18,997) Bond Costs - 150 0%- 150 Total Distribution Expenses 7,257,647 1,729,938 24%678,287 1,051,651 Income (loss) Before Transfers 147,696 (34,291)803,581 (837,872) Transfers (Payment in Lieu of taxes)(147,696)(51,465) 35%(49,980) (1,485) Income (loss)-$ (85,756)$ 753,601$ (839,357)$ - Production Distribution City of Salem, Virginia Water Fund Statement of Operations For Four Months Ending October 31, 2024 Page 25 of 241 Schedule K Operating Revenues Current Year Budget Current Year Year to Date % of Budget Prior Year Year to Date Variance Services 7,220,956$ 2,518,242$ 35%2,328,229$ 190,013$ Other Revenue 182,200 59,361 33%47,389 11,972 Reserve for Encumbrances 732,058 - 0%- - Appropriated from Net Position 1,685,000 - 0%- - Total Operating Revenues 9,820,214 2,577,603 26%2,375,618 201,985 . Operating Expenses Salaries of Personnel 952,012 247,447 26%236,766 10,681 Fringe Benefits 432,026 121,392 28%115,335 6,057 Contractual Services 3,454,354 933,164 27%771,208 161,956 Printing and Binding 1,500 133 9%487 (354) Advertising 1,500 - 0%- - Utilities 4,500 1,290 29%1,185 105 Communications 14,850 4,810 32%4,395 415 Insurance 15,000 - 0%- - Lease/Rent of Equipment 1,800 375 21%375 - Travel and Training 12,000 2,569 21%2,550 19 Miscellaneous 40,693 15,785 39%17,105 (1,320) Miscellaneous Credits (270,000) (79,127) 29%(66,611) (12,516) Materials and Supplies 93,420 23,755 25%13,230 10,525 Depreciation - 480,236 0%469,299 10,937 Capital 2,856,114 220,415 8%100,569 119,846 Interest Obligations 1,803,283 16,143 1%17,751 (1,608) Contingency 407,162 - 0%- - Total Operating Expenses 9,820,214 1,988,387 20%1,683,644 304,743 Income (loss) before Transfers - 589,216 691,974 (102,758) Income (loss)-$ 589,216$ 691,974$ (102,758)$ City of Salem, Virginia Sewer Fund Statement of Operations For Four Months Ending October 31, 2024 Page 26 of 241 Schedule L Operating Revenues Current Year Budget Current Year Year to Date % of Budget Prior Year Year to Date Variance Shows/rentals 373,000$ 115,593$ 31%130,281$ (14,688)$ Box office shows 1,500,000 195,097 13%316,545 (121,448) Merchandise and commissions 250,800 40,800 16%107,218 (66,418) Static advertising 55,000 18,750 34%16,250 2,500 Miscellaneous income 20,000 7,599 38%9,762 (2,163) Interest Income 1,000 271 27%454 (183) Salem Fair 645,000 672,891 104%610,595 62,296 Reserve For Encumbrances 178,614 - 0%- - Appropriated from Net Position 272,190 - 0%- - Total Operating Revenues 3,295,604 1,051,001 32%1,191,105 (140,104) Operating Expenses Salaries of personnel 1,451,908 480,807 33%481,514 (707) Fringe benefits 547,769 159,663 29%160,302 (639) Maintenance and contractual services 399,487 71,647 18%64,066 7,581 Printing and binding 500 - 0%- - Advertising 23,000 16,817 73%3,481 13,336 Utilities 323,000 161,160 50%112,719 48,441 Communications 12,700 3,558 28%3,206 352 Insurance 30,500 - 0%- - Leases and Rentals 3,200 2,639 82%- 2,639 Travel and training 11,600 1,529 13%6,447 (4,918) Miscellaneous 108,267 48,697 45%39,093 9,604 Show expense 1,450,000 240,431 17%361,633 (121,202) Fair expense 625,363 546,644 87%620,542 (73,898) Materials and supplies 38,000 14,872 39%9,625 5,247 Capital 1,107,954 27,845 3%267,177 (239,332) Depreciation - 102,165 0%91,082 11,083 Total Operating Expenses 6,133,248 1,878,474 31%2,220,887 (342,413) Income (loss) Before Transfers (2,837,644)(827,473) (1,029,782)202,309 Transfers 2,837,644 655,881 23%616,995 38,886 Income (loss)-$ (171,592)$ (412,787)$ 241,195$ 0.00 City of Salem, Virginia Salem Civic Center Statement of Operations For Four Months Ending October 31, 2024 Page 27 of 241 Schedule M Operating Revenues: Current Year Budget Current Year Year to Date % of Budget Prior Year Year to Date Variance Catering 655,785$ 172,577$ 26%230,664$ (58,087)$ Concessions 137,833 20,610 15%10,763 9,847 Moyer Concessions 65,000 51,538 79%- 51,538 Salem High Concessions 8,500 6,387 75%4,310 2,077 Appropriated from Net Position 54,916 - 0%- - Total Operating Revenues 922,034 251,112 27%245,737 5,375 Operating Expenses: Salaries of personnel 305,459 90,691 30%89,563 1,128 Fringe benefits 111,075 29,234 26%31,821 (2,587) Contractual services 9,465 8,078 85%1,817 6,261 Printing and binding 300 - 0%- - Laundry and Cleaning 2,500 - 0%- - Communications 200 64 32%58 6 Insurance 2,000 - 0%- - Travel and training - - 0%179 (179) Miscellaneous 24,848 9,341 38%8,047 1,294 Materials and supplies 254,331 63,497 25%79,733 (16,236) Capital 54,916 - 0%- - Depreciation - 1,169 0%1,285 (116) Total Catering Expenses 765,094 202,074 26%212,503 (10,429) Salaries of Personnel 58,030 14,229 25%9,915 4,314 Fringe Benefits 15,246 2,533 17%1,462 1,071 Contractual services 25,000 1,793 7%2,955 (1,162) Miscellaneous 150 (7) -5%(14) 7 Materials and Supplies 29,000 8,410 29%4,892 3,518 Total Concessions Expenses 127,426 26,958 21%19,210 7,748 Salaries of Personnel 37,000 13,247 36%- 13,247 Fringe Benefits 11,698 4,131 35%- 4,131 Contractual services 2,500 10,591 424%- 10,591 Miscellaneous - (18) 0%- (18) Materials and Supplies 21,000 20,803 99%- 20,803 Total Moyer Expenses 72,198 48,754 68%- 48,754 Salaries of Personnel 4,461 2,958 66%702 2,256 Fringe Benefits 1,676 619 37%305 314 Contractual 2,500 - 0%1,005 (1,005) Miscellaneous - 2 0%- 2 Materials and Supplies 1,807 1,667 92%1,570 97 Total Salem High Expenses 10,444 5,246 50%3,582 1,664 Income (loss) Before Transfers (53,128)(31,920)10,442 (42,362) Transfers 53,128 - 0%- - Income (loss)-$ (31,920)$ 10,442$ (42,362)$ Moyer Concessions Salem High Concessions City of Salem, Virginia Salem Catering and Concessions Statement of Operations For Four Months Ending October 31, 2024 Catering Concessions Page 28 of 241 City of Salem, Virginia Water and Sewer Capital Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenditures For Period Ending October 31, 2024 Schedule N Project Total Available Year To Budget To Date Encumbrances Project Balance Date Fund Balance, July 1, 2024 13,575,000$ Revenues: Transfer From General Fund 13,575,000$ 13,575,000$ -$ 13,575,000$ -$ -$ Total Revenues 13,575,000 13,575,000 - 13,575,000 - - Expenditures: North Salem Water Improvements 6,200,000 - - - 6,200,000 - Roanoke River Upper Sewer Rehab 7,000,000 - - - 7,000,000 - Wiley Ct Sewer Improvements 375,000 - - - 375,000 - Total Expenditures 13,575,000$ -$ -$ -$ 13,575,000$ - Fund Balance, October 31, 2024 13,575,000$ Page 29 of 241 Schedule O Budget Current Year Year to Date Percent to Date Prior Year Year to Date Variance Beginning Net Position -$ 9,399,213$ 7,846,412$ 1,552,801$ Revenue Premiums Paid - City 6,016,000 1,477,564 25% 1,465,992 11,572 Premiums Paid - School 5,150,000 1,258,251 24% 1,284,532 (26,281) Premiums Paid - Retirees 697,500 257,209 37% 239,885 17,324 Dental Premiums Paid 590,600 151,798 26% 150,280 1,518 Interest Earnings 475,000 96,780 20% 82,511 14,269 Miscellaneous 5,000 1,574 31% 3,060 (1,486) Total Year to Date Revenues 12,934,100 3,243,176 25% 3,226,260 16,916 Expenses Health Claims 11,700,266 3,098,983 26% 2,361,048 737,935 Dental Claims 590,600 132,917 23% 128,010 4,907 Employee Health Clinic 532,884 118,200 22% 84,102 34,098 Consulting Services 105,250 23,238 22% 22,717 521 Miscellaneous 5,100 4,408 86% 4,170 238 Total Year to Date Expenses 12,934,100 3,377,746 26% 2,600,047 777,699 Ending Net Position -$ 9,264,643$ 8,472,625$ 792,018$ City of Salem, Virginia Health Insurance Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenses For Three Months Ending September 30, 2024 Page 30 of 241 City of Salem, Virginia Schedule of Deposits and Investments For Period Ending October 31, 2024 Schedule P FV as a Cash Value Net Change Fair Value % of 10/31/2024 in Fair Value 10/31/2024 Portfolio Demand & Time Deposits Concentration Account 47,000,725$ -$ 47,000,725$ 29.1% Payroll Account 9,929 - 9,929 0.0% Revenue Recovery Account 3,410 - 3,410 0.0% Utility Billing Account 49,301 - 49,301 0.0% Box Office Account 996,814 - 996,814 0.6% Held as Fiscal Agent of: Cardinal Academy 1,142,038 - 1,142,038 0.7% Court Community Corrections 1,382,584 - 1,382,584 1.0% Held on Behalf of: Economic Development Authority 579,716 - 579,716 0.4% Total Demand & Time Deposits 51,164,517 - 51,164,517 31.8% Investments Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP) 109,826,427 - 109,826,427 67.8% Held on Behalf of: Economic Development Authority LGIP 610,354 - 610,354 0.4% Total Investments 110,436,781 - 110,436,781 68.2% Total Deposits and Investments 161,601,298$ -$ 161,601,298$ 100.0% Page 31 of 241 Item #: 6.A. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA HELD AT CITY HALL MEETING DATE: November 25, 2024 AGENDA ITEM: Council Salary Ordinance Hold a public hearing and consider the first reading of an ordinance increasing and establishing the annual salaries of the Mayor and Council effective July 1, 2027. (Advertised in the November 16 and 17, 2024, issues of the Roanoke Times.) SUBMITTED BY: Rob Light, Assistant City Manager/Clerk of Council SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The present salaries for the Mayor and Council members are based on the limits established by the General Assembly in 1996 at $13,000/year and $12,000/year, respectively. The 2024 General Assembly and Governor enacted legislation that increased the maximum salaries to $24,000/year for Mayors and $22,000/year for Council members in the City of Salem. The maximum salaries are established based on population ranges of localities. The enacted legislation requires Council adopt an ordinance to amend these salaries at least four months prior to the date of the next municipal election and such increases may be effective on July 1st after the next regularly scheduled election of Council members. The next such election will be in November of 2026. Thus, if adopted, the salary increases will not be effective until July 1, 2027. FISCAL IMPACT: Effective July 1, 2027, the Mayor's salary will increase from $13,000/year to $24,000/year. Council member salaries will increase from $12,000/year to $22,000/year. From July of 1996 to October of 2024, inflation has increased 101.1% per the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI for All Urban Consumers Price Index. The proposed salary increases are less than the comparative salaries applying inflation. This does not account for an additional approximate 32 months of future inflation from October of 2024 until the salaries will be effective on July 1, 2027. Page 32 of 241 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council hold a public hearing and consider on first reading an ordinance increasing and establishing the annual salaries of the Mayor at $24,000/year and Council members at $22,000/year effective July 1, 2027. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Item 6A 11-25-24 Council Salary Ordinance 11.2024 Page 33 of 241 AN ORDINANCE INCREASING AND ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SALARIES OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL WHEREAS, the current maximum salaries for the Mayor and Salem City Council members has been in effect since July 1, 1996; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly increased the maximum salaries in the 2024 session; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1. That pursuant to §15.2-1414.6 of the Code of Virginia, the Mayor’s salary shall be increased to $24,000 annually and City Council members salaries shall be increased to $22,000 annually. 2. That these salary increases shall take effect July 1, 2027. 3. That these annual salaries shall apply for succeeding fiscal years unless subsequently modified by ordinance duly adopted by Council. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: H. Hunter Holliday – William D. Jones – Byron Randolph Foley – James W. Wallace III – Renee F. Turk – Passed: Effective: /s/ Renee F. Turk Mayor ATTEST: H. Robert Light Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia Page 34 of 241 Item #: 6.B. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA HELD AT CITY HALL MEETING DATE: November 25, 2024 AGENDA ITEM: Amendment to the City Code - Chapter 106, Zoning Hold public hearing and consider ordinance on first reading amending Chapter 106, Zoning, Article IV Development Standards, section 106-406 miscellaneous provisions of the CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA pertaining to storage containers. (Advertised in the November 16 and 17, 2024, issues of the Roanoke Times.)(Planning Commission Public hearing was held September 11, 2024 and item was continued to the November 13, 2024, meeting. (Planning Commission recommended approval with a unanimous vote.) SUBMITTED BY: Maxwell Dillon, Planner SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In the September 2024 Planning Commission meeting addressing storage containers, staff noted the following: Throughout the past several years, storage containers (also referred to as shipping containers) have become increasingly prevalent as businesses seek cost-effective and efficient repositories for their excess goods, equipment, or inventory. Staff has learned through numerous conversations with commercial and industrial enterprises that storage containers are critical to their business operations, as they provide additional space that is flexible, durable, protected from the elements, and relatively inexpensive. While storage containers clearly have a valuable use-case for many non-residential purposes, their appearance can also detract from the character of commercial corridors if not maintained appropriately. Rust, graffiti, and other forms of deterioration can have a negative impact on the aesthetic environment of major commercial districts that are important to the presentation and ultimate vitality of the city. To provide a bit of background on historical storage container regulation, containers were not regulated by city code prior to 2017. In 2017, the city adopted an ordinance Page 35 of 241 permitting storage containers on a temporary basis; however, that provision currently does not allow for the permanent keeping of storage containers on any property. This proposed storage container ordinance excludes storage containers utilized for temporary purposes, located in the right of way, used for occupancy as approved by the Uniform Statewide Building Code, or utilized in conjunction with an active building permit. This section introduces numerical (for commercially zoned properties) and locational (not to interfere with parking, landscaping, stormwater, etc.) restrictions for storage containers everywhere in the city. For properties located on specified major corridors, this ordinance requires storage containers to be painted a neutral color, maintained properly, and placed behind the front building line. At the conclusion of that meeting, staff was directed to perform additional research to try and refine the proposed regulations regarding storage containers. After consulting regulations adopted in September of 2024 by the City of Norfolk, extensive tabulation and evaluation of existing containers, and feedback from Planning Commissioners, staff has proposed a new ordinance to address storage containers. The changes from the previous draft are summarized by the following highlights: 1. The numerical limitation on storage containers is now based on primary street frontage instead of acreage. This change is anticipated to more appropriately scale the allowable containers to properties along Salem’s major corridors. Industrial properties are still exempt from a numerical limitation. 2. Containers on major corridors must be placed on a surface consistent with the development standards in our zoning ordinance. In other words, containers will have to be placed on asphalt, concrete, or engineered gravel (as approved by the City Engineer). 3. The colors “black” and “white” have been removed from the permitted shades of acceptable neutral colors. 4. A stipulation has been added to require parcels with multiple containers to situate them in a side-by-side fashion. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council hold a public hearing and consider approval of this ordinance change, as storage containers are not currently permitted on a permanent basis. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Item 6B 11-25-24 Sec._106-406_Storage Containers amended final Page 36 of 241 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND, REVISE, AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 106, ZONING, ARTICLE IV, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SECTION 106-406 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO STORAGE CONTAINERS OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, THAT SECTION 106-406 OF CHAPTER 106, OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA BE AMENDED, REVISED, AND REORDAINED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 106 ZONING Article IV Development Standards Sec. 106-406.25. On-site storage and temporary mobile storage containers. (A) Storage containers shall be considered accessory structures and shall be located in accordance with the standards for accessory structures as described in article II of this chapter. (BA)No vehicle, truck body, detachable semi-trailer, manufactured home, mobile home, bus, trailer, recreational vehicle, shipping container, portable storage unit, or similar equipment shall be used as a storage container or building in any zoning district, except that: . (1) Temporary mobile storage containers designed for site delivery and pickup may be placed and used on any property for a period not to exceed 30 days per calendar year. Such a container shall be placed in the driveway or rear yard of residentially zoned property. (2) Commercial and industrial use types may use shipping containers for storage provided that: a. All containers are maintained in suitable condition and be free of rust, deterioration, graffiti, etc. b. All containers are placed in an approved location that does not utilize existing parking spaces, fire lines, etc. c. All containers are placed in the rear of the property and shielded from public views. d. Such containers shall not be allowed for more than 90 consecutive days in any one-year period. (C) A zoning permit shall be obtained prior to the placement of any storage container. (D) No stacking of storage containers shall be allowed. (B) Temporary mobile storage containers such as portable storage units and moving pods, up to 20’ in length that are designed for site delivery and pickup may be placed and used on any residentially zoned property, or on any property that is used residentially for a period not to exceed 30 days per calendar year. Such a container shall be placed in the driveway or rear yard of residentially zoned property. A zoning permit shall be obtained prior to the placement. Page 37 of 241 (C) For containers on any nonresidential or agriculturally zoned property that will be utilized for 90 days or less, a zoning permit may be issued in lieu of these requirements. (D) Mobile storage containers that are temporarily located in the right of way require a Right of Way Permit issued by the Community Development Office and are not subject to the standards of this Section. (E) Permanent storage containers that are used for occupancy as approved by the Uniform Statewide Building Code and possess a certificate of occupancy from the Building Official are not subject to the standards of this Section. (F) Containers utilized in conjunction with construction that have an active building permit are exempt from the requirements of this section. (G) Storage containers and shipping containers may be placed and used on any nonresidential or agriculturally zoned property, provided that: 1) One shipping container shall be permitted on each lot, with one additional container permitted for each additional 100 feet of primary street frontage. Lot frontage shall be rounded down to the nearest hundred. a. There is no numerical storage container limitation on industrially zoned properties. 2) All containers are placed in a location that does not encroach upon required parking spaces, drive aisles, fire lanes, or landscaping/stormwater management areas. The placement of containers shall not inhibit adequate sight distance as prescribed by Section 106-406.17 and/or as determined by the Administrator. 3) Each container shall be reported to the Commissioner of the Revenue’s Office. 4) Containers shall not display signage of any kind. 5) No container shall be allowed to obtain a public utility service connection. 6) No stacking of storage containers shall be allowed. 7) A landscape buffer shall be planted to screen any containers from adjacent residential properties. (H) Such containers that may be viewed from the public way of the following streets shall be required to conform to additional standards 1) Streets: a. Main Street b. Wildwood Road c. 4th Street d. Thompson Memorial Drive e. College Avenue Page 38 of 241 f. Electric Road g. Texas Street h. Roanoke Boulevard i. Apperson Drive j. South Colorado Street k. Lynchburg Turnpike 2) Additional standards: a. All containers shall be placed on a surface in accordance with Section 106- 404.11 of the zoning ordinance. b. All containers are painted a singular neutral color (shades of gray, brown, cream, beige, and taupe) and maintained in a fashion free of rust, deterioration, graffiti, and other decomposition. c. Containers shall have a maximum length of twenty (20) feet. d. Containers on the same parcel shall be situated in a side-by-side fashion, with the longest dimensions of each container abutting. Containers shall be placed behind the front building line of the principal structure. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: H. Hunter Holliday - William D. Jones - Byron Randolph Foley - James W. Wallace, III – Renee F. Turk – Passed: Effective: ___ Mayor ATTEST: H. Robert Light Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia Page 39 of 241 Item #: 6.C. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA HELD AT CITY HALL MEETING DATE: November 25, 2024 AGENDA ITEM: Amendment to City Code - Chapter 18 Consider adoption of ordinance on first reading amending Chapter 18, Buildings and Building Regulations, Article VII, Historic Structures be renamed and by adopting additional sections 18-701 through 18-805 of the Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, pertaining to the Maintenance of Structures, Spot Blight Abatement, and Vacant Building Registration. SUBMITTED BY: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Following the City Council retreat of 2023, a set of goals was established to guide the city's initiatives and priorities for the future. It was determined that a focus on property clean up and maintenance was one of those goals. As a result, the proposed code sections will add appropriate tools for staff to make that goal a priority. The following three proposed code additions are aimed at enhancing neighborhood vitality, addressing property blight, and ensuring the upkeep of both occupied and vacant properties within the community. The three proposed code sections are: 1. Exterior Property Maintenance Code 2. Spot Blight Abatement Ordinance 3. Vacant Building Registry Each of these measures is designed to address specific property maintenance issues, promote public safety, reduce blight, and improve the overall aesthetics and quality of life in residential and nonresidential neighborhoods. 1. Exterior Property Maintenance Code The proposed Exterior Property Maintenance Code establishes minimum standards for the maintenance of the exteriors of all properties within the city. This code applies to both residential and nonresidential properties and addresses the following key areas: • Building Exteriors: Requirements for the repair or maintenance of building facades, roofing, windows, doors, and other visible structural and decorative Page 40 of 241 elements. This ensures that properties do not fall into disrepair or become eyesores. This code provides property owners with clear guidelines regarding maintenance expectations and gives the city the authority to take corrective action when properties fall into disrepair or violate these standards. 2. Spot Blight Abatement The Spot Blight Abatement section provides a mechanism for the city to address properties that are determined to be contributing to blight, even if they are not part of a larger pattern of decay. Spot blight refers to isolated instances of property neglect or deterioration that, while affecting only a few properties, can have a significant negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Key provisions of this ordinance include: • Definition of Spot Blight: Properties can be considered blighted if they have been vacant for at least a year, have been the subject of documented complaints, are no longer being maintained for useful occupancy, is dilapidated or lacks normal maintenance, has been the subject of nuisance abatement, or are detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the community. • City Authority to Intervene: If a property is preliminarily deemed blighted, city staff will contact the owner and work on a plan to cure the blight. Failure to comply may result in the request for City Council to conduct a public hearing concerning the repair or other disposition of the property. The Spot Blight Abatement aims to remedy instances of blight that disrupt the neighborhood’s quality of life, prevent further deterioration, and promote neighborhood reinvestment. 3. Vacant Building Registry The Vacant Building Registry Ordinance requires property owners to register vacant buildings with the city. A vacant building is defined as any building that is unoccupied for a period of twelve months and for six months or longer, it has been vacant, boarded up or secured in accordance with the building code, and not lawfully connected to electric, water or sewer service. The registry will include the following components: • Registration Requirement: Property owners must register any vacant building by April 1 of each year. • Registration Fees: A $100 fee will be assessed for registration. • Penalties: Failure to register a vacant property shall be subject to a $200 civil penalty and if the property has been deemed blighted it shall be subject to a $400 civil penalty. The purpose of this registry is to reduce the negative impacts of vacant buildings on neighborhoods, including increased risk of crime, vandalism, and deterioration. It also enables the city to track vacant properties, engage with property owners, and facilitate rehabilitation or repurposing of these buildings. The proposed Exterior Property Maintenance Code, Spot Blight Abatement, and Page 41 of 241 Vacant Building Registry Ordinance represents an important step toward maintaining the quality of life in our neighborhoods, addressing property blight, and encouraging responsible property ownership. By giving staff, the tools to ensure properties are well-maintained, these measures will help to foster a cleaner, safer, and more attractive community. FISCAL IMPACT: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council consider approval of the proposed ordinance on first reading. ATTACHMENTS: 1. ext prop main, spot blight, vacant bldg corrected dadak 10-8-2024 Page 42 of 241 Page 1 of 13 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND, REVISE, REORDAIN, AND ENACT, CHAPTER 18, BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS, ARTICLE VII, HISTORIC STRUCTURES, BE RENAMED AND BY ADOPTING ADDITIONAL SECTIONS 18- 701 THROUGH 18-805 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, PERTAINING TO THE MAINTENANCE OF STRUCTURES, SPOT BLIGHT ABATEMENT, AND VACANT BUILDING REGISTRATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, THAT Article VII, Historic Structures, Building Code, DIVISIONS I-IV, Article VII, Historic Structures, Chapter 18, of The Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, be adopted to read as follows: PART II - CODE Chapter 18 - BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS ARTICLE VII. HISTORIC STRUCTURES MAINTENANCE OF STRUCTURES DIVISION I. – HISTORIC STRUCTURES Sec. 18-651. - Purpose. City council finds that recognition of buildings that have important historic, architectural, archaeological, and cultural significance to the community is in the public interest and should be encouraged. Furthermore, regulatory flexibility is required for the preservation and maintenance of the historic contribution of such buildings as redevelopment occurs. Sec. 18-652. - Intent. It is the intent of city council that recognition pursuant to this chapter shall not in and of itself constitute an "official designation" for the purposes and intent of Code of Virginia § 15.2-2306 and shall not constitute a "site" for the purposes of establishing a historic district thereunder. Sec. 18-653. - Register. The planning commission is hereby authorized and directed to compile a register of such structures, sites, and places of historic significance. No structure, site, or place shall be listed on the register except upon application by the owner. Sec. 18-654. - Consideration of applications. (a) The executive secretary to the planning commission, upon receiving any such application requesting listing on the register, shall promptly transmit the same to the planning commission. Page 43 of 241 Page 2 of 13 (b) Within 120 days after receiving any such application for listing on the register, the planning commission shall review the application and approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions any such application for listing on the register. Sec. 18-655. - Inclusion. To be considered for inclusion on the register, a property must be a minimum of 100 years old and meet one of the following conditions: (1) The building must be of significant historic architectural design. (2) The building must have played a significant role in community history. (3) The building must have ties to a historic event. (4) The building must be associated with a person of historic significance. Sec. 18-656. - Powers of planning commission. The planning commission shall have the authority to approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions any application for inclusion on the register. Sec. 18-657. - Maintenance of historic buildings. It is found that the owner of a historic building has the responsibility to protect and preserve, in perpetuity, the structural and visual components of such building. Every building listed on any historic register or located within any designated historic district shall be kept in good repair. All exterior portions of such buildings and all related interior portions thereof must be maintained to prevent the exterior of such building to fall into a state of disrepair and/or be exposed to the elements. Deterioration by neglect is expressly prohibited. Therefore, the reasonable maintenance of historic buildings is required as follows: (1) The decorative features of the building, including but not limited to, molding, filigree, and cornices, shall be maintained. (2) The exterior of the building, including, but not limited to, walls, vertical supports, horizontal support members, roofs, chimneys, siding, doors, windows, shall be maintained. (3) Any painted exterior surfaces shall be maintained. (4) Any other necessary maintenance required by the Building Official that prevents the deterioration of a historic building. DIVISION II. – EXTERIOR MAINTENANCE OF STRUCTURES Sec. 18-701. Scope The provisions of this chapter shall govern the minimum conditions for the Page 44 of 241 Page 3 of 13 maintenance of structures and equipment and for the maintenance of exterior property to the extent that this code is applicable. Sec. 18-703. Exterior Structure A.General. The exterior of a structure shall be maintained in good repair and structurally sound. B.Protective treatment. Exterior surfaces, including but not limited to, doors, door and window frames, cornices, porches, trim, balconies, and decks, shall be maintained in good condition. Exterior wood surfaces, other than decay- resistant woods, shall be protected from the elements and decay by painting or staining or may be covered by a roof. Peeling, flaking and chipped paint shall be eliminated and surfaces repainted. Siding and masonry joints, as well as those between the building envelope and the perimeter of windows, doors and skylights, shall be maintained weather resistant and watertight. Concrete shall be treated to remove and prevent efflorescence. Metal surfaces subject to rust or corrosion shall be coated to inhibit such rust and corrosion, and surfaces with rust or corrosion shall be stabilized and coated to inhibit future rust and corrosion. Oxidation stains shall be removed from exterior surfaces. Surfaces designed for stabilization by oxidation are exempt from this requirement. C.Structural members. Structural members shall be maintained free from deterioration and shall be capable of safely supporting the imposed dead and live loads. D.Foundation walls. Foundation walls shall be maintained plumb and free from open cracks and breaks and shall be kept in such condition so as to prevent the entry of rodents and other pests. E.Exterior walls and fences. Exterior walls and fences shall be free from holes, breaks, and loose or rotting materials; Exterior walls shall be maintained weatherproof and properly surface coated where required to prevent deterioration. F.Decorative features. Cornices, belt courses, corbels, terra cotta trim, wall facings and similar decorative features shall be maintained in good repair with proper anchorage and in a safe condition. Sec. 18-705. Violations and penalties. It shall be unlawful for any owner or any other person, firm, or corporation, on or after the effective date of any Code provisions, to violate any such provisions. Any such violation shall be deemed a misdemeanor and any owner or any other person, firm, or corporation convicted of such a violation shall be punished by a fine of not more than Page 45 of 241 Page 4 of 13 $2,500. If the violation remains uncorrected at the time of the conviction, the court shall order the violator to abate or remedy the violation in order to comply with the Code. Except as otherwise provided by the court for good cause shown, any such violator shall abate or remedy the violation within six months of the date of conviction. Each day during which the violation continues after the court-ordered abatement period has ended shall constitute a separate offense. Any person, firm, or corporation convicted of a second offense committed within less than five years after a first offense under this chapter shall be punished by a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $2,500. Any person, firm, or corporation convicted of a second offense committed within a period of five to 10 years of a first offense under this chapter shall be punished by a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $2,500. Any person, firm, or corporation convicted of a third or subsequent offense committed within 10 years of an offense under this chapter after having been at least twice previously convicted shall be punished by confinement in jail for not more than 10 days and a fine of not less than $5,000 nor more than $10,000, either or both. No portion of the fine imposed for such third or subsequent offense committed within 10 years of an offense under this chapter shall be suspended. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit issuing a summons for violation of any code provision to the lessor or sublessor of a residential dwelling unit, provided a copy of the notice is served on the owner. Sec. 18-707. Notices, reports and orders. Upon findings by the code official that violations of this code exist, the code official shall issue a correction notice or notice of violation to the owner, tenant or the person responsible for the maintenance of the structure. Work done to correct violations of this code subject to the permit, inspection and approval provisions of the VCC shall not be construed as authorization to extend the time limits established for compliance with this code. When the owner is not the responsible party to whom the notice of violation or correction notice is issued, a copy of the notice shall also be delivered to the owner. Sec. 18-709. Correction notice. The correction notice shall be a written notice of the defective conditions. The correction notice shall require correction of the violation within a reasonable time. Upon request, the correction notice shall reference the code section that serves as the basis for the defects and shall state that such defects shall be corrected and reinspected in a reasonable time designated by the code official. Sec. 18-711. Notice of violation. If the code official determines there are violations of this code a written notice of violation may be issued to the owner, tenant, or the person responsible for the maintenance or use of the building or structure in lieu of a correction notice. In addition, the code official shall issue a notice of violation for any uncorrected violation Page 46 of 241 Page 5 of 13 remaining from a correction notice. The code official shall provide the section numbers for any code provisions cited in the notice of violation to the owner, tenant, or the person responsible for the maintenance or use of the building or structure. The notice shall require correction of the violation within a reasonable time. The owner, tenant, or person to whom the notice of violation has been issued shall be responsible for contacting the code official within the timeframe established for any reinspections to assure the violations have been corrected. The code official will be responsible for making such inspection and verifying the violations have been corrected. In addition, the notice of violation shall indicate the right of appeal by referencing the appeals section of this code. Sec. 18-713. Further action when violation not corrected. If the responsible party has not complied with the notice of violation, the code official may request the legal counsel of the locality to institute the appropriate legal proceedings to restrain, correct or abate the violation or to require the removal or termination of the use of the building or structure involved. In cases where the locality or legal counsel so authorizes, the code official may issue or obtain a summons or warrant. Sec. 18-715. Right of appeal; filing of appeal application. Any person aggrieved by the application of this code or the refusal to grant a modification to the provisions of this code may appeal to the BBOA. The applicant shall submit a written request for appeal to the BBOA within 30 calendar days of the receipt of the decision being appealed. The application shall contain the name and address of the owner of the building or structure and, in addition, the name and address of the person appealing, when the applicant is not the owner. A copy of the code official’s decision shall be submitted along with the application for appeal and maintained as part of the record. The application shall be marked by the BBOA to indicate the date received. Failure to submit an application for appeal within the time limit established by this section shall constitute acceptance of a code official’s decision. Sec. 18-717. Meetings and postponements. The BBOA shall meet within 30 calendar days after the date of receipt of the application for appeal. A longer time period shall be permitted if agreed to by all the parties involved in the appeal. A notice indicating the time and place of the hearing shall be sent to the parties in writing to the addresses listed on the application at least 14 calendar days prior to the date of the hearing, except that a lesser time period shall be permitted if agreed to by all the parties involved in the appeal. When a quorum of the BBOA is not present at a hearing to hear an appeal, any party involved in the appeal shall have the right to request a postponement of the hearing. The BBOA shall reschedule the appeal within 30 calendar days of the postponement, except that a Page 47 of 241 Page 6 of 13 longer time period shall be permitted if agreed to by all the parties involved in the appeal. Sec. 18-719. Hearings and decision. All hearings before the BBOA shall be open meetings and the appellant, the appellant’s representative, the locality's representative and any person whose interests are affected by the code official’s decision in question shall be given an opportunity to be heard. The chairman shall have the power and duty to direct the hearing, rule upon the acceptance of evidence and oversee the record of all proceedings. The BBOA shall have the power to uphold, reverse, or modify the decision of the official by a concurring vote of a majority of those present. Decisions of the BBOA shall be final if no further appeal is made. The decision of the BBOA shall be explained in writing, signed by the chairman and retained as part of the record of the appeal. Copies of the written decision shall be sent to all parties by certified mail. In addition, the written decision involving the statewide building code shall contain the following wording: •“Any person who was a party to the appeal may appeal to the State Review Board by submitting an application to such Board within 21 calendar days upon receipt by certified mail of the written decision. Application forms are available from the Office of the State Review Board, 600 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219, (804) 371-7150.” • However, the written decision involving a violation or application of this code shall contain the following wording: •“Anyone aggrieved by the Board’s decision in this matter may file a petition pursuant to Virginia Code § 15.2-2314 for a writ of certiorari with the Circuit Court for the City of Salem. The petition must be filed within 30 days of the date of this letter. Any decision not appealed within 30 days becomes final.” • Sec. 18-721. Appeals. After final determination by the BBOA in an appeal involving the statewide building code, any person who was a party to the appeal may further appeal to the State Review Board. The application for appeal shall be made to the State Review Board within 21 calendar days of the receipt of the decision to be appealed. Failure to submit an application within that time limit shall constitute an acceptance of the code official’s decision. For appeals from the BBOA, a copy of the code official’s decision and the written decision of the BBOA shall be submitted with the application for appeal to the State Review Board. Upon request by the Office of the State Review Board, the BBOA shall submit a copy of all pertinent information from the record of the appeal. Procedures of the State Review Board are in accordance with Article 2 (§ 36-108 et Page 48 of 241 Page 7 of 13 seq.) of Chapter 6 of Title 36 of the Code of Virginia. Decisions of the State Review Board shall be final if no further appeal is made. After final determination by the BBOA in an appeal involving a violation or application of this code, anyone aggrieved by the determination may file a petition pursuant to Virginia Code § 15.2-2314 for a writ of certiorari with the Circuit Court for the City of Salem. The petition must be filed within 30 days of the date of the BBOA decision. Any decision not appealed within 30 days becomes final. DIVISION III. - SPOT BLIGHT ABATEMENT Sec. 18-751. Purpose The city council finds that deteriorating properties, including the improvements and the land on which they are built, have a detrimental effect on property values and the quality of life in the area surrounding them. This article is enacted to provide for the abatement of blight which threatens the health, safety and welfare of the community. Sec. 18-753. Authorization The city may clear or repair any blighted property as defined in this article in order to abate blight. In addition, the city may recover the cost of any clearing or repair of such property from the owner of the property. Sec. 18-755. Preliminary Determination The city manager or his designee shall make a preliminary determination that a property has non-structural blight in accordance with section 18-765. The Building Official shall make the preliminary determination that a property has structural blight in accordance with section 18-38. The city manager or his designee shall notify the owner by regular and certified mail sent to the last address shown in the real estate tax assessment records, specifying the reasons why the property is blighted. The owner shall have 30 days within which to respond in writing with a plan to cure the blight within a reasonable time. Such plan shall include a site plan delineating blighted condition(s) and specifying measures to be taken for the removal of each. Upon the Building Official’s approval of the plan to cure structural blight, and/or the city’s approval of the plan to cure non-structural blight, the owner shall have 90 days to complete all work approved in the spot blight abatement plan. The city, upon acceptance of a performance bond in the amount of the estimated cost of the work, may grant an extension of an additional 90 days to complete work where it is determined that the owner has completed substantial portions of the work in compliance with the plan and is diligently pursuing completion of all work. Page 49 of 241 Page 8 of 13 Sec. 18-757. Public Hearing and Determination If the owner fails to respond within the 30-day period with a spot blight abatement plan that is acceptable, or fails to complete the work approved in the spot blight abatement plan to cure the blight within the allotted time, including any extensions, the city manager or his designee (1) may request the city council to conduct a public hearing concerning the repair or other disposition of the property in question, and if a public hearing is scheduled, (2) shall prepare a spot blight abatement plan for the repair or other disposition of the property. The city shall send written notice and the proposed plan to the owner before the city council acts on the ordinance and proposed plan. Notice of public hearing will be mailed by regular mail to (1) the property owner(s) and (2) abutting property owner(s) at least three weeks prior to the date of the public hearing. Notice must also be published twice in a newspaper with local circulation and shall also be posted on the property. Sec. 18-759. Remediation and Restoration (cost recovery) Following the public hearing, the city council may consider the proposed ordinance to declare the property blighted and the proposed plan. If said ordinance is adopted and council approves the proposed plan, the city may clear or repair the property in accordance with the approved plan, the provisions of this section, and applicable law. The city shall have a lien on all property so cleared or repaired under an approved plan to recover the cost of demolition or improvements made by the city to bring the blighted property into compliance with applicable building codes. The lien on such property shall bear interest at the legal rate of interest established in Code of Virginia, § 6.2-301, as amended, beginning on the date the repairs are completed through the date on which the lien is paid. The lien shall be filed in the Office of the Treasurer and shall be treated in all respects as a tax lien and enforceable in the same manner as provided by law. The city may recover its costs of clearing or repair from the owner of record of the property when the clearing or repairs were made at such time as the property is sold or disposed of by such owner. The costs of clearing or repair shall be recovered from the proceeds of any such sale. Sec. 18-761. Declaration of Nuisance In lieu of the exercise of powers granted in sections 18-751 through 18-759, the city council, by ordinance, may declare any blighted property to constitute a nuisance, and thereupon abate the nuisance as authorized by law. Such ordinance shall be adopted only after written notice by certified mail to the owner of the property at the last known address of such owner as shown on the current real estate tax assessment books or current real estate tax assessment records. If the owner does not abate or remove the nuisance and the city abates or removes the nuisance at its expense, the costs of abatement or removal shall be a lien on the property and the lien shall bear Page 50 of 241 Page 9 of 13 interest at the legal rate of interest established in Code of Virginia, § 6.2-301, as amended, beginning on the date the abatement or removal is completed through the date on which the lien is paid. Sec. 18-763. Provisions cumulative; inclusion of other statutes and ordinances The provisions of this article shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to any remedies for spot blight abatement that may be authorized by law. Sec. 18-765. Definitions (A) General definitions a. The term "blighted property" means any individual commercial, industrial, or residential structure or improvement that endangers the public's health, safety, or welfare because the structure or improvement upon the property is dilapidated, deteriorated, or violates minimum health and safety standards, or any structure or improvement previously designated as blighted under the process of determination of "spot blight." b. A property can be considered blighted if it meets the standards set forth in Virginia Code § 36-49.1:1, as amended. Detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare may be substantiated by meeting more than one of the following instances: (1) It has been vacant and/or boarded for at least one year. (2) It has been the subject of documented complaints. (3) It is no longer being maintained for useful occupancy. (4) It is dilapidated or lacks normal maintenance and upkeep. (5) It has been the subject of nuisance abatement actions undertaken by the city. (6) Any buildings or improvements which, by reason of dilapidation, obsolescence, overcrowding, faulty arrangement of design, lack of ventilation, light and sanitary facilities, excessive land coverage, deleterious land use or obsolete layout, or any combination of these or other factors, are detrimental to the safety, health or welfare of the community. c. The following is a list of potential conditions that may cause a property to be considered blighted under the terms of this article: (1)Condemned structure. A structure on the property has been continuously vacant for at least one year, has been condemned as unfit for human occupancy by the Building Official in accordance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, but has neither Page 51 of 241 Page 10 of 13 been demolished nor repaired by the owner as directed by the Building Official. (2)Rat and rodent infestation. There is evidence of rat or rodent infestation, or harborages caused by conditions on the property. (3)Previous citations. The property has been used or maintained in a condition which as result in the following actions: (i) The owner has been cited on at least three separate occasions because activities or conditions on the property violate state or city laws or ordinances governing the use or maintenance of property, and those activities or conditions threaten the public health, safety and welfare of the community: or (ii) The owner has refused to abate one or more violations as ordered by the court or has repeated conduct involving the use or maintenance of property for which the owner has been convicted of violating state law, town/county or local ordinances in the past. (4)Inadequate facilities. The property has inadequate sewage, septic, plumbing, well or heating facilities. (5)Potential trespass. If the property is vacant, the owner has failed to take adequate precautions to prevent the use of or access to the property by trespassers. (6)Nuisance to children. A potential attractive nuisance to children exists on the property, including, but not limited to, abandoned wells, basements, excavations or broken fences. (7)Fire hazard. Any condition exists on the property that has been specifically identified as a fire hazard by the fire department or the Building Official; or (8)Substantial dilapidation of buildings or structures as evidenced by either: (i) Collapse of either interior or exterior structural elements such as floors, walls, roofs, porches, decks and similar appendages which pose a danger to the public; or (ii) Removal or rotting of exterior siding, roofing or sheathing exposing structural members to the weather. (B) Definitions. Page 52 of 241 Page 11 of 13 Blighted area: Any area that endangers the public health, safety or welfare; or any area that is detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare because commercial, industrial, or residential structures or improvements are dilapidated, or deteriorated or because such structures or improvements violate minimum health and safety standards. This definition includes, without limitation, areas previously designated as blighted areas pursuant to the provisions of the Code of Virginia § 36-1 et seq. Blighted property: Any individual commercial, industrial, or residential structure or improvement that endangers the public's health, safety, or welfare because the structure or improvement upon the property is dilapidated, deteriorated, or violates minimum health and safety standards, or any structure or improvement previously designated as blighted pursuant to the Code of Virginia § 36-49.1:1, under the process for determination of "spot blight. Infestation: the presence of insects, rodents, vermin, or other pests in sufficient number to adversely affect the structure or health safety, and welfare of the occupants. Spot blight: A structure or improvement that is a blighted property as defined in this section. Spot blight abatement plan (referred to as "plan"): the written plan prepared by the owner or owners of record of the real property to address spot blight. If the owner or owners of record of the real property fail to respond as provided in the Code of Virginia § 36-49.1:1, the locality or the authority can prepare a spot blight abatement plan to address the spot blight with respect to an individual commercial, industrial, or residential structure or improvement, but may only implement such plan in accordance with the provisions of § 36-49.1:1. Vacant: any parcel of land in the city that contains any building or structure that is not lawfully occupied or inhabited by human beings as evidenced by two or more of the following conditions: 1. Failure to make contact with anyone on site 2. Overgrown and/or dead vegetation 3. Overdue utility bills or at least one disconnected utility 4. Accumulation of trash, junk or debris 5. Abandoned vehicles, auto parts, or materials 6. The absence of furnishings and/or personal items consistent with habitation or occupancy 7. The presence of an unsanitary, stagnant swimming pool 8. The accumulation of newspapers, circulars, flyers and/or mail 9. Statements from neighbors, family members, delivery agents, or government agents 10.The presence of boards over doors, windows, or other openings Page 53 of 241 Page 12 of 13 11.Absence of or continually drawn window coverings such as curtains, blinds and/or shutters 12.The absence of a certificate of occupancy DIVISION IV. – VACANT BUILDING REGISTRY Sec. 18-801. Vacant building registration. On or before April 1 of each year, the owner or managing agent, or a duly authorized representative acting on behalf of the owner or managing agent, shall register with the Building Official’s office, the address of any buildings they own or manage which have been vacant for a continuous period of twelve (12) months or more and which meet the definition of derelict building. For purposes of this section, "derelict building" shall mean a residential or nonresidential building or structure, whether or not construction has been completed, that might endanger the public's health, safety, or welfare and for a continuous period in excess of six (6) months, it has been (i) vacant, (ii) boarded up or secured in accordance with the building code, and (iii) not lawfully connected to electric service from a utility service provider or not lawfully connected to any required water or sewer service from a utility service provider. Every person filing registration forms with the Building Official’s office shall pay an annual registration fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00) to defray the cost of processing the registration. Sec. 18-803. Failure to register. Any person who fails to register a vacant building by the April 1 deadline shall be subject to a two hundred dollars ($200.00) civil penalty. Any person who fails to register any vacant building that has been designated as blighted pursuant to the provisions of section 36-49.1:1 of the Code of Virginia, shall be punished by a civil penalty not exceeding four hundred dollars ($400.00) for each building that is not registered. Sec. 18-805. Notice of assessment penalty. At least thirty (30) days prior to the assessment of any civil penalty, the Building Official’s office shall mail the owner, or managing agent, or the duly authorized representative acting on behalf of the owner or managing agent, at the address to which property tax notices are sent notice of the failure to comply with the registration requirements of this section. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its final passage. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: H. Hunter Holliday, III William D. Jones - Byron Randolph Foley - Page 54 of 241 Page 13 of 13 James W. Wallace, III – Renee F. Turk – Passed: Effective: Mayor ATTEST: H. Robert Light Clerk of Council City of Salem, Virginia Page 55 of 241 Item #: 6.D. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA HELD AT CITY HALL MEETING DATE: November 25, 2024 AGENDA ITEM: Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Consider ordinance on first reading regarding the request of Virginia Baptist Children's Home and Family Services d/b/a Hopetree Family Services (Salem CI) f/k/a The Virginia Baptist Childrens' Home f/k/a Baptist Orphanage of Virginia, property owner, for rezoning the properties located at 1000 block Red Lane and a portion of 860 Mount Vernon Lane (Tax Map #'s 41-1-1, 41-1-2, 41-1-3, 41-1-4, 41-1-5, 41-1-6, and a portion of 44-3-10) from RSF Residential Single Family District to PUD Planned Unit District with proffered conditions. (The Planning Commission and City Council held a joint public hearing during the Planning Commissions regular meeting on November 13, 2024 as advertised in the November 1 and 4, 2024, issues of The Roanoke Times. The Planning Commission recommended approval by a 4 to 1 vote). SUBMITTED BY: Mary Ellen Wines, Planning & Zoning Administrator SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On August 30, 2024, HopeTree submitted a rezoning application to the Community Development Department. That application included the proffered PUD document and supporting documentation, with the only change to the proffered PUD document being an update to the formal name of the property owner. That application’s supporting documentation can be found in the following attachments. On October 25, 2024, HopeTree submitted an addendum to the August 30, 2024, application which contained a letter highlighting the addition of a supplemental phasing plan. That supplemental phasing plan replaced the previous phasing plan in the proffered PUD document, and it can be found on the pages labeled EX-A and EX-B. To summarize, the complete list of changes from the previously approved PUD document to the proposed proffered PUD document include: Page 56 of 241 1. An update to the applicant’s/property owner’s name (Page 3) 2. An adjusted phasing plan (replacement of Page 25 with pages EX-A and EX-B). On Monday, November 4, 2024, Planning and Zoning staff provided a list of clarifications for the applicant to address. On Tuesday, November 5, 2024, the applicant responded to that list. The details of those clarifications can be found in the following attachments. The link to previous Planning Commission agendas and materials can be found here: https://salemcity.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/meetingsresponsive.aspx?Meeting Type=3 FISCAL IMPACT: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council consider adoption of the ordinance on first reading. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Item 6D 11-25-24 HopeTree Ordinance 2. HopeTree Rezoning Narrative August 2024 3. HopeTree Rezoning Application August 2024 4. Item 6D 11-25-24 PlanningCommissionRecommendation 5. HopeTree Property Exhibit August 2024 6. HopeTree Property Ownership Exhibit August 2024 7. HopeTree Legal Description August 2024 8. HopeTree Traffic Study 9. HopeTree Traffic Impact Study - M & C Letter 10. Addendum Letter to PUD Application October 2024 11. Staff comments to applicant November 2024 12. Applicant response to staff comments November 2024 13. Item 6D 11-25-24 HopeTree final PUD document November 2024 (Exhibit A) 14. Roanoke Times Affidavit 15. Affidavit Page 57 of 241 {00563605.DOCX } AN ORDINANCE TO ORDAIN, REORDAIN, AMEND, REAMEND, ADOPT, AND/OR READOPT SECTION 106-110, ARTICLE I, CHAPTER 106, OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, RELATING TO ZONING AND DIVIDING THE CITY INTO BUILDING DISTRICTS AND ESTABLISHING DISTRICT BOUNDARY LINES ON THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, Virginia Baptist Children’s Home and Family Services d/b/a HopeTree Family Services (Salem CI) f/k/a the Virginia Baptist Children’s Home f/k/a Baptist Orphanage of Virginia (“HopeTree” or “Owner”) has petitioned to have a parcel located at the 1000 block of Red Lane and a portion of 860 Mount Vernon Lane (Tax Map Nos. 41-1-1, 41-1-2, 41-1-3, 41-1- 4, 41-1-5, 41-1-6, and a portion of 44-3-10) (the “Property”) rezoned from RSF Residential Single Family to PUD Planned Unit District with proffered conditions; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Salem previously adopted an Ordinance on June 24, 2024, approving rezoning of the Property from RSF Residential Single Family to PUD Planned Unit District with proffered conditions; and WHEREAS, on July 23, 2024, five citizens of the City filed lawsuits in the Circuit Court for the City of Salem, case nos. CL24000244, CL24000245, CL24000246, CL24000247, and CL24000248, challenging the procedure and substance of the June 24, 2024 ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Owner submitted a new rezoning application dated August 30, 2024, to the City as a means to address any alleged potential defects in the procedure; and WHEREAS, the August 30, 2024 rezoning application was substantially similar to the Owner’s original application dated November 30, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Owner again voluntarily proffered conditions which are attached to this ordinance and labeled Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, Council has again reviewed the previous application materials and legislative record concerning the previous HopeTree rezoning application that it approved on June 24, 2024, the new Rezoning Application submitted on August 30, 2024, and the proffered conditions and concluded that the proffered conditions are in the best interests of the City and comply with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Salem heretofore adopted; and WHEREAS, the City Council and the Planning Commission held a joint public hearing on November 13, 2024 to receive public comment with respect to the HopeTree application dated August 30, 2024. The joint public hearing was preceded by advertised public notices; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its regular meeting held on November 13, 2024 again recommended approval of HopeTree’s rezoning request with proffers; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the HopeTree application dated August 30, 2024 on its first reading on November 25, 2024, after legal notice and advertisement, and a second reading on December 9, 2024, after legal notice and advertisement; and Page 58 of 241 {00563605.DOCX } WHEREAS, the Council again finds that the requested rezoning with the proffers set forth in Exhibit A is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and good zoning practice; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice support the adoption of this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, that Section 106-110, Article I, Chapter 106 of The Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, relating to zoning district boundary lines be amended in the following particular and no other: That the following described property in the City of Salem of Virginia Baptist Children’s Home and Family Services d/b/a HopeTree Family Services (Salem CI) f/k/a the Virginia Baptist Children’s Home f/k/a Baptist Orphanage of Virginia, property owner, located at 1000 block Red Lane and a portion of 860 Mount Vernon Lane (Tax Map Nos. 41-1-1, 41-1-2, 41-1-3, 41-1-4, 41-1-5, 41-1-6, and a portion of 44-3-10) be and the same is hereby changed from the zoning classification RSF Residential Single Family to the zoning classification PUD Planned Unit District with proffered conditions set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto, and the map referred to shall be changed in this respect and no other, said property being described as follows: Beginning at a point at the intersection of the North line of West Carrollton Avenue and the East line of North Broad Street, thence along the East line of North Broad Street N 27°07'26" W a distance of 405.00' to a point at the terminus of North Broad Street; thence S 62°50'44" W a distance of 220.00' to a point; thence N 27°07'26" W a distance of 56.58' to a point; thence S 65°21'08" W a distance of 20.97' to a point; thence N 60°42'55" W a distance of 39.80' to a point; thence S 65°51'41" W a distance of 177.30' to a point; thence S 66°49'50" W a distance of 165.36' to a point; thence N 27°06'48" W a distance of 127.34' to a point; thence S 60°36'41" W a distance of 49.06' to a point; thence N 29°18'28" W a distance of 127.22' to a point; thence N 27°59'13" W a distance of 401.04' to a point; thence S 61°59'55" W a distance of 12.00' to a point; thence N 71°49'41" W a distance of 152.51' to a point; thence N 60°22'31" E a distance of 118.03' to a point; thence N 19°56'17" W a distance of 1088.42' to a point on the South line of Interstate 81; thence along the South line of Interstate 81 N 51°21'30" E a distance of 390.06' to a point; thence N 59°46'44" E a distance of 100.89' to a point; thence N 42°21'32" E a distance of 100.52' to a point; thence N 52°01'06" E a distance of 380.85' to a point at the intersection of the South line of Interstate 81 and the West line of Red Lane; thence along the West line of Red Lane S 08°26'28" E a distance of 365.95' to a point; thence S 08°55'13" E a distance of 83.12' to a point; thence with a curve turning to the left with an arc length of 353.82', with a radius of 320.00', with a chord bearing of S 40°35'45" E, with a chord length of 336.07', to a point; thence S 72°16'18" E a distance of 141.44' to a point; thence with a non-tangent curve turning to the right with an arc length of 318.24', with a radius of 710.00', with a chord bearing of S 58°42'30" E, with a chord length of 315.58', to a point; thence S 45°54'08" E a distance of 839.41' to a point ; thence S 67°53'11" W a distance of 9.99' to a point; thence S 22°06'49" E a distance of 315.70' to a point; thence leaving the West line of Red Lane S 60°35'11" W a distance of 190.10' to a point; thence S 22°06'49" E a distance of 100.00' to a point; thence S 37°19'34" E a distance of 95.13' to a point; thence S 28°44'42" E a distance of 122.90' to a point on the North line of West Carrollton Avenue; thence along the North line of West Carrollton Avenue S 62°51'48" W a distance of 676.02' to a point; which is the point of beginning, having an area of 2,714,568 square feet, 62.318 acres, being known as part of tax map number 44-3-10 and lying in the City of Salem, Virginia. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed. Page 59 of 241 {00563605.DOCX } That pursuant to Section 106.228.4(G) of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance, the adoption of ordinance shall constitute acceptance of the HopeTree preliminary master plan and acceptance of the plan’s provision and concepts as proffers as stated in the August 30, 2024 rezoning application and the October 25, 2024 supplement to the Rezoning application. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its final passage. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: H. Hunter Holliday – William D. Jones – Byron Randolph Foley – James W. Wallace, III – Renee F. Turk – Passed: December _______, 2024 Effective: December ______, 2024 /s/ Mayor ATTEST: H. Robert Light, Clerk Page 60 of 241 REZONING NARRATIVE The Owner, VIRGINIA BAPTIST CHILDREN’S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES d/b/a HOPETREE FAMILY SERVICES (SALEM CI) f/k/a THE VIRGINIA BAPTIST CHILDREN’S HOME f/k/a BAPTIST ORPHANAGE OF VIRGINIA (“HopeTree” or “Owner”), provides this Rezoning Narrative as part of its new Rezoning Application. Being part of the Salem community for over 100 years, HopeTree values its community partners in carrying out its mission “through God’s love, [to] foster hope by empowering families, youth, and adults to lead fulfilling lives.” To that end, HopeTree is committed to remaining as an integral part of this community for years to come as it works to fulfil those goals. Due to litigation that was filed in July 2024, HopeTree is now aware of allegations of procedural concerns with the rezoning approval process from the previous rezoning application that HopeTree filed on December 1, 2023. The original application, dated November 30, 2023, was ultimately approved and adopted by City Council on June 24, 2024, as an amendment to Section 106-110, Article I, Chapter 106, of the Code of the City of Salem, Virginia. HopeTree does not wish for any uncertainties surrounding the procedural processes to detract from its efforts on behalf of those HopeTree serves. For this reason, HopeTree is filing this new Rezoning Application to again request that the City of Salem approve the enclosed Rezoning plan. This new Application is substantially similar to the original application filed on December 1, 2023, as approved by City Council on June 24, 2024. HopeTree makes this filing to provide certainty in, and to show its community partners and supporters that it values the Salem community’s perspective of, this rezoning process. HopeTree is optimistic that the community, Planning Commission, and City Council will support its future vision as defined in this filing. By submitting this new Rezoning Application, HopeTree, as Owner, is requesting that the City of Salem ordain, reordain, amend, reamend, adopt and/or readopt Section 106-110, Article I, Chapter 106, of the Code of the City of Salem, Virginia, as outlined in this Rezoning Application. The Owner requests that in reviewing this new Rezoning Application, the City of Salem consider and include in its records, all the Planning Commission, City Staff, citizen comments, and any and all materials utilized in reviewing the similar rezoning application that Owner filed on December 1, 2023 (dated November 30, 2023). As outlined in the PUD document, the vision for this property is to allow for the development of a fully integrated, mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented neighborhood woven into the campus of buildings and surrounding open space that exists on the property, while being sensitive to, and providing meaningful connections to, the surrounding neighborhoods in the community. On behalf of the Owner, we are providing the narrative below as supplemental information to support the rezoning application and Planned Unit District (PUD) document with associated zoning information and guidelines for the development. This request is to rezone existing Tax Parcels 41-1-1, 41-1-2, 41-1-3, 41- 1-4, 41-1-5, 41-1-6, and a portion of existing Tax Parcel 44-3-10 from RSF-Residential Single Family, to PUD-Planned Unit District for a proposed mixed-use neighborhood to be developed on the property. Project Narrative The portion of the property that is proposed to be rezoned is approximately 62.318 acres along Red Lane and East Carrollton Avenue. The parcel is owned, operated, and occupied by Virginia Baptist Children’s Home and Family Services d/b/a HopeTree Family Services (Salem CI) (“Owner”), formerly known as Virgnia Baptist Children’s Home. The property offers a wide range of ministries for at-risk children and youth and their families. These services include Treatment Foster Care, the Academy secondary educational Aug 2024 Page 61 of 241 program, and Therapeutic Group Home. Facilities on the property also serve the needs of adults with intellectual disabilities and their families through the Developmental Disabilities Ministry. Over the last several decades, the use of this property has changed significantly, mainly due to a changing regulatory environment surrounding the specific types of services that have occupied the Salem campus. At its peak, when the property was an orphanage, the campus was home to more than 400 youth ranging in age from 5 to 18. New regulations have discouraged the type of large-scale group home that existed on this campus in the past and have moved instead toward smaller-scale facilities that are integrated with the surrounding communities in which they are located. Because of limits from licensing bodies, the campus is now limited to housing no more than 16 youth residents ages 13 to 17. In the past, youth would live on the campus for years until they turned 18. Today, youth residents typically stay no more than 6 months before being moved to another setting or back to their home. Care for youth and adults is moving away from a congregate, campus-style setting. Today, most services are offered in the communities in which they already live. As a result, the Owner no longer has a need for the large amount of property that exists at this site; however, there is a strong desire to stay true to their roots and maintain a presence in this location. The Board of Directors has been discussing options for the Salem campus since 2007. Several recommendations have been considered over the years, including selling the Salem campus property and moving elsewhere, or selling a portion of property along the Red Lane frontage for development. The proposed rezoning request is a result of the Owner’s desire to “do more” with the property and to create something that will benefit the Owner, the City of Salem, and its residents for years to come. The proposed PUD rezoning and associated development will allow the Owner to remain on the property where they have so much history, while integrating existing services with the proposed development, which is in keeping with the intent of the new regulations. The Owner is currently teamed with a residential home builder (Stateson Homes) and commercial builder (Snyder & Associates), who are providing construction expertise on the project. Existing Conditions Existing improvements on the site include approximately 20 buildings of varying condition, drive aisles and parking areas, pool, tennis and basketball courts, two existing baseball fields near Red Lane, picnic shelter, above-ground stormwater management facility, and other miscellaneous improvements. The existing improvements have served various purposes for the Owner over the years and many of them are under-utilized or no longer utilized at all. Many of the buildings are centered around the core area in the center of the site. Six of these buildings are currently vacant and will not be used again by the Owner, and were previously planned to be demolished. The proposed development envisions preserving as many of these structures as possible and converting them to residential or commercial uses that the entire community can benefit from. Utilizing the existing structures will preserve the unique character of the campus and allow this existing infrastructure to be re- purposed for the intended new uses. Existing topography is rolling with a ridge through the middle of the site running north to south that contains much of the existing development. There is an existing pond and two existing creeks on the property. One creek is on the west side to the south of the pond and the other creek is located in the southeast corner of the site. These features are anticipated to remain and have been incorporated into the Master Plan. There is a wooded area near the pond and creek along the western side of the property and this vegetation will be preserved to the extent practical. Page 62 of 241 The property has frontage on the public rights-of-way of Red Lane, East Carrollton Avenue, North Broad Street, and Mount Vernon Avenue. This property is designated for residential use on the City of Salem Future Land Use Map dated June 11, 2012. The property is surrounded by Interstate 81 to the north and existing residential development on other sides. Community Vision The intent of this project is to preserve the existing campus and buildings to the extent practical (including the buildings that were previously planned to be demolished) and provide new and infill development, where appropriate. Guiding principles of the project are to create a new community that minimizes traffic congestion, suburban sprawl, site grading, infrastructure costs, and preserves natural features and amenities. The plan for the proposed project is based on neighborhood design and development conventions which were widely used in the United States up until the 1940s and were based on the principles outlined throughout the PUD document. A design charette was held in October 2022 to solicit input from, and engage with, adjacent property owners, City staff, elected City officials, and other stakeholders for the project. While engaging with the community during the development of the Master Plan, it was noted that the existing neighborhood lacks pedestrian amenities such as sidewalks or trails. Residents currently walk along Red Lane and the speed of traffic along this road was also cited as a major concern. It is the intent of the project to reduce vehicle trips and encourage pedestrian activity by limiting the width of vehicular drives, providing on-street parking where possible, and providing a network of sidewalks and trails throughout the property. In addition to these design principles, the project also proposes to install on-street parking along the frontage of Red Lane, which will slow traffic and provide additional parking opportunities, and to install a new sidewalk along the frontage of Red Lane to provide safe pedestrian accommodations for the surrounding community. Density The City of Salem has very limited land resources remaining to be developed and it is paramount to utilize these remaining land resources to their true potential. The proposed PUD plan allows for the property to be developed to its potential while also being sensitive to the existing community and its residents. These are guiding principles of this PUD plan. The density of the development will be limited by what is allowed in the PUD document. The total number of residential units shall not exceed 340. Residential uses will make up the majority of the development with the proposed commercial uses and existing institutional uses being integrated into the overall development. The commercial uses within the development will be determined based on what this community can support but is anticipated to consist of smaller users that are integrated into the neighborhood at an appropriate scale and in thoughtful locations. Approximately 40% of the property will be preserved either in a natural state or as public or private open space areas. This includes the large area on the west side of the site that contains the existing pond, creek, and natural vegetation. Several interior open space areas will be provided as well, including the proposed lawn area near the center of the site. Development Guidelines The development of the property will be governed by the PUD document. Lot development regulations, architectural standards, etc. are provided within the document and will be enforceable throughout the development. Allowable uses are outlined in the Use Table that is provided within the PUD document. Roads Roads and drive aisles internal to the development will be private. On-street parking will be a preferred parking solution for the development and will be utilized where practical. All proposed roads will be paved, Page 63 of 241 and we will work with the appropriate City staff to ensure that sufficient access for emergency and trash collection vehicles is provided. A network of sidewalks will be provided throughout the development to encourage pedestrian activity and connectivity, as this is a central theme of the project. On-street parking and new sidewalk will be provided on Red Lane along the frontage of the property. The intent of these improvements is to slow traffic along this section of Red Lane, provide additional public parking opportunities, and to provide a dedicated pedestrian accommodation where one does not exist now. This section of Red Lane has a significant amount of pedestrian activity, and these improvements will serve existing and new residents. Access There are existing vehicular access points on Red Lane (2 locations) and East Carrollton Avenue (1 location). Additional access points are proposed along Red Lane, East Carrollton Avenue, and at the end of North Broad Street. One of the central themes within this development is to provide multiple access points to increase connectivity within the existing street grid pattern and to allow vehicular trips to be distributed to the existing road network more efficiently. As requested by the City, a Traffic Study was prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc., dated December 1, 2023, last revised February 1, 2024, that analyzes the development and impacts to three existing intersections (Red Lane/East Carrollton Avenue, East Carrollton Avenue/Mount Vernon Lane, and East Carrollton Avenue/North Broad Street) that are adjacent to the project. In addition to this, turn lane warrants have been analyzed for the existing and proposed entrances into the property. Traffic counts were conducted at two existing intersections to serve as the basis for the study. As outlined in the Traffic Study, the surrounding road network is sufficient to handle traffic from the proposed development and impacts to delay and level of service are minimal. The development does not meet any turn lane warrants at any of the proposed access points. Sight distance requirements will be required to be met with the final development plans. The City of Salem Engineering Department sent the traffic study to a third party reviewer, Mattern & Craig. Mattern and Craig issued a comment letter dated December 20, 2023 requesting additional information and analysis. The comments were addressed, and Mattern & Craig issued a letter on February 20, 2024 indicating that the revised study addressed the concerns with the original study and that the study conforms with industry standards. A copy of this letter is included with the rezoning application. Utilities This project will be served by public water and sewer. As discussed with the City of Salem Water and Sewer Department, sufficient capacity exists within the existing public water and sewer systems to serve the proposed development. Public water and sewer will be extended through the property to serve the existing and proposed buildings and replace the existing private utility systems that are currently in place. New public water mains are anticipated to provide additional interconnectivity and redundancy in the system, which will improve service to the property and the surrounding area. Comprehensive Development Plan This project is in conformance with many of the Goals and Objectives defined in the City of Salem’s current Comprehensive Plan. The development pattern for this project is sensitive to the existing surrounding neighborhoods by centering the most intense uses near the core of the property furthest from the existing residential houses. The least intense residential uses are located around the perimeter of the property, closest to the existing roadways and existing residential homes. The variety of housing types acknowledges and addresses the need for new housing and varying types of housing in the City of Salem. The intent of the Page 64 of 241 project is to maximize the development potential of the most developable portions of the property and to preserve the most environmentally sensitive areas of the property. The preservation of open space, development of pedestrian amenities, and extensive landscaping will all enhance the neighborhood and directly address the goals of improving the beauty and appearance of the City of Salem and Preserving and Enhancing Open Space on Private properties. Summary The proposed development regulations and Master Plan are fully outlined in the PUD document, attached to this application. It is the intent that this be the official document that will guide the development of this property. The Owner has repeatedly stated that its three main goals for the project are “to honor the history of the organization on this campus, to position us for the future, and to make our community proud.” We are extremely excited to submit this application for rezoning. This project provides an excellent opportunity for the City of Salem to gain a new mixed-use community that will serve existing and future residents of Salem. The proposed project will provide many different housing types, while being sensitive to the surrounding residential neighborhoods, preserving important natural features, and providing services and amenities that will benefit the entire community. Page 65 of 241 1 City of Salem Rezoning Application Pre-application Meeting (optional) •Meetings with the Community Development Staff are recommended prior to submittal of a rezoning application. Please bring a plat to the meeting with a sketch of your proposal. Application Submittal •The application deadline is the first of the month for inclusion on the following month’s agenda. If the first falls on a weekend or holiday, the application deadline will be the following business day. •When submitting an application be sure to include the following: a complete application, plat of the subject property, legal description that includes metes and bounds, and supplementary information to support the request (such as conceptual plans and building elevations). Please note: incomplete applications will not be accepted and will be returned to the applicant. •The application fee is due at time of submittal. (See Page 4) •PLEASE NOTE: As per 106-520(C) of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance no application shall be accepted for a lot or parcel that does not comply with the minimum lot area, width, or frontage requirements of the requested zoning district. A variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals must be obtained prior to the submission of a rezoning application. Application Distribution for City Review •Complete applications may be routed to City departments for review. Staff/Applicant Meeting •The staff may contact the applicant to schedule a meeting to discuss comments provided by reviewing agencies, to request additional information or plan revisions, and to negotiate proffers. Planning Commission •Revised conceptual plans and draft proffers must be submitted prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Proffers and conceptual plans may be revised in accordance with Staff’s recommendations, and revisions incorporating the staff’s recommendations must be submitted prior to the Planning Commission meeting. •A staff report and recommendation is included in the Planning Commission packet. The packet is distributed approximately 1 week prior to the Planning Commission meeting. •The Planning Commission meets on the 1st Wednesday after the 1st City Council meeting of the month. •Following a public hearing on the rezoning case, the Planning Commission may recommend approval, approval with revisions to the proffers, denial, or deferral of the application. City Council •Signed and notarized final proffers must be submitted prior to the City Council meeting. •A staff report containing the recommendation of the Planning Commission and Staff is sent to the City Council prior to the meeting. •The City Council typically hears rezoning cases on the 4th Monday of every month. Cases are usually heard by Council at the meeting following the Planning Commission meeting. •Following a public hearing on the case, the City Council may vote to approve, approve with proffered conditions, deny, defer the application to another meeting, or remand the application back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. Aug 2024 3DJgRI 2 TO THE APPLICANT: It is the policy of the City of Salem City Council, the City of Salem Planning Commission, and City of Salem Board of Zoning Appeals to require a property to be posted when a zoning action is being considered. Such a posting notifies the general public of an impending action and the location being considered. It is incumbent on you, the applicant, to e nsure the sign is in the proper location and remains there until an action has taken place. Consequently, the procedure for posting is as follows: 1.The Community Development Staff will post the sign on your property. 2.You should check the location of the sign to make certain it is in the right place on your property. If it is not, notify the Community Development Office as soon as possible. 3.You should check periodically to ensure the safety of the sign. If it is stolen or otherwise harmed, notify the Community Development Office as soon as possible. In submitting this rezoning application, you hereby grant permission to the agents and employees of the City of Salem to enter the referenced property for the purposes of processing and reviewing the above application. Should you have any questions regarding this policy, please contact a member of Community Development. ATTACHMENTS - For ALL REQUESTS you must submit the following electronically: A fully completed signed application. Acknowledgement of Application Fee Payment Procedure (Page 4) Signed Proffer Statement if applicable (Pages 6 & 7) A plat of the subject property, which accurately reflects the current property boundaries, is drawn to scale, and shows existing structures. (Typically, available from the City Clerk’s Office.) Responses to questions on Page 5 Historic Impact Information (if any) For applications requiring plans, please submit electronically only. No hard copies will be accepted. Check here if the conceptual plan will serve as the preliminary plat. NOTE: Elevations will be required with new development. Page 67 of 241 Page 68 of 241 Page 69 of 241 5 PLEASE RESPOND FOR ALL REZONING APPLICATIONS: 1. What is the Future Land Use Designation for the subject property? _______________________________________ 2. Describe in detail the proposed use of the property. _________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3. List any sensitive environmental or unique features on the property. Are there any high voltage transmission lines, public utility lines, or others? ________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4. Is the subject property located within the Floodplain District? YES NO If yes, describe the proposed measures for meeting the standards of the Floodplain Ordinance. ____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5. Is the subject property listed as a historic structure or located within a historic district? YES NO If yes, describe the proposed measures for meeting the standards of the Department of Historic Resources. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6. Have you provided a conceptual plan of the proposed development, including general lot configurations and road locations? Are the proposed lot sizes compatible with existing parcel sizes in the area? PLEASE RESPOND FOR COMMERCIAL REZONING APPLICATIONS 1. What provisions will be made to ensure safe and adequate access to the subject property? 2. How will the traffic impact of this development be addressed? 3. Describe why the proposed use is desirable and appropriate for the area. What measure will be taken to assure that the proposed use will not have a negative impact on the surrounding vicinity? 4. What type of signage is proposed for the site? 5. Have architectural/building elevations been submitted with this application? Page 70 of 241 Page 71 of 241 PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley Shenandoah Valley PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 2 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 2 0 0 2 9 . 0 0 H O P E T R E E M A S T E R P L A N \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 2 0 0 2 9 . 0 0 C i v i l B a s e 6 . 2 9 . 2 0 2 3 . d w g P L O T T E D : 8 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 8 : 0 6 : 1 4 A M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 AAB CPB CPB 8/30/2024 1" = 100' HO P E T R E E P L A N N E D U S E D I S T R I C T PR O P E R T Y E X H I B I T CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A MO U N T V E R N O N A V E N U E EX-A 04220029.00 Aug 2024 Page 72 of 241 PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley Shenandoah Valley PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS J: \ 2 2 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 2 0 0 2 9 . 0 0 H O P E T R E E M A S T E R P L A N \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 2 0 0 2 9 . 0 0 H o p e T r e e P r o p e r t y E x h i b i t . d w g P L O T T E D : 2 / 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 0 : 3 4 : 4 8 A M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 AAB CPB CPB 2/9/2024 1" = 100' HO P E T R E E PR O P E R T Y O W N E R S H I P E X H I B I T CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A MO U N T V E R N O N A V E N U E EX-A 04220029.00 PRE L I M I N A R Y PROPERTY EXPECTED TO BE RETAINED BY HOPETREE (±22 ACRES TOTAL) LEGEND Aug 2024 Page 73 of 241 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE REZONED Beginning at a point at the intersection of the North line of West Carrollton Avenue and the East line of North Broad Street, thence along the East line of North Broad Street N 27°07'26" W a distance of 405.00' to a point at the terminus of North Broad Street; thence S 62°50'44" W a distance of 220.00' to a point; thence N 27°07'26" W a distance of 56.58' to a point; thence S 65°21'08" W a distance of 20.97' to a point; thence N 60°42'55" W a distance of 39.80' to a point; thence S 65°51'41" W a distance of 177.30' to a point; thence S 66°49'50" W a distance of 165.36' to a point; thence N 27°06'48" W a distance of 127.34' to a point; thence S 60°36'41" W a distance of 49.06' to a point; thence N 29°18'28" W a distance of 127.22' to a point; thence N 27°59'13" W a distance of 401.04' to a point; thence S 61°59'55" W a distance of 12.00' to a point; thence N 71°49'41" W a distance of 152.51' to a point; thence N 60°22'31" E a distance of 118.03' to a point; thence N 19°56'17" W a distance of 1088.42' to a point on the South line of Interstate 81; thence along the South line of Interstate 81 N 51°21'30" E a distance of 390.06' to a point; thence N 59°46'44" E a distance of 100.89' to a point; thence N 42°21'32" E a distance of 100.52' to a point; thence N 52°01'06" E a distance of 380.85' to a point at the intersection of the South line of Interstate 81 and the West line of Red Lane; thence along the West line of Red Lane S 08°26'28" E a distance of 365.95' to a point; thence S 08°55'13" E a distance of 83.12' to a point; thence with a curve turning to the left with an arc length of 353.82', with a radius of 320.00', with a chord bearing of S 40°35'45" E, with a chord length of 336.07', to a point; thence S 72°16'18" E a distance of 141.44' to a point; thence with a non-tangent curve turning to the right with an arc length of 318.24', with a radius of 710.00', with a chord bearing of S 58°42'30" E, with a chord length of 315.58', to a point; thence S 45°54'08" E a distance of 839.41' to a point ; thence S 67°53'11" W a distance of 9.99' to a point; thence S 22°06'49" E a distance of 315.70' to a point; thence leaving the West line of Red Lane S 60°35'11" W a distance of 190.10' to a point; thence S 22°06'49" E a distance of 100.00' to a point; thence S 37°19'34" E a distance of 95.13' to a point; thence S 28°44'42" E a distance of 122.90' to a point on the North line of West Carrollton Avenue; thence along the North line of West Carrollton Avenue S 62°51'48" W a distance of 676.02' to a point; which is the point of beginning, having an area of 2,714,568 square feet, 62.318 acres, being known as part of tax map number 44-3-10 and lying in the City of Salem, Virginia. Aug 2024 Page 74 of 241 1 HOPETREE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Traffic Impact Study B&A Project #04220029.00 Date: December 1, 2023 Revised: February 2, 2024 Planners | Architects | Engineers | Surveyors 1208 Corporate Circle, Roanoke, VA 24018 www.balzer.cc Aug 2024 unchanged from Feb 2024 Page 75 of 241 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR HOPETREE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TAX MAP #: 44-3-10 860 MOUNT VERNON LANE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA B&A PROJECT #04220029.00 DATE: December 1, 2023 REVISED: February 2, 2024 PLANNERS ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Phone: (540) 772-9580 Page 76 of 241 Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………. 1 2. Analysis of Existing Conditions………………………………………………………....... 4 3. Analysis of Future Conditions Without Development.……..…………………………... 6 4. Trip Generation.…………………………………………………………………….……… 8 5. Site Traffic Distribution and Assignment…………………………..……………………. 11 6. Analysis of Future Conditions with Development……….…………………….............. 14 7. Turn Lane Warrants……………………………….……….…………………….............. 18 8. Conclusions………………………………………………………………………………… 20 Appendix A – Vicinity Map………………………………………………………………... 21 Appendix B – P.U.D. Master Plan…..…………………..………………….……………. 23 Appendix C – Existing Traffic Data………………………………………………………. 25 Appendix D – VDOT Turn Lane Worksheets…………………………………………… 28 Appendix E – Synchro 11 and SimTraffic 11 Intersection Analysis Data……………. 33 2023 Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis………………………………………… 34 2023 Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis………………………………………… 43 2028 Background AM Peak Hour Analysis……………………………………. 52 2028 Background PM Peak Hour Analysis……………………………………. 61 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hour Analysis…..……………………….…………… 70 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hour Analysis………..………………………………. 79 Page 77 of 241 List of Figures Fig. 1 – 2023 Existing Turning Movements…..……………………..………….……............………..5 Fig. 2 – 2028 Projected Turning Movements..…………………………..............................………..7 Fig. 3 – Site-Generated Entering Movements..……………...………….............................………..12 Fig. 4 – Site-Generated Exiting Movements..…...…………...………….............................………..13 Fig. 5 –2028 Buildout Turning Movements..…………..….…...………………..………….……........15 List of Tables Table 1 – LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections (HCM)………...……………………………..3 Table 2 – Site-Generated Traffic…………………...…..…………………………….…….....………..8 Table 3 – Site-Generated Traffic w/ 25% Reduction…………………...…..……....…….....………..10 Table 4 – Red Lane & East Carrollton Avenue LOS & Queuing Analysis……….………..………..16 Table 5 – Mount Vernon Lane & East Carrollton Avenue LOS & Queuing Analysis…….………..16 Table 6 – North Broad Street & East Carrollton Avenue LOS & Queuing Analysis….…..………..17 Page 78 of 241 Traffic Study 1 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 1. Introduction HopeTree Family Services is proposing to rezone 62.318 acres of land located along Red Lane in the City of Salem (see Appendix A for vicinity map). The property is proposed to be rezoned from RSF, Residential Single Family, to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The P.U.D. Land Use Plan, prepared by Civic by Design, is included in Appendix B. The development will have a mix of residential and commercial use types. The maximum number of residential units allowed for this development is 340 and these are assumed to be broken down by type as outlined in the list below. Residential and commercial uses will be determined by market conditions and opportunities available at the time of development. The list below outlines the uses that have been assumed for the purposes of this traffic study. •115 Single-Family Detached Dwelling Units •140 Single-Family Attached Dwelling Units •85 Multi-Family Dwelling Units •60 Total Hotel Rooms •15,000 s.f. of Total General Office Space •7,500 s.f. of Total Restaurant Space The breakdown of uses above is based on what is considered to be a reasonable and conservative expectation for the development based on the P.U.D. Land Use Plan. The actual breakdown will differ from these assumptions. It is recommended that projected trip generation be tracked as the development progresses for comparison to the traffic study. If the actual development results in significantly more traffic than what is included in these assumptions, then it may be necessary to update this study. The site is located on the west side of Red Lane with East Carrollton Avenue to the south and Interstate 81 to the north. The property is described as City of Salem Tax Parcel #44-3-10. The development has several proposed existing and proposed entrances on Red Lane, East Carrollton Avenue, and North Broad Street. Page 79 of 241 Traffic Study 2 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 As discussed with the City of Salem, the following intersections will be analyzed to determine levels of service with the proposed development: •Red Lane and East Carrollton Avenue (Unsignalized) •East Carrollton Avenue and Mount Vernon Lane (Unsignalized) •East Carrollton Avenue and North Broad Street (Unsignalized) All roads in the direct vicinity of the project are two-lane local roads that provide access between mostly residential areas. A mix of residential building types is present in this area, including single-family, two-family, townhome, and multi-family units. Roanoke College is located approximately 0.25 miles from the site to the southeast. The Main Street and downtown Salem commercial corridor is located approximately 0.7 miles south of the site. There are also two golf courses located in this area, Hanging Rock Golf Course to the north and Salem Municipal Golf Course to the west. Red Lane is utilized as a connection between downtown Salem, Hanging Rock Golf Course, and existing residential developments to the north. The speed limit on all of the local roads in the direct vicinity of the project is 25 mph. Three scenarios will be considered: Existing Condition 2023, Background Condition 2028, and Buildout Condition 2028 to determine the effects of the background traffic growth and the proposed development on the levels of service at the existing intersections. Level of service (LOS) for unsignalized intersections is evaluated based on control delay per vehicle and the driver’s perception of those conditions. Control delay is the portion of the total delay attributed to the control at the intersection. Table 1 depicts the LOS scale with corresponding control delay per vehicle, with LOS “A” representing the best operating conditions and LOS “F” representing the worst. Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level Of Service Avg. Control Delay (Sec./Veh) A < 10 B > 10 – 15 C > 15 – 25 D > 25 – 35 E > 35 – 50 F > 50 Table 1: LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections (HCM) Page 80 of 241 Traffic Study 3 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 The Synchro 11 software was used for traffic modeling and analysis. This study was undertaken by Balzer and Associates, Inc. to: •determine the total number of vehicle trips generated by the potential development to be added to the adjacent street network; •determine the impacts to level of service and queue lengths at the existing intersections as a result of the background traffic growth and from the proposed development; •determine if any roadway or intersection improvements are warranted as a result of the proposed development; •and to determine turn lane/taper requirements at the proposed entrances to the site. Page 81 of 241 Traffic Study 4 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 2. Analysis of Existing Conditions The site is currently owned and operated by HopeTree Family Services and has been for many years. Changing regulations over the last several decades have greatly decreased the number of permanent residents that are allowed to be housed at the site at any one time. There are many existing buildings, some of which are still in use by HopeTree, and others that are no longer in use. Among other things, the site includes a school, group homes for children and adults, and offices where staff members work on-site. Other improvements on-site include access drives and parking areas, pool and athletic courts, two existing baseball fields near Red Lane, and other miscellaneous improvements. There is an existing pond and two existing creeks located on the site as well and these will be preserved to the extent practical. All intersections in the vicinity of the site are unsignalized. 2021 VDOT traffic count data is available for Red Lane just to the north of the site in Roanoke County, and this data is provided below as general background information. 2021 VDOT Traffic Count Data: Red Lane, Rte. 705 (from Salem/Roanoke County line to North Road) AADT = 1,100 vpd Directional Factor = not provided K Factor = not provided In addition to the VDOT published traffic count data, manual traffic counts were performed at two of the study intersections. Counts were performed at the Red Lane/East Carrollton Avenue intersection and the East Carrollton Avenue/North Broad Street intersection on Tuesday, October 3, 2023 from 7:00 AM – 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM – 6:00 PM to capture the AM and PM peak hours. All turning and through movements were counted to facilitate analysis of the intersections. The manual traffic count data for these intersections is provided in Appendix C. After the first review of the traffic study, it was requested by the City of Salem that the intersection of East Carrollton Avenue/Mount Vernon Lane be added to the analysis. Traffic volumes for this intersection were derived from the previous counts that were obtained at the other two intersections. In addition, a site visit was made to observe traffic patterns at this intersection during the peak traffic times to inform the breakdown of turning movements at each approach. Figure 1 graphically depicts the existing peak hour traffic volumes at all intersections. The Synchro 11 software was used to analyze delay and level of service for existing weekday AM and PM peak hours. The Synchro 11 results are included in Appendix E. Page 82 of 241 Page 83 of 241 Traffic Study 6 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 3. Analysis of Future Conditions Without Development It is anticipated that the proposed development will be constructed and in use by the year 2028. To analyze the future conditions and obtain the projected background traffic volumes, an annual growth factor was applied to the existing traffic volumes. Based on historical VDOT traffic data, the average growth rate over the last 10 years or so has been approximately 1% on Red Lane and there has actually been a reduction in traffic volume over the last 5 years. To provide a conservative analysis, a 1.5% annual growth rate was applied to bring the existing traffic volumes from the current year of 2023 to the buildout year of 2028. Figure 2 graphically depicts the projected background traffic in the year 2028 with the growth rate applied. The Synchro 11 software was used to analyze delay and level of service for background weekday AM and PM peak hours. The Synchro 11 results are included in Appendix E. Page 84 of 241 Page 85 of 241 Traffic Study 8 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 4. Trip Generation Trip generation for this study was based on the anticipated and assumed uses outlined in the Introduction and information provided by the developer regarding the possible uses of the property. The policies and procedures found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, were employed to determine the potential site generated traffic volumes for the proposed development for the average weekday and AM and PM peak hours. Trip generation calculations were performed using the equations provided in the ITE manual. Table 2 shows the potential site-generated traffic for this development. Trip Generation Land Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Weekday Proposed Development ITE Code Independent Variable Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Total Single-Family Detached Housing 210 115 Dwelling Units 21 64 85 71 42 113 1,147 Single-Family Attached Housing 215 140 Dwelling Units 17 50 67 47 33 80 1,016 Multi-Family Housing (Low- Rise) 220 85 Dwelling Units 12 37 49 36 21 57 620 Hotel 310 60 Rooms 13 10 23 8 9 17 227 General Office 710 15,000 s.f.29 4 33 6 28 34 223 Sit-Down Restaurants 932 7,500 s.f.39 33 72 41 27 68 804 Total 131 198 329 209 160 369 4,037 Table 2: Site-Generated Traffic Please note that the table above does not include traffic volumes for the HopeTree school or office uses. These specific uses are already taking place on the site and will not be trips that are “added” to the street network. The addition of the other use types on-site may actually reduce some of the existing trips due to the fact that some of the existing trips may be redirected to or from the new facilities that are developed within the site. The intent of the proposed development is to provide a cohesive, connected, walkable community where pedestrian connectivity is a primary focus and vehicular trips are secondary. Due to the nature of the development and the mix of residential, commercial, institutional, and other uses, a portion of the site-generated trips will be pedestrian trips and/or “internally Page 86 of 241 Traffic Study 9 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 captured”. Internal capture reductions consider site trips “captured” within a mixed-use development, recognizing that trips from one land use can access another land use within a development without having to access the adjacent street system. It is well-documented that this type of pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use development will result in less traffic to the adjacent street network than what is calculated using traditional trip generation methods. It should also be noted that ITE and VDOT both have methodologies for estimating trip generation reduction for mixed-use developments. These methodologies require a high level of detail about proposed uses that is not available at this time for this particular development. In addition, these methodologies also do not adequately account for other characteristics of this development that are expected to further reduce traffic. These include urban design principles such as proximity between uses interior and exterior to the development, proximity to Roanoke College and downtown, and the very nature of the development which is to prioritize pedestrian connectivity and walkability and de-emphasize vehicle trips. Walkable mixed-use developments have been documented to reduce traffic dependent on factors such as location, density, mix of uses, etc. A report by the American Planning Association entitled “Getting Trip Generation Right: Eliminating the Bias Against Mixed Use Development,” indicates that, on average, conventional trip generation methods overestimate trip generation by 49 percent for typical mixed-use developments. It is acknowledged that this development does not have all of the characteristics that would warrant a 49 percent reduction in traffic. However, it is expected to share many of the same characteristics such as density, diversification of uses, proximity between uses, and walkability. Based on the characteristics and initiatives of this P.U.D. development and utilizing engineering judgement, a 25% reduction was deemed to be reasonable for this project. Table 3 below shows the potential site-generated traffic for this development with the internal capture reduction applied. Page 87 of 241 Traffic Study 10 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 Trip Generation Land Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Weekday Proposed Development ITE Code Independent Variable Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Total Single-Family Detached Housing 210 115 Dwelling Units 16 48 64 53 32 85 860 Single-Family Attached Housing 215 140 Dwelling Units 13 37 50 35 25 60 762 Multi-Family Housing (Low- Rise) 220 85 Dwelling Units 9 28 37 27 16 43 465 Hotel 310 60 Rooms 10 8 18 6 7 13 170 General Office 710 15,000 s.f.22 3 25 4 21 25 167 High-Turnover Sit- Down Restaurant 932 7,500 s.f.29 25 54 31 20 51 603 Total 99 149 248 156 121 277 3,027 Table 3: Site-Generated Traffic w/ 25% Reduction Page 88 of 241 Traffic Study 11 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 5. Site Traffic Distribution and Assignment The distribution of potential site generated traffic was completed by applying engineering judgement based on knowledge of the proposed uses, as well as the surrounding area. These assumptions were then applied to the site generated traffic to determine the ingress/egress movements at each entrance and in each direction. Traffic will enter to and exit from the site to the north toward I-81 or to the south or west to go toward downtown Salem. There are several entrances planned for the site in strategic locations to disperse traffic and efficiently distribute vehicles to the adjacent road system in an interconnected grid-type network that is similar to what already exists to the north of Main Street. This development is proposed to have four access points on Red Lane, three access points on East Carrollton Avenue, and one access point on North Broad Street. The roadway network creates a network of streets within the development with a high level of interconnectivity both internally and externally to the existing streets. After distribution of trips to the roadway, trips were distributed to each road and intersection based on the assumptions described above. Traffic assignment for traffic entering the development is shown graphically in Figure 3 and for traffic exiting the development is shown graphically in Figure 4. Page 89 of 241 Page 90 of 241 Page 91 of 241 Traffic Study 14 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 6. Analysis of Future Conditions With Development The buildout traffic was calculated by adding the 2028 background traffic (Figure 2) to the site-generated traffic (Figures 3 and 4). The 2028 buildout traffic for each of the study intersections is shown in Figure 5. The intersections were then modeled and evaluated using the Synchro 11 software. Tables 4 and 5 provide a summary of the levels of service and delays calculated at each intersection for the 2023 Existing, 2028 Background, and 2028 Buildout conditions. The detailed Synchro 11 reports are included in Appendix E. As shown in the data, all approaches at the two study intersections will function at the same level of service in the Buildout condition as they do in the Existing and Background conditions, with minimal increases in delay. No further improvements are warranted or recommended as a result of the development traffic. Page 92 of 241 Page 93 of 241 Traffic Study 16 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 Red Lane and East Carrollton Avenue AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR CONDITION LANE GROUP LANE LOS (delay) Max. Queue (ft.) LANE LOS (delay) Max. Queue (ft.) NBLT A (7.4)40 A (7.9)52 EBLR A (7.4)31 A (7.9)39Existing 2023 Condition SBTR A (7.2)52 A (7.3)55 NBLT A (7.5)47 A (7.9)53 EBLR A (7.5)37 A (8.0)48 Background 2028 Condition SBTR A (7.3)55 A (7.4)55 NBLT A (7.7)46 A (8.4)56 EBLR A (7.7)37 A (8.4)44 Buildout 2028 Condition SBTR A (7.6)57 A (7.7)62 Table 4: Red Lane & East Carrollton Avenue LOS & Queuing Analysis Mount Vernon Lane and East Carrollton Avenue AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR CONDITION LANE GROUP LANE LOS (delay) Max. Queue (ft.) LANE LOS (delay) Max. Queue (ft.) NBLTR A (7.5)34 A (7.7)34 EBLTR A (7.5)53 A (7.8)61 WBLTR A (7.5)55 A (7.9)68 Existing 2023 Condition SBLTR A (7.0)31 A (7.4)34 NBLTR A (7.6)43 A (7.8)32 EBLTR A (7.5)60 A (7.9)61 WBLTR A (7.5)52 A (8.0)70 Background 2028 Condition SBLTR A (7.1)31 A (7.4)33 NBLTR A (7.8)47 A (8.1)40 EBLTR A (7.9)62 A (8.5)66 WBLTR A (7.9)62 A (8.4)61 Buildout 2028 Condition SBLTR A (7.5)45 A (7.8)44 Table 5: Mount Vernon Lane & East Carrollton Avenue LOS & Queuing Analysis Page 94 of 241 Traffic Study 17 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 North Broad Street and East Carrollton Avenue AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR CONDITION LANE GROUP LANE LOS (delay) Max. Queue (ft.) LANE LOS (delay) Max. Queue (ft.) NBLTR B (10.3)49 B (12.1)64 EBL --2 A (7.5)11 WBL A (7.6)22 A (7.7)27 Existing 2023 Condition SBLTR A (8.7)18 B (10.3)28 NBLTR B (10.5)46 B (12.6)77 EBL ----A (7.5)11 WBL A (7.7)15 A (7.7)23 Background 2028 Condition SBLTR A (8.7)18 B (10.5)31 NBLTR B (11.6)50 B (14.8)76 EBL A (7.5)12 A (7.6)41 WBL A (7.8)33 A (7.8)35 Buildout 2028 Condition SBLTR B (10.9)34 B (11.8)47 Table 6: North Broad Street & East Carrollton Avenue LOS & Queuing Analysis Page 95 of 241 Traffic Study 18 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 7. Turn Lane Warrants The analyses to determine turn lane requirements for the new development were completed by following the procedures and methodologies found in the VDOT Road Design Manual, Volume I, Appendix F. Turn lane warrants were analyzed based on the highest volumes for each roadway (Red Lane and East Carrollton Avenue) to show that the warrants are not met and will not be met for any of the intersections. Right-Turn Lane into Site from Red Lane AM Peak Hour Analysis: - 22 Vehicles per Hour Turning Right into site from Red Lane - Approach Volume = 127 + 22 = 149 VPH Red Lane -- Right-Turn Lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Radius Required (please see Appendix D). PM Peak Hour Analysis: - 36 Vehicles per Hour Turning Right into site from Red Lane - Approach Volume = 133 + 36 = 169 VPH Red Lane -- Right-Turn Lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Radius Required (please see Appendix D). Left-Turn Lane into Site from Red Lane AM Peak Hour Analysis: - 7 (9.7%) Vehicles per Hour Turning Left into site from Red Lane Posted Speed Limit = 25 mph - Advancing Volume = 72 VPH - Opposing Volume = 127 VPH -- Left-Turn Lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: None Required (please see Appendix D). PM Peak Hour Analysis: - 11 (6.8%) Vehicles per Hour Turning Left into site from Red Lane Posted Speed Limit = 25 mph - Advancing Volume = 161 VPH - Opposing Volume = 133 VPH -- Left-Turn Lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: None Required (please see Appendix D). Page 96 of 241 Traffic Study 19 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 Right-Turn Lane into Site from East Carrollton Avenue AM Peak Hour Analysis: - 6 Vehicles per Hour Turning Right into site from East Carrollton Avenue - Approach Volume = 122 VPH East Carrollton Avenue -- Right-Turn Lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Radius Required (please see Appendix D). PM Peak Hour Analysis: - 9 Vehicles per Hour Turning Right into site from East Carrollton Avenue - Approach Volume = 166 VPH East Carrollton Avenue -- Right-Turn Lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Radius Required (please see Appendix D). Left-Turn Lane into Site from East Carrollton Avenue AM Peak Hour Analysis: - 8 (8.4%) Vehicles per Hour Turning Left into site from East Carrollton Avenue Posted Speed Limit = 25 mph - Advancing Volume = 95 VPH - Opposing Volume = 122 VPH -- Left-Turn Lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: None Required (please see Appendix D). PM Peak Hour Analysis: - 14 (9.0%) Vehicles per Hour Turning Left into site from East Carrollton Avenue Posted Speed Limit = 25 mph - Advancing Volume = 155 VPH - Opposing Volume = 166 VPH -- Left-Turn Lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: None Required (please see Appendix D). Page 97 of 241 Traffic Study 20 HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 8. Conclusions Based on the data collected, the assumptions made, and the projected site-generated traffic, the results of the analysis are outlined below. •The proposed development will generate additional traffic to the existing road network. •The proposed development results in very minimal increases in delay and queue lengths at the study intersections and all approaches function at the same level of service in the Existing, Background, and Buildout scenarios. •No turn lanes or tapers are warranted by the proposed development. Page 98 of 241 Traffic Study HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 Appendix A Vicinity Map 21 Page 99 of 241 Traffic Study HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 SITE SITE 22 Page 100 of 241 Traffic Study HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 Appendix B P.U.D. Master Plan 23 Page 101 of 241 24 Page 102 of 241 Traffic Study HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 Appendix C Existing Traffic Data 25 Page 103 of 241 TOTALS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY Counted by: VCU Intersection of: North Broad Street Date: October 03, 2023 Tuesday and: Carrollton Avenue Weather: Sunny/Warm Location: Salem, Virginia Entered by: SN Star Rating: 4 TOTAL on:North Broad Street on:North Broad Street on:Carrollton Avenue on:Carrollton Avenue N + S TIME + RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL E + W AM 7:00 - 7:15 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 11 2 0 13 20 5 0 0 25 44 7:15 - 7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 13 2 0 15 21 10 0 0 31 54 7:30 - 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 5 1 18 2 0 21 50 13 0 0 63 89 7:45 - 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 8 0 15 2 0 17 32 20 0 0 52 77 8:00 - 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 0 25 0 0 25 15 18 0 0 33 71 8:15 - 8:30 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 9 0 10 0 16 0 0 16 19 8 0 0 27 54 8:30 - 8:45 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 7 0 8 0 7 0 0 7 25 11 0 0 36 52 8:45 - 9:00 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 5 0 10 0 13 0 0 13 16 9 0 0 25 49 2 Hr Totals 3 3 0 0 6 6 3 56 0 65 1 118 8 0 127 198 94 0 0 292 490 1 Hr Totals 7:00 - 8:00 1 2 0 0 3 2 0 22 0 24 1 57 8 0 66 123 48 0 0 171 264 7:15 - 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 32 0 34 1 71 6 0 78 118 61 0 0 179 291 7:30 - 8:30 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 33 0 36 1 74 4 0 79 116 59 0 0 175 291 7:45 - 8:45 1 1 0 0 2 3 0 36 0 39 0 63 2 0 65 91 57 0 0 148 254 8:00 - 9:00 2 1 0 0 3 4 3 34 0 41 0 61 0 0 61 75 46 0 0 121 226 PEAK HOUR 7:30 - 8:30 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 33 0 36 1 74 4 0 79 116 59 0 0 175 291 PM 4:00 - 4:15 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 8 0 10 0 24 0 0 24 19 17 0 0 36 71 4:15 - 4:30 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 20 0 20 0 20 1 0 21 18 19 0 0 37 79 4:30 - 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 0 13 0 34 1 0 35 15 20 0 0 35 83 4:45 - 5:00 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 18 0 18 0 28 3 0 31 12 18 1 0 31 81 5:00 - 5:15 1 1 0 0 2 2 0 25 0 27 0 35 0 0 35 19 25 1 0 45 109 5:15 - 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 23 0 25 0 36 4 0 40 32 26 1 0 59 124 5:30 - 5:45 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 16 0 16 1 20 1 0 22 17 23 0 0 40 80 5:45 - 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 20 0 22 0 24 2 0 26 19 25 1 0 45 93 2 Hr Totals 3 4 0 0 7 8 1 142 0 151 1 221 12 0 234 151 173 4 0 328 720 1 Hr Totals 4:00 - 5:00 1 2 0 0 3 2 1 58 0 61 0 106 5 0 111 64 74 1 0 139 314 4:15 - 5:15 2 2 0 0 4 2 1 75 0 78 0 117 5 0 122 64 82 2 0 148 352 4:30 - 5:30 1 2 0 0 3 4 1 78 0 83 0 133 8 0 141 78 89 3 0 170 397 4:45 - 5:45 2 3 0 0 5 4 0 82 0 86 1 119 8 0 128 80 92 3 0 175 394 5:00 - 6:00 2 2 0 0 4 6 0 84 0 90 1 115 7 0 123 87 99 3 0 189 406 PEAK HOUR 5:00 - 6:00 2 2 0 0 4 6 0 84 0 90 1 115 7 0 123 87 99 3 0 189 406 TRAFFIC FROM NORTH TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TRAFFIC FROM EAST TRAFFIC FROM WEST 26 Page 104 of 241 TOTALS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY Counted by: VCU Intersection of: Red Lane Date: October 03, 2023 Tuesday and: Carrollton Avenue Weather: Sunny/Warm Location: Salem, Virginia Entered by: SN Star Rating: 4 TOTAL on:Red Lane on:Red Lane on:on:Carrollton Avenue N + S TIME + RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL E + W AM 7:00 - 7:15 12 6 0 0 18 0 3 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 5 28 7:15 - 7:30 9 7 0 0 16 0 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 9 0 11 32 7:30 - 7:45 10 18 0 0 28 0 3 6 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 8 0 11 48 7:45 - 8:00 13 9 0 0 22 0 4 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 0 13 42 8:00 - 8:15 14 9 0 0 23 0 6 6 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 13 0 17 52 8:15 - 8:30 10 11 0 0 21 0 6 4 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 36 8:30 - 8:45 5 2 0 0 7 0 8 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 0 12 28 8:45 - 9:00 10 3 0 0 13 0 6 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 10 0 12 33 2 Hr Totals 83 65 0 0 148 0 37 28 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 61 0 86 299 1 Hr Totals 7:00 - 8:00 44 40 0 0 84 0 11 15 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 26 0 40 150 7:15 - 8:15 46 43 0 0 89 0 14 19 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 37 0 52 174 7:30 - 8:30 47 47 0 0 94 0 19 19 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 31 0 46 178 7:45 - 8:45 42 31 0 0 73 0 24 14 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 32 0 47 158 8:00 - 9:00 39 25 0 0 64 0 26 13 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 35 0 46 149 PEAK HOUR 7:30 - 8:30 47 47 0 0 94 0 19 19 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 31 0 46 178 PM 4:00 - 4:15 18 12 0 0 30 0 13 5 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 13 0 20 68 4:15 - 4:30 16 2 0 0 18 0 9 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 15 0 20 48 4:30 - 4:45 21 7 0 0 28 0 12 7 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 18 0 23 70 4:45 - 5:00 21 10 0 0 31 0 12 4 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 15 0 18 65 5:00 - 5:15 12 8 0 0 20 0 17 11 1 29 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 18 0 25 74 5:15 - 5:30 19 6 0 0 25 0 12 13 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 20 0 27 77 5:30 - 5:45 13 7 0 0 20 0 10 3 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 14 0 16 49 5:45 - 6:00 19 9 0 0 28 0 7 4 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 13 0 20 59 2 Hr Totals 139 61 0 0 200 0 92 48 1 141 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 126 0 169 510 1 Hr Totals 4:00 - 5:00 76 31 0 0 107 0 46 17 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 61 0 81 251 4:15 - 5:15 70 27 0 0 97 0 50 23 1 74 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 66 0 86 257 4:30 - 5:30 73 31 0 0 104 0 53 35 1 89 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 71 0 93 286 4:45 - 5:45 65 31 0 0 96 0 51 31 1 83 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 67 0 86 265 5:00 - 6:00 63 30 0 0 93 0 46 31 1 78 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 65 0 88 259 PEAK HOUR 4:30 - 5:30 73 31 0 0 104 0 53 35 1 89 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 71 0 93 286 TRAFFIC FROM NORTH TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TRAFFIC FROM EAST TRAFFIC FROM WEST 27 Page 105 of 241 Traffic Study HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 Appendix D VDOT Turn Lane Worksheets 28 Page 106 of 241 Road Design Manual Appendix F Page F-89 FIGURE 3-26 WARRANTS FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2-LANE HIGHWAY) Appropriate Radius required at all Intersections and Entrances (Commercial or Private). LEGEND PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adjustment for Right Turns For posted speeds at or under 45 mph, PHV right turns > 40, and PHV total < 300. Adjusted right turns = PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use formula: PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow Note: An average of 11% for K x D will suffice. When right turn facilities are warranted, see Figure 3-1 for design criteria.* * Rev. 1/15 NO TURN LANES OR TAPERS REQUIRED 29 Page 107 of 241 Road Design Manual Appendix F Page F-69 WARRANT FOR LEFT-TURN STORAGE LANES ON TWO-LANE HIGHWAY FIGURE 3-4 WARRANT FOR LEFT TURN STORAGE LANES ON TWO LANE HIGHWAY FIGURE 3-5 WARRANT FOR LEFT TURN STORAGE LANES ON TWO LANE HIGHWAY 30 Page 108 of 241 Road Design Manual Appendix F Page F-89 FIGURE 3-26 WARRANTS FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2-LANE HIGHWAY) Appropriate Radius required at all Intersections and Entrances (Commercial or Private). LEGEND PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adjustment for Right Turns For posted speeds at or under 45 mph, PHV right turns > 40, and PHV total < 300. Adjusted right turns = PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use formula: PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow Note: An average of 11% for K x D will suffice. When right turn facilities are warranted, see Figure 3-1 for design criteria.* * Rev. 1/15 NO TURN LANES OR TAPERS REQUIRED 31 Page 109 of 241 Road Design Manual Appendix F Page F-69 WARRANT FOR LEFT-TURN STORAGE LANES ON TWO-LANE HIGHWAY FIGURE 3-4 WARRANT FOR LEFT TURN STORAGE LANES ON TWO LANE HIGHWAY FIGURE 3-5 WARRANT FOR LEFT TURN STORAGE LANES ON TWO LANE HIGHWAY 32 Page 110 of 241 Traffic Study HopeTree Planned Unit Development – City of Salem, VA February 2, 2024 Appendix E Synchro 11 Intersection Analysis Data 33 Page 111 of 241 HCM 2010 AWSC 2: Red Ln & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr 7:30 am 10/03/2023 Existing AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.3 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 15 19 19 47 47 Future Vol, veh/h 31 15 19 19 47 47 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 36 17 22 22 55 55 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Right NB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 7.4 7.4 7.2 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 50% 67% 0% Vol Thru, % 50% 0% 50% Vol Right, % 0% 33% 50% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 38 46 94 LT Vol 19 31 0 Through Vol 19 0 47 RT Vol 0 15 47 Lane Flow Rate 44 53 109 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.051 0.061 0.113 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.178 4.102 3.728 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 854 867 959 Service Time 2.218 2.155 1.764 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 0.061 0.114 HCM Control Delay 7.4 7.4 7.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.2 0.4 34 Page 112 of 241 HCM 2010 AWSC 8: Mt Vernon Ln & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr 7:30 am 10/03/2023 Existing AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.5 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 43 7 0 59 7 15 13 3 0 4 5 Future Vol, veh/h 12 43 7 0 59 7 15 13 3 0 4 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 52 9 0 72 9 18 16 4 0 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.5 7.5 7 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 48% 19% 0% 0% Vol Thru, % 42% 69% 89% 44% Vol Right, % 10% 11% 11% 56% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 31 62 66 9 LT Vol 15 12 0 0 Through Vol 13 43 59 4 RT Vol 3 7 7 5 Lane Flow Rate 38 76 80 11 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.045 0.085 0.09 0.012 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.251 4.052 4.013 3.899 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 834 880 889 905 Service Time 2.322 2.094 2.055 1.979 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.046 0.086 0.09 0.012 HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.5 7.5 7 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.3 0.3 0 35 Page 113 of 241 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Broad St & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr 7:30 am 10/03/2023 Existing AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 59 116 4 74 1 33 0 1 0 0 1 Future Vol, veh/h 0 59 116 4 74 1 33 0 1 0 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 72 141 5 90 1 40 0 1 0 0 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 91 0 0 213 0 0 244 244 143 244 314 91 Stage 1 - - - - - - 143 143 - 101 101 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 101 101 - 143 213 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1517 - - 1369 - - 714 661 910 714 605 972 Stage 1 - - - - - - 865 782 - 910 815 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 910 815 - 865 730 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1517 - - 1369 - - 711 658 910 711 603 972 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 711 658 - 711 603 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 865 782 - 910 812 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 905 812 - 864 730 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 10.3 8.7 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 716 1517 - - 1369 - - 972 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 - - - 0.004 - - 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 0 - - 7.6 0 - 8.7 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0 36 Page 114 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Existing AM 02/02/2024 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 1 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Start Time 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 Total Time (min) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 # of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 412 419 411 363 368 375 359 Vehs Exited 411 418 405 364 369 380 354 Starting Vehs 2 2 0 3 1 7 2 Ending Vehs 3 3 6 2 0 2 7 Travel Distance (mi) 87 89 85 77 80 79 77 Travel Time (hr) 4.2 4.2 4.0 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.7 Total Delay (hr) 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 Total Stops 413 433 403 360 389 365 373 Fuel Used (gal) 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.3 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Start Time 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 Total Time (min) 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 5 5 5 5 # of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 384 396 396 385 Vehs Exited 386 399 399 388 Starting Vehs 8 5 3 0 Ending Vehs 6 2 0 0 Travel Distance (mi) 78 84 83 82 Travel Time (hr) 3.7 4.0 4.0 3.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 Total Stops 355 373 399 386 Fuel Used (gal) 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.5 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 7:15 End Time 7:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. No data recorded this interval. 37 Page 115 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Existing AM 02/02/2024 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 2 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 7:30 End Time 7:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 127 125 124 111 113 103 114 Vehs Exited 125 122 119 106 108 106 109 Starting Vehs 2 2 0 3 1 7 2 Ending Vehs 4 5 5 8 6 4 7 Travel Distance (mi) 26 26 24 23 24 21 24 Travel Time (hr) 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 128 120 106 108 129 99 113 Fuel Used (gal) 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 7:30 End Time 7:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 102 120 104 114 Vehs Exited 104 119 105 113 Starting Vehs 8 5 3 0 Ending Vehs 6 6 2 3 Travel Distance (mi) 21 25 21 24 Travel Time (hr) 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 95 110 99 110 Fuel Used (gal) 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 38 Page 116 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Existing AM 02/02/2024 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 3 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 90 90 85 71 94 99 81 Vehs Exited 89 92 87 74 100 101 86 Starting Vehs 4 5 5 8 6 4 7 Ending Vehs 5 3 3 5 0 2 2 Travel Distance (mi) 19 19 18 15 20 21 18 Travel Time (hr) 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.0 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 93 96 86 66 92 104 88 Fuel Used (gal) 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.8 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 100 99 97 89 Vehs Exited 105 103 97 94 Starting Vehs 6 6 2 3 Ending Vehs 1 2 2 0 Travel Distance (mi) 21 23 21 20 Travel Time (hr) 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 102 113 100 92 Fuel Used (gal) 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 39 Page 117 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Existing AM 02/02/2024 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 4 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 8:00 End Time 8:15 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 119 98 94 96 92 96 81 Vehs Exited 120 95 90 93 86 92 82 Starting Vehs 5 3 3 5 0 2 2 Ending Vehs 4 6 7 8 6 6 1 Travel Distance (mi) 24 21 20 20 19 19 18 Travel Time (hr) 1.2 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 109 109 94 95 93 88 86 Fuel Used (gal) 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 8:00 End Time 8:15 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 92 88 100 95 Vehs Exited 88 86 101 93 Starting Vehs 1 2 2 0 Ending Vehs 5 4 1 1 Travel Distance (mi) 17 18 21 20 Travel Time (hr) 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 71 76 99 92 Fuel Used (gal) 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 40 Page 118 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Existing AM 02/02/2024 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 5 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 8:15 End Time 8:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 76 106 108 85 69 77 83 Vehs Exited 77 109 109 91 75 81 77 Starting Vehs 4 6 7 8 6 6 1 Ending Vehs 3 3 6 2 0 2 7 Travel Distance (mi) 17 22 23 19 16 17 18 Travel Time (hr) 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 Total Stops 83 108 117 91 75 74 86 Fuel Used (gal) 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 8:15 End Time 8:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 90 89 95 86 Vehs Exited 89 91 96 88 Starting Vehs 5 4 1 1 Ending Vehs 6 2 0 0 Travel Distance (mi) 18 17 20 19 Travel Time (hr) 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 87 74 101 91 Fuel Used (gal) 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.8 41 Page 119 of 241 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing AM 02/02/2024 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr 2023 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 6 Intersection: 2: Red Ln & Carrollton Ave Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 40 52 Average Queue (ft) 25 22 32 95th Queue (ft) 43 46 48 Link Distance (ft) 383 305 460 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Broad St & Carrollton Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 2 22 49 18 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 20 1 95th Queue (ft) 0 12 46 11 Link Distance (ft) 292 373 621 370 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Mt Vernon Ln & Carrollton Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 53 55 34 31 Average Queue (ft) 29 28 20 10 95th Queue (ft) 50 47 44 33 Link Distance (ft) 373 383 294 364 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 42 Page 120 of 241 HCM 2010 AWSC 2: Red Ln & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 10/03/2023 Existing PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 71 22 36 53 31 73 Future Vol, veh/h 71 22 36 53 31 73 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 76 24 39 57 33 78 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Right NB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 7.9 7.9 7.3 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 40% 76% 0% Vol Thru, % 60% 0% 30% Vol Right, % 0% 24% 70% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 89 93 104 LT Vol 36 71 0 Through Vol 53 0 31 RT Vol 0 22 73 Lane Flow Rate 96 100 112 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.113 0.118 0.116 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.243 4.264 3.727 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 835 829 946 Service Time 2.316 2.349 1.81 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.115 0.121 0.118 HCM Control Delay 7.9 7.9 7.3 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.4 0.4 43 Page 121 of 241 HCM 2010 AWSC 8: Mt Vernon Ln & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 10/03/2023 Existing PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 88 12 2 104 2 13 3 2 3 5 6 Future Vol, veh/h 5 88 12 2 104 2 13 3 2 3 5 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 107 15 2 127 2 16 4 2 4 6 7 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.9 7.7 7.4 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 72% 5% 2% 21% Vol Thru, % 17% 84% 96% 36% Vol Right, % 11% 11% 2% 43% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 18 105 108 14 LT Vol 13 5 2 3 Through Vol 3 88 104 5 RT Vol 2 12 2 6 Lane Flow Rate 22 128 132 17 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.028 0.144 0.15 0.02 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.593 4.043 4.092 4.307 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 784 881 871 836 Service Time 2.593 2.097 2.143 2.308 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 0.145 0.152 0.02 HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.4 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.1 44 Page 122 of 241 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Broad St & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 10/03/2023 Existing PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 99 87 7 115 1 84 0 6 0 2 2 Future Vol, veh/h 3 99 87 7 115 1 84 0 6 0 2 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 4 121 106 9 140 1 102 0 7 0 2 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 141 0 0 227 0 0 343 341 174 345 394 141 Stage 1 - - - - - - 182 182 - 159 159 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 161 159 - 186 235 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1455 - - 1353 - - 615 584 875 613 546 912 Stage 1 - - - - - - 824 753 - 848 770 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 846 770 - 820 714 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1455 - - 1353 - - 606 578 875 603 541 912 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 606 578 - 603 541 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 822 751 - 845 765 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 835 765 - 811 712 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.4 12.1 10.3 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 619 1455 - - 1353 - - 679 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.177 0.003 - - 0.006 - - 0.007 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 7.5 0 - 7.7 0 - 10.3 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0 - - 0 45 Page 123 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Existing PM 02/02/2024 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 1 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Start Time 4:45 4:45 4:45 4:45 4:45 4:45 4:45 End Time 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 Total Time (min) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 # of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 550 568 518 505 500 529 506 Vehs Exited 551 561 518 507 497 528 502 Starting Vehs 9 3 4 7 4 6 7 Ending Vehs 8 10 4 5 7 7 11 Travel Distance (mi) 122 122 115 114 111 118 113 Travel Time (hr) 6.0 5.9 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.7 5.5 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 Total Stops 658 628 623 629 611 640 604 Fuel Used (gal) 5.3 5.3 5.0 4.9 4.9 5.2 4.8 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Start Time 4:45 4:45 4:45 4:45 End Time 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 Total Time (min) 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 5 5 5 5 # of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 517 535 506 522 Vehs Exited 509 540 509 523 Starting Vehs 4 7 4 2 Ending Vehs 12 2 1 5 Travel Distance (mi) 115 118 111 116 Travel Time (hr) 5.6 5.8 5.4 5.7 Total Delay (hr) 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 Total Stops 629 646 590 627 Fuel Used (gal) 5.0 5.2 4.9 5.0 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 4:45 End Time 5:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. No data recorded this interval. 46 Page 124 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Existing PM 02/02/2024 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 2 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 5:00 End Time 5:15 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 136 126 130 95 108 114 113 Vehs Exited 137 123 128 97 110 115 116 Starting Vehs 9 3 4 7 4 6 7 Ending Vehs 8 6 6 5 2 5 4 Travel Distance (mi) 31 26 28 22 24 27 26 Travel Time (hr) 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 170 132 148 122 128 147 133 Fuel Used (gal) 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 5:00 End Time 5:15 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 135 138 111 120 Vehs Exited 134 143 108 120 Starting Vehs 4 7 4 2 Ending Vehs 5 2 7 3 Travel Distance (mi) 29 31 24 27 Travel Time (hr) 1.4 1.5 1.1 1.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 Total Stops 159 169 124 142 Fuel Used (gal) 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.2 47 Page 125 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Existing PM 02/02/2024 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 3 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 5:15 End Time 5:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 168 150 138 148 158 159 152 Vehs Exited 171 150 138 143 154 163 153 Starting Vehs 8 6 6 5 2 5 4 Ending Vehs 5 6 6 10 6 1 3 Travel Distance (mi) 38 32 30 32 35 35 33 Travel Time (hr) 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.6 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Total Stops 204 163 159 180 195 190 180 Fuel Used (gal) 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.4 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 5:15 End Time 5:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 144 155 160 152 Vehs Exited 142 150 161 153 Starting Vehs 5 2 7 3 Ending Vehs 7 7 6 2 Travel Distance (mi) 32 33 35 34 Travel Time (hr) 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Total Stops 181 180 177 183 Fuel Used (gal) 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.5 48 Page 126 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Existing PM 02/02/2024 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 4 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 5:30 End Time 5:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 130 127 115 118 135 137 115 Vehs Exited 131 125 114 124 133 131 111 Starting Vehs 5 6 6 10 6 1 3 Ending Vehs 4 8 7 4 8 7 7 Travel Distance (mi) 28 27 27 27 30 29 25 Travel Time (hr) 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 148 143 148 153 166 153 136 Fuel Used (gal) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.0 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 5:30 End Time 5:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 114 104 111 119 Vehs Exited 113 106 114 122 Starting Vehs 7 7 6 2 Ending Vehs 8 5 3 3 Travel Distance (mi) 25 23 25 27 Travel Time (hr) 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 136 131 138 144 Fuel Used (gal) 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.2 49 Page 127 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Existing PM 02/02/2024 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 5 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 5:45 End Time 6:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 116 165 135 144 99 119 126 Vehs Exited 112 163 138 143 100 119 122 Starting Vehs 4 8 7 4 8 7 7 Ending Vehs 8 10 4 5 7 7 11 Travel Distance (mi) 25 37 30 32 22 27 28 Travel Time (hr) 1.2 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.3 1.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 136 190 168 174 122 150 155 Fuel Used (gal) 1.1 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.2 1.2 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 5:45 End Time 6:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 124 138 124 129 Vehs Exited 120 141 126 129 Starting Vehs 8 5 3 3 Ending Vehs 12 2 1 5 Travel Distance (mi) 28 31 28 29 Travel Time (hr) 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 153 166 151 157 Fuel Used (gal) 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.3 50 Page 128 of 241 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM 02/02/2024 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr 2023 Existing PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 6 Intersection: 2: Red Ln & Carrollton Ave Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 39 52 55 Average Queue (ft) 29 32 33 95th Queue (ft) 41 46 49 Link Distance (ft) 383 305 460 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Broad St & Carrollton Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 11 27 64 28 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 34 4 95th Queue (ft) 6 10 56 20 Link Distance (ft) 292 373 621 370 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Mt Vernon Ln & Carrollton Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 61 68 34 34 Average Queue (ft) 34 34 15 12 95th Queue (ft) 54 50 41 37 Link Distance (ft) 373 383 294 364 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 51 Page 129 of 241 HCM 2010 AWSC 2: Red Ln & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2028 Background AM Peak Hr 2028 Background AM Peak Hr 4:22 pm 10/20/2023 Background AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.4 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 33 16 20 20 51 51 Future Vol, veh/h 33 16 20 20 51 51 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 38 19 23 23 59 59 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Right NB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.5 7.3 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 50% 67% 0% Vol Thru, % 50% 0% 50% Vol Right, % 0% 33% 50% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 40 49 102 LT Vol 20 33 0 Through Vol 20 0 51 RT Vol 0 16 51 Lane Flow Rate 47 57 119 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.054 0.065 0.123 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.19 4.121 3.735 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 851 862 956 Service Time 2.234 2.18 1.774 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 0.066 0.124 HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.5 7.3 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.2 0.4 52 Page 130 of 241 HCM 2010 AWSC 8: Mt Vernon Ln & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2028 Background AM Peak Hr 2028 Background AM Peak Hr 4:22 pm 10/20/2023 Background AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.5 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 46 8 0 64 8 16 14 3 0 4 5 Future Vol, veh/h 13 46 8 0 64 8 16 14 3 0 4 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 16 56 10 0 78 10 20 17 4 0 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.5 7.6 7.1 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 48% 19% 0% 0% Vol Thru, % 42% 69% 89% 44% Vol Right, % 9% 12% 11% 56% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 33 67 72 9 LT Vol 16 13 0 0 Through Vol 14 46 64 4 RT Vol 3 8 8 5 Lane Flow Rate 40 82 88 11 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.048 0.092 0.098 0.012 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.278 4.058 4.019 3.924 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 827 878 887 898 Service Time 2.354 2.103 2.064 2.01 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.048 0.093 0.099 0.012 HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.5 7.5 7.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.3 0.3 0 53 Page 131 of 241 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Broad St & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2028 Background AM Peak Hr 2028 Background AM Peak Hr 4:22 pm 10/20/2023 Background AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 64 125 4 80 1 36 0 3 0 0 1 Future Vol, veh/h 0 64 125 4 80 1 36 0 3 0 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 78 152 5 98 1 44 0 4 0 0 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 99 0 0 230 0 0 263 263 154 265 339 99 Stage 1 - - - - - - 154 154 - 109 109 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 109 109 - 156 230 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1507 - - 1350 - - 694 646 897 692 586 962 Stage 1 - - - - - - 853 774 - 901 809 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 901 809 - 851 718 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1507 - - 1350 - - 691 643 897 687 584 962 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 691 643 - 687 584 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 853 774 - 901 806 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 896 806 - 848 718 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 10.5 8.7 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 703 1507 - - 1350 - - 962 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.068 - - - 0.004 - - 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.5 0 - - 7.7 0 - 8.7 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0 54 Page 132 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Background AM 02/02/2024 2028 Background AM Peak Hr 2028 Background AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 1 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Start Time 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 Total Time (min) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 # of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 430 415 428 404 400 398 440 Vehs Exited 424 409 426 405 397 399 434 Starting Vehs 1 1 0 3 1 5 3 Ending Vehs 7 7 2 2 4 4 9 Travel Distance (mi) 88 87 92 84 85 85 94 Travel Time (hr) 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.6 Total Delay (hr) 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 Total Stops 401 422 468 369 406 402 460 Fuel Used (gal) 3.8 3.8 4.0 3.6 3.6 3.7 4.0 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Start Time 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 Total Time (min) 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 5 5 5 5 # of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 394 424 426 416 Vehs Exited 395 426 425 415 Starting Vehs 3 5 1 0 Ending Vehs 2 3 2 0 Travel Distance (mi) 83 90 89 88 Travel Time (hr) 4.0 4.3 4.3 4.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 Total Stops 396 423 417 418 Fuel Used (gal) 3.6 4.0 3.9 3.8 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 7:15 End Time 7:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. No data recorded this interval. 55 Page 133 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Background AM 02/02/2024 2028 Background AM Peak Hr 2028 Background AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 2 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 7:30 End Time 7:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 128 117 133 111 118 120 148 Vehs Exited 126 116 129 109 114 121 145 Starting Vehs 1 1 0 3 1 5 3 Ending Vehs 3 2 4 5 5 4 6 Travel Distance (mi) 26 24 29 23 25 25 31 Travel Time (hr) 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 Total Stops 119 117 149 94 119 115 139 Fuel Used (gal) 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.4 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 7:30 End Time 7:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 124 130 120 121 Vehs Exited 121 134 112 121 Starting Vehs 3 5 1 0 Ending Vehs 6 1 9 2 Travel Distance (mi) 26 29 24 26 Travel Time (hr) 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 Total Stops 120 142 109 120 Fuel Used (gal) 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.1 56 Page 134 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Background AM 02/02/2024 2028 Background AM Peak Hr 2028 Background AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 3 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 107 90 88 83 98 100 94 Vehs Exited 105 88 87 83 101 101 98 Starting Vehs 3 2 4 5 5 4 6 Ending Vehs 5 4 5 5 2 3 2 Travel Distance (mi) 22 18 19 17 21 21 21 Travel Time (hr) 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 102 87 98 67 106 105 100 Fuel Used (gal) 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 106 96 99 95 Vehs Exited 111 95 102 95 Starting Vehs 6 1 9 2 Ending Vehs 1 2 6 1 Travel Distance (mi) 24 21 21 21 Travel Time (hr) 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 123 101 101 99 Fuel Used (gal) 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 57 Page 135 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Background AM 02/02/2024 2028 Background AM Peak Hr 2028 Background AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 4 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 8:00 End Time 8:15 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 110 100 99 107 92 94 110 Vehs Exited 110 98 96 106 89 90 102 Starting Vehs 5 4 5 5 2 3 2 Ending Vehs 5 6 8 6 5 7 10 Travel Distance (mi) 21 21 22 22 19 20 23 Travel Time (hr) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 89 104 110 100 89 101 118 Fuel Used (gal) 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 8:00 End Time 8:15 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 79 97 100 99 Vehs Exited 73 97 105 97 Starting Vehs 1 2 6 1 Ending Vehs 7 2 1 3 Travel Distance (mi) 16 20 22 21 Travel Time (hr) 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 73 89 95 100 Fuel Used (gal) 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 58 Page 136 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Background AM 02/02/2024 2028 Background AM Peak Hr 2028 Background AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 5 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 8:15 End Time 8:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 85 108 108 103 92 84 88 Vehs Exited 83 107 114 107 93 87 89 Starting Vehs 5 6 8 6 5 7 10 Ending Vehs 7 7 2 2 4 4 9 Travel Distance (mi) 19 23 22 22 19 18 19 Travel Time (hr) 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 91 114 111 108 92 81 103 Fuel Used (gal) 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 8:15 End Time 8:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 85 101 107 98 Vehs Exited 90 100 106 97 Starting Vehs 7 2 1 3 Ending Vehs 2 3 2 0 Travel Distance (mi) 17 20 23 20 Travel Time (hr) 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Stops 80 91 112 100 Fuel Used (gal) 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.9 59 Page 137 of 241 Queuing and Blocking Report Background AM 02/02/2024 2028 Background AM Peak Hr 2028 Background AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 6 Intersection: 2: Red Ln & Carrollton Ave Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 37 47 55 Average Queue (ft) 26 22 33 95th Queue (ft) 44 46 48 Link Distance (ft) 383 305 460 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Broad St & Carrollton Ave Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 15 46 18 Average Queue (ft) 1 24 1 95th Queue (ft) 11 47 9 Link Distance (ft) 373 621 370 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Mt Vernon Ln & Carrollton Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 60 52 43 31 Average Queue (ft) 30 28 20 8 95th Queue (ft) 51 48 46 31 Link Distance (ft) 373 383 294 364 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 60 Page 138 of 241 HCM 2010 AWSC 2: Red Ln & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2028 Background PM Peak Hr 2028 Background PM Peak Hr 4:18 pm 10/20/2023 Background PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 76 24 38 57 33 79 Future Vol, veh/h 76 24 38 57 33 79 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 82 26 41 61 35 85 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Right NB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 8 7.9 7.4 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 40% 76% 0% Vol Thru, % 60% 0% 29% Vol Right, % 0% 24% 71% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 95 100 112 LT Vol 38 76 0 Through Vol 57 0 33 RT Vol 0 24 79 Lane Flow Rate 102 108 120 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.121 0.128 0.125 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.263 4.288 3.744 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 830 824 941 Service Time 2.344 2.378 1.835 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.123 0.131 0.128 HCM Control Delay 7.9 8 7.4 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.4 0.4 61 Page 139 of 241 HCM 2010 AWSC 8: Mt Vernon Ln & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2028 Background PM Peak Hr 2028 Background PM Peak Hr 4:18 pm 10/20/2023 Background PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.9 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 95 13 2 112 2 14 3 2 3 5 6 Future Vol, veh/h 5 95 13 2 112 2 14 3 2 3 5 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 116 16 2 137 2 17 4 2 4 6 7 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.9 8 7.8 7.4 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 74% 4% 2% 21% Vol Thru, % 16% 84% 97% 36% Vol Right, % 11% 12% 2% 43% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 19 113 116 14 LT Vol 14 5 2 3 Through Vol 3 95 112 5 RT Vol 2 13 2 6 Lane Flow Rate 23 138 141 17 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.03 0.155 0.161 0.021 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.641 4.051 4.101 4.35 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 776 878 867 828 Service Time 2.642 2.111 2.159 2.351 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.03 0.157 0.163 0.021 HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.9 8 7.4 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.1 62 Page 140 of 241 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Broad St & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2028 Background PM Peak Hr 2028 Background PM Peak Hr 4:18 pm 10/20/2023 Background PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 107 94 8 124 1 90 0 6 0 2 2 Future Vol, veh/h 3 107 94 8 124 1 90 0 6 0 2 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 4 130 115 10 151 1 110 0 7 0 2 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 152 0 0 245 0 0 370 368 188 371 425 152 Stage 1 - - - - - - 196 196 - 172 172 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 174 172 - 199 253 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1441 - - 1333 - - 590 564 859 589 524 900 Stage 1 - - - - - - 810 742 - 835 760 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 833 760 - 807 701 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1441 - - 1333 - - 581 558 859 579 518 900 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 581 558 - 579 518 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 808 740 - 832 754 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 821 754 - 798 699 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.5 12.6 10.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 593 1441 - - 1333 - - 658 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.197 0.003 - - 0.007 - - 0.007 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.6 7.5 0 - 7.7 0 - 10.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0 - - 0 - - 0 63 Page 141 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Background PM 02/02/2024 2028 Background PM Peak Hr 2028 Background PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 1 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Start Time 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 Total Time (min) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 # of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 608 572 581 509 564 592 556 Vehs Exited 608 567 579 507 564 593 547 Starting Vehs 9 7 4 8 4 8 6 Ending Vehs 9 12 6 10 4 7 15 Travel Distance (mi) 135 124 129 115 126 132 125 Travel Time (hr) 6.7 6.1 6.3 5.6 6.2 6.5 6.1 Total Delay (hr) 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 Total Stops 743 661 699 627 675 707 684 Fuel Used (gal) 5.9 5.3 5.6 5.0 5.5 5.8 5.4 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Start Time 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 Total Time (min) 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 5 5 5 5 # of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 573 574 563 566 Vehs Exited 569 580 562 569 Starting Vehs 4 6 4 3 Ending Vehs 8 0 5 5 Travel Distance (mi) 130 128 125 127 Travel Time (hr) 6.4 6.3 6.1 6.2 Total Delay (hr) 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Total Stops 718 697 672 684 Fuel Used (gal) 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.5 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 4:15 End Time 4:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. No data recorded this interval. 64 Page 142 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Background PM 02/02/2024 2028 Background PM Peak Hr 2028 Background PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 2 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 4:30 End Time 4:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 150 125 145 112 120 134 120 Vehs Exited 151 126 144 116 121 138 125 Starting Vehs 9 7 4 8 4 8 6 Ending Vehs 8 6 5 4 3 4 1 Travel Distance (mi) 33 26 32 26 27 32 29 Travel Time (hr) 1.6 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 Total Stops 183 139 171 145 140 181 156 Fuel Used (gal) 1.5 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.2 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 4:30 End Time 4:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 143 148 130 132 Vehs Exited 139 152 127 133 Starting Vehs 4 6 4 3 Ending Vehs 8 2 7 2 Travel Distance (mi) 31 34 29 30 Travel Time (hr) 1.5 1.7 1.4 1.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 170 191 145 162 Fuel Used (gal) 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.3 65 Page 143 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Background PM 02/02/2024 2028 Background PM Peak Hr 2028 Background PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 3 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 4:45 End Time 5:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 144 141 134 114 149 143 141 Vehs Exited 145 138 134 110 149 142 140 Starting Vehs 8 6 5 4 3 4 1 Ending Vehs 7 9 5 8 3 5 2 Travel Distance (mi) 33 31 29 24 32 31 31 Travel Time (hr) 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 178 170 160 132 181 178 168 Fuel Used (gal) 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.3 1.4 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 4:45 End Time 5:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 128 124 139 135 Vehs Exited 134 123 139 135 Starting Vehs 8 2 7 2 Ending Vehs 2 3 7 2 Travel Distance (mi) 31 27 31 30 Travel Time (hr) 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 176 153 166 166 Fuel Used (gal) 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 66 Page 144 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Background PM 02/02/2024 2028 Background PM Peak Hr 2028 Background PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 4 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 5:00 End Time 5:15 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 146 119 128 126 139 145 128 Vehs Exited 148 120 126 126 129 142 122 Starting Vehs 7 9 5 8 3 5 2 Ending Vehs 5 8 7 8 13 8 8 Travel Distance (mi) 33 25 30 28 32 32 29 Travel Time (hr) 1.6 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 184 134 159 152 172 166 160 Fuel Used (gal) 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.2 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 5:00 End Time 5:15 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 131 130 124 133 Vehs Exited 124 123 128 131 Starting Vehs 2 3 7 2 Ending Vehs 9 10 3 6 Travel Distance (mi) 30 28 27 29 Travel Time (hr) 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 162 149 160 159 Fuel Used (gal) 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 67 Page 145 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Background PM 02/02/2024 2028 Background PM Peak Hr 2028 Background PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 5 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 5:15 End Time 5:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 168 187 174 157 156 170 167 Vehs Exited 164 183 175 155 165 171 160 Starting Vehs 5 8 7 8 13 8 8 Ending Vehs 9 12 6 10 4 7 15 Travel Distance (mi) 37 41 39 36 36 37 37 Travel Time (hr) 1.8 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Total Stops 198 218 209 198 182 182 200 Fuel Used (gal) 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 5:15 End Time 5:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 171 172 170 168 Vehs Exited 172 182 168 169 Starting Vehs 9 10 3 6 Ending Vehs 8 0 5 5 Travel Distance (mi) 39 39 38 38 Travel Time (hr) 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Total Stops 210 204 201 199 Fuel Used (gal) 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 68 Page 146 of 241 Queuing and Blocking Report Background PM 02/02/2024 2028 Background PM Peak Hr 2028 Background PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 6 Intersection: 2: Red Ln & Carrollton Ave Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 48 53 55 Average Queue (ft) 30 32 33 95th Queue (ft) 41 49 47 Link Distance (ft) 383 305 460 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Broad St & Carrollton Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 11 23 77 31 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 35 4 95th Queue (ft) 6 10 56 20 Link Distance (ft) 292 373 621 370 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Mt Vernon Ln & Carrollton Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 61 70 32 33 Average Queue (ft) 36 34 14 11 95th Queue (ft) 54 51 39 35 Link Distance (ft) 373 383 294 364 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 69 Page 147 of 241 HCM 2010 AWSC 2: Red Ln & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr 1:26 pm 11/30/2023 Buildout AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 31 31 28 64 63 Future Vol, veh/h 44 31 31 28 64 63 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 51 36 36 33 74 73 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Right NB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.7 7.6 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 53% 59% 0% Vol Thru, % 47% 0% 50% Vol Right, % 0% 41% 50% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 59 75 127 LT Vol 31 44 0 Through Vol 28 0 64 RT Vol 0 31 63 Lane Flow Rate 69 87 148 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.081 0.1 0.156 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.273 4.138 3.808 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 831 854 932 Service Time 2.339 2.223 1.87 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.083 0.102 0.159 HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.7 7.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.3 0.6 70 Page 148 of 241 HCM 2010 AWSC 8: Mt Vernon Ln & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr 1:26 pm 11/30/2023 Buildout AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 63 9 1 87 11 17 18 3 8 9 16 Future Vol, veh/h 21 63 9 1 87 11 17 18 3 8 9 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 77 11 1 106 13 21 22 4 10 11 20 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.9 7.9 7.8 7.5 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 45% 23% 1% 24% Vol Thru, % 47% 68% 88% 27% Vol Right, % 8% 10% 11% 48% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 38 93 99 33 LT Vol 17 21 1 8 Through Vol 18 63 87 9 RT Vol 3 9 11 16 Lane Flow Rate 46 113 121 40 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.058 0.131 0.138 0.048 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.536 4.164 4.107 4.26 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 794 849 861 846 Service Time 2.538 2.249 2.191 2.261 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 0.133 0.141 0.047 HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.9 7.9 7.5 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 71 Page 149 of 241 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Broad St & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr 1:26 pm 11/30/2023 Buildout AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 77 125 20 99 3 36 6 13 5 8 9 Future Vol, veh/h 7 77 125 20 99 3 36 6 13 5 8 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 9 94 152 24 121 4 44 7 16 6 10 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 125 0 0 246 0 0 370 361 170 371 435 123 Stage 1 - - - - - - 188 188 - 171 171 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 182 173 - 200 264 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1474 - - 1332 - - 590 569 879 589 517 933 Stage 1 - - - - - - 818 748 - 836 761 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 824 760 - 806 694 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1474 - - 1332 - - 563 554 879 561 504 933 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 563 554 - 561 504 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 812 743 - 830 747 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 788 746 - 778 689 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 1.3 11.6 10.9 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 614 1474 - - 1332 - - 639 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.109 0.006 - - 0.018 - - 0.042 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.6 7.5 0 - 7.8 0 - 10.9 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 72 Page 150 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Buildout AM 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 1 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Start Time 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 Total Time (min) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 # of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 554 584 531 514 533 592 558 Vehs Exited 553 581 526 516 530 591 560 Starting Vehs 3 0 5 4 3 6 7 Ending Vehs 4 3 10 2 6 7 5 Travel Distance (mi) 118 125 114 108 111 127 119 Travel Time (hr) 5.7 6.1 5.6 5.3 5.4 6.2 5.8 Total Delay (hr) 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.2 Total Stops 580 636 597 522 555 654 599 Fuel Used (gal) 5.2 5.6 5.0 4.7 4.8 5.6 5.1 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Start Time 7:15 7:15 7:15 7:15 End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 Total Time (min) 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 5 5 5 5 # of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 594 567 537 556 Vehs Exited 595 569 537 556 Starting Vehs 7 6 4 2 Ending Vehs 6 4 4 2 Travel Distance (mi) 127 121 115 119 Travel Time (hr) 6.2 5.9 5.7 5.8 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 Total Stops 637 626 603 600 Fuel Used (gal) 5.5 5.3 5.0 5.2 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 7:15 End Time 7:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. No data recorded this interval. 73 Page 151 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Buildout AM 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 2 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 7:30 End Time 7:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 178 159 187 156 163 161 173 Vehs Exited 175 153 186 153 161 157 173 Starting Vehs 3 0 5 4 3 6 7 Ending Vehs 6 6 6 7 5 10 7 Travel Distance (mi) 37 33 39 31 34 34 37 Travel Time (hr) 1.8 1.6 1.9 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 Total Stops 180 166 208 144 181 179 176 Fuel Used (gal) 1.6 1.5 1.8 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 7:30 End Time 7:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 172 177 148 167 Vehs Exited 168 178 147 165 Starting Vehs 7 6 4 2 Ending Vehs 11 5 5 3 Travel Distance (mi) 36 37 31 35 Travel Time (hr) 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.7 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 Total Stops 187 177 160 175 Fuel Used (gal) 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.5 74 Page 152 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Buildout AM 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 3 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 121 130 109 110 129 129 132 Vehs Exited 122 130 107 114 131 136 134 Starting Vehs 6 6 6 7 5 10 7 Ending Vehs 5 6 8 3 3 3 5 Travel Distance (mi) 26 28 23 25 27 28 29 Travel Time (hr) 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 138 147 125 114 126 145 150 Fuel Used (gal) 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 157 139 122 126 Vehs Exited 159 141 125 129 Starting Vehs 11 5 5 3 Ending Vehs 9 3 2 2 Travel Distance (mi) 34 31 27 28 Travel Time (hr) 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 176 167 139 143 Fuel Used (gal) 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.2 75 Page 153 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Buildout AM 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 4 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 8:00 End Time 8:15 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 143 139 116 114 123 141 129 Vehs Exited 141 140 117 112 118 138 133 Starting Vehs 5 6 8 3 3 3 5 Ending Vehs 7 5 7 5 8 6 1 Travel Distance (mi) 30 30 27 24 26 30 27 Travel Time (hr) 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 144 150 138 119 126 161 135 Fuel Used (gal) 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.1 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 8:00 End Time 8:15 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 133 127 142 130 Vehs Exited 135 124 140 129 Starting Vehs 9 3 2 2 Ending Vehs 7 6 4 1 Travel Distance (mi) 28 27 30 28 Travel Time (hr) 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 Total Stops 137 148 159 141 Fuel Used (gal) 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 76 Page 154 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Buildout AM 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 5 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 8:15 End Time 8:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 112 156 119 134 118 161 124 Vehs Exited 115 158 116 137 120 160 120 Starting Vehs 7 5 7 5 8 6 1 Ending Vehs 4 3 10 2 6 7 5 Travel Distance (mi) 24 34 25 28 25 35 26 Travel Time (hr) 1.2 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.7 1.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 Total Stops 118 173 126 145 122 169 138 Fuel Used (gal) 1.1 1.5 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.6 1.1 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 8:15 End Time 8:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 132 124 125 134 Vehs Exited 133 126 125 131 Starting Vehs 7 6 4 1 Ending Vehs 6 4 4 2 Travel Distance (mi) 28 27 27 28 Travel Time (hr) 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Total Stops 137 134 145 141 Fuel Used (gal) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 77 Page 155 of 241 Queuing and Blocking Report Buildout AM 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 6 Intersection: 2: Red Ln & Carrollton Ave Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 37 46 57 Average Queue (ft) 27 27 35 95th Queue (ft) 43 47 52 Link Distance (ft) 383 305 460 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Broad St & Carrollton Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 12 33 50 34 Average Queue (ft) 1 4 28 16 95th Queue (ft) 7 22 49 41 Link Distance (ft) 292 373 621 370 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Mt Vernon Ln & Carrollton Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 62 62 47 45 Average Queue (ft) 33 32 22 22 95th Queue (ft) 53 50 46 47 Link Distance (ft) 373 383 294 364 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 78 Page 156 of 241 HCM 2010 AWSC 2: Red Ln & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr 1:27 pm 11/30/2023 Buildout PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.2 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 91 35 56 70 44 89 Future Vol, veh/h 91 35 56 70 44 89 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 98 38 60 75 47 96 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Right NB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 8.4 8.4 7.7 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 44% 72% 0% Vol Thru, % 56% 0% 33% Vol Right, % 0% 28% 67% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 126 126 133 LT Vol 56 91 0 Through Vol 70 0 44 RT Vol 0 35 89 Lane Flow Rate 135 135 143 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.168 0.169 0.158 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.451 4.478 3.967 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 807 803 907 Service Time 2.466 2.496 1.982 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.167 0.168 0.158 HCM Control Delay 8.4 8.4 7.7 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 0.6 0.6 79 Page 157 of 241 HCM 2010 AWSC 8: Mt Vernon Ln & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr 1:27 pm 11/30/2023 Buildout PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.4 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 119 14 3 133 7 16 8 2 8 9 16 Future Vol, veh/h 19 119 14 3 133 7 16 8 2 8 9 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 23 145 17 4 162 9 20 10 2 10 11 20 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.5 8.4 8.1 7.8 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 62% 12% 2% 24% Vol Thru, % 31% 78% 93% 27% Vol Right, % 8% 9% 5% 48% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 26 152 143 33 LT Vol 16 19 3 8 Through Vol 8 119 133 9 RT Vol 2 14 7 16 Lane Flow Rate 32 185 174 40 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.043 0.22 0.207 0.051 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.848 4.263 4.279 4.519 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 739 847 842 793 Service Time 2.871 2.268 2.284 2.541 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.043 0.218 0.207 0.05 HCM Control Delay 8.1 8.5 8.4 7.8 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.8 0.8 0.2 80 Page 158 of 241 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Broad St & Carrollton Ave 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr 1:27 pm 11/30/2023 Buildout PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 128 94 21 140 5 90 8 22 5 9 9 Future Vol, veh/h 12 128 94 21 140 5 90 8 22 5 9 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 15 156 115 26 171 6 110 10 27 6 11 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 177 0 0 271 0 0 481 473 214 488 527 174 Stage 1 - - - - - - 244 244 - 226 226 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 237 229 - 262 301 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1411 - - 1304 - - 499 493 831 493 459 875 Stage 1 - - - - - - 764 708 - 781 721 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 771 718 - 747 669 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1411 - - 1304 - - 471 476 831 457 443 875 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 471 476 - 457 443 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 754 699 - 771 705 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 733 702 - 704 660 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 1 14.8 11.8 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 512 1411 - - 1304 - - 554 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.286 0.01 - - 0.02 - - 0.051 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.8 7.6 0 - 7.8 0 - 11.8 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.2 81 Page 159 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Buildout PM 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 1 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Start Time 4:45 4:45 4:45 4:45 4:45 4:45 4:45 End Time 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 Total Time (min) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 # of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 757 750 729 730 679 735 724 Vehs Exited 753 749 730 733 680 739 723 Starting Vehs 7 7 7 9 5 10 10 Ending Vehs 11 8 6 6 4 6 11 Travel Distance (mi) 174 167 165 164 152 164 163 Travel Time (hr) 8.8 8.4 8.3 8.2 7.6 8.2 8.2 Total Delay (hr) 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.9 1.9 Total Stops 997 941 925 911 852 916 913 Fuel Used (gal) 7.8 7.5 7.3 7.3 6.7 7.3 7.2 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Start Time 4:45 4:45 4:45 4:45 End Time 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 Total Time (min) 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 5 5 5 5 # of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 745 750 693 727 Vehs Exited 738 752 689 730 Starting Vehs 7 10 4 4 Ending Vehs 14 8 8 6 Travel Distance (mi) 162 166 151 163 Travel Time (hr) 8.0 8.3 7.5 8.2 Total Delay (hr) 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.8 Total Stops 911 947 856 918 Fuel Used (gal) 7.2 7.4 6.8 7.2 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 4:45 End Time 5:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. No data recorded this interval. 82 Page 160 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Buildout PM 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 2 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 5:00 End Time 5:15 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 188 163 175 167 144 149 177 Vehs Exited 187 167 174 168 140 152 177 Starting Vehs 7 7 7 9 5 10 10 Ending Vehs 8 3 8 8 9 7 10 Travel Distance (mi) 42 36 40 39 31 34 40 Travel Time (hr) 2.2 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.5 1.7 2.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 Total Stops 245 195 224 218 175 189 218 Fuel Used (gal) 1.9 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.8 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 5:00 End Time 5:15 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 172 194 163 169 Vehs Exited 169 198 156 167 Starting Vehs 7 10 4 4 Ending Vehs 10 6 11 3 Travel Distance (mi) 37 43 35 38 Travel Time (hr) 1.9 2.1 1.7 1.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 Total Stops 210 239 188 212 Fuel Used (gal) 1.7 1.9 1.6 1.7 83 Page 161 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Buildout PM 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 3 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 5:15 End Time 5:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 228 214 203 212 227 217 214 Vehs Exited 226 211 202 207 230 216 221 Starting Vehs 8 3 8 8 9 7 10 Ending Vehs 10 6 9 13 6 8 3 Travel Distance (mi) 51 47 46 46 51 47 50 Travel Time (hr) 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.6 2.4 2.6 Total Delay (hr) 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 Total Stops 296 261 265 257 291 254 289 Fuel Used (gal) 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.1 2.2 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 5:15 End Time 5:30 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 214 220 198 214 Vehs Exited 219 219 198 215 Starting Vehs 10 6 11 3 Ending Vehs 5 7 11 6 Travel Distance (mi) 47 49 44 48 Travel Time (hr) 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 Total Stops 277 286 244 270 Fuel Used (gal) 2.1 2.2 1.9 2.1 84 Page 162 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Buildout PM 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 4 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 5:30 End Time 5:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 182 177 176 165 151 183 166 Vehs Exited 187 172 172 168 147 183 159 Starting Vehs 10 6 9 13 6 8 3 Ending Vehs 5 11 13 10 10 8 10 Travel Distance (mi) 44 39 40 38 35 40 36 Travel Time (hr) 2.2 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.7 2.0 1.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Total Stops 248 227 217 214 203 231 208 Fuel Used (gal) 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.8 1.6 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 5:30 End Time 5:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 162 150 172 167 Vehs Exited 156 149 176 168 Starting Vehs 5 7 11 6 Ending Vehs 11 8 7 6 Travel Distance (mi) 35 33 38 38 Travel Time (hr) 1.7 1.6 1.9 1.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Total Stops 187 189 224 214 Fuel Used (gal) 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.7 85 Page 163 of 241 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Buildout PM 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 5 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 5:45 End Time 6:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vehs Entered 159 196 175 186 157 186 167 Vehs Exited 153 199 182 190 163 188 166 Starting Vehs 5 11 13 10 10 8 10 Ending Vehs 11 8 6 6 4 6 11 Travel Distance (mi) 37 45 40 41 35 43 36 Travel Time (hr) 1.8 2.3 2.0 2.0 1.7 2.2 1.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.4 Total Stops 208 258 219 222 183 242 198 Fuel Used (gal) 1.6 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.6 2.0 1.6 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 5:45 End Time 6:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors. Run Number 8 9 10 Avg Vehs Entered 197 186 160 175 Vehs Exited 194 186 159 178 Starting Vehs 11 8 7 6 Ending Vehs 14 8 8 6 Travel Distance (mi) 42 41 34 40 Travel Time (hr) 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 Total Stops 237 233 200 219 Fuel Used (gal) 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.8 86 Page 164 of 241 Queuing and Blocking Report Buildout PM 02/02/2024 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2028 Buildout PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 6 Intersection: 2: Red Ln & Carrollton Ave Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 44 56 62 Average Queue (ft) 31 36 36 95th Queue (ft) 38 53 54 Link Distance (ft) 383 305 460 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Broad St & Carrollton Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 41 35 76 47 Average Queue (ft) 3 5 39 17 95th Queue (ft) 21 24 64 44 Link Distance (ft) 292 373 621 370 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Mt Vernon Ln & Carrollton Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 66 61 40 44 Average Queue (ft) 38 34 19 21 95th Queue (ft) 58 49 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 373 383 294 364 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 87 Page 165 of 241 701 1st St. S.W. ● Roanoke, VA 24016 (540) 345-9342 ● Fax (540) 345-7691 www.matternandcraig.com Randy W. Beckner Bradley C. Craig Wm. Thomas Austin James B. Voso Chad M. Thomas Jason A. Carder Brian R. Newman D. Jason Snapp Ryan P. Kincer Edwin K. Mattern, Jr. (1949-1982) Gene R. Cress (1935-2014) Sam H. McGhee, III (1940-2018) Stewart W. Hubbell (Retired) J. Wayne Craig (Retired) Michael S. Agee (Retired) Steven A. Campbell (Retired) Randy L. Dodson (Retired) February 20, 2024 Mr. William Simpson, Jr., PE Assistant Director/City Engineer City of Salem 21 S Bruffey Street Salem, Virginia, 24153 wsimpson@salemva.gov Re: Traffic Study Review HopeTree Planned Unit Development M&C Commission No. 4197-H GESC Contract No. 2021-018 Dear Mr. Simpson, In response to our review of a traffic impact study prepared by Balzer & Associates, for the HopeTree Planned Unit Development, a revised study (and response to our review) was provided to us. We have reviewed the revised study (dated February 2, 2024), and the revised study appears to conform with VDOT and industry standard practices, and addresses our concerns with the original study. If any additional information is needed on this subject at this time, please feel free to contact me directly via email at jbvoso@matternandcraig.com or by telephone at 828-254-2201. Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance to the City of Salem. Sincerely, Mattern & Craig James B. Voso, PE Traffic Engineer 2/20/2024 Page 166 of 241 October 25, 2024 City of Salem, Virginia Planning Commission 114 North Broad Salem, Virginia 24153 Re: Supplement to August 30, 2024 Rezoning Application Filed by Virginia Baptist Children’s Home and Family Services d/b/a HopeTree Family Services (Salem CI) Dear Planning Commissioners: Virginia Baptist Children’s Home and Family Services d/b/a HopeTree Family Services (Salem CI) (“HopeTree”) filed a Rezoning Application on August 30, 2024 (the “Application”). The Application is substantially similar to HopeTree’s original application, dated November 30, 2023, that was approved by City Council on June 24, 2024. In submitting the new Application, HopeTree is requesting that the City of Salem ordain, reordain, amend, reamend, adopt and/or readopt the HopeTree rezoning, as outlined in the Application, as supplemented by this letter with enclosures. HopeTree requests that in reviewing this Application, as supplemented herein, the City of Salem also consider, all the Planning Commission, City Staff, citizen comments, and any and all materials utilized in reviewing the similar rezoning application that HopeTree filed on December 1, 2023 (dated November 30, 2023). We are aware that much prior work has gone into the review of the proposed HopeTree P.U.D., but we expect that this supplement will enhance the City’s current review of the Application. We look forward to presenting the Application to the Planning Commission. Proffer Statement The P.U.D., along with this supplement, are proffered pursuant to Salem Code §§ 106-228.4(B), 106-228.4(G), and 106-522. Page 167 of 241 Conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan HopeTree’s P.U.D. is consistent with several important elements of the City’s Comprehensive Plan approved June 11, 2012. The Goal under the “Housing and Neighborhoods” section of the Comprehensive Plan is “To maintain and enhance the character and quality of Salem’s housing and neighborhoods.” The Objectives to achieve this Goal recognize the need for new housing construction and in-fill development to make use of the vacant land in the City. The “development or expansion of industrial and commercial business in Salem” is the Goal under the “Land Use and Community Appearance” section of the Comprehensive Plan. The HopeTree P.U.D. includes commercial uses to serve the needs of the existing and future residents on land that is currently underutilized. The HopeTree P.U.D. includes significant new open space amenities which are consistent with the “Open Space” Goal of the Comprehensive Plan. Further, we recognize that the City is in the process of developing an updated Comprehensive Plan. The City has solicited input on future housing needs in the City and issued a report earlier this year. The City’s report included the following observations and conclusions: • “In general, folks support the inclusion of higher density housing that is integrated in existing neighborhoods and promoted in new developments as a way to increase diversity and affordability.” • “…an openness to explore many types of housing such as patio homes, townhouses, small apartment buildings, townhouses , duplexes, and triplexes.” As shown in the Application, the HopeTree P.U.D. advances the housing needs that are being considered for the updated Comprehensive Plan. Page 168 of 241 Development Schedule and Phasing Plan HopeTree encloses a supplemental Development Schedule and Phasing Plan in the P.U.D. to further outline the Developer’s plans for developing the HopeTree P.U.D. The Development Schedule and Phasing Plan states the location, extent, and sequence of the proposed development, as well as specifies the anticipated development of open space, recreational areas, and non- residential uses for the P.U.D. In the Notes accompanying the Development Schedule and Phasing Plan map, we have included an anticipated development schedule, based on the four phases of development, as well as information about key development and construction plans and approvals such as the Site Plan, Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, Stormwater Management Plans, and Subdivision Plats for each phase. The Notes replace the prior phasing plans and provide greater detail about the development and provide the anticipated timeline for future development to occur. Page 169 of 241 Traffic Study A comprehensive traffic study was completed for the HopeTree P.U.D. The scope of the traffic counts and study were coordinated with the City of Salem engineering staff. Standard procedure for similar traffic studies that Balzer & Associates performs in this region (including those reviewed by the Virginia Department of Transportation) is to perform traffic counts for one day (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday when school is in session) during these hours to capture the morning and evening peak hours. These traffic counts and procedures are standard and commonly accepted in the planning industry. Balzer performed manual traffic counts on October 3, 2023, from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. at the Red Lane/Carrollton Avenue intersection and the Carrollton Avenue/Broad Street intersection. The intersection of Carrollton Avenue/Mount Vernon Lane was added to the model based on the comments received from Mattern & Craig. Since this intersection was located between the two intersections that already had manual traffic count data, the volumes for this intersection were derived from the previously performed traffic counts. This intersection was also reviewed in the field to ensure that the volumes utilized were reasonable. Studying other intersections apart from those included would result in smaller and smaller impacts, because site-generated traffic disperses as it gets further from the site. The Application strikes a balance between “flexibility in the design and development of land,” pursuant to Salem Code § 106-228.1(A), and the need to provide clarity and certainty in the amount of new traffic generation by the P.U.D. The traffic study was informed by the anticipated mix of uses on the P.U.D. and the overall level of development to occur on the P.U.D. While some of the proposed uses were updated after the traffic study was completed, this Application includes a proffered maximum on site-generated traffic. This cap is included in Note (G)(6) on page 7 of the HopeTree PUD Rezoning Application Document included in the Application (4,037 trips per day). This Note requires the Developer to calculate site-generated traffic as the project progresses to cap the site-generated traffic at 4,037 daily trips, which was the figure included in the traffic study. The anticipated vehicle trips will be finally determined as each phase and the corresponding uses of the P.U.D. are developed. As the build out of the P.U.D. occurs, the Developer and the City will coordinate on the volume of traffic associated with each new use. The proffered maximum will limit the development and provide assurances that the traffic assumptions prepared for the P.U.D. are honored as the P.U.D. is fully built out. The traffic study confirms that the levels of service at all intersections and roads will continue to function at the same levels with the proposed development. Page 170 of 241 Commercial Uses The creation of new commercial uses are an important element of the HopeTree P.U.D. and consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The final locations and types of commercial uses will be determined based on the needs of the community. The Application states that “Shopfront and Mixed-Use Buildings are small to medium size traditional building types typically following the platting patterns of the historic main street” and that “ground level uses typically include retail shops, restaurants and cafes, and commercial.” The character of the anticipated non- residential, mixed-use, and commercial uses of the P.U.D. will align with the character of neighboring communities. The proffered maximums for non-residential and commercial uses have been included to “encourage maximum flexibility in the design and development of land” that comprises the P.U.D., while also specifying the general character that the City can expect in such non-residential uses. As shown in the Master Plan and Land Use Plan in the P.U.D., the commercial uses will be built in the T4 and T5 Transect Zones and may be developed as part of Phases 1 through 4 of the P.U.D. shown on the Phasing Plan. Notably, the P.U.D. limits the maximum hotel rooms to 34, maximum square footage for retail and restaurant uses to 15,000 square feet, and up to 35,000 square feet of office and other commercial. In addition, the Developer has limited the total number of site-generated traffic to 4,037 trips per day as a further restriction on the final level of development. Page 171 of 241 Open Space As further explained in the Application and Open Space Plan, at least 35% of the property will be preserved either in a natural state or as public or private open space areas. The final design of the open space areas will be determined by the needs of the residents, but space has been designated for athletic fields, a pond, creek, lawn area, greenways and natural vegetation. The preserved open space is a significant benefit of the HopeTree P.U.D. and will advance the open space goals of the Comprehensive Plan through private investment. Sincerely, Jon Morris, President & CEO HopeTree Family Services Enclosures Page 172 of 241 DATE: November 4, 2024 TO: Chris Burns, Balzer & Associates FROM: Mary Ellen Wines, Planning & Zoning, City of Salem RE: Hopetree comments In response to the most recent Hopetree rezoning application and subsequent amended Planned Unit Development Document the following clarifications are requested. 1. Changes to the PUD document are on Page 3 (owner name) and the replacement of page 25 with pages EX-A and EX-B. Staff requests to substitute those 3 pages within the final approved version from June 2024. 2. Pages 8 and 9 Transect Zone 3 includes stacked flats. Page 13 Transect Zone 3 does not include stacked flats. Please verify which is true. 3. Page EX-B #7, Clarification required. Site plans shall be submitted in accordance with 106-400 and are not limited to just 7A and 7B as listed in the PUD document. 4. Page EX-B #9, Clarification required. All major subdivisions must be approved by the Planning Commission. 5. Page EX-B #14, Clarification required. No commercial structures (other than those used for Hopetree services) may be constructed until 20% of the residential units are completed. The exception is utilization of existing structures. 6. Clarification required. If the phasing plan does not coincide with the individual block groups, how do you intend to verify that the various development requirements (20% of each building type, minimum of three building types, etc.) are being met? 7. Page 33, definition of commercial outdoor sports and recreation states that it is limited to two existing ballfields in current or future locations/design. Clarification that if the ballfields are moved slightly within the current location area (as shown on page 6) that it will be allowed. Should the location of the two ballfields is to be moved outside this general area will not meet substantial conformance to the proposed plan and will have to be requested as an amendment through the public hearing process. Page 173 of 241 From:Chris Burns To:Mary Ellen H Wines; Maxwell S Dillon Cc:Jon Morris; Todd Robertson Subject:RE: [Ext.] HopeTree Rezoning Application - Supplemental Information Date:Tuesday, November 5, 2024 12:35:30 PM Attachments:image001.png Phasing Plan Notes Updated 11-5-24.pdf Mary Ellen and Max, Thanks for your time this morning. Please see responses to your comments below. 1. The applicant takes no exception to the City replacing the updated pages within the final approved version from June 2024. It is our understanding that a new date will be placed on the cover page to eliminate any confusion. 2. The intent is that the stacked flat building type is allowed within the T-3 zone as indicated in the text and graphics on Page 8, Page 9, and in the large graphic on Page 13. The inconsistency in the graphic on the left side of page 13 is an error. As discussed with the City, this will be noted and the stacked flat will be allowed in the T-3 zone. No revisions necessary. 3. Notes 7A and 7B have been clarified on EX-B to indicate that the infrastructure and erosion and sediment control/stormwater management plans will be included as part of the site plans and submitted pursuant to the relevant code section. Revised EX-B attached. 4. As discussed, this requirement is understood by the applicant and covered by Note #9 on phasing plan EX-B. No revisions necessary. 5. This requirement is understood by the applicant. Additional clarification added to Note #14 and this is also covered on Page 37 of the PUD document. 6. As discussed, it is understood that individual phases of development may not coincide with block groups as shown on Page 9 of the PUD document. If a block group will be partially developed with a phase, the developer shall provide the City with information about what other development is anticipated within that block group with future phases to demonstrate that all requirements can be met. Requirements will be confirmed when future plans are developed that completes that specific block group. No revisions necessary. 7. As discussed, it is noted and understood that the ballfields will need to be located generally where they are shown on Page 9 of the PUD document. Any significant deviation in the location of the ballfields would require an amendment to the PUD document. No revisions necessary. Thanks, Chris Burns, PE Civil/LA Project Manager II / Associate Vice President 1208 Corporate Circle, Roanoke, VA 24018Roanoke / Richmond / New River Valley / Shenandoah Valley Page 174 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 HOPETREE SALEM, VIRGINIA PUD REZONING APPLICATION 1 d COMBINED DOCUMENT 11-5-2024 Exhibit A 3DJHRI4 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 SALEM PUD REZONING APPLICATION CITY OF SALEM VIRGINIA PUD APPLICATION PLANNING OBJECTIVES Per the Salem Zoning Application Sec. 106-228.4. Application process:To initiate an amendment, the applicant shall complete a rezoning application. This information shall be accompanied by graphic and written information, which shall constitute a preliminary master plan. All information submitted shall be of sufficient clarity and scale to clearly and accurately identify the location, nature, and character of the proposed district. At a minimum this information shall include: 1.A legal description and plat showing the site boundaries, and existing street lines, lot lines, and easements. 2.Existing zoning, land use and ownership of each parcel proposed for the district. 3.A general statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the PUD district, including a description of the character of the proposed development, the existing and proposed ownership of the site, the market for which the development is oriented, and objectives towards any specific manmade and natural characteristics located on the site. 4.A description and analysis of existing site conditions, including information on topography, natural water courses, floodplains, unique natural features, tree cover areas, etc. 5.A land use plan designating specific use types for the site, both residential and non-residential use types, and establishing site development regulations, including setback, height, building coverage, lot coverage, and density requirements. 6.A circulation plan, including location of existing and proposed vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, and other circulation facilities and location and general design of parking and loading facilities. General information on the trip generation, ownership and maintenance and proposed construction standards for these facilities should be included. A traffic impact analysis may be required by the administrator. 7.A public services and utilities plan providing requirements for and provision of all utilities, sewers, and other facilities to serve the site. 8.An open space plan, including areas proposed for passive and active recreational uses, natural and undisturbed areas, and proposed buffer areas proposed around the perimeter of the site. Information on the specific design and location of these areas and their ownership and maintenance should be included. 9.Generalized statements pertaining to any architectural and community design guidelines shall be submitted in sufficient detail to provide information on building designs, orientations, styles, lighting plans, etc. 10.A development schedule indicating the location, extent and sequence of proposed development. Specific information on development of the open space, recreational areas, and non-residential uses should be included. 2 Page 176 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION Existing Development The site is currently developed with a network of private driveways and several existing buildings on the property. The center core of the site is located on top of a ridge and consists of many of the existing buildings, as well as supporting parking areas and other improvements. Some of the existing buildings are currently being utilized by HopeTree, while others are vacant. There are also two recreational fields located near Red Lane to the north of the center core. The existing site has road frontage on East Carrollton Avenue, Red Lane, and North Broad Street. There is an existing private access drive (Mount Vernon Lane) from East Carrollton Avenue that accesses through the site and provides access to the center core before continuing through the site and back to Red Lane. A separate private access drive (Printers Lane) from Red Lane provides access to the recreational fields, as well as providing an additional connection to Mount Vernon Lane to the north of the center core. In addition to these private roads, there are also adult homes located at the north end of the property with driveways that access directly from Red Lane. Existing Topography There is an existing ridge bisecting the property from north to south. The east side of the property slopes from this ridge and from Red Lane to an existing drainage swale and storm sewer system. There is an existing stormwater management detention pond located near the center core of the property that was constructed with a previous development project. Existing Natural Features/Floodplain There is an existing pond located on the property in the northwest corner adjacent to Interstate 81. The pond discharges to an existing creek to the south that conveys stormwater from north to south toward the existing residential area at the end of North Broad Street. There is also an existing creek located at the southeast corner of the property that begins at the end of the existing storm sewer system that conveys water through the HopeTree property. This creek conveys runoff to an existing culvert under East Carrollton Avenue. The property is not located within a FEMA-defined floodplain. Existing Vegetation Much of the property that is not developed with buildings or pavement/hardscape is covered with a mix of managed turf and pasture. There is a large wooded area on the west side of the property around the pond and existing creek. There is a variation of other trees that are located throughout the property, with many of these being in the southeast corner of the site or along Red Lane. EXISTING SITE PLAN EXISTING AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF SITE 4.A description and analysis of existing site conditions, including information on topography, natural water courses, floodplains, unique natural features, tree cover areas, etc. BALZER ENGINEERS 1.A legal description and plat showing the site boundaries, and existing street lines, lot lines, and easements. 2.Existing zoning, land use and ownership of each parcel proposed for the district. BALZER AND ASSOCIATES 62.318 3 41-1-1, 41-1-2, 41-1-3, 41-1-4, 41-1-5, 41-1-6, and a portion of 44-3-10. Page 177 of 241 EXISTING SITE PLAN HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 BALZER ENGINEERS SWIMMING POOL BASKETBALL & TENNIS COURTS STABLES ALMA HUNT BUILDING BLEADSOE BUILDING BLESSINGS BUILDING RUTH CAMP CAMPBELL BUILDING MEMORIAL BUILDING LONGVIEW BUILDING PRESIDENT’S HOUSE BROWNLEY DOCK EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES FISHING POND BAPTIST ORPHANAGE CEMETARY HOBDAY BOXLEY BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING ANNEX BUILDING INFIRMARY BUILDING JAMES CAMP CARPENTER BUILDING 4 Page 178 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 EXISTING SITE PLAN AERIAL Dra$ 9.25.22 5 Page 179 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 ILLUSTRATIVE MASTER PLAN WITH AERIAL 6 Page 180 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 PROJECT DESCRIPTION CITY OF SALEM VIRGINIA PUD APPLICATION HOPETREE Master Planned TND Traditional Neighborhood Development PLANNING OBJECTIVES Per the Salem Zoning Application Sec. 106-228.4. - Application process: “ 3. A general statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the PUD district, including a description of the character of the proposed development, the existing and proposed ownership of the site, the market for which the development is oriented, and objectives towards any specific manmade and natural characteristics located on the site.” The purpose of the Hopetree master plan is to allow for the development of fully integrated, mixed-use pedestrian oriented neighborhood woven into the existing Hopetree campus of buildings and surrounding open space while connecting to the surrounding neighborhoods where feasible. The intent is to preserve the Hopetree campus and buildings and for new and infill development to minimize traffic congestion, suburban sprawl, site grading, infrastructure costs, and environmental degradation. The provisions of the Hopetree neighborhood are based on urban design and development conventions which were widely used in the United States since its founding until the 1940's and were based on the following principles: A. All neighborhoods have identifiable centers and edges. B. The center of the neighborhood is easily accessed by non-vehicular means from lots on the edges (i.e. approximately one-quarter-mile from center to edge, or a five-minute walk). C. Uses and housing types are mixed and in close proximity to one another. D. Street networks are interconnected and blocks are small. E. Civic buildings are given prominent sites throughout the neighborhood. THE HOPETREE MASTER PLAN INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING DESIGN FEATURES: A. Neighborhood form. 1. Dwellings at the edge of the neighborhood are roughly a five-minute walk or less to the center of the neighborhood. 2. A great variety of housing types and price ranges is included in the neighborhood, with the highest density of housing located towards the center of the neighborhood. 3. Within the neighborhood a mix of land uses is arranged to serve the needs of the residents in a convenient walking environment: open space/recreational areas, civic buildings, low and high density residential, retail/commercial, business/workplace, institutional, educational, and parking. 4. The area of the overall master plan includes the existing core campus with the surrounding open areas divided into blocks, streets, lots, greenways, and open space. 5. Similar land uses generally front across each street. Dissimilar land uses generally abut at rear lot lines. Corner lots which front on streets of dissimilar use generally observe the setback established on each fronting street. 6. Along existing streets, new buildings are compatible with the general spacing of structures, building mass and scale, and street frontage relationships of existing buildings. 7. The appearance of the neighborhood blends in with existing surrounding neighborhoods and feature the use of similar materials in construction. B. Lots and buildings: 1. New lots share a frontage line with a street or public space; lots fronting on a public space shall have access to a rear alley. 2. Consistent build-to lines are established along all streets and public space frontages. 3. All buildings, except accessory structures, have their main entrance opening on a street or public space. 4. No structure exceeds 3 stories in height in the Edge zone, and 4 stories in the General and Center zones. Height of buildings shall be measured per the Salem code and shall not exceed 45’ in any location. C. Streets, alleys and pathways: 1. Designs permit comfortable use of the street by motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists. Pavement widths, design speeds, and number of motor travel lanes are minimized to enhance safety for motorists and non-motorists alike. The specific design of each street considers the building types which front on the street and the relationship of the street to the overall town street network. An extensive system of connected pathways is woven through the core campus extending to the perimeter. 2. A combination of perimeter public streets and internal private streets provide access to all tracts and lots 3. Streets and alleys connect where feasible at other streets within the neighborhood and connect to existing and projected streets outside the development. Cul-de-sac and dead-end streets are discouraged and should only occur where absolutely necessary due to natural conditions. 4. Block faces do not have a length greater than 500 feet without dedicated alleys or pathways providing through access. 5. To prevent the build-up of vehicular speed, disperse traffic flow, and create a sense of visual enclosure, long uninterrupted segments of straight streets are avoided. 6. A continuous network of rear alleys is provided for the majority of lots. 7. Existing and proposed utilities are underground and run along alleys wherever possible as well as some streets and greenways. 8. Streets are organized according to a hierarchy based on function, size, capacity and design speed. Streets and rights-of-ways are therefore expected to differ in dimension. The proposed hierarchy of streets is indicated on the submitted master plan and each street type is separately detailed in the master plan. 9. Every street, except alleys, has a sidewalk on at least one side that is at least five feet wide. In commercial areas, sidewalks shall be at least ten feet wide. D. Parking: 1. On-street parking is provided on all streets where feasible. Occasional on-street parking may be accommodated without additional pavement width. For streets which serve workplace and storefront buildings, on-street parking is required and should be marked as such. On-street parking is parallel to the street unless the street lends itself to other parking layouts. 2. Parking lots are generally located at the rear or at the side of buildings and screened from public rights-of-way and adjoining properties by land forms or evergreen vegetation . 3. To the extent practicable, adjacent parking lots are interconnected. 4. Small and strategically placed parking areas are also provided. 5. Parking areas are paved as required and all parking areas and traffic lanes shall be clearly marked. 6. The number, width and location of curb cuts is such as to minimize traffic hazards, inconvenience and congestion. 7. Off-street parking and loading requirements as outlined in the city’s parking regulations may be used as guidance but there are no minimum parking standards. 8. The master plan provides adequate parking and off-street loading areas for different areas of the development, based on the uses allowed and the density of development. 9. In addition to landscaping provided for screening above, trees are planted around the perimeter and interior of parking lots to provide shade. E. Landscaping: 1. Trees are planted within right-of-ways parallel to the street along all streets except alleys. 2. Tree spacing is determined by species type selected from the City list of approved trees. Large maturing trees are generally planted a minimum of 30 feet and a maximum of 50 feet on center. Small and medium maturing trees are planted a minimum of ten feet and a maximum of 30 feet on center. 3. Large maturing trees are generally planted along residential streets and along the street frontages and perimeter areas of parks, squares, greenbelts and civic structures. 4. Small maturing trees are generally planted along non-residential streets, interior portions of parks, squares, greenbelts and civic lots. Storefronts are not obstructed by the planting pattern. 5. The natural features of the landscape are incorporated into the landscaping plan. 6. All plantings are with native or appropriate species (refer to the City list). 7. Buffer requirements for property located on the perimeter of the neighborhood has setbacks and buffers that are consistent with the setbacks and buffers of the adjoining zoning district, including provisions for accessory buildings, but are a minimum of 10 feet. F. Sidewalks and Greenways: 1. Sidewalks or greenway easements are proposed in locations shown on the master plan or proposed to connect to pedestrian facilities shown on the master plan. 2. Existing sidewalks at the time of development or re-development in each phase are improved, repaired, or replaced as necessary. G. Uses 1. Maximum number of total residential units is 340. 2. Maximum number of total hotel rooms is 34. 3. Maximum total square footage of retail and restaurant uses is 15,000 s.f. 4. Home occupations shall not be counted toward any maximum densities. Permitted uses shall be based on the general category of use that has been established for a lot or group of lots as shown in the Use Table. 3.A general statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the PUD district, including a description of the character of the proposed development, the existing and proposed ownership of the site, the market for which the development is oriented, and objectives towards any specific manmade and natural characteristics located on the site. 7 Page 181 of 241 T-4 NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL T-4 The Neighborhood General Zone consists of higher-density scale urban fabric with predominantely attached residential and serves as a transition from neighborhood edge to the neighborhood center with the historic campus core. Home occupation and accessory buildings are allowed. Setbacks and landscaping are also similar and may vary some. These houses front on new streets, and greenways. Streets vary depending on location and may include curbs, planting strips, sidewalks arranged with traditional size blocks including side streets, rear lanes, and greenways. General Character A mix of houses with a range of medium to high density building types including a range of single-family urban houses, multi-family estates, cottages, townhouses in a variety of configurations, cottage courts, stacked flats, loft houses, mews houses, multi-family houses, tree houses, and multi-family buildings. Building Placement Shallow front and side yard setbacks. Accessory building and parking are accessed from rear lanes. Frontage Type Porches, stoops, terraces, light wells, forecourts, shopfronts, Galleries, and arcades. Typical Building Two to four-story Types of Civic Space: Urban streetscapes with on-street parking, walks, street trees, courtyards, plazas, terraces, mews, and linear green fingers with pathways. T-5 NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER T-5 The Neighborhood Center Zone consists of higher-density scale urban fabric with predominantely attached residential and mixed- use buildings including infill in the historic campus core. These buildings front on squares, campus greens, plazas, parking courts, streets, and greenways. Street are limited in the core and vary depending on location and may include curbs, planting strips, sidewalks arranged with traditional size blocks including side streets, rear lanes, and greenways. General Character A mix of buildings with a range of medium to high density building types including townhouses in a variety of configurations, tree houses on steep slopes, stacked flats, loft houses, mews houses, multi-family estates, multi-family buildings, and mixed-use buildings. Building Placement No setbacks are required for buildings in the general campus parcel. Parking is accessed from on-street parking, rear lanes, in nearby perimeter areas adjacent to the core campus including the parking allee, and in small parking courts that also serve as civic gather space. Frontage Type Stoops, terraces, light wells, forecourts, shopfronts, Galleries, and arcades. Typical Building Two to four-story Types of Civic Space: Urban streetscapes with on-street parking, walks, street trees, courtyards, plazas, terraces, mews, and linear green fingers with pathways. HISTORIC EXISTING CAMPUS CORE The historic campus consists of a range of institutional buildings originally serving the orphanage as well as newer school buildings, a chapel, dormitories, and other related uses. Each historic building is to be retained where feasible for on going institutional uses, commercial, residential and mixed-use with additional infill mixed-use buildings, building additions, and spaces. These buildings front on squares, campus greens, plazas, parking courts, streets, and greenways. Streets are limited in the core and vary depending on location and may include curbs, planting strips, sidewalks arranged with traditional size blocks including side streets, rear lanes, and greenways. General Character A mix of buildings with a range of medium to high density building types including townhouses in a variety of configurations, tree houses on steep slopes, stacked flats, loft houses, mews houses, multi-family houses, multi-family buildings, and mixed-use buildings. Building Placement Minimum or no setback are required. Parking is accessed from on-street parking, rear lanes, in nearby perimeter areas adjacent to the core campus including the parking allee, and in small parking courts that also serve as civic gathering space. Frontage Type Stoops, terraces, light wells, forecourts, shopfronts, Galleries, and arcades. Typical Building Two to four-story Types of Civic Space: Urban streetscapes with on-street parking, walks, street trees, courtyards, plazas, terraces, mews, and linear green fingers with pathways. T-3 NEIGHBORHOOD EDGE T-3 The Neighborhood Edge Zone consists of residential scale urban fabric similar to existing neighborhoods and serves as a buffer and transition to higher internal zones that have more residential and other mixed use. Home occupations and accessory buildings are allowed. Setbacks and landscaping are also similar and may vary some. These houses front on existing streets facing similar scale existing homes on the opposite side. Streets include curbs, planting strips, and will include new sidewalks with on-street parking on the Hopetree side arranged with traditional size blocks including connected streets, rear lanes, and greenways. General Character A mix of houses with a range of neighborhood density building types including larger estate houses, smaller single-family houses, multi-family estates, cottages, pair houses, stacked flats, townhouses in a variety of configurations, and cottage courts. Building Placement Shallow to medium front and side yard setbacks. Outbuilding and parking are accessed from rear lanes. Frontage Type Porches, stoops, landscaped front yards Typical Building One to two-story, with some three story Types of Civic Space: Neighborhood streetscapes with on-street parking, walks, street trees, and linear green fingers with pathways. EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS The existing surrounding neighborhoods consist of primarily traditional single family homes. Home occupations and accessory buildings are evident. Setbacks and landscaping are generally front lawns and vary in character. General surrounding neighborhood houses front on streets facing similar scale homes on the opposite side. Some blocks include rear lanes, while others use front loaded driveways. Existing streets include curbs, planting strips, both with and without sidewalks. Most neighborhoods are arranged with traditional size blocks. In the case of homes immediately around Hopetree, the homes generally face the campus open space in the form of recreation fields, lawn, pasture, or natural vegetation. There are no sidewalks along Red Lane and sidewalks only on one side of one block for North Broad Street and Carrollton Avenue. General Character A mix of houses immediately around Hopetree include larger estate houses, smaller single-family houses. Nearby neighborhoods include a range of larger estate houses, smaller single-family houses, multi-family estates, cottages, duplexes, townhouses, stacked flats, multi-family houses, multi-family buildings, and mixed-use buildings. Nearby Wiley Court is a famous example of a pocket court. Building Placement Shallow to medium front and side yard setbacks. Outbuilding and parking are accessed from rear lanes. Frontage Type Porches, stoops, landscaped front yards Typical Building One to two-story, with some three story Types of Civic Space: Neighborhood streetscapes with on-street parking, walks, street trees, and linear green fingers with pathways. HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 TRANSECT ZONE DESCRIPTIONS MISSING MIDDLE H O U S I N G ILLUSTRATION BY OPTICOS FOR AARP LIVABLE COMMUNITIES PUBLICATION ON MISSING MIDDLE HOUSING https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/livable-communities/housing/2022/Discovering and Developing Missing Middle Housing-spreads-093022.pdf SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES HOUSES COTTAGES MULTI-FAMILY HOUSES PAIR HOUSES COTTAGE COURTS TOWN HOUSES APARTMENT BUILDINGS MIXED-USE BUILDINGS URBAN CORE STACKED FLATS TRANSECT ZONES SUMMARY LESS URBAN MORE URBAN 3.A general statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the PUD district, including a description of the character of the proposed development, the existing and proposed ownership of the site, the market for which the development is oriented, and objectives towards any specific manmade and natural characteristics located on the site. 8 Page 182 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 LAND USE PLAN GENERAL NOTES: •Building Types generally provide parking from rear alleys and lanes screened from frontages on lots. •On-street parking shall be provided along all streets where pratical. •Each Block Group includes a minimum of three (3) building types. •Each Block Group shall have 20% minimum of each of the building types used. •A minimum of six (6) building types shall be used for the overall project. • A maximum of five (5) of the same building type attached consecutively. •Civic or Historic Core Buildings may be converted to T5 - Neighborhood Center transect zone if the current use is discontinued. •Land may be subdivided into seperate ownership. •These standards do not CIVIC SPACE RESERVES HISTORIC CORE BUILDINGS CIVIC BUILDINGS STREETS AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS & DETAILS BLOCK GROUP RECOMMENDED GALLERY RECOMMENDED SHOPFRONT VISTA POINTS PEDESTRIAN SHED - 5 MINUTE WALK RADIUS TRANSECT ZONES w/ FRONTAGE LINES T5 - NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER T4 - NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL T3 - NEIGHBORHOOD EDGE OPEN SPACE / NATURAL T5 T3 T4 TRANSECT ZONES & BUILDING TYPES KEY (SEE SPECIFIC BUILDING TYPES FOR STANDARDS) 5.A land use plan designating specific use types for the site, both residential and non-residential use types, and establishing site development regulations, including setback, height, building coverage, lot coverage, and density requirements. STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED 9 E - ESTATE H - HOUSE / ADU C - COTTAGE / ADU PH - PAIR HOUSE / ADU T - TOWNHOUSE / ADU PC - POCKET / COTTAGE COURT TH-PU - TOWNHOUSE PARK-UNDER 3THE - 3-TOWNHOUSE ESTATE SF - STACKED FLAT LH - LOFT HOUSE MH- MEWS HOUSE TR - TREE HOUSE AH - MULTI-FAMILY HOUSE AB - MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING MXB - MIXED-USE BUILDING CV - HISTORIC CORE BUILDING SITE T5 T3 T4 H C PH T AH PC TH- PU SF 3 THE LH MH MX B CV AB TR E Page 183 of 241 CIRCULATION PLAN HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 PARK ALLEE’ ST 20-64 PLAZA PL VARIES PEDESTRIAN PATH** PP 5/10 REAR LANE* RL 14-30 HOPETREE THOROUGHFARE TYPES HILLSIDE LANE HL 20-20 The Purpose of Streets designed within Hopetree is to create a network with managed motor vehicle driver speeds that are compatible with safe, comfortable walking and bicycle mobility. Target Speeds are 20 miles per hour. Lane widths of 10 feet maximum and street trees planted between certain parking spaces and between the curb and sidewalk help manage driver speeds via lateral views and provide shade for travelers in summer months. Wet utilities are typically placed in the front of buildings and dry utilities are in the rear. Solid waste is collected in the rear lanes enhancing walkability in front. MOUNT VERNON AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS* MV 36-60 RED LANE IMPROVEMENTS* RED - 28-60 ** On existing thoroughfares dimensions and details may vary based on existing conditions and site constraints. The first number is the estimated pavement width and second is the estimated R.O.W. width but dimensions may vary as the design is engineered in more detail. 6.A circulation plan, including location of existing and proposed vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, and other circulation facilities and location and general design of parking and loading facilities. General information on the trip generation, ownership and maintenance and proposed construction standards for these facilities should be included. A traffic impact analysis may be required by the administrator. ST ST PL PL RL RL RL RL RL RL RED MV MV HL HL HL HL HL HL MV RED RED PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PPPP PP PP PP PP PP PP 10 * On-street parking and a minimum 5' sidewalk shall be provided along Red Lane. Page 184 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 4.25.23 7.A public services and utilities plan providing requirements for and provision of all utilities, sewers, and other facilities to serve the site. PUBLIC SERVICES & UTILITY PLAN * BALZER ENGINEERS * Loca'ons are conceptual and subject to change with the final design. 11 Page 185 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 OPEN SPACE PLAN SHOWING PARKS, GREENWAYS, GREEN FINGERS, TREE CANOPY, TREE PLANTINGS, ,WATER FEATURES, & THE QUADRANGLE 8. An open space plan, including areas proposed for passive and active recreational uses, natural and undisturbed areas, and proposed buffer areas proposed around the perimeter of the site. Information on the specific design and location of these areas and their ownership and maintenance should be included. 12 Page 186 of 241 POCKET COURT TRANSECT ZONES & BUILDING TYPES KEY (SEE SPECIFIC BUILDING TYPES FOR STANDARDS) HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 COMMUNITY DESIGN STANDARDS SUMMARY T5 – CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD T3 – EDGE NEIGHBORHOOD T4 – GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD COTTAGE MULIT-FAMILY HOUSE PAIR HOUSEESTATE TOWNHOUSEHOUSE SHOP FRONT / MIXED-USE MULTI-FAMILY BUILDINGTOWNHOUSE PARK-UNDER 3-TOWNHOUSE ESTATE STACKED FLAT LOFT HOUSE MEWS HOUSE T5 – CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD T4 – GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD T3 – EDGE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN SPACE / PARK T1 – NATURAL CIVIC CIVIC AHTH- PU SF3 THE LH MH MX B CV ABTR C PH T PCEH HOUSING & BUILDING TYPES BY TRANSECT ZONES TREE HOUSE 9.Generalized statements pertaining to any architectural and community design guidelines shall be submitted in sufficient detail to provide information on building designs, orientations, styles, lighting plans, etc. E - ESTATE H - HOUSE / ADU C - COTTAGE / ADU PH - PAIR HOUSE / ADU T - TOWNHOUSE / ADU PC - POCKET / COTTAGE COURT TH-PU - TOWNHOUSE PARK-UNDER 3THE - 3-TOWNHOUSE ESTATE SF - STACKED FLAT LH - LOFT HOUSE MH- MEWS HOUSE TR - TREE HOUSE AH - MULTI-FAMILY HOUSE AB - MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING MXB - MIXED-USE BUILDING CV - CIVIC BUILDING SITE T5 T3 T4 H C PH T AH PC TH- PU SF 3 THE LH MH MX B CV AB TR E 13 Note: These standards do not apply to the existing buildings. Page 187 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 BUILDING TYPES STANDARDS TEMPLATE F/G A E B C D HH I K J L TOWNHOUSE TOWNHOUSE A Townhouse is a single-family residence that shares a party wall with another of the same type and occupies the full frontage line on its own lot. For Townhouses, garages and/or parking is provided from the rear lane frontages while the primary townhouse front faces a street or public greenway. Townhouses in the Strolling District are permitted to have ground floor mixed-use. Lot width x depth 16’ min. x 80’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 10’ min. (B) Front Corner 10’ min. (C) Side 0’ min. (D) Rear 20’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 20’ min. (F) Accessory Buildings from Front 40’ min. (G) Accessory Buildings Side Align. (H) Accessory Buildings Rear 0’ min. (I) Building Frontage at Setback 100 %’ max. (J) Building Front Encroachments 5’ max.(K) Building Side Encroachments 4’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 3.5 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2.5 Stories max. DESCRIPTION LOT DIMENSIONS DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS KEYED TO THE GRAPHIC PLAN FORM-BASED GRAPHIC PLAN NAME OF BUILDING TYPES ACCESSORY’ DWELLING UNIT PRIMARY ‘BUILDING SIDE PORCH LOT BOUNDARY REAR LANE DRIVEWAY REAR YARD PLANTING STRIP FRONT STREET STREET CORNER FRONT FACADE SIDE YARD FRONT YARD SIDE STREET PLANTING STRIP SIDEWALK FRONT PORCH SIDEWALK SAMPLE STANDARDS TEMPLATE KEY 14 THIS IS A SAMPLE BUILDING TYPES TEMPLATE KEY FOR REFERENCE ONLY AS A GUILD TO THE BUILDING TYPES STANDARDS GRAPHICS INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT. THE TEXT LABELS IN RED IIDENTIFY THE SPECIFIC STANDARDS FEATURED ON THE GRAPHICS FOR EACH TYPE. NOTE: THESE STANDARDS DO NOT APPLY TO THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. Page 188 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 GREENWAY OPTION A E B C D HH I K J L F/G GREENWAY OPTION — AVAILABLE OF ALL TYPES A Greenway Option is for reference. Instead of fronting a street, the primary facade faces a public greenway connected to walks and trails while garages and/or parking is generally provided from a rear lane frontage. For each Type the Standards are the same. EXAMPLE of the HOUSE TYPE SHOWING the GREENWAY OPTION Lot width x depth 50’ min. x 100’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 20’ min. (B) Front Corner 15’ min. (C) Side 8’ min. (D) Rear 20’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 20’ min. (F) Accessory Buildings from Front 40’ min. (G) Accessory Buildings Side 5’ min. (H) Accessory Buildings Rear 5’ min. (I) Building Frontage at Setback 30’ min. (J) Building Front Encroachments 12’ max.(K) Building Side Encroachments 8’ max. (L) Height Principle Building Varied Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2.5 Stories max. BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS ESTATE ESTATE An Estate is a large single-family dwelling on a large lot of more suburban character, often shared by one or more ancillary buildings. The primary facade faces a street or public greenway where a porch and entry are prominent. Garages and/or parking is generally provided from the street frontage and is set back from the primary facade, side-loaded, or set forward side-loaded. Garage forward doors are not permitted to face the street. Lot width x depth 80’ min. x 100’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 25’ min. (B) Front Corner 20’ min. (C) Side 20’ min. (D) Rear 20’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 20’ min. (F) Accessory Buildings from Front 25’ min. (G) Accessory Buildings Side 10’ min. (H) Accessory Buildings Rear 6’ min. (I) Building Frontage at Setback 60 % max. (J) Building Front Encroachments 15’ max.(K) Building Side Encroachments 12’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 3.5 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2.5 Stories max. A E B C HH I K L J D F/G A C H H F J L EI K D B/G J 15 Page 189 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 HOUSE HOUSE A House Type is a single-family residence on its own lot. For House the primary facade faces a public street or a greenway where a porch and entry are prominent. Garages and/or parking is generally provided from a rear lane or from the street frontage set back from the primary façade. Lot width x depth 50’ min. x 100’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 20’ min. (B) Front Corner 15’ min. (C) Side 8’ min. (D) Rear 20’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 20’ min. (F) Accessory Buildings from Front 40’ min. (G) Accessory Buildings Side 6’ min. (H) Accessory Buildings Rear 6’ min. (I) Building Frontage at Setback 30’ min. (J) Building Front Encroachments 12’ max.(K) Building Side Encroachments 8’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 3.5 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2.5 Stories max. A E B C D HH I K J L F/G BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS A E B C HH I K J L F/G D COTTAGE DD HH F/G M COTTAGE A Cottage is a smaller single-family residence on its own lot. For Cottages garages and/or parking is required to be provided from a rear lane while the primary house front faces a public street or greenway. Lot width x depth 30’ min. x 65’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 12’ min. (B) Front Corner 8’ min. (C) Side 5’ min. (D) Rear 30’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 40’ min. (F) Accessory Buildings from Front 40’ min. (G) Accessory Buildings Side Align (H) Accessory Buildings Rear 0’ min. (I) Building Frontage at Setback 20’ min. (J) Building Front Encroachments 10’ max.(K) Building Side Encroachments 6’ max. (L) Building Back Wing 15’ max. (M) Height Principle Building 3.0 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2.0 Stories max. 16 Page 190 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 PAIR HOUSE PAIR HOUSE A Pair House is a single-family residence that shares a party wall with one other of the same type, each on their own lot. Garages, ADUs and/or parking is provided from the rear lane while the primary front faces a street or public greenway. Lot width x depth 24’ min. x 65’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 15’ min. (B) Front Corner 10’ min. (C) Side 6’ min. (D) Rear 30’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 35’ min. (F) Accessory Buildings from Front 40’ min. (G) Accessory Buildings Side Align (H) Accessory Buildings Rear 0’ min. (I) Building Frontage at Setback 20’ min. (J) Building Front Encroachments 12’ max.(K) Building Side Encroachments 6’ max. (L) Building Back Wing 15’ max. (M) Height Principle Building 3.5 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2 Stories max. F/G A E B C D HH I K J L M H BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS TOWNHOUSE F/G A E B C D HH I K J L M H TOWNHOUSE A Townhouse is a single-family residence that shares a party wall with another of the same type, with a minimum of three units in a row, and occupies the full frontage line on its own lot. For Townhouses, garages, ADUs, and/or parking is provided from the rear lane frontages while the primary townhouse front faces a street or public greenway. Townhouses in the T-5 Neighborhood Center Strolling District are permitted to have ground floor mixed-use. Lot width x depth 16’ min. x 80’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 10’ min. (B) Front Corner 8’ min. (C) Side 0’ min. (D) Rear 30’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 35’ min. (F) Accessory Buildings from Front 40’ min. (G) Accessory Buildings Side Align. (H) Accessory Buildings Rear 0’ min. (I) Building Frontage at Setback 100 %’ max. (J) Building Front Encroachments 8’ max.(K) Building Side Encroachments 6’ max. (L) Building Back Wing 15’ max. (M) Height Principle Building 3.5 Stories max. First Floor Above Sidewalk Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2.5 Stories max. 17 Page 191 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 POCKET COURT POCKET COURT A Pocket Court is permitted with up to 8 units. Pocket Courts permit units that do not front a public vehicular right-of-way, Attached and detached houses can be grouped in pedestrian courts facing a mews, small common, green or garden, shared through an owners’ association. A pocket court is often, but not always, arranged in a U-shape. The units are separated from the common area only by a sidewalk, path or other non-vehicular way. Parking is from rear lanes or alleys in attached or detached garages or open parking in a central location. Lot width x depth (may rotate) 60’ min. x 90’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 5’ min. (B) Front Corner 10’ min. (C) Side 5’ min. (D) Rear 20’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 20’ min. (F) Building Frontage at Setback 80 % max. (J) Building Front Encroachments 5’ max. (K) Building Side Encroachments 5’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 2.5 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. A E B C D F K J LPer Fire Code BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS LOFT F AE B C D K J L LOFT A Loft is a single-family residence that is detached or shares a party wall with another of the same type and occupies the full frontage line on its own lot. For Loft types, garages, and/or parking is provided adjacent or under the townhouse from the rear lane frontages while the primary townhouse front faces a lane, street, or public greenway. Lofts in the T-5 Neighborhood Center Strolling District are permitted to have ground floor mixed-use. Lot width x depth 20’ min. x 30’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 0’ min. (B) Front Corner 0’ min. (C) Side 0’ min. (D) Rear 0’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 20’ min. (F) Building Frontage at Setback 90 %’ max. (J) Building Front Encroachments 8’ max. (K) Building Side Encroachments 6’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 3.5 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2.5 Stories max. 18 Page 192 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 TOWNHOUSE PARK-UNDER F AE B C D K J L TOWNHOUSE PARK-UNDER A Townhouse is a single-family residence that shares a party wall with another of the same type and occupies the full frontage line on its own lot. For Townhouse Park-Under types, garages, and/or parking is provided under the townhouse from the rear lane frontages while the primary townhouse front faces a street or public greenway. Townhouses in the T-5 Neighborhood Center Strolling District are permitted to have ground floor mixed-use. Lot width x depth 20’ min. x 50’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 10’ min. (B) Front Corner 8’ min. (C) Side 0’ min. (D) Rear 30’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 30’ min. (F) Building Frontage at Setback 100 %’ max. (J) Building Front Encroachments 8’ max.(K) Building Side Encroachments 6’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 3.5 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2.5 Stories max. BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS 3-TOWNHOUSE ESTATE 3-TOWNHOUSE ESTATE A 3-Townhouse Estate is a single-family residence that shares a party wall with two other of the same type with the building and architectural massing of a large house or estate. and occupies the full frontage line on its own lot. For 3-Townhouse Estate types, garages, and/or parking is provided under the townhouse from the rear lane frontages while the primary townhouse front faces a street or public greenway. Townhouses in the T-5 Neighborhood Center Strolling District are permitted to have ground floor mixed-use. Lot width x depth 24’ min. x 50’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 10’ min. (B) Front Corner 8’ min. (C) Side 0’ min. (D) Rear 30’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 30’ min. (F) Building Frontage at Setback 100 %’ max. (J) Building Front Encroachments 8’ max. (K) Building Side Encroachments 6’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 3.5 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2.5 Stories max. F AE B C D K J L C L 19 Page 193 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 STACKED-FLAT F AE B CD K J L STACKED-FLAT A Stacked-Flat is a single floor or town house residence that is stacked vertically with one above the other and occupies the full frontage line on a shared lot lot. For Staked-Flat types, garages, and/or parking is provided under or behind the building accessed from the rear lane frontages while the front faces a street or public greenway. Stacked-Flats in the T-5 Neighborhood Center are permitted to have ground floor mixed-use. Lot width x depth 60’ min. x 50’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 10’ min. (B) Front Corner 8’ min. (C) Side 0’ min. (D) Rear 30’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 30’ min. (F) Building Frontage at Setback 80 % max. (J) Building Front Encroachments 8’ max. (K) Building Side Encroachments 6’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 4 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS MEWS HOUSE MEWS HOUSE A Mews House is a single-family residence that is detached or shares a party wall with another of the same type and occupies the full frontage line on its own lot. Mews House types are generally wide and shallow. For Mews House types, garages, and/or parking is provided adjacent from the rear lane frontages screened from the frontage while the primary townhouse front faces a lane, street, or public greenway. Mews Houses in the T-5 Neighborhood Center are permitted to have ground floor mixed-use. Lot width x depth 50’ min. x 30’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 5’ min. (B) Front Corner 5’ min. (C) Side 5’ min. (D) Rear 5’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade Screened (F) Building Frontage at Setback 90 % max. (J) Building Front Encroachments 8’ max. (K) Building Side Encroachments 6’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 3.5 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2.5 Stories max. F AE B C D K J L 20 Page 194 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 A E B C D HH I K J L D H F D MULTI-FAMILY HOUSE M H MULTI-FAMILY HOUSE A Multi-Family House is a multi-family residence with up to 8 units that is similar in scale, massing, and character with a large single-family house and intended to be compatible in form and adjacency. For Multi-Family Houses, garages, ADUs and/or parking is provided from the street and lane frontages while the primary front faces a street or public greenway. Multi-Family Houses in the T-5 Neighborhood Center are permitted to have ground floor mixed-use. Lot width x depth 72’ min. x 100’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 12’ min. (B) Front Corner 6’ min. (C) Side 8’ min. (D) Rear 30’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 45’ min. (F) Accessory Buildings from Front 60’ min. (G) Accessory Buildings Side Align (H) Accessory Buildings Rear 0’ min. (I) Building Frontage at Setback 90 % max. (J) Building Front Encroachments 10’ max. (K) Building Side Encroachments 6’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 3.5 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2.5 Stories max. M BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS A E B C D H I K J L D H F D MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING H MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING A Multi-Family House is a multi-family residence with up to 16 units that is similar in scale, massing, and character with the frontage of a Multi-Family Building and intended to be compatible in form and adjacency. For Multi-Family Buildings, garages, ADUs and/or parking is provided in a rear common parking area and/or park-under garages screened from the street while the primary front faces a street or public greenway. Multi-Family Buildings in the T-5 Neighborhood Center are permitted to have ground floor mixed-use. Lot width x depth 72’ min. x 60’ min. (A) Setbacks Front 6’ min. (B) Front Corner 6’ min. (C) Side 6’ min. (D) Rear 0’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 45’ min. (F) Building Frontage at Setback 90 % max. (J) Building Front Encroachments 10’ max. (K) Building Side Encroachments 6’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 4 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding 2.5 Stories max. 21 Page 195 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS TREEHOUSE A Treehouse Type is a single-family dwelling. The small footprint is vertical in proportion and typically includes substantially deep cantilevered porches and balconies. Parking is generally provided along the street frontage or by driveways set back from the frontage. Lot width x depth & max footprint 50’ min. x 50’ min. (A) 576 sq. ft. max. building footprint Setbacks Front 5’ min. (B) Front Corner 12’ min. (C) Side 12’ min. (D) Rear 5’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 20’ min. (F) Building Frontage at Setback 40 % max. (J) Building Front Encroachments 15’ max.(K) Building Side & Rear Encroachments 12’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 4 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 1.5’ min. Outbuilding N/A TREEHOUSE A E B D F K C L J SHOPFRONT / MIXED-USE SHOPFRONT / MIXED USE Shopfront and Mixed-Use Buildings are small to medium size size traditional building types typically following the platting patterns of the historic main street. Ground level uses typically include retail shops, restaurants and cafes, and commercial. Upper level uses typically include residential and/or commercial uses. Ground level facades are detailed with inviting storefronts with abundant windows and canopies, balconies, and/or awnings above. Parking is provided on-street and in shared screened parking areas or park-under accessed from a rear alley while the primary front faces the street or public green space. Refer to the Land Use Plan for recommended shopfront locations. Lot width x depth 12’ min. x 40’ min. (A) Building Footprint 5,000 sf building footprint max. Setbacks Front 0’ min. (B) Front Corner 0’ min. (C) Side 0’ min. (D) Rear 0’ min. (E) Parking and Waste from Front Façade 20’ min. (F) Building Frontage at Setback 80 % min. (J) Building Front Encroachments Above 1st Level 15’ max. (K) Building Side Encroachments Above 1st Level 8’ max. (L) Height Principle Building 4 Stories max. First Floor Above Grade 0’ min. A E B C F K L J 22 Note: These standards do not apply to the existing buildings. Page 196 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 ACCESSORY BUILDING ACCESSORY BUILDING •Accessory Structures are permitted in zones with residential uses. In all cases, garages and storage buildings should be located behind or set back from the principal dwelling. When the housing type does not include a garage, a storage building is recommended. •Garages: Garages should be located behind the principal dwelling. Construction of garages for houses should be optional. •Accessory buildings are allowed everywhere that accessory building standards are called out in specific Building Types Standards including Estate, House, Cottage, Pair House, Town House, and Multi-Family House. •Accessory Dwelling Unit: A secondary dwelling unit associated with a principal residence on a single lot is permitted. ADUs shall be a maximum of 50% of the square footage of the primary building footprint. An accessory unit is typically located over the detached garage of a townhouse or detached house. Refer to each Building Type for specific standards. • See the Use Table for “accessory apartment” when attached to the principal residence. BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS 23 Page 197 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 ROOFS Roofs shall be clad in galvanized metal, fiberglass/asphalt shingles, or slate. Roof Penetrations, including vent stacks, shall be placed on the rear slope of the roof where feasible. Roof penetrations shall be finished to match the color of the roof. Mechanical equipment including solar panels shall be screened and located away from frontages. Roof Slope shall be between 6:12 and 12:12. Porch Slope shall be a minimum of 3:12. Gutters, Downspouts, and Projecting Drainpipes shall be made of galvanized metal, copper, or painted aluminum in white or same color as building. Flashing shall be galvanized/pre-painted metal or copper. Eaves shall be continuous. Eaves shall be either exposed with custom cut rafter tails, partially exposed with square-cut rafter tails, or closed soffits and on the front facade shall project 12 to 36 inches from the exterior wall sheathing to the outer edge of gutter. Rafter Tails shall not exceed 6 inches in depth at the tip. OPENINGS Doors shall provide a clear width of not less than 32”. Exterior doors shall have a maximum nominal width of 36” for single doors. If double doors are used, one leaf shall provide a minimum 32” clearance. Local compliance for fire egress and ADA standards takes precedent. Doors shall be side-hinged swinging type (no sliders) at frontages. Doors shall be painted. Windows shall be made of wood, extruded aluminum, vinyl, or hollow steel frame and glazed with clear glass. Windows shall be with a vertical or square proportion, Storm Windows and Screens, shall cover the entire window area. Panes shall be of square or vertical proportion. Shutters shall be operable w/ shutter dogs, sized, and shaped to meet the associated openings. SUSTAINABILITY GUIDELINES Sites should be disturbed as little as possible during construction. Natural drainage patterns shall be kept wherever feasible. Excavated soil shall be used for required contour line modifications and onsite backfill. Materials should be locally sourced where feasible. Use of Recycled Materials is encouraged. Building Shape is recommended to be rectangular to allow breezes inside, cross-ventilation, and provide natural cooling. Landscaping should encourage deciduous trees next to buildings to provide them with shade in summer and solar heating in winter. Building Shading should be used selectively to minimize unwanted solar heat gain in the summer and maximize heat gains in the winter. Cross ventilation is recommended to be provided through narrow floor plans with large, operable windows, porches and breezes. Paints are recommended to have Low-VOC emissions. Stormwater Management for guidance on stormwater management and the application of tools for paving, channeling, storage, and filtration including maintenance and costs refer to the; Light Imprint Handbook; Integrating Sustainability and Community Design. HEIGHT Height of buildings shall be measured per the Salem code. For residential dwellings the ground floor shall be a minimum of 18” above the back of curb measured at the front corners. ELEMENTS Porches and Colonnades are generally covered and shall have their columns, and posts. Porches shall have square or vertically proportioned intercolumniation. Porches may encroach into the setbacks. Railings shall be made of metal, wood, or composite. Railings shall have horizontal top and bottom rails centered on the balusters. The openings between balusters shall not exceed 4 inches. Bottom rails shall be raised above the level of the floor. Equipment including HVAC and utility meters shall be screened and located away from the primary entries. Vista Points where shown on the Land Use Plan are prominent locations including corners, deflections, and at the axial conclusion of a thoroughfare or public space. A building located at a Vista Point designated on a Regulating Plan is required to be designed in response to this location. Galleries shall be aligned close to the frontage line with an attached cantilevered shed or lightweight colonnade overlapping the Sidewalk. WALLS Walls shall be in stone, brick, stucco, wood clapboard, board and batten, fiber cement, or vinyl, or polymeric. Walls shall show no more than two materials above the foundation. Materials shall change along a horizontal line, with the heavier material below the lighter. Siding shall be of integral color, painted or stained. Arches and Piers shall be brick, stone, or stucco. Posts shall be pressure treated, wood, or protective wrapped with vinyl or PVC. Foundations shall be enclosed with horizontal wood boards, wood louvers, stucco over block, stamped poured concrete, stone, or brick. Trim shall be high grade lumber, pre-painted metal, polymeric, vinyl, or fiber cement board, and shall be 3.5 inches to 6 inches in width at corners and around corners. Wood, if visible, shall be painted or stained with an opaque stain, except walking surfaces, which may be left natural. Stucco shall be cement with smooth sand or pebble finish. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES SIGNAGE A Master Signage Plan and Sign Standards may be submitted prior to specific site plan submissions. General to all zones: a.There shall be no signage permitted additional to that specified in this section. Temporary signage for builders is excluded. General and Edge zone a.The address number, no more than 6 inches measured vertically, shall be attached to the building in proximity to the Principal Entrance or at a mailbox. Center zone a. Blade signs, not to exceed 6 square ft. for each separate business entrance, may be attached to and should be perpendicular to the Facade, and shall clear 8 feet above the Sidewalk. b. A single external permanent sign band may be applied to the Facade of each building, providing that such sign not exceed 3 feet in height by any length. 9.Generalized statements pertaining to any architectural and community design guidelines shall be submitted in sufficient detail to provide information on building designs, orientations, styles, lighting plans, etc. 24 Note: These standards do not apply to the existing buildings. Page 198 of 241 Page 199 of 241 PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond New River Valley Shenandoah Valley P L A N N E R S / A R C H I T E C T S E N G I N E E R S / S U R V E Y O R S J: \ 2 2 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 2 0 0 2 9 . 0 0 H O P E T R E E M A S T E R P L A N \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 2 0 0 2 9 . 0 0 P h a s i n g P l a n . d w g P L O T T E D : 11 / 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 2 4 : 5 2 A M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 LDS CPB CPB 11/5/2024 N/A HO P E T R E E P . U . D . DE V E L O P M E N T S C H E D U L E / P H A S I N G P L A N CI T Y O F S A L E M , V I R G I N I A MO U N T V E R N O N A V E N U E EX-B 04220029.00 PRE L I M I N A R Y 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Page 200 of 241 Use Type Historic Core Buildings T3 T4 T5 Open Space / Natural Definition Agriculture The use of land for the production of food and fiber, including farming, dairying, pasturage, agriculture, horticulture, viticulture, and animal and poultry husbandry. A garden accessory to a residence shall not be considered agriculture. The keeping of a cow, pig, sheep, goat, chicken or similar animal shall constitute agriculture regardless of the size of the animal and regardless of the purpose for which it is kept. Agritourism Any activity carried out on a farm or ranch that allows members of the general public, for recreational, entertainment, or educational purposes, to view or enjoy rural activities, including farming, wineries, ranching, historical, cultural, harvest-your- own activities, or natural activities and attractions. Farm stand An establishment for the seasonal retail sale of agricultural goods and merchandise primarily produced by the operator on the site, or on nearby property. Agricultural goods produced on other properties owned or leased by the operator may also be allowed provided a majority of the produce comes from land surrounding the wayside stand. This use type shall include agricultural products picked by the consumer. Forestry operations The use of land for the raising and harvesting of timber, pulp woods and other forestry products for commercial purposes, including the temporary operation of a sawmill and/or chipper to process the timber cut from that parcel or contiguous parcels. Excluded from this definition shall be the cutting of timber associated with land development approved by the City of Salem, which shall be considered accessory to the development of the property. Stable √* The boarding, keeping, breeding, pasturing or raising of horses, ponies, mules, donkeys or llamas by the owner or occupant of the property and/or their paying or non-paying guests. Included in this definition are riding academies. *HopeTree Equine Therapy to remain a viable use. The City of Salem Zoning Ordinance - Hopetree Uses & Definitions - Revised 03.18.2024 Agriculture 1 Page 201 of 241 Use Type Historic Core Buildings T3 T4 T5 Open Space / Natural Definition Accessory apartment √ √ √ √ A second dwelling unit within a detached single family dwelling which is clearly incidental and subordinate to the main dwelling unit. Accessory Dwelling Unit √√√√Additional use type to include attached or detached accessory dwelling units. Family day care home √ √ A single family dwelling in which more than five but less than ten individuals, are received for care, protection and guidance during only part of a 24 hour day. Individuals related by blood, legal adoption or marriage to the person who maintains the home shall not be counted towards this total. The care of five or less individuals for portions of a day shall be considered a home occupation. Home occupation √ √ √ √ An accessory use of a dwelling unit for gainful employment involving the production, provision, or sale of goods and/or services. Manufactured home A structure, transportable in one or more sections, which in the traveling mode is eight body feet or more in width or 40 body feet or more in length, or, when erected on site, is 320 or more square feet, and which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation. A manufactured home shall contain one dwelling unit. Some manufactured homes are also referred to as mobile homes. Manufactured home, accessory A manufactured home that is subordinate to a single family dwelling on a single lot and meets the additional criteria contained in this chapter. Manufactured home, emergency A manufactured home used temporarily for the period of reconstruction or replacement of an uninhabitable dwelling lost or destroyed by fire, flood, or other act of nature, or used temporarily as housing relief to victims of a federally declared disaster in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Manufactured home subdivision A ten acre or larger community of manufactured home dwellings with lots that are subdivided for individual ownership. Manufactured home park A ten acre or larger tract of land intended to accommodate a manufactured home community of multiple spaces for lease or condominium ownership. A manufactured home park is also referred to as a mobile home park. Multi-family dwelling √√ √ A building or portion thereof which contains three or more dwelling units for permanent occupancy, regardless of the method of ownership. Included in the use type would be garden apartments, low and high rise apartments, apartments for elderly housing and condominiums. Residential human care facility √ √ √ √ A building (1) used as a group home where not more than eight mentally ill, mentally retarded or other developmentally disabled persons, not related by blood or marriage, reside, with one or more resident counselors or other staff persons and for which the Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services is the licensing authority, pursuant to Virginia Code § 15.2-2291, or (2) used as a group home where not more than eight aged, infirm or disabled persons, not related by blood or marriage, reside with one or more resident counselors or other staff persons and for which the Department of Social Services is the licensing authority, pursuant to § Virginia Code § 15.2-2291(B). Excluded from this definition are drug or alcohol rehabilitation centers, half-way houses and similar uses. Residential 2 Page 202 of 241 Single family dwelling detached √ √ √ √ A site built or modular building designed for or used exclusively as one dwelling unit for permanent occupancy. A single family dwelling which is surrounded by open space or yards on all sides, is located on its own individual lot, and which is not attached to any other dwelling by any means. Single family dwelling attached √ √ √ √ A site built or modular building designed for or used exclusively as one dwelling unit for permanent occupancy. Two single family dwellings sharing a common wall area, each on its own individual lot. Temporary family health care structure √ √ √ √ A transportable residential structure providing an environment facilitating a caregiver's provision of care for mentally or physically impaired person that (i) is primarily assembled at a location other than its site of installation, (ii) is limited to one occupant who shall be the mentally or physically impaired person, (iii) has no more than 300 gross square feet, (iv) complies with the applicable provisions of the Industrialized Building Safety Law and the Uniform Statewide Building Code, and (v) is not placed on a permanent foundation. For purposes of this definition "caregiver" and "mentally or physically impaired person" are as defined in § 15.2-2292.1 of the Code of Virginia. Townhouse √ √ √ A grouping of three or more attached single family dwellings in a row in which each unit has its own front and rear access to the outside, no unit is located over another unit, and each unit is separated from any other unit by one or more common walls. Two family dwelling √ √ √ √The use of an individual lot for two dwelling units which share at least one common wall, each occupied by one family. 3 Page 203 of 241 Use Type Historic Core Buildings T3 T4 T5 Open Space / Natural Definition Administrative services Governmental offices providing administrative, clerical or public contact services that deal directly with the citizen. Typical uses include federal, state, county, and city offices. Assisted care residence An establishment that provides shelter and services which may include meals, housekeeping, and personal care assistance primarily for the elderly. Residents are able to maintain a semi-independent life style, not requiring the more extensive care of a nursing home. Residents will, at a minimum, need assistance with at least one of the following: medication management, meal preparation, housekeeping, money management, or personal hygiene. At least one nurse's aid is typically on duty, with medical staff available when needed. Camps √*A use which primarily provides recreational opportunities of an outdoor nature on a daily or overnight basis. Included in this use type would be scout camps, religious camps, children's camps, wilderness camps, and similar uses which are not otherwise specifically described in this chapter.*Includes special events of a temporary nature. Cemetery √* Land used or dedicated to the burial of the dead, including columbariums, crematoriums, mausoleums, and necessary sales and maintenance facilities. Funeral Services use types shall be included when operated within the boundary of such cemetery. * There is small cemetery located on the edge of our pasture Clubs √√ A use providing meeting, or social facilities for civic or social clubs, and similar organizations and associations, primarily for use by members and guests. Recreational facilities, unless otherwise specifically cited in this section, may be provided for members and guests as an accessory use. This definition shall not include fraternal or sororal organizations associated with colleges or universities. A Club does not include a building in which members reside. Community recreation √√ √ A recreational facility for use solely by the residents and guests of a particular residential development, planned unit development, or residential neighborhood, including indoor and outdoor facilities. These facilities are usually proposed or planned in association with development and are usually located within or adjacent to such development. Correction facilities A public or privately operated use providing housing and care for individuals legally confined, designed to isolate those individuals from a surrounding community. Crisis center A facility providing temporary protective sanctuary for victims of crime or abuse including emergency housing during crisis intervention for individuals, such as victims of rape, child abuse, or physical beatings. Cultural services √*√*A library, museum, or similar public or quasi-public use displaying, preserving and exhibiting objects of community and cultural interest in one or more of the arts or sciences. **HopeTree Museum Specifically Educational facilities, college/university An educational institution authorized by the Commonwealth of Virginia to award associate, baccalaureate or higher degrees. Educational facilities, primary/secondary √√A public, private or parochial school offering instruction at the elementary, junior and/or senior high school levels in the branches of learning and study required to be taught in the public schools of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Civic 4 Page 204 of 241 Guidance services √√ A use providing counseling, guidance, recuperative, or similar services for persons requiring rehabilitation assistance or therapy for only part of a 24 hour day. This use type shall not include facilities that dispense and/or administer controlled substances and/or pharmaceutical products for the treatment of drug addiction and substance abuse and/or mental health disorders. Non-medicinal counseling-based treatment of drug addiction and substance abuse and/or mental health disorders may be considered guidance services after review by the administrator. Facilities that do dispense and/or administer controlled substances and/or pharmaceutical products for the treatment of drug addiction and substance abuse and/or mental health disorders shall be considered an Outpatient mental health and substance abuse clinic. Halfway House An establishment providing residential accommodations, rehabilitation, counseling, and supervision to persons suffering from alcohol or drug addiction, to persons reentering society after being released from a correctional facility or other institution, or to persons suffering from similar disorders or circumstances. Life care facility A residential facility primarily for the continuing care of the elderly, providing for transitional housing progressing from independent living in various dwelling units, with or without kitchen facilities, and culminating in nursing home type care where all related uses are located on the same lot. Such facility may include other services integral to the personal and therapeutic care of the residents. Nursing home A use providing bed care and in-patient services for persons requiring regular medical attention but excluding a facility providing surgical or emergency medical services and excluding a facility providing care for alcoholism, drug addiction, mental disease, or communicable disease. Nursing homes have doctors or licensed nurses on duty. Park and ride facility A publicly owned, short-term, parking facility for commuters. Post office Postal services directly available to the consumer operated by the United States Postal Service. Public assembly Facilities owned and operated by a public agency accommodating public assembly for sports, amusement, or entertainment purposes. Typical uses include auditoriums, sports stadiums, convention facilities, fairgrounds, and sales and exhibition facilities. Public maintenance and service facilities A public facility supporting maintenance, repair, vehicular or equipment servicing, material storage, and similar activities including street or sewer yards, equipment services centers, and similar uses having characteristics of commercial services or contracting or industrial activities. Public parks and recreational areas Publicly-owned and operated parks, picnic areas, playgrounds, indoor or outdoor athletic facilities, greenways and open spaces. Religious assembly √√A use located in a permanent building and providing regular organized religious worship and related incidental activities, except primary or secondary schools and day care facilities. Safety services Facilities for the conduct of safety and emergency services for the primary benefit of the public, whether publicly or privately owned and operated, including police and fire protection services and emergency medical and ambulance services. 5 Page 205 of 241 Use Type Historic Core Buildings T3 T4 T5 Open Space / Natural Definition Financial instutitions √√* Provision of financial and banking services to consumers or clients. Walk-in and drive-in services to consumers are generally provided on site. Typical uses include banks, savings and loan associations, savings banks, credit unions, lending establishments and free-standing automatic teller machines. • Walk-In Only General office √√ Use of a site for business, professional, or administrative offices, excluding medical offices/clinic. Typical uses include real estate, insurance, management, travel, computer software or information systems research and development, or other business offices; organization and association offices; or law, architectural, engineering, accounting or other professional offices. Retail sales do not comprise more than an accessory aspect of the primary activity of a General Office. Medical Office/clinic A facility used for human health care of the body, such as medical, dental, therapeutic, chiropractic or similar consultation, diagnosis, and treatment by one or more practitioners licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Medical offices/clinics provide outpatient care on a routine basis, and may offer minor surgical care, but do not provide overnight care or serve as a base for an ambulance service. Outpatient mental health and sustance abuse clinic An establishment which provides outpatient services primarily related to the diagnosis and treatment of mental health disorders, alcohol, or other drug or substance abuse disorders. Services include the dispensing and administering of controlled substances and pharmaceutical products by professional medical practitioners licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Laboratories √√ Establishments primarily engaged in performing research or testing activities into technological matters. Typical uses include engineering and environmental laboratories, medical, optical, dental and forensic laboratories, x-ray services, and pharmaceutical laboratories only involved in research and development. Excluded are any laboratories which mass produce one or more products directly for the consumer market. Office 6 Page 206 of 241 Use Type Historic Core Buildings T3 T4 T5 Open Space / Natural Definition Adult business Any adult bookstore, adult video store, adult model studio, adult motel, adult movie theater, adult nightclub, adult store, business providing adult entertainment, or any other establishment that regularly exploits an interest in matters relating to specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas or regularly features live entertainment intended for the sexual stimulation or titillation of patrons, and as such terms are defined in Chapter 58 of this Code. Agricultural services An establishment primarily engaged in providing services specifically for the agricultural community which is not directly associated with a farm operation. Included in this use type would be servicing of agricultural equipment, independent equipment operators, and other related agricultural services. Antique shops √√A place offering primarily antiques for sale. An antique for the purposes of this chapter shall be a work of art, piece of furniture, decorative object, or the like, of or belonging to the past, at least 30 years old. Assembly hall √√A building, designed and used primarily for the meeting or assembly of a large group of people for a common purpose. Typical uses include meeting halls, union halls, bingo parlors, and catering or banquet facilities. Athletic instruction services √√ Establishments primarily engaged in providing indoor instruction and training in athletic sports that require high ceiling heights for the activity. Typical uses include gymnastics academies, baseball and softball training centers, tennis centers and golf centers. Automobile dealership, new The use of any building, land area or other premise for the display of new and used automobiles, trucks, vans, or motorcycles for sale or rent, including any warranty repair work and other major and minor repair service conducted as an accessory use. Automobile dealership, used Any lot or establishment where three or more used motor vehicles, including automobiles, trucks, and motorcycles are displayed at one time for sale. Automobile repair services, major Repair of construction equipment, commercial trucks, agricultural implements and similar heavy equipment, including automobiles, where major engine and transmission repairs are conducted. This includes minor automobile repairs in conjunction with major automobile repairs. Typical uses include automobile and truck repair garages, transmission shops, radiator shops, body and fender shops, equipment service centers, machine shops and other similar uses where major repair activities are conducted. Automobile repair services, minor Repair of automobiles, noncommercial trucks, motorcycles, motor homes, recreational vehicles, or boats, including the sale, installation, and servicing of equipment and parts. Typical uses include tire sales and installation, wheel and brake shops, oil and lubrication services and similar repair and service activities where minor repairs and routine maintenance are conducted. Automobile rental/leasing Rental of automobiles and light trucks and vans, includ-ing incidental parking and servicing of vehicles for rent or lease. Typical uses include auto rental agencies and taxicab dispatch areas. Automobile parts/supply, retail Retail sales of automobile parts and accessories. Typical uses include automobile parts and supply stores which offer new and factory rebuilt parts and accessories, and include establishments which offer minor automobile repair services. Commercial 7 Page 207 of 241 Business support services √√ Establishments or places of business engaged in the sale, rental or repair of office equipment, supplies and materials, or the provision of services used by office, professional and service establishments. Typical uses include office equipment and supply firms, small business machine repair shops, convenience printing and copying establishments, as well as temporary labor services. Business or trade schools A use providing education or training in business, commerce, language, or other similar activity or occupational pursuit, and not otherwise defined as an educational facility, either primary and secondary, or college and university. Campgrounds Facilities providing camping or parking areas and incidental services for travelers in recreational vehicles and/or tents. Car wash Washing and cleaning of vehicles. Typical uses include automatic conveyor machines and self-service car washes. Commercial indoor amusement Establishments which provide multiple coin operated amusement or entertainment devices or machines as other than an incidental use of the premises. Such devices would include pinball machines, video games, and other games of skill or scoring, and would include pool and/or billiard tables, whether or not they are coin operated. Typical uses include game rooms, billiard and pool halls, and video arcades. Commercial indoor entertainment Predominantly spectator uses conducted within an enclosed building. Typical uses include motion picture theaters, and concert or music halls. Commercial indoor sports and recreation Predominantly non-instructional participant-based uses conducted within an enclosed building. Typical uses include bowling alleys, ice and roller skating rinks, indoor racquetball, swimming, and/or tennis facilities. Commercial outdoor entertainment Predominantly spectator uses conducted in open or partially enclosed or screened facilities. Typical uses include sports arenas, motor vehicle or animal racing facilities, and outdoor amusement parks. Commercial outdoor sports and recreation √*√*Predominantly participant uses conducted in open or partially enclosed or screened facilities. Typical uses include driving ranges, miniature golf, swimming pools, tennis courts, outdoor racquetball courts, motorized cart and motorcycle tracks, and motorized model airplane flying facilities. *Limited to two existing ballfields in current or future location/design. Communications services Establishments primarily engaged in the provision of broadcasting and other information relay services accomplished through the use of electronic and telephonic mechanisms. Excluded from this use type are facilities classified as Utility Services - Major or Towers. Typical uses include television studios, telecommunication service centers, telegraph service offices or film and sound recording facilities. Construction sales and services Establishments or places of business primarily engaged in retail or wholesale sale, from the premises, of materials used in the construction of buildings or other structures, but specifically excluding automobile or equipment supplies otherwise classified herein. Typical uses include building material stores and home supply establishments. Consumer repair services √√ Establishments primarily engaged in the provision of repair services to individuals and households, rather than businesses, but excluding automotive and equipment repair use types. Typical uses include appliance repair shops, shoe repair, watch or jewelry repair shops, or repair of musical instruments. Convenience store √√Establishments primarily engaged in the provision of frequently or recurrently needed goods for household consumption, such as prepackaged food and beverages, and limited household supplies and hardware. Convenience stores shall not include fuel pumps or the selling of fuel for motor vehicles. Typical uses include neighborhood markets and country stores. 8 Page 208 of 241 Dance hall Establishments in which more than ten percent of the total floor area is designed or used as a dance floor, or where an admission fee is directly collected, or some other form of compensation is obtained for dancing. Day care center √√Any facility operated for the purpose of providing care, protection and guidance to ten or more individuals during only part of a 24 hour day. This term includes nursery schools, preschools, day care centers for individuals, and other similar uses but excludes public and private educational facilities or any facility offering care to individuals for a full 24 hour period. Equipment sales and rental Establishments primarily engaged in the sale or rental of tools, trucks, tractors, construction equipment, agricultural implements, and similar industrial equipment, and the rental of mobile homes. Included in this use type is the incidental storage, maintenance, and servicing of such equipment. Flea market Businesses engaged in the outdoor sale of used or new items, involving regular or periodic display of merchandise for sale. Funeral services Establishments engaged in undertaking services such as preparing the dead for burial, and arranging and managing funerals. Typical uses include mortuaries and crematories. Garden center Establishments or places of business primarily engaged in retail or wholesale (bulk) sale, from the premises, of trees, shrubs, seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, plants and plant materials primarily for agricultural, residential and commercial consumers. Such establishments typically sell products purchased from others, but may sell some material which they grow themselves. Typical uses include nurseries, plant stores and lawn and garden centers. Gasoline station Any place of business with fuel pumps and gasoline storage tanks which provides fuels and oil for motor vehicles. Golf course A tract of land for playing golf, improved with tees, greens, fairways, hazards, and which may include clubhouses and shelters. Included would be executive or par 3 golf courses. Specifically excluded would be independent driving ranges and any miniature golf course. Homestay inn A dwelling in which not more than five bedrooms are provided for overnight guests for compensation, on a daily or weekly basis, with or without meals. The owner or the owner's agent shall reside on the same parcel occupied by the homestay inn. A homestay inn may also be known as a bed and breakfast. Hospital A facility providing medical, psychiatric, or surgical service for sick or injured persons primarily on an in-patient basis and including ancillary facilities for outpatient and emergency treatment diagnostic services, training, research, administration, and services to patients, employees, or visitors. Hotel/motel/motor lodge √√ A building or group of attached or detached buildings containing lodging units intended primarily for rental or lease to transients by the day, week or month. Such uses generally provide additional services such as daily maid service, restaurants, meeting rooms and/or recreation facilities. Kennel, commercial The boarding, breeding, raising, grooming or training of dogs, cats, or other household pets of any age not owned by the owner or occupant of the premises, and/or for commercial gain. Laundry Establishments primarily engaged in the provision of laundering, cleaning or dyeing services other than those classified as Personal Services. Typical uses include bulk laundry and cleaning plants, diaper services, or linen supply services. Manufactured home sales Establishments primarily engaged in the display, retail sale, rental, and minor repair of new and used manufactured homes, parts, and equipment. 9 Page 209 of 241 Massage parlor Establishments having a fixed place of business where any person other than a massage therapist, as licensed by the Virginia Board of Nursing, administers or gives any kind or character of massage, manipulation of the body or other similar procedure. Massage therapy as licensed by the Virginia Board of Nursing shall be considered a personal service. This definition shall not be construed to include a hospital, nursing home, medical clinic, or the office of a duly licensed physician, surgeon, physical therapist, chiropractor, osteopath, or a barber shop or beauty salon in which massages are administered only to the scalp, the face, the neck, or the shoulders, or an exercise club where massage is performed by a person of the same sex as the subject of the massage. Microbrewery √√An establishment engaged in the production of beer with a significant commercial component, such as a restaurant or retail store. Microdistillery √√An establishment engaged in the production of spirits with a significant commercial component, such as a restaurant or retail store. Personal storage A building designed to provide rental storage space in cubicles where each cubicle has a maximum floor area of 400 square feet. Each cubicle shall be enclosed by walls and ceiling and have a separate entrance for the loading and unloading of stored goods. Pawn shop A use engaged in the loaning of money on the security of property pledged in the keeping of the pawnbroker and the incidental sale of such property. Personal improvement services √√ Establishments primarily engaged in the provision of informational, instructional, personal improvements and similar services. Typical uses include driving schools, health or physical fitness centers (excluding athletic instruction services), reducing salons, dance studios, handicraft and hobby instruction. Personal services √√ Establishments or places of business engaged in the provision of frequently or recurrently needed services of a personal nature. Typical uses include beauty and barber shops; grooming of pets; seamstresses, tailors, or shoe repairs; florists; and Laundromats and dry cleaning stations serving individuals and households. Recreational vehicle sales and service Retail sales of recreational vehicles and boats, including service and storage of vehicles and parts and related accessories. Restaurant* √*√*An establishment engaged in the preparation and sale of food and beverages. Service to customers may be by counter or table service, or by take-out or delivery. * Walk-In Only. Retail Sales √√Sale or rental with incidental service of commonly used goods and merchandise for personal or household use but excludes those classified more specifically by these use type classifications. Short-term lender Establishments primarily engaged in short-term lending such as payday loans, car title loans, and refund anticipation loans. Studio, fine arts √√A building, or portion thereof, used as a place of work by a sculptor, artist, or photographer. Truck stop An establishment containing a mixture of uses which cater to the traveling public and in particular motor freight operators. A truck stop might include such uses as fuel pumps, restaurants, overnight accommodations, retail sales related to the motor freight industry, and similar uses. Veterinary hospital/clinic Any establishment rendering surgical and medical treatment of animals. Boarding of animals shall only be conducted indoors, on a short term basis, and shall only be incidental to such hospital/clinic use, unless also authorized and approved as a commercial kennel. 10 Page 210 of 241 Use Type Existing Buildings T3 T4 T5 Open Space / Natural Definition Amateur radio tower A structure on which an antenna is installed for the purpose of transmitting and receiving amateur radio signals erected and operated by an amateur radio operator licensed by the Federal Communications Commission. Aviation facilities Private or public land areas used or intended to be used for the take-off and landing of aircraft. Aviation facilities may include facilities for the operation, service, fueling, repair and/or storage of the aircraft. Mixed use √√Mixed use is a single building or parcel wherein multiple uses such as residential and commercial share space. Outdoor gathering Any temporary organized gathering expected to attract 500 or more people at one time in open spaces outside an enclosed structure. Included in this use type would be music festivals, church revivals, carnivals and fairs, and similar transient amusement and recreational activities not otherwise listed in this section. Such activities held on publicly owned land shall not be included within this use type. Parking facility, surface/structure Use of a site for surface parking or a parking structure unrelated to a specific use which provides one or more parking spaces together with driveways, aisles, turning and maneuvering areas, incorporated landscaped areas, and similar features meeting the requirements established by this chapter. This use type shall not include parking facilities accessory to a permitted principal use. Shooting range, outdoor The use of land for archery and the discharging of firearms for the purposes of target practice, skeet and trap shooting, mock war games, or temporary competitions, such as a turkey shoot. Excluded from this use type shall be general hunting, and the unstructured and nonrecurring discharging of firearms on private property with the property owner's permission if in compliance with the Code of the City of Salem. Tower Any structure that is designed and constructed primarily for the purpose of supporting one or more antennas. The term includes but need not be limited to radio and television transmission towers, microwave towers, common-carrier towers, and cellular telephone and wireless communication towers. Tower types include, but are not limited to monopoles, lattice towers, wooden poles, and guyed towers. Excluded from this definition are amateur radio towers, which are otherwise defined. Utility services, minor √ √ √ √ √ Services which are necessary to support existing and future development within the immediate vicinity and involve only minor structures. Including in this use type are distribution lines and small facilities that are underground or overhead, such as transformers, relay and booster devices, and well, water and sewer pump stations. Also included are all major utility services owned and/or operated by the City of Salem, or any major utility services which were in existence prior to the adoption of this chapter. Utility services, major Services of a regional nature which normally entail the construction of new buildings or structures such as generating plants and sources, electrical switching facilities and stations or substations, water towers and tanks, community waste water treatment plants, and similar facilities. Included in this definition are also electric, gas, and other utility transmission lines of a regional nature which are not otherwise reviewed and approved by the Virginia State Corporation Commission. Miscellaneous 11 Page 211 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 SALEM PUD REZONING APPLICATION (1 OF 3) Not Applicable for existing buildings. Not Applicable due to campus arrangements of multiple buildings. 32 Page 212 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 SALEM PUD REZONING APPLICATION (2 OF 3)33 Page 213 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 SALEM PUD REZONING APPLICATION (3 OF 3)34 Page 214 of 241 HOPETREE PUD SALEM, VIRGINIA© 3.7.24 HOPETREE SALEM, VIRGINIA PUD REZONING APPLICATION 35 Page 215 of 241 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING - Page 1 of 2 [def:$signername|printname|req|signer1] [def:$signersig|sig|req|signer1] [def:$notarysig|sig|req|notary] [def:$date|date|req|notary] [def:$state|state|req|notary] [def:$county|county|req|notary] [def:$disclosure|disclosure|req|notary] [def:$seal|seal|req|notary] AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of Pennsylvania, County of Lancaster, ss: Rachel Cozart, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That (s)he is a duly authorized signatory of Column Software, PBC, duly authorized agent of The Roanoke Times, a newspaper printed and published in the City of Roanoke, County of Roanoke, State of Virginia, and that this affidavit is Page 1 of 2 with the full text of the sworn-to notice set forth on the pages that follow, and the hereto attached: PUBLICATION DATES: Nov. 1, 2024, Nov. 4, 2024 NOTICE ID: wQ7jDBjOnRYQTp3rsrBU PUBLISHER ID: COL-1000915 NOTICE NAME: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Publication Fee: 1684.13 Ad Size: 2 X 78 L Category: General Legal Notice Under penalty of perjury, I, the undersigned affiant swear or affirm that the statements above are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. [$signersig ] (Signed)______________________________________ [$seal] VERIFICATION State of Pennsylvania County of Lancaster Subscribed in my presence and sworn to before me on this: [$date] [$notarysig ] ______________________________ Notary Public [$disclosure] See Proof on Next Page Notarized remotely online using communication technology via Proof. 11/06/2024 Page 216 of 241 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING - Page 2 of 2 Page 217 of 241 Page 218 of 241 Page 219 of 241 Page 220 of 241 Page 221 of 241 Page 222 of 241 Item #: 6.E. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA HELD AT CITY HALL MEETING DATE: November 25, 2024 AGENDA ITEM: Special Exception Permit Consider for approval the request of Jason N. and Jennifer C. Fountain, property owners, for the issuance of a Special Exception Permit to allow an accessory apartment on the property located at 621 North Broad Street, (Tax Map # 70-2-1). (The Planning Commission and City Council held a joint public hearing during the Planning Commissions regular meeting on November 13, 2024 as advertised in the November 1 and 4, 2024, issues of The Roanoke Times. The Planning Commission recommended approval by a unanimous vote). SUBMITTED BY: Maxwell Dillon, Planner SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 621 North Broad Street is 0.322-acre parcel that sits within the RSF Residential Single Family zoning district. The property owners are pursuing a Special Exception Permit to allow for an accessory apartment to be constructed in an attached garage. In order to qualify as an accessory apartment, that space must be structurally attached to (or within) a primary dwelling unit. While there is a canopy currently extending towards the existing detached garage, the current garage on the property is not structurally attached to the principal dwelling and thus not a candidate for an accessory apartment. The proposed building plans and elevations display an attached garage (structurally connecting the primary dwelling to the existing garage by way of a breezeway), with a proposed renovation allocating approximately 625 square feet of finished living space for the planned accessory apartment. According to Salem’s zoning ordinance, accessory apartments are permitted by Special Exception Permit in the RSF Residential Single Family zoning district, and are subject to the following Use and Design Standards (Section 106-304.1). The relevant details of the applicant’s proposal are included in bold. Page 223 of 241 1. An accessory apartment shall only be considered accessory to a detached single family dwelling. (applicant satisfies this requirement) 2. At the completion of construction, no accessory apartment shall contain more than 40 percent of the finished floor area of the principal dwelling. (accessory apartment = 625 square feet, principal dwelling = 1,893 square feet) 3. No accessory apartment shall contain less than 300 square feet of finished floor area, or more than 1,000 square feet of finished floor area. (625 square feet) 4. Only one accessory apartment shall be allowed per lot or per principal dwelling. (applicant satisfies this requirement – no existing accessory apartments on the parcel) 5. The owner of the principal dwelling shall reside on the property and the accessory apartment shall only be occupied by a family member of the owner of the principal dwelling. (applicant satisfies this requirement – the property owners will reside the principal dwelling, and the accessory apartment will be utilized for multi-generational living) 6. No separate utility services shall be allowed for the accessory apartment. (applicant satisfies this requirement) FISCAL IMPACT: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council consider approval of this request. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Special Exception Permit application 2. Proposed building plans and elevations 3. 621 North Broad Street receipt 4. Affidavit Page 224 of 241 Docusign Envelope ID: 67409B48-3454-4094-9788-C88AC6930510 Page 225 of 241 X Docusign Envelope ID: 67409B48-3454-4094-9788-C88AC6930510 Page 226 of 241 dolly@architecturaldesign services.net 540 793-3339 dolly@architecturaldesignser vices.net 540 793-3339 4421 Bandy Rd Roanoke, VA 24104 Architectural Design Services c/o Dolly Dollberg 070004559(s)/0 70-2-1 621 North Broad Street, Salem, VA 24153 Dolly-Davis Dollberg Jason and Jenn Fountain Digitally signed by Dolly-Davis Dollberg DN: C=US, O=architectural design services, CN=Dolly-Davis Dollberg, E=dolly@architecturaldesignservices.net Reason: I have reviewed this document Location: your signing location here Date: 2024.09.30 15:11:27-04'00' Foxit PhantomPDF Version: 10.1.9 Dolly-Davis Dollberg Docusign Envelope ID: 67409B48-3454-4094-9788-C88AC6930510 Jason Fountain Jennifer Fountain 9/30/2024 Page 227 of 241 dolly@architecturaldesignservices.netx Digitally signed by Dolly-Davis Dollberg DN: C=US, O=architectural design services, CN=Dolly-Davis Dollberg, E=dolly@architecturaldesignservices.net Reason: I have reviewed this document Location: your signing location here Date: 2024.09.30 16:36:49-04'00' Foxit PhantomPDF Version: 10.1.9 Dolly-Davis Dollberg Docusign Envelope ID: 67409B48-3454-4094-9788-C88AC6930510 Jason and Jennifer Fountain 9/30/2024 Page 228 of 241 X Yes, a conceptual design package containing plans, elevations and basic site plan are provided to identify all setbacks, dimensions and uses. The corner lot size has not changed and is compliance with existing codes of Salem. X The proposed use will allow the aging in place of the owner's parents allowing a family based care and monitoring of aging parents to maintain a cohesive multi-generational family unit. The investment in property will raise adjacent property owners values as an added benefit. No negative impact perceived. The main structure will be renovated and an addition will be constructed to provide new master bedroom, living room, covered porch and basement storage space. A pool, utility shed will be constructed behind main structure and proposed "Accessory Apartment" (AA). The existing garage will be renovated into a one bedroom AA for aging family members and single car garage. The main house structure and the AA will be connected structurally with roof covering raised deck, lower deck and walkway. Renovate and existing garage structure into an attached ADU - accessory apartment. This is intended to serve as a residential unit for the aging parents of the owner/occupants of this property. Docusign Envelope ID: 67409B48-3454-4094-9788-C88AC6930510 Page 229 of 241 INDEX TO DRAWINGS COVER SHEET ARCHITECTURAL DOLLY@ARCHITECTURALDESIGNSERVICES.NET 4421 BANDY RD, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 540.793.3339 DOLLY-DAVIS DOLLBERG, PA ARCHITECTURE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGEMENT ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES ROANOKE, VIRGINIA FOUNTAIN RESIDENCE PROPOSED DESIGN DOCUMENTS 3155 STONERIDGE ROAD SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 A100 BASIC SITE PLAN GARAGE AND ENTRANCE * * A101 EXISTING PLANS* NO USE OR REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT NOTE: ALL DESIGNS ARE PROPERTY OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES, LLC A102 FIRST FOOR PLAN HOUSE* A104 ROOF PLAN* A103 FIRST FLOOR PLAN APARTMENT* A501 ELEVATIONS* A502 ELEVATIONS* Page 230 of 241 16 3 ' - 3 " 24 ' - 7 1 16 " MA C C I E S T R E E T 30 ' - 0 " 40'-0" 8'-6"8'-6" 5' - 0 " 8'-6" 84'-6" 14'-0" 29 ' - 6 " 10'-33 4" DW REF OUTDOOR KITCHEN 106 105 13 ' - 0 " 104 4'-1" 3'-0"GRILL PATIO COVERED 107 10 ' - 7 " BAR/STOR 107B STORAGE 107A 100 101 102 103 103A 100A PORCH COVERED 107 UP LIVING RM 101 BATH 105 PORCH 100 KITCHEN 102 HOME OFFICE 103 MASTER BATH AND CLOSET 106 LIVING ROOM 104 MASTER BEDROOM 106 4'-113 4" 6' - 9 3 8" 4' - 0 " 3'-6" REFDW BA R PANTRY 13 ' - 0 " 8' - 1 0 3 16 " 3' - 3 7 8" 3' - 6 3 8" 2' - 0 " 10 ' - 9 1 4" CLOSET 100 BATHROOM 100 7' - 9 7 8" 2' - 6 " LINENCOATS WALK-IN CLOSET 106 12 ' - 2 " 28'-1" GRILL SHOWER IRON BOARD FULL MIRROR P100 STORAGE pool equip changing 17'-6" W D 4'-6" 1SCALE: 3/32" =1'-0"PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED SITE PLAN A100 DATE REVISIONS PROJECT ARCHITECT SHEET TITLE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 4421 BANDY RD, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 NOTES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING 540.793.3339 DOLLY@ARCHITECTURALDESIGNSERVICES.NET NUMBER DATE DDD DOLLY-DAVIS DOLLBERG, PA SALEM, VIRGINIA PROGRESS DRAWINGS FOR OWNER REVIEW FOUNTAIN RESIDENCE 621 NORTH BROAD ST SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 NOTE: ALL DESIGNS ARE PROPERTY OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES, LLC NO USE OR REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT Page 231 of 241 UP EXIST STORAGE 004 EXIST FAMILY RM 001 EXIST BATH 003 EXIST CRAWL UP EXIST STORAGE 004 EXIST FAMILY RM 001 EXIST BATH 003 EXISTING BASEMENT EXISTING FIRST FLOOR TAKEN FROM BALZER DOES NOT ALIGN WITH OTHER FLOOR FIELD VERIFY TAKEN FROM BALZER DOES NOT ALIGN WITH OTHER FLOOR FIELD VERIFY 1SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0"EXIST FLOOR PLANS EXISTING FLOOR PLANS A101 DATE REVISIONS PROJECT ARCHITECT SHEET TITLE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 4421 BANDY RD, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 NOTES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING 540.793.3339 DOLLY@ARCHITECTURALDESIGNSERVICES.NET NUMBER DATE DDD DOLLY-DAVIS DOLLBERG, PA SALEM, VIRGINIA PROGRESS DRAWINGS FOR OWNER REVIEW FOUNTAIN RESIDENCE 621 NORTH BROAD ST SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 NOTE: ALL DESIGNS ARE PROPERTY OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES, LLC NO USE OR REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT Page 232 of 241 105 13 ' - 0 4'-1" PATIO COVERED 107 BAR/STOR 107B PORCH COVERED 107 UP LIVING RM 101 BATH 105 PORCH 100 KITCHEN 102 HOME OFFICE 103 MASTER BATH AND CLOSET 106 LIVING ROOM 104 MASTER BEDROOM 106 4'-113 4" 6' - 9 3 8" 4' - 0 " 3'-6" REFDW BA R PANTRY 13 ' - 0 " 8' - 1 0 3 16 " 3' - 3 7 8" 3' - 6 3 8" 2' - 0 " 10 ' - 9 1 4" CLOSET 100 BATHROOM 100 7' - 9 7 8" 2' - 6 " LINENCOATS WALK-IN CLOSET 106 12 ' - 2 " 28'-1" GRILL SHOWER IRON BOARD FULL MIRROR 17'-6" W D 4'-6" 1SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0"EXIST FLOOR PLANS FIRST FLOOR PLAN A102 DATE REVISIONS PROJECT ARCHITECT SHEET TITLE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 4421 BANDY RD, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 NOTES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING 540.793.3339 DOLLY@ARCHITECTURALDESIGNSERVICES.NET NUMBER DATE DDD DOLLY-DAVIS DOLLBERG, PA SALEM, VIRGINIA PROGRESS DRAWINGS FOR OWNER REVIEW FOUNTAIN RESIDENCE 621 NORTH BROAD ST SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 NOTE: ALL DESIGNS ARE PROPERTY OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES, LLC NO USE OR REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT Page 233 of 241 MA C C I E S T R E E T 30 ' - 0 " 40'-0" 5' - 0 " 8'-6"14'-0" 29 ' - 6 " 10'-33 4" DW REF OUTDOOR KITCHEN 106 105 13 ' - 0 " 104 4'-1" 3'-0"GRILL PATIO COVERED 107 10 ' - 7 " BAR/STOR 107B STORAGE 107A 100 101 102 103 103A 100A 8' - 1 0 3 16 " P100 STORAGE pool equip changing 1SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0"APARTMENT PLAN APARTMENT PLAN A103 DATE REVISIONS PROJECT ARCHITECT SHEET TITLE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 4421 BANDY RD, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 NOTES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING 540.793.3339 DOLLY@ARCHITECTURALDESIGNSERVICES.NET NUMBER DATE DDD DOLLY-DAVIS DOLLBERG, PA SALEM, VIRGINIA PROGRESS DRAWINGS FOR OWNER REVIEW FOUNTAIN RESIDENCE 621 NORTH BROAD ST SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 NOTE: ALL DESIGNS ARE PROPERTY OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES, LLC NO USE OR REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT Page 234 of 241 16 3 ' - 3 " MA C C I E S T R E E T 4:12 SLOPE RIDGE VENT, TYP ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS SHINGLE ROOFING, W/ ICE AND WATER SHIELD @ EAVES VALLES AND VERTICAL TERMINATIONS, TYP. ICE AND WATER SHIELD AT ROOF EAVES AND RAKES 36" MIN FROM EDGE OF ROOF, TYPICAL ALUM CONTINUOUS GUTTER & DOWNSPOUTS TO 4" UNDERGROUND PIPE TO DAYLIGHT, TYP. ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS SHINGLE ROOFING, W/ ICE AND WATER SHIELD @ EAVES VALLES AND VERTICAL TERMINATIONS, TYP. ICE AND WATER SHIELD AT ROOF EAVES AND RAKES 36" MIN FROM EDGE OF ROOF, TYPICAL ALUM CONTINUOUS GUTTER & DOWNSPOUTS TO 4" UNDERGROUND PIPE TO DAYLIGHT, TYP. 2.5:12 SLOPE 1SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0"ROOF PLAN ROOF PLAN A104 DATE REVISIONS PROJECT ARCHITECT SHEET TITLE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 4421 BANDY RD, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 NOTES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING 540.793.3339 DOLLY@ARCHITECTURALDESIGNSERVICES.NET NUMBER DATE DDD DOLLY-DAVIS DOLLBERG, PA SALEM, VIRGINIA PROGRESS DRAWINGS FOR OWNER REVIEW FOUNTAIN RESIDENCE 621 NORTH BROAD ST SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 NOTE: ALL DESIGNS ARE PROPERTY OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES, LLC NO USE OR REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT Page 235 of 241 3SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0"EXTERIOR ELEVATION - RIGHT ELEVATIONS A501 DATE REVISIONS PROJECT ARCHITECT SHEET TITLE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 4421 BANDY RD, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 NOTES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING 540.793.3339 DOLLY@ARCHITECTURALDESIGNSERVICES.NET NUMBER DATE DDD DOLLY-DAVIS DOLLBERG, PA SALEM, VIRGINIA PROGRESS DRAWINGS FOR OWNER REVIEW FOUNTAIN RESIDENCE 621 NORTH BROAD ST SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 1SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0"EXTERIOR ELEVATION - FRONT 2SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0"EXTERIOR ELEVATION - LEFT Page 236 of 241 2SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0"EXTERIOR ELEVATION - REAR ELEVATIONS A502 DATE REVISIONS PROJECT ARCHITECT SHEET TITLE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 4421 BANDY RD, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 NOTES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING 540.793.3339 DOLLY@ARCHITECTURALDESIGNSERVICES.NET NUMBER DATE DDD DOLLY-DAVIS DOLLBERG, PA SALEM, VIRGINIA PROGRESS DRAWINGS FOR OWNER REVIEW FOUNTAIN RESIDENCE 621 NORTH BROAD ST SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 1SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0"EXTERIOR ELEVATION - LEFT Page 237 of 241 Page 238 of 241 Page 239 of 241 Item #: 6.F. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA HELD AT CITY HALL MEETING DATE: November 25, 2024 AGENDA ITEM: 2025 Legislative Package Consider the adoption of Resolution 1489 adopting a Legislative Program for the 2025 session of the Virginia General Assembly and petitioning the General Assembly to favorably consider the issues and topics addressed herein. SUBMITTED BY: Chris Dorsey, City Manager SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This resolution will adopt priorities for use in working with our local legislative delegation and others to promote the interests of the City. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for the development of the legislative program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopt the 2025 General Assembly Legislative Priorities for the City. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Item 6F 11-25-24 2025 Legislative Agenda Resolution Page 240 of 241 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, November 25, 2024: RESOLUTION 1489 WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Salem is concerned with certain specific issues that may come before the 2025 session of the Virginia General Assembly; and WHEREAS, Council is desirous of expressing to its representatives its official position on the following matters: •Support runway safety improvements and expansions at the Roanoke-Blacksburg Regional Airport. •Commitment to transportation projects in the region including innovative funding strategies for I-81 which will sustain investment beyond 2033 and account for inflation- related shortfalls; and additional funding necessary to adequately maintain and repair roads in the City of Salem. •Carefully consider those recommendations set forth by the Virginia Municipal League in its 2025 Legislative Program. Upon a call for an aye and a nay vote, the same stood as follows: H. Hunter Holliday – William D. Jones – Byron Randolph Foley – James W. Wallace III – Renee F. Turk – Aye - ATTEST: _________ H. Robert Light Clerk of Council Page 241 of 241